the allocated school clearly mentioned in writing that dont provide any support within the school it has been always outsourced to a 3rd party which is not realiable(we have evidence for that as well), whereas the school that we are appealing for provides in school support+3rd party support and they confirmed that in writing that they have been doing this for many years now and well aware of YC needs, we didnt get this school because of the oversubscription.
this wasnt the only reasons there are other reasons as well.
our appeal is already over, waiting for an outcome now and this waiting time is what killing us
Pannel said there are many appeals for this school they can only take a decission once they heard everything, my worry is, though we our case is strong, there could be other families they too might have a strong reasons as well, in that case how do they decide to whoom they will up held
another question: when multiple appeals are being heard nearly 15+ do they take a decission immediately after the appeal or they revisit each case once again at the end of hearing everyones case, how does it work ?
pannel didnt probe much asked few generic questions or the most common questions only, do they really go through all the details specially when you share all the evidence and writeup and medical history that are really long ?
Will pannel assume that every school provides the same/similar support for YC even though we shared all the details that they dont, infact allocated school mentioned that its not mandatory for the school support to YC but providing support to SEN is mandatory.
What happens during the pannel training ? would they be aware that YC also face disadvantage or barier to education like FSM/PP