Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

QEB v Wilson's - which is the leading/best school

55 replies

StrugglingPa · 26/10/2024 08:43

Hi everyone,

I find myself in a bit of a good dilemma! My DS has scored well in both the 11+ exams for QE and SET/Wilson. While QE was my natural choice, I've recently discovered more about Wilson, and now I’m quite confused about which would be the best fit for him.

Here’s a quick breakdown of what I see as the pros:
QE:

  • Has a strong academic reputation and has been consistently at the top for years.
  • Offers some opportunities in sports and music, though it seems to be more academically focused.
Wilson:
  • They have a rigorous selection process, possibly ensuring a higher standard of entry.
  • Appears to offer more in terms of sports and music, which might be a good fit for my DS too.
Speaking of my DS, he’s academically aligned, does well in music and computing, and is an avid reader.

I’m feeling a bit biased towards Wilson, but I’m also hearing good things about QE's international expansion, which could be beneficial for their brand. Plus, I’m open to relocating for either school, so that’s not a deciding factor.

I’d love to hear your thoughts! If you have any experiences with either school or general advice, please share. I need to make a decision in a week, so any feedback would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks so much!

OP posts:
Ubertomusic · 27/10/2024 20:08

You can't be serious about numerical strength? 😁

One doesn't have to be numerical to manage people (~corporate leadership).

belladonna22 · 27/10/2024 20:06

Congratulations to your son OP, he must be very bright indeed to have offers from both those schools. I'm not terribly familiar with either beyond they are both great, so I'd say just go with the one that you and your son like more (and also which part of London you'd prefer to live in!).

Judging from your post I'd guess you're an immigrant to the UK (I'm not saying this as a negative - I am, too!). In many other countries it's normal for parents to do everything possible to get their children the best possible education, it's totally accepted and understood. Given the complex class history in the UK, attitudes to education vary widely, and there are certain people who don't understand why parents would do something like relocate just for an educational opportunity (and many of these people are on Mumsnet).

They also resent anyone trying to get their child a "better" opportunity, and will inundate you with stories about how private school teachers aren't qualified, grammar schools aren't better, just stuffed with top test-takers, etc. "Just go to your local state school, they'll be fine, I went to state school and turned out fine." Probably true! But that doesn't make it the best choice for someone else.

Good luck - there's lots of good advice on here but don't let the anonymous internet naysayers get you down Wink

StrugglingPa · 27/10/2024 19:32

TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 19:05

Because cause it shows the gap between expectations and reality, which is as a fact very unpredictable. Many jobs that will not even exist anymore when Y7 will be at a Univ level, and new will be created.

Instead of choosing a school based on the child's personality and interests, parents rely on rankings, as if a school ranked 5th offers less chance of a good exam result than one ranked 1st. It’s the students and youth who make the school. Not the other way. For me, the absurdity also lies in the fact that, in many grammar schools, the teaching and teachers don’t necessarily represent the high level that these children deserve, and the school rides on its reputation because, thanks to the number of applicants , it stays at the top of the rankings.

That’s a systematic issue, get the best and then claim top results. I feel competitive schools or events or any competition only helps open the doors that might otherwise be closed

OP posts:
StrugglingPa · 27/10/2024 19:31

Ubertomusic · 27/10/2024 18:55

Competitive private schools have an advantage over grammar for corporate leadership, not the other way round.

Why does that happen? Surely if you get into Oxbridge or IVY league colleges, you will also get the grammar school students in that mix. Plus the numerical strength of grammar students will be more than private school students

OP posts:
TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 19:05

Ubertomusic · 27/10/2024 18:55

Why is it worrying?

Because cause it shows the gap between expectations and reality, which is as a fact very unpredictable. Many jobs that will not even exist anymore when Y7 will be at a Univ level, and new will be created.

Instead of choosing a school based on the child's personality and interests, parents rely on rankings, as if a school ranked 5th offers less chance of a good exam result than one ranked 1st. It’s the students and youth who make the school. Not the other way. For me, the absurdity also lies in the fact that, in many grammar schools, the teaching and teachers don’t necessarily represent the high level that these children deserve, and the school rides on its reputation because, thanks to the number of applicants , it stays at the top of the rankings.

Ubertomusic · 27/10/2024 18:55

TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 18:50

It is kind of worrying that the parents assume that getting into grammar school is a ticket to success. My friend and another acquaintance of mine are above 50, both are grammar graduate and both are job seeking at the very moment. One of them has even PhD at Chemistry.

Why is it worrying?

Ubertomusic · 27/10/2024 18:55

StrugglingPa · 27/10/2024 18:06

I do hear you you TheGoldenGate and Foxesandsquirrels, opposite but I guess these views are prevalent. The thing that confuses me is who are going to be the future corporate leaders and work force, where are these people going to be hired from. Forget the entrepreneur and the self made ones.

If people will need to be academically qualified then the sheer number of students from grammar will have an advantage...followed by private and then by state schools

Competitive private schools have an advantage over grammar for corporate leadership, not the other way round.

TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 18:50

It is kind of worrying that the parents assume that getting into grammar school is a ticket to success. My friend and another acquaintance of mine are above 50, both are grammar graduate and both are job seeking at the very moment. One of them has even PhD at Chemistry.

TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 18:41

StrugglingPa · 27/10/2024 18:06

I do hear you you TheGoldenGate and Foxesandsquirrels, opposite but I guess these views are prevalent. The thing that confuses me is who are going to be the future corporate leaders and work force, where are these people going to be hired from. Forget the entrepreneur and the self made ones.

If people will need to be academically qualified then the sheer number of students from grammar will have an advantage...followed by private and then by state schools

I have spent all of my life working in very large corporations. I work in 70 k large corporation now. Before in one of the world top 10 in terms of no of employees. The assumption that the top management went mostly to grammar school is wrong.
Actually, most often they are not even British because the corporations are international. My e.g. ex boss from P...had only GCSE. He started from lowest position, worked hard his way up to the head of Sales ( I'm not in Sales)

Also, as AI says grammar graduate tend to study traditional STEM subjects, Social sciences and business is only on the 5th place

StrugglingPa · 27/10/2024 18:10

puffyisgood · 26/10/2024 10:12

Honestly, they have identical budgets per head, teach an identical syllabus, have identical demographic of kids [both well on the way to being exclusively attended by mostly Indian kids who've been tutored since the cradle], the differences between the two are not worth giving a second thought. UK schools, especially state schools, are nothing like universities, where the very best places teach slightly better courses, have stronger academics in their teaching departments, and so on - they're broadly all the same, certainly two 'similar' schools like two super-selective grammars, are identical.

Edited

Eternally confused, just three days to go :-) Thanks for the inputs puffyisgood and everyone else

OP posts:
StrugglingPa · 27/10/2024 18:08

TheWrongBus · 26/10/2024 10:40

QE I’m told does not teach computer science at GCSE or A level, or offer much/any football. These may be deciding factors if it were my son, but it’s not!

They are both amazing schools so I would personally now focus on where I would rather live.

Yeah this is something that isn't a deal breaker but is quite odd, why would a school in AI env not offer computer science! Maths and Physics are as important for AI and form the basic of computer science but still not offering it is weird

OP posts:
StrugglingPa · 27/10/2024 18:06

TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 01:15

I know a boy with a very "challenging" , to put it diplomatically, behaviour who is at QE. Of course his parents are Indian. And tbh I was asking my son to stay away from that kid.

They are surely quite bright and used to hard work but not necessarily all incredibly bright. Only some are. Not brighter than many other kids. What the are incredibly is ...tutored...from the early age.

The fact is that most of the selective grammar are full of South Asian kids. An intelligent person can easily observe it and definitely such observation does not equal racism. Simply, parents of Indian kids value selective and grammar education.

Edited

I do hear you you TheGoldenGate and Foxesandsquirrels, opposite but I guess these views are prevalent. The thing that confuses me is who are going to be the future corporate leaders and work force, where are these people going to be hired from. Forget the entrepreneur and the self made ones.

If people will need to be academically qualified then the sheer number of students from grammar will have an advantage...followed by private and then by state schools

OP posts:
Foxesandsquirrels · 27/10/2024 07:26

TealReal · 27/10/2024 01:02

What a ridiculous thing to say @Foxesandsquirrels . The children who go to QE are incredibly bright. You would want your son to be around people like that.
Racist much?

How is that racist? I never said they're not bright, it's full of very clever kids yes. But if there's very few kids that look like you it can be hard. It's no fun being the only Asian kid in a school full of white kids either. Works both ways. Some kids don't struggle with this, some do. Its important to know what you're getting yourself into.

TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 01:15

TealReal · 27/10/2024 01:02

What a ridiculous thing to say @Foxesandsquirrels . The children who go to QE are incredibly bright. You would want your son to be around people like that.
Racist much?

I know a boy with a very "challenging" , to put it diplomatically, behaviour who is at QE. Of course his parents are Indian. And tbh I was asking my son to stay away from that kid.

They are surely quite bright and used to hard work but not necessarily all incredibly bright. Only some are. Not brighter than many other kids. What the are incredibly is ...tutored...from the early age.

The fact is that most of the selective grammar are full of South Asian kids. An intelligent person can easily observe it and definitely such observation does not equal racism. Simply, parents of Indian kids value selective and grammar education.

TealReal · 27/10/2024 01:02

Foxesandsquirrels · 26/10/2024 15:08

I don't know Wilson's but QE boys is not very diverse, if your son isn't of a SE Asian/ Indian background they may struggle.

What a ridiculous thing to say @Foxesandsquirrels . The children who go to QE are incredibly bright. You would want your son to be around people like that.
Racist much?

TheGoldenGate · 27/10/2024 00:51

puffyisgood · 26/10/2024 10:12

Honestly, they have identical budgets per head, teach an identical syllabus, have identical demographic of kids [both well on the way to being exclusively attended by mostly Indian kids who've been tutored since the cradle], the differences between the two are not worth giving a second thought. UK schools, especially state schools, are nothing like universities, where the very best places teach slightly better courses, have stronger academics in their teaching departments, and so on - they're broadly all the same, certainly two 'similar' schools like two super-selective grammars, are identical.

Edited

This☝️

LIZS · 26/10/2024 15:18

Of course public transport is safe! Plenty of kids commute around London. However you may prefer a