Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

How many GCSEs do kids take these days?

223 replies

backinthebox · 06/01/2025 23:44

DS will choose his options next week, and we have only just been sent information home on this. DD chose her’s 4 years ago (same school) and did 11 GCSEs, but DS has been told pupils only do 8 now. This is obviously fewer than he was expecting to be able to choose, and he is worried about how this will affect his future prospects. Am I right in thinking that 8 GCSEs for a top set pupil is a rather low number?

OP posts:
durness · 12/01/2025 12:33

WombatChocolate · 12/01/2025 09:58

It’s a mistake to think that more subjects, beyond about 8 or 9, make someone look cleverer.

Lots of parents mistakenly take the view that doing more must be more impressive.

What really matters is your APS - average point score. So, having fewer with better grades is important. If taking 8 will get you all 7-9, that’s better than doing 10 with a number of 5s and 6s in there too.

Some students with particular circumstances might do especially low numbers. But for most in normal curcumstances, 8 or 9 is good. Ensuring a decent range, to include a humanity and ideally a language too (if a child can do it and perform well in it) is a good idea. Breadth is important at GCSE. If you’re talking about 10 or more, it’s really only useful for the very able who might be doing Further Maths GCSE or some kind of twilight language course. It’s only worth it if it won’t affect their performance in other subjects. For the reasonably bright, it would be better to do 8 or 9. Much better to do that and get 8/9 in Maths for example, than to stretch themselves too thin and get a 6/7 in maths.

Parents often equate more subjects with more impressive. This is a problem for schools and difficult to explain to parents…why more isn’t usually better.

There seems to be a trend at GCSE to reduce numbers. I don’t like it. 14 feels too soon to be cutting out the majority of subjects.

durness · 12/01/2025 12:28

clary · 07/01/2025 12:39

who actually needs to know how to analyse poetry and Shakespeare?! A waste of time when she could’ve been doing something with real life benefit.

That’s depressing. I agree that Eng lit is not beneficial for all (and I have said so before on this board), but I am thinking of the tiny minority of students who for SEN or other reasons will never manage to gain a grade in it.

Who needs to know how to analyse Shakespeare? Well, he is only the most performed author in the world. Arguably the greatest writer ever. His influence on our language is immense and you probably quote him regularly without realising. Who knows, these students may one day go and watch a Shakespeare play or read a poem.

That’s like when my students would say “why do I need to learn French? I’m never going to go to France.” What happened to learning for the love of learning? It makes me sad when people seem to value learning only when it has a practical application.

This. A thousand times this. When I was in education it was science that was looked down on, with English students ruling the roost. This was, of course, absurd and unhealthy. Now there seeks to have been a complete reversal and the new situation is, of course, absurd and unhealthy.

WombatChocolate · 12/01/2025 11:39

BornSandyDevotional · 12/01/2025 10:32

@WombatChocolate I'd be delighted if mine got a 6/7 in maths. That's a high B/A and a cracking grade. My eldest did surprisingly well in French but - for mine - MFL feels like a waste of time. GCSE is all about getting through to the next round. A 4 in maths is more than enough to do that depending on which course of study people want to take. For the OP, science and maths results are highly relevant (engineering). For other career paths, the grades are irrelevant above a pass.

Fair enough. Again, a child who is borderline for a pass at GCSE or for whom a 5 would be a good achievement and open doors to the next phase (the majority of kids) will be more likely to achieve their best outcomes by doing slightly fewer rather than more subjects. They are more likely to get their 4 or 5 if they do perhaps 8 subjects, rather than stretch themselves too thin. And yes, I agree that languages (in their current form at GCSE) are not necessarily a good choice for those who are hoping to get 4/5/6.

I wouldn’t fully agree that the grades are irrelevant beyond getting a pass. I agree that the most important thing is to meet the threshold to move onto the next stage….passing English and Maths and meeting the specific criteria for the course they want to do next. But actually, lots of 6th form colleges will prioritise people for certain courses who have got the higher grades and are more likely to succeed at them. Often courses are over-subscribed and a college might guarantee a place, but not on the course a student might want. Equally, at the next phase, the grades achieved at GCSE will be noticed. People know a 4 is a scrape pass and a 6 is better. For uni, lots of courses don’t require an A Level in Maths, but many specify a 6 or 7 at GCSE as a minimum. It would be better to have done a couple of fewer GCSEs and got that 6/7 rather than a 4/5.

Of course not everyone will be a higher achiever. But pretty much all students will do better in their core subjects, if they do slightly fewer GCSEs.

BornSandyDevotional · 12/01/2025 10:32

WombatChocolate · 12/01/2025 09:58

It’s a mistake to think that more subjects, beyond about 8 or 9, make someone look cleverer.

