Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Help me parse "school shoes" vs. trainers

133 replies

ysette9 · 31/08/2025 15:07

As a new parent newly moved to the UK, I appreciate these forums as a source of advice. My oldest is starting Year 7 and we are parsing the uniform policy. I've never experienced a shoe policy other than "wear something you can safely run and play in", so figuring out what is considered school shoes is a bit mysterious.

I looked at the example images the school provided of acceptable footwear, and it is a collection of horrifyingly ugly and horrifyingly uncomfortable/disfiguring torture devices. I want their feet to be in foot-shaped, flexible, flat shoes to promote balance and proper development. I found these shoes that seem to fit the bill, but my spouse is concerned they look too "trainer-like". Neither of us can determine what a trainer is or is not. I know the decision is ultimately up to the judges at school, but I'd love your collective input to help educate me.

These are the shoes: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/187473076260 I blacked out the edges to make it more subtle. I'll see if I can figure a way to add an attachment to this post with the actual photos.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
mamagogo1 · 31/08/2025 20:00

Polishable shoe means leather or fake leather basically. Shoes you can use shoe polish on. They can be lace up, slip on or Mary Jane style. They are comfortable to wear and leather lets your feet breathe. Trainers are sneakers

bumbaloo · 31/08/2025 19:51

CMOTDibbler · 31/08/2025 15:16

Oh, with your edit, those shoes would not be acceptable. Just buy a pair as shown by the school information

But they tick all the requirements

clary · 31/08/2025 19:46

Brbreeze · 31/08/2025 19:13

This isn’t the case for barefoot shoes, which is what the OP is after.

As they are minimalist, zero drop, flexible and foot shaped, you don’t have the same issues and gait problems causing uneven wear that you do when you shove your children’s feet into “traditional” school shoes.

Thanks for this which answers my question about the shoes being secondhand.

@ysette9 I am also intrigued that you don't or didn't know what trainers were. Is that bc you have never come across them, or are they called something different where you come from? Have you really never seen anyone wearing something like this:
www.nike.com/gb/t/mc-trainer-3-workout-shoes-0F20Pb

iontheprize · 31/08/2025 19:42

These would have been fine at my DCs schools (London, primary and secondary) so I think the best way forward is just ask the school. Don't go into the whole thing about getting them and colouring them in, just send them a photo, say these are the shoes you have for your child and do they meet school policy.

Brbreeze · 31/08/2025 19:13

SomeOfTheTrouble · 31/08/2025 18:51

If you’re concerned about the health of your child’s feet then don’t buy second hand shoes. Shoes mould to their owner’s feet, so won’t fit a second owner’s foot properly. Those in your link look well worn.

This isn’t the case for barefoot shoes, which is what the OP is after.

As they are minimalist, zero drop, flexible and foot shaped, you don’t have the same issues and gait problems causing uneven wear that you do when you shove your children’s feet into “traditional” school shoes.

MyCrushWithEyeliner · 31/08/2025 19:05

They look scruffy where you’ve coloured them black

Bigearringsbigsmile · 31/08/2025 18:59

I don't think they're acceptable.

Plus...second hand shoes from Ebay??? Really?

Needlenardlenoo · 31/08/2025 18:54

Gosh, unusual for SLT to teach reception.

Could have been worse though. Our reception teachers had to store a dozen boaters (Head with hat fetish).

M&S do shirts with a fake button and velcro underneath. Those and a clip on tie saw us through Infants.

RosesAndHellebores · 31/08/2025 18:52

@Lady1576 has nobody ever taught the teachers that socks should be the same or a darker colour than the shoes 😀. I loved the class my children's teachers brought to the table.

MigGril · 31/08/2025 18:52

I agree with everyone else that it would be good to speak to someone from the school. It does totally depend of the school, DS's school is very strict on shoes and even some of the Clarks styles aren't acceptable. Where as my school is fine as long as they are black leather and no logo's. So they are a bit more flexible.

They wouldn't be acceptable at DS's school and they do have uniform inspection and would get a warning for them.

madnessitellyou · 31/08/2025 18:51

To echo others, go to Clarks or John Lewis and ask for school shoes.

Unless he’s 20 and has stopped growing, they won’t be “forever” shoes and you can get something different when you know the lay of the land.

SomeOfTheTrouble · 31/08/2025 18:51

If you’re concerned about the health of your child’s feet then don’t buy second hand shoes. Shoes mould to their owner’s feet, so won’t fit a second owner’s foot properly. Those in your link look well worn.

RosesAndHellebores · 31/08/2025 18:46

Needlenardlenoo · 31/08/2025 18:00

Do you think the reception teacher and TA devised the uniform code 😂?

No. But as it was the uniform code and theh reception teacher was an Assistant Head, perhaps they could have stopped whingeing, don't you think? They certainly had more influence over the rules than the parents or children.

