Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Original poster

Erm please don't ban me but....

29 replies

FlossyMoo · 17/09/2014 22:30

Why have you stopped the thread I was on. I won't mention it's name or link it as I don't want to be deleted for TAAT. You site "not what MN is about" as the reason for suspending the thread. Does that mean you are going to ban the women hating, incest promoting, Robin Thicke (Blurred lines) agreeing, all women lie, mothers kill their children more than men, I DON'T pay a penny for my kids poster then?

Seriously though don't ban me please Grin

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
MNHQ
IonaMumsnet · 18/09/2014 11:43

Hello
Just to let you all know, the thread is back up now, and to clarify, it is TomLondon that was banned, rather than the OP.

MNHQ
RowanMumsnet · 18/09/2014 10:33

The post about the reasoning behind the Mumsnet name was really for the benefit of any lurkers!

usualsuspect333 · 18/09/2014 10:31

So Scousebird wasn't a scousebird after all.

I would never have guessed.

MNHQ
RowanMumsnet · 18/09/2014 10:26

Hello

Apologies - that suspension message wasn't quite right (if it's the thread we're thinking of).

We've suspended the thread so that we can take a good look and determine whether it's best off zapped or not. We've banned the TomLondon though because he was reported many times, and if someone has signed up to MN purely to promote an MRA or anti-woman agenda, that counts as deliberately inflammatory posting in our book.

We certainly didn't suspend it because the TomLondon didn't find it supportive! But sorry that the suspension message wasn't more clear.

We'll have a proper look at the thread ASAP.

[Message edited by MNHQ because RowanMumsnet is a bit of an idiot]

AnyFucker · 18/09/2014 06:38

I was a little Hmm about that too, Bas, but it was too late to comment onthread by the time I noticed...

Original poster
FlossyMoo · 18/09/2014 00:10

So do I Grin

OP posts:
Isabeller · 18/09/2014 00:08

I have no idea about the thread in question but this one looks important and I hope you don't get banned.

SilverShins · 18/09/2014 00:08

I didn't understand the thread suspension message either. Would you mind explaining please HQ?

Original poster
FlossyMoo · 18/09/2014 00:03

Don't get me wrong we agreed violence was indeed wrong. It was the more women are violent then men cos the prison system proves it crap we found a bit Hmm

OP posts:
AGnu · 17/09/2014 23:59

Just RTFT & tbf, he had a point: violence is wrong, regardless of gender. He got one thing right! I'm a little confused about how it went from a discussion about one person's opinion of a debate about DV to another person arguing that he was doing the right thing by refusing to pay maintenance or, presumably, see his children at all given that he referred to supervised contact as a breach of his human rights. There was me thinking it's about the children's rights... Hmm

I'm intrigued to know why it was suspended rather than just deleted altogether. It's not like any parents with similar outlooks are going to come along, do a search, read the thread & suddenly change their opinions. They'll come, start a new thread & have their own argument about it. Why leave it up?

Original poster
FlossyMoo · 17/09/2014 23:04

Exactly Bas

Lets ignore the fact he said that the murder of 2 women (See AF I listened Grin) per week from DV is a lie made up just to benefit the Feminazi. Lets ignore.....I can't be arsed to list the things he said because there were so many but you get the gist.

OP posts:
basgetti · 17/09/2014 22:55

Yes and the only post of his MNHQ picked up on, was to explain why the site is called Mumsnet and to reassure him of their commitment to gender equality.

Original poster
FlossyMoo · 17/09/2014 22:52

I honestly don't get it. Here we have a person calling feminists men haters, saying murders from DV are part of the feminist sorry feminazi movement, openly admits to not financially supporting his children for 4 years just to get one over on his ex and AND he thinks a man who promotes incest and no means yes from a women is a swell guy and the thread is deleted because HE didn't find it supportive Hmm

OP posts:
AnyFucker · 17/09/2014 22:47

suspended not deleted

basgetti · 17/09/2014 22:46

It's the one about Loose Women in AIBU. It's about half way down the page now.

Original poster
FlossyMoo · 17/09/2014 22:45

Well I'm still here so either they have decided not to ban me or they haven't seen this thread Confused

OP posts:
AnyFucker · 17/09/2014 22:45

it's still there, Latte

AnyFucker · 17/09/2014 22:45

no

lettertoherms · 17/09/2014 22:40

Ooh, was it the 1-2% one? Asking for "a friend?"

I backed out of that real quick.

LatteLoverLovesLattes · 17/09/2014 22:40

Missed it.

Bugger.

AnyFucker · 17/09/2014 22:39

PBH, it must be late because I can't work out what you mean in your post Smile

Original poster
FlossyMoo · 17/09/2014 22:38

AF said I could keep him as a pet. I have a rock to put him under and everything Grin

OP posts:
basgetti · 17/09/2014 22:37

I wondered this. That thread was a fascinating insight into the mind of an MRA, as well as having some good statistics and links. Shame it's been suspended.

treaclesoda · 17/09/2014 22:37

aw, I hope they don't ban him, he was such fun. In a terrifying creepy way.

usualsuspect333 · 17/09/2014 22:36

Seems like a reasonable question to me.

Swipe left for the next trending thread