Lots of parents mistakenly take the view that doing more must be more impressive.

What really matters is your APS - average point score. So, having fewer with better grades is important. If taking 8 will get you all 7-9, that’s better than doing 10 with a number of 5s and 6s in there too.

Some students with particular circumstances might do especially low numbers. But for most in normal curcumstances, 8 or 9 is good. Ensuring a decent range, to include a humanity and ideally a language too (if a child can do it and perform well in it) is a good idea. Breadth is important at GCSE. If you’re talking about 10 or more, it’s really only useful for the very able who might be doing Further Maths GCSE or some kind of twilight language course. It’s only worth it if it won’t affect their performance in other subjects. For the reasonably bright, it would be better to do 8 or 9. Much better to do that and get 8/9 in Maths for example, than to stretch themselves too thin and get a 6/7 in maths.

Parents often equate more subjects with more impressive. This is a problem for schools and difficult to explain to parents…why more isn’t usually better.

@WombatChocolate I'd be delighted if mine got a 6/7 in maths. That's a high B/A and a cracking grade. My eldest did surprisingly well in French but - for mine - MFL feels like a waste of time. GCSE is all about getting through to the next round. A 4 in maths is more than enough to do that depending on which course of study people want to take. For the OP, science and maths results are highly relevant (engineering). For other career paths, the grades are irrelevant above a pass.

WombatChocolate · 12/01/2025 09:58

It’s a mistake to think that more subjects, beyond about 8 or 9, make someone look cleverer.

Lots of parents mistakenly take the view that doing more must be more impressive.

What really matters is your APS - average point score. So, having fewer with better grades is important. If taking 8 will get you all 7-9, that’s better than doing 10 with a number of 5s and 6s in there too.

Some students with particular circumstances might do especially low numbers. But for most in normal curcumstances, 8 or 9 is good. Ensuring a decent range, to include a humanity and ideally a language too (if a child can do it and perform well in it) is a good idea. Breadth is important at GCSE. If you’re talking about 10 or more, it’s really only useful for the very able who might be doing Further Maths GCSE or some kind of twilight language course. It’s only worth it if it won’t affect their performance in other subjects. For the reasonably bright, it would be better to do 8 or 9. Much better to do that and get 8/9 in Maths for example, than to stretch themselves too thin and get a 6/7 in maths.

Parents often equate more subjects with more impressive. This is a problem for schools and difficult to explain to parents…why more isn’t usually better.

boysmuminherts · 12/01/2025 09:44

My son is in y13 and went to a non selective state comp and took 10 gcses. Would have been 11 with triple which some took!!! 2x english maths 2x science humanity language and then 2 free options as well as compulsory RE.

pljlse · 12/01/2025 09:08

DS will only do 9, annoyingly if they do triple science they have to drop an option. In my school triple science was an extra but thinking back we got the same number of lessons as the double award students, but DS's school will have extra timetable for science, so maybe not a bad thing.

So after triple science, a humanity and a language, he only gets 1 option.

OneInEight · 12/01/2025 09:06

If you are worried about university then actually only 5 meets the requirements - luckily for ds2 as that is all he took. The greater problem is that it is more difficult to keep your choices open the fewer GCSEs you are allowed to take. Not a problem if like ds2 you clearly have a mathematics / science strength but more of an issue for those allrounders who are still undecided at 14 what route to take.

Clearinguptheclutter · 12/01/2025 09:04

Ours do 9 in total but they do compulsory MFL in year 9
so only do 8 in years 10-11

separate sciences is one of the options so if they do that they only have two other options which seems limiting.

I did mine in wales where I did 12 which I felt was ridiculous. Because you have to do welsh language and lit. No issue with welsh but welsh literature is a total waste of time (IMO it should have been a choice between English lit and welsh lit).
Shocked that some in wales now do 15! Thats literally almost double what mine will do.

SunsetGirl · 12/01/2025 09:01

Zonder · 12/01/2025 08:52

What do you mean by "that doubled grade"?

You don't need eng lit for progress 8. You just need Eng Lang, maths, 3 ebacc and 3 open.

If you don't sit English Literature, the highest English grade is not double weighted. Eight GCSEs, but ten "numbers" which are worked with.

A perfect example from a government document, here:

How many GCSEs do kids take these days?
BornSandyDevotional · 12/01/2025 08:59

10 for DS (Yr11) including triple science and a language. The other two senior schools locally do combined science only. So 8 at both. My eldest also did 10 but definitely only needed 8 to progress so I wouldn't worry.

Zonder · 12/01/2025 08:52

SunsetGirl · 12/01/2025 08:49

But you need to sit both of them to get that doubled grade - weird but true.

What do you mean by "that doubled grade"?

You don't need eng lit for progress 8. You just need Eng Lang, maths, 3 ebacc and 3 open.