Duechristmas · 31/08/2025 18:34

Lady1576 · 31/08/2025 15:13

The main rule/distinction I have seen (I am a secondary school teacher) is no large/visible brand logos and entirely black. If you meet both of these criteria even trainer-type shoes should be classed as school-appropriate. Also be careful about socks - we are stupidly picky that socks must be grey unless a girl is wearing them with a skirt when they must be white. Bizarre and ridiculous but they genuinely do pick up on it during the first few days of uniform checks 🤣

Imagine being in SLT discussing sock colour and the direct impact on attainment. Honestly! 😂😂

clary · 31/08/2025 18:26

Actually @ysette9 I’m a bit confused. Did you buy those shoes from eBay? And then black out the soles? Is that the second pic you posted? They look very worn, which would not be my choice for my DC. You feel very strongly about foot development, so I am surprised that well-worn secondhand shoes are acceptable to you. Unless I have totally misunderstood and this is a pair your DC have had from new and worn in, in which case apologies.

I infer you have an image of the horrifyingly ugly (quite likely) shoes that your DC’s school finds acceptable – are you happy to post it here, as that will give us all a decent steer?

minipie · 31/08/2025 18:16

OP, as opinions differ on this thread, can you ask the school?? Make it clear you have already bought the shoes ( if I have understood correctly?) and send a photo. I reckon they’ll be happy with them but really hard to predict

Lady1576 · 31/08/2025 18:14

ysette9 · 31/08/2025 15:16

I am no longer able to edit the original message.

School policy wording is as follows:

"Plain black polishable school shoes. Laces and stitching must be black. No trainers, Velcro, boots or fabric shoes. No Vans or boots. No trimmings i.e., buckles, labels, tags or decorations. "

Shoe images included below.

Those shoes you show look like sensible school shoes to me. So maybe I don’t get it either 🤣It doesn‘t look like they are brand new shoes, so I would just send him in those and see what they say. Unless he‘s super sensitive and having it mentioned would ruin his first day… I think these will get through and if they don‘t, he’ll most likely be asked to change them by the end of the week. If that happens go to Clarks and pick from their school section. I know it‘s annoying but not worth getting too deep about.

clary · 31/08/2025 18:09

As others say @ysette9 it varies by school. My DCs’ school said black, polishable (so not canvas), no logos (so all-black Nikes not ok, nor the eBay pair you posted), no boots, low heel or flat.

Then they changed it to say no trainer-style shoes; DS was a big footballer at lunchtime and the Clarks school shoes that were lace-up in a trainer style came under this heading – IIRC I called the school out on this and they agree he could wear them – this kind of thing.
https://www.clarks.com/en-gb/urban-solo-older/26178424-p

The school I worked in was OK with trainers as long as they were plain black; from a different thread some schools are OK with Nike Airforce 1s but they would be too logoed for either my DCs' school or where I worked.

ETA: I see you have updated @ysette9 yes the ones you linked at first would not be any good – they have a logo and the sole would probably need to be black. The Clarks ones I have pasted in here would be OK tho I think.

Or these are even better (sorry these are for a boy rather than a girl as a rule) – no one could argue with these and they look comfortable and practical to me.
https://www.clarks.com/en-gb/lorcam-edge-youth/26178303-p
ETA: pix not showing so have added links

Needlenardlenoo · 31/08/2025 18:00

RosesAndHellebores · 31/08/2025 17:26

You just need sensible rules then. When my dc were four years old (now 30 and 27) they had to wear proper cotton shirts and a tie. The reception teacher and ta never stopped whingeing about the children not having mastered buttons and ties. I suggested that it might be easier if four year olds had polos and the look I got. I didn't mind the traditional uniform back then but I did mind the constant whingeing which I found illogical.

Do you think the reception teacher and TA devised the uniform code 😂?

KurtCobainLover · 31/08/2025 17:54

I’m afraid they wouldn’t pass at our school as they look too casual / trainer like. Can you go to Clarks and get some from there. Normally they have a slight heal.

RampantIvy · 31/08/2025 17:46

buffy2025 · 31/08/2025 16:14

None of those do barefoot shoes
shes wanting foot shaped shoes with a minimal sole and no heel
theres some here

https://www.happylittlesoles.co.uk/froddo-kids-barefoot-school-lace-up-shoe.html

It's still worth getting feet professionally measured even if shoes aren't bought from the shop.

DD had very narrow feet, and I often ended up getting her shoes from Clinkards.

Ncforthiscms · 31/08/2025 17:41

BangingOn · 31/08/2025 17:14

Happy Little Soles have a decent range of barefoot friendly school shoes, for examples

Gorgeous. But also a trainer.
Would much rather dc be in barefoot than squeezing their foot into a clarks brogue.

RosesAndHellebores · 31/08/2025 17:26

BetweenTwoFerns · 31/08/2025 17:20

I wish those examples were extreme but they are just two kids from my actual reception class last year. Those converse were my nemesis. I also had one whose coat was an all in one affair that he had to take his shoes off to put on. He must have spent over an hour a day just taking his all in one coat on and off.

I’m not a big supporter of ridiculous school uniform rules but some people just seem to be incapable of making clothing choices for their children that are appropriate for the situation.

You just need sensible rules then. When my dc were four years old (now 30 and 27) they had to wear proper cotton shirts and a tie. The reception teacher and ta never stopped whingeing about the children not having mastered buttons and ties. I suggested that it might be easier if four year olds had polos and the look I got. I didn't mind the traditional uniform back then but I did mind the constant whingeing which I found illogical.

Itsatrap5050 · 31/08/2025 17:21

Why would you buy second hand shoes from EBay if you’re concerned about good foot support? That doesn’t make sense. And colouring in the logo will look messy.

Swipe left for the next trending thread