Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Please explain exam boards to me: why so many? Why doesn't the DofE do it?

234 replies

ParentOfOne · 09/09/2025 10:32

This is going to sound a very banal question, but can someone please explain the concept of exam boards?

In many other countries, it's the Department of Education that sets the national curriculum and prepares the national exams (GCSE, A-levels and equivalents).

  • Why do we have various boards in the UK?
  • Are they all private entities?
  • Who pays for them?
  • Has it always been like this, or was there a time when it was all done by the Department of Education?
  • How meaningful are the differences between exam boards? Eg how much of a difference is there between Edexcel maths and AQA maths?
  • Is each secondary school free to choose which exam board to follow?
  • How comparable are the programs and the difficulty? Does this create an unfair advantage, if getting a high score is easier with one board than another?
  • If there are no meaningful differences, why do we have multiple exam boards?

I have seen that Wikipedia provides some history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_boards_in_the_United_Kingdom but doesn't address the main questions

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
HostaCentral · 09/09/2025 10:51

I think OP might be suggesting "it's not fair".

Don't forget though OP, if exams in any year are apparently "easier" the exam boards set boundaries to reflect this, so that comparable results are available across all years and all boards.

Windthebloodybobbinup · 09/09/2025 10:50

private exam boards were thought to introduce healthy competition to the sector- but they have played a part in the very confusing and complex qualification structures in the uk. European countries, for example, will have one, state approved, way of qualifying a plumber. The uk have a plethora of different awarding bodies competing to offer plumbing qualifications. It’s mad if you ask me, it’s also hugely expensive for schools and colleges who work with up to 50 different awarding bodies with different fees, software platforms etc. hugely costly to the taxpayer.

Octavia64 · 09/09/2025 10:49

ParentOfOne · 09/09/2025 10:44

@twistyizzy
But why isn't it done by the Department of Education?

That's the bit I don't get.

Privatisation can make sense in some areas, not here.

Ofqual (which is a government department) sets out the rules, right?
So exam boards cannot do whatever they like, they must follow Ofqual and in the end exam boards cannot be too different from each other

So why outsourcing it to multiple exam boards at all?

I understand the point about devolution, but, within the same nation, why multiple boards?

As for how comparable they are, are you implying that the content and difficulty are comparable, so it is not easier to get high grades with one board than with another?

It isn’t done by the department of education because these exams and these exam boards have been in existence much longer than the department of education has.

the department of education as a central government thing only really started in Victorian times. The exam boards already existed.

why nationalise something that already existed and was working fine?

twistyizzy · 09/09/2025 10:48

ParentOfOne · 09/09/2025 10:44

@twistyizzy
But why isn't it done by the Department of Education?

That's the bit I don't get.

Privatisation can make sense in some areas, not here.

Ofqual (which is a government department) sets out the rules, right?
So exam boards cannot do whatever they like, they must follow Ofqual and in the end exam boards cannot be too different from each other

So why outsourcing it to multiple exam boards at all?

I understand the point about devolution, but, within the same nation, why multiple boards?

As for how comparable they are, are you implying that the content and difficulty are comparable, so it is not easier to get high grades with one board than with another?

"Are you implying that the content and difficulty are comparable, so it is not easier to get high grades with one board than with another", I'm not implying it, I'm directly saying it.
Each AO interprets criteria in slightly different way but they have to have parity with all other AOs.

DfE remit isn't to create and administer exams, it's remit is policy + funding etc. They don't "outsource" because it isn't something they are involved in.

It is a highly regulated sector.

Octavia64 · 09/09/2025 10:47

So in the U.K. there are multiple exam boards.

OCR came out of Oxford and Cambridge exam board and I think is owned by the university of Cambridge

Edexcel is owned by Pearson and conglomerate.

there’ also AQA, WJEC (Welsh exam board) and a few others.

yep privately owned.

schools pay exam entry fees for each student to enter GCSEs or a levels or BTECs and that’s where their income comes from.

lots also do international qualifications - so IGCSE which many schools abroad enter students for, also international a levels.

in some subjects there are a lot of differences between exam boards. In others not so much. Maths gcse for example is quite similar. Maths a level the same.

yes each school is free to choose which exam board to use although Gove stopped U.K. state schools entering students for international GCSEs.

we have multiple exam boards because they have always been there.

the university of Cambridge has been setting exams since about the twelfth century. In this country education and qualifications have been around a lot lot longer than state education (1870 compulsory state education) or a national curriculum (1988).

one exam board, city and guilds who offer vocational qualifications came out of the medieval guild system of craftsmen and craft qualifications.

Seeline · 09/09/2025 10:44

I think in the past different universities produced different exams. My O levels and A levels were university of London and generally considered more rigorous than some - grammar school. Strangely I seem to remember Cambridge being considered an 'easier' option. This was 40+ years ago though.

ParentOfOne · 09/09/2025 10:44

@twistyizzy
But why isn't it done by the Department of Education?

That's the bit I don't get.

Privatisation can make sense in some areas, not here.

Ofqual (which is a government department) sets out the rules, right?
So exam boards cannot do whatever they like, they must follow Ofqual and in the end exam boards cannot be too different from each other

So why outsourcing it to multiple exam boards at all?

I understand the point about devolution, but, within the same nation, why multiple boards?

As for how comparable they are, are you implying that the content and difficulty are comparable, so it is not easier to get high grades with one board than with another?

OP posts:
Spartak · 09/09/2025 10:39

I've nothing meaningful to add, but did spend a couple of minutes scratching my head, wondering what the Duke of Edinburgh had to do with exams!

twistyizzy · 09/09/2025 10:37

I work for an exam board.

They are all private businesses
Schools can choose which ones they use
They all have to follow the qualification specs laid down by Ofqual
Ofqual oversee production of every syllabus and exam
Ofqual and JCQ lay down rigorous assurance of exam boards
Schools pay out of their budgets
Education is devolved in Wales, Scotland and Ireland hence need for different exam boards there
We have different exam boards to prevent a monopoly by 1