Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Am I the only one to be a bit sad that Mumsnet have caved in?

221 replies

oliveoil · 25/08/2005 14:56

Don't know, just feel a bit that some people felt it necessary to report mumsnet to a baby milk board or whatever it is for a so called breach of advertising. If you use and love a website why on earth would you want to get them into trouble?

Hmmmmm. I bet they feel like they have been beaten up this week. Storm in a teacup.

V weird.

OP posts:
milkymouth · 25/08/2005 15:36

Sorry? Who am I in real life? Is that what you mean?

Blu · 25/08/2005 15:36

naughtynoonoo, whoever you are, the threads are there, count.

compo · 25/08/2005 15:35

milkymouth -who are you? (if you don't mind me asking)

oliveoil · 25/08/2005 15:35

HM - So what if they are advertised to? And?

Mm - er no idea what you are on about.

OP posts:
milkymouth · 25/08/2005 15:34

All of it,olive,all of it.

lemonice · 25/08/2005 15:34

I can use one fo those expressions that 99% of people find annoying...

What doesn't kill you makes you stronger

oliveoil · 25/08/2005 15:34

calig - Well why not, lets get the threads about threads up to treble figures.

OP posts:
milkymouth · 25/08/2005 15:33

(Perhaps we'd all be better off not mentioning that we breastfeed in case bottlefeeders feel bad? Is that what you're saying? )

Incidentally,there were quite a few bottlefeeders who objected to the ad,and quite a few breastfeeders who weren't really bothered.

hunkermunker · 25/08/2005 15:33

Do I have to quote Caligula's drip drip drip theory of advertising here?

Or talk about how people who trust health professionals to offer impartial advice might not realise that health professionals are some of the most heavily advertised-at by formula companies (and other baby and child-related products) people in the country?

oliveoil · 25/08/2005 15:33

milkymouth - what don't I get, enlighten me.

OP posts:
caligula · 25/08/2005 15:32

I love this. After the thread, the analysis of the thread.

milkymouth · 25/08/2005 15:31

oliveoil,you really really really don't get it do you?
I used to credit you with a little more insight than you obviously have.

expatinscotland · 25/08/2005 15:31

I never even saw the ad until it was pointed out that it was there. I'm a strong, confident person, and no ad would make my decision one way or another. I bottlefed DD, but not b/c of pressure from advertisers - she didn't latch well and I had severe PND. I wouldn't have been able to continue bf'ing her had I started b/c I needed some very serious anti-d's, anti-anxiety drugs, hypertension meds, sleeping tablets, etc.

caligula · 25/08/2005 15:30

blimey toothache, what's with you today? That wasn't directed at you - again!

sunchowder · 25/08/2005 15:30

Thanks for noticing FIO It has been building up inside of me!! Toothache if the typos were meant for me, just blame my ignorance then! If they had spellcheck on preview, I guess I would come off a bit more intelligent....

oliveoil · 25/08/2005 15:29

The advert didn't bother me and I am not stupid either.

But I did note a lot of people (me included) hastened to add they b/fed as if that made a difference to their views. So it did make bottle feeders feel bad, as much as the pros made out it was only about the sly advertising aspect, IMO it was just more breast is best ranting in parts.

OP posts:
hunkermunker · 25/08/2005 15:28

But lots and lots of people did totally miss the point and turn it into breast v bottle, which was not what it was ever intended to be.

It was about the legality of the advert, and the sheer gall of Milupa setting up to offer breastfeeding advice.

Cam · 25/08/2005 15:28

Fio's post of 3:14

Best larf I've had all day, cheers luv!

naughtynaughtynoonoo · 25/08/2005 15:25

i think that those who didnt care about the advert got upset because those who hated it told basically told them they were stupid for not understanding the issues surrounding it.

right must take the kids out now, DD hanging round mya nkles

oliveoil · 25/08/2005 15:25

Calm down toothy, you are imagining insults where there are non. Bless her ill little self.

xx

OP posts:
Fio2 · 25/08/2005 15:25

look at sunchowder with her novel; in the middle of thread (only joking )

oliveoil · 25/08/2005 15:23

Oh I am not bothered by insults bring them on.

OP posts:
Toothache · 25/08/2005 15:23

terrible typos there..... I'm flagging today. >weary emoticon

sunchowder · 25/08/2005 15:22

This advert and all it means to everyone has pushed a lot of buttons. Olive Oil I respect your position but I also supported TikToks decision to leave after reviewing her posts and looking at the issue. I personally, would never have forced the issue up to Mumsnet Towers as it is just not in my "personality" to do so. I do, however, admire TikTok for doing what she did and making a stand (along with Mears and others). Living in the US, I am not even informed enough to know if this is illegal in the USA. I was not able to breastfeed my daughter, so I have plenty of my own "issues", etc--but I am never one to try to force what I believe onto another.

I felt a bit uncomfortable at the looking up of the "books" of Mumsnet myself, it would not have occurred to me to do thisI don't feel that it is my business (even if it is public record which again, I am too ignorant to be aware of). It was their decision whether they needed the money to survive or notthey are entitled to make money. I also am a paid subscriber and it is difficult for me to believe (as again I am ignorant) that coming forward with $10 a year would be a hardship for all the value that I receive here from the site. Again, I don't want to insult anyone and act like a spoiled brat because I am able to send $10 in and someone really else really cannot afford do that--it is just difficult for me to see this.

I usually do not come forward with strong opinions because I don't want anyone to think badly of me or to shut down any future communication because they view me a certain way. I also think that Batters had a valid point in saying that many other posters contribute a alot to the board, not just the ones that took a position to leave (I don't think she meant to include trolls in this ).

I hope that we can respect each other's feelings with this issue and enjoy the relief that the sneaky bit of advertising will be gone at some point in time soon and that we have clarification that this has nothing to do with bottle fed vs breast fed at all, only to do with the false bit of advertising (illegal actually).

Toothache · 25/08/2005 15:22

Caligula - I never once suggested that!! And it wasn't an insult saying they protested loudly..... it was hardly a subtle approach now was it? Please don't take everything I say as an insult! It really wasn't!"