Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Original poster

Private Boarding vs. Day School vs. Grammar

283 replies

Breeze67 · 01/07/2026 12:40

As a parent of a Year 5 DD, I’m struggling to justify the premium of a private day school. My primary concern is the disruption and mixed academic abilities in comprehensive state schools, which is why a selective school—be it a grammar or an independent one—seems like a solid solution. There is so much praise for independent schools, but when you look at the time factor, it gets complicated: When you look at how little time kids are actually at school—only covering half the year (private schools have much longer holidays) and only 8 out of 24 hours in a school day—it is clear that the heavy lifting, the real character building, and extra learning still happen at home. If we parents are doing the bulk of the work, what are we actually paying the big fees for?
Despite the fancy surface, much of the day-to-day experience between a grammar and an indie is not significantly different. Whether it’s museum trips, sports days, or classroom activities, the core experience cannot be vastly different. Is a class of 20-plus kids in a private day school really that much better than 30 in a top grammar? Of course, a difference exists, but likely impacts less than 1/3 of the school time. So, if we look at the maths, it’s 1/3 (the advantage) of 1/3 (the school day duration) of 1/2 (the school year), which is only about 1/18 of the year's time! Are we paying a figure roughly equivalent to the UK average salary for what essentially amounts to a 1/18 difference in yearly education? I am shocked by the number.
This leads me to wonder: is boarding the only true exception? Personally, I will not do it because I just enjoy my kid's company every day. But logically, only full boarding offers a genuine holistic education. It is a 24/7 immersion into an academic and social community that a day school, by design, simply cannot touch.
So, if day schools aren't significantly better than grammars, and I’m unwilling to consider boarding, am I left with a compromise? Are we paying for a superior education, or just a different peer group?

OP posts:
Original poster
Breeze67 · 02/07/2026 11:09

Pigsmightfly31 · 01/07/2026 16:17

I have DC in both private day and grammar and they are in their schools for very different reasons because they are very different children. We chose schools that suited our children rather than breaking it down to a cost value ratio. I think if you approach it like this then you are never going to feel comfortable paying out for private. If you approach it along the lines of .. looked at all available options and this school is best suited to my child then you’ll appreciate the benefits much more if you’re paying for it. Some grammars are excellent at providing a full co-curricular experience, others much less so however most private schools (esp those with borders) will always offer an extensive extra curricular experience that cannot be replicated even in the very best grammar schools. How academic they are depends entirely on how selective they are of course. It’s hard to compare, grammar v Indy is a very different experience because not all schools are made equal. If you’re in the privileged position where you have the option to go private and also try for grammar (and get a place) then choose the school that best suits your child.

I agree that every school and every child is different, and choosing from schools or attempting to gain admission is a very personalised and nuanced process. I also agree that we should choose what best suits our children, but I would add that it must also best suit our family, as we have to consider the interests of the family as a whole. It is not sustainable to sacrifice everything for your child. Yes, if I focus on the strengths and the aspects that fit my child, I would appreciate the school more.

OP posts:
redskyAtNigh · 02/07/2026 11:08

ToadRage · 01/07/2026 16:50

I can say with absolutely certainty that I would not have got the GCSE grades I got if I had gone to a state school. It probably means little now after so much time but back then i was proud of them and no one can take them from me. In a private school, some if the teachers were more prepared to help and take the time with those who struggle. My Maths teacher spent many evenings after school taking out of her own time going over the coursework with me as many times as she needed to until I understood it. A friends Mum was a teacher in a state school a she said no one in a state school would spend that time with a child. It's was really sad to hear that they cared little about whether pupils passed or failed.

Is getting good GCSE results the only outcome from school?

I went to a private school and go fantastic results. I was also bullied for years (very linked to the private school as it was to do with my not being from the same background of the majority of others) and left with huge self esteem issues that took years to get over and massively affected my adult life.

I think I would have got good but potentially not "as good" results from a state school as I was highly motivated anyway. Long term I think it would have made no difference to my career outcomes.

Original poster
Breeze67 · 02/07/2026 10:56

ToadRage · 01/07/2026 16:50

I can say with absolutely certainty that I would not have got the GCSE grades I got if I had gone to a state school. It probably means little now after so much time but back then i was proud of them and no one can take them from me. In a private school, some if the teachers were more prepared to help and take the time with those who struggle. My Maths teacher spent many evenings after school taking out of her own time going over the coursework with me as many times as she needed to until I understood it. A friends Mum was a teacher in a state school a she said no one in a state school would spend that time with a child. It's was really sad to hear that they cared little about whether pupils passed or failed.

In an alternative scenario where you had not attended a private school, would you have attended a grammar school? If not, would you have had a tutor? If not, would your parents have helped you with your GCSE work? If not, were you naturally academic or self-motivated in your studies? These factors matter. If the answer to all of these is no, then, of course, one has to rely solely on the private school to prepare them for those academic results. Otherwise, if the answer to some of these questions is yes, one might still thrive academically in a state school.

OP posts:
HawaiiWake · 01/07/2026 21:14

It is too general for comparison and what you need are data between the schools you are looking at. The variables factors and pros and cons will show from a smaller list of schools. MN can get more in-depth information if they know which ones you comparing.

ToadRage · 01/07/2026 16:50

I can say with absolutely certainty that I would not have got the GCSE grades I got if I had gone to a state school. It probably means little now after so much time but back then i was proud of them and no one can take them from me. In a private school, some if the teachers were more prepared to help and take the time with those who struggle. My Maths teacher spent many evenings after school taking out of her own time going over the coursework with me as many times as she needed to until I understood it. A friends Mum was a teacher in a state school a she said no one in a state school would spend that time with a child. It's was really sad to hear that they cared little about whether pupils passed or failed.

BreakingBroken · 01/07/2026 16:47

We’re paying for a happy child and childhood. Education is a long game. We want the overall experience to be positive.

TakeThatAndParty81 · 01/07/2026 16:25

You do what’s best for that child. Full stop.

Pigsmightfly31 · 01/07/2026 16:17

I have DC in both private day and grammar and they are in their schools for very different reasons because they are very different children. We chose schools that suited our children rather than breaking it down to a cost value ratio. I think if you approach it like this then you are never going to feel comfortable paying out for private. If you approach it along the lines of .. looked at all available options and this school is best suited to my child then you’ll appreciate the benefits much more if you’re paying for it. Some grammars are excellent at providing a full co-curricular experience, others much less so however most private schools (esp those with borders) will always offer an extensive extra curricular experience that cannot be replicated even in the very best grammar schools. How academic they are depends entirely on how selective they are of course. It’s hard to compare, grammar v Indy is a very different experience because not all schools are made equal. If you’re in the privileged position where you have the option to go private and also try for grammar (and get a place) then choose the school that best suits your child.