SunsetGirl · 12/01/2025 08:49

Zonder · 11/01/2025 22:51

@SunsetGirl only English Language is compulsory, not English Lit. The highest grade of the two is used for progress 8.

But you need to sit both of them to get that doubled grade - weird but true.

Zonder · 11/01/2025 22:51

@SunsetGirl only English Language is compulsory, not English Lit. The highest grade of the two is used for progress 8.

SunsetGirl · 11/01/2025 22:41

Nine at ours as standard, although there is extra further maths and/or Latin as after school courses.

Four options and the only restriction is that one of them needs to be one of Triple Science/Computer Science/History/Geography/MFL.

Schools will require both English Language and English Literature as both must be sat for the school to get a Progress 8 figure for the student.

BigSilly · 11/01/2025 20:24

My kids grammar school do 10 normally but if they are decent at maths do FM too ( not technically a gcse but very similar)

PlopSofa · 11/01/2025 20:21

9 is normal.

If you DS can't do it at school would he consider studying the other one at home with support from you with tutors?

Comefromaway · 11/01/2025 20:11

It was 9 at the three different schools my kids attended including the selective independent school.

Another76543 · 11/01/2025 20:04

The majority take 8 or 9 according to the government stats. Only around 14% of pupils take 10 or more. You'll get a skewed answer on Mumsnet!

www.gov.uk/government/publications/infographic-gcse-results-2024/infographics-for-gcse-results-2024-accessible

Cornwallian · 11/01/2025 19:49

8 feels very low.

DD1 - took 11 in an academic private achool
DD2 - took 10 in a comprehensive school, would have been limited to 9 but she took triple science
DS1 - is taking 9 at same comprehensive as only recommended for double science. Chose to do Latin off his own bat out of school so will have 10 in the end.
DS2 - not that old yet but if his school said he could only take 8 I think I’d move him.

Zonder · 11/01/2025 19:41

Mepop · 11/01/2025 19:20

My son did 9 last year, they dropped one not long before as apparently universities don’t require them and kids find it easier to do better but it does mean there is very little choice since there are so many mandatory subjects.

That's down to the school though. The only mandatory GCSE subjects are English Language, Maths and Stuff cience.

Mepop · 11/01/2025 19:20

My son did 9 last year, they dropped one not long before as apparently universities don’t require them and kids find it easier to do better but it does mean there is very little choice since there are so many mandatory subjects.

JoanThursday · 07/01/2025 13:14

EHCPerhaps · 07/01/2025 09:29

Thank you JoanThursday and anotherusernameforthis

Does eng Lit need to be part of the 5? Is Eng lang, Maths, three sciences OK?
My child finds English literature virtually impossible even beyond the reading and spelling issues with dyslexia etc. English literature GCSE seems to require complex interpretation about what the author wants to make the reader feel. These can be extremely difficult concepts for some students who have autism and alexithymia etc.

Universities only requiring 5 GCSEs as standard minimum has cheered me up. My DC with SEND may have to drop out of school entirely but if it’s possible to study 5 subjects without closing off future options that makes me feel fractionally less anxious .

Many local authorities (despite every child’s right to a full time education) save money by providing only 5-10 hours tutor time a week for kids who can’t go to school. That’s often only after maybe a couple years of intensive often legal pressure from other professionals and the parents. So I still don’t know how not-school would work even with 5 gcses and probably impossible to fit in at 16 with all the disruption but it helps to know where the bar is for entry to university level sciences. (biology based studies)

Where I work, we don't actually specify GCSE subjects, or even state that it has to be 5 GCSEs. We used to specify English and Maths and (sometimes) Science but even that's gone now.

We expect applicants to have Level 3 quals when applying to uni. These can be A levels, BTECs, Access courses etc and these, of course, are all higher level than GCSEs. Our assumption is that, if an applicant has successfully acquired Level 3 quals at the appropriate level, then their Level 2 standard is fine!

In practice, the minimum we see is 5 or 6 - it's rare to see less than that for our very mathematical science subject.

chickensandbees · 07/01/2025 13:00

10 or 11 here depending if they do combined or triple science.
2/3 science
2 english
maths
RE
4 options

I think it's okay but would be good if you could drop one you are struggling with. RE is compulsory but my DDs find it quite easy so I'm okay with that for them.

If DD could give up French I would be delighted though, it would save me money on tutoring for a subject she will never use again and she could divert the energy to other subjects and still have 9 GCSEs. She's conscientious though and wouldn't even drop to the foundation paper.

Zonder · 07/01/2025 12:49

So true @clary and of course these subjects are a gateway to other things. French may not be useful but the skill of learning a language may, and the understanding of another way of life.

Swipe left for the next trending thread