Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

The 11+ process for independent schools: is there a better way?

53 replies

IsThisRealLife · 21/02/2026 22:52

Just: that.

My DC has offers to our preferred schools. I am grateful for that. And: deeply so.

As a result, part of me just wants to put the 11+ behind me - to focus on the 'broad, sunlit uplands' (as it were).

Still: cannot, in good conscience, fail to flag my belief that the process was more brutal, on many levels, than it needed to be.

I might be an outlier; would appreciate the thinking of others.

Ultimately, I hold out hope that the thinking of parents on the other side of the admissions process might incline powerful schools to recognise the need for change - and galvanise them to use their tremendous heft to help facilitate it.

Thus: this thread.

Again: might be alone in thinking this way. But: thought I'd throw it out there all the same.

OP posts:
FallingIsLearning · 22/02/2026 01:28

I think your question is about the admission process for private schools rather than 11+ grammar.

We’ve just accepted the offer of a place at our local independent school for my daughter.

I think it may depend on the school.

The admission process for us was:

  • interview
  • exam
  • assessment morning for specialist scholarship
  • assessment afternoon for academic scholarship

My impression is that it was carried out in a manner to put the child most at ease. My daughter is at a state primary, and probably far less polished than children who have been at a prep school. She had nerves before going into the interview and the exam as these are experiences that she had never had before, but it sounds like she settled very quickly.

The things I thought were really good were:

Everybody that we came across each time we brought her in was warm and friendly and made her feel that they were interested in her.

For the interview, they had grouped the time slots consecutively for the very few children applying from her primary school. This meant that they saw familiar faces just before their interview.

They were also invited to bring something that was importantly to them that they would like to talk about, so essentially they had a prop as an ice-breaker to ease them into the interview. The admission staff in the waiting area were chatting to them, and asking them about their prop, so it helped warm them up for the interview itself, and distract them from their nerves waiting.

During both scholarship assessment sessions, there was a short talk to parents and children at the beginning. In these talks, they reiterated over and again what a great achievement it was to get to that stage of the process, regardless of the outcome. Whether true or not, it must give you confidence if someone keeps saying that you’ve done really well.

The academic scholarship assessment was framed as a series of tasks to solve an overarching problem, for which they worked in teams - in essence very much like an escape room. She said it was huge fun, and seemed to have forgotten that they were being observed.

I think it was really skilfully done, and I am very sure that the way they ran the process allowed my child to show the best of herself.

We only applied for the one private school, as we very much liked what it had to offer, my daughter loved it on the open day and taster morning, and it is very local to us. I don’t, therefore, have any experience of the process at other schools, nor what it would have been like if she was having to attend assessments for multiple schools.

Redexpress · 21/02/2026 23:09

I think the only way is to have more grammar schools and have more opportunities for those academically inclined to attend these schools. I also think the VAT situation for independent has worsened the grammar school situation as there is more competition from those no longer able to afford the fees.

I don’t think scraping grammar schools is in the best interest of those kids that actually want to learn! Perhaps ship out all the disruptive kids to their own school and open more apprenticeship kind of schools so comprehensives becomes a place to learn and others have alternative choices

CanIRetirePlease · 21/02/2026 23:01

I don’t think there is a better way, if you want to retain selective schools. You have to weed out the kids who won’t thrive in that grammar school environment.

We moved to a nice town in a non-grammar area, and our secondary schools are all pretty good - eg I know someone whose dc got 9 grade 9s and two grade 8s at gcse at the regular mixed comprehensive. We are in catchment for two small state super selectives which take tutored kids - over 95% Asian. There is also a very good private school if that’s your jam.

I personally think that having only a tiny number of pupils going to super selectives, and everyone else educated comprehensively, is the best way forwards. I would therefore scrap grammars and the 11+

Swipe left for the next trending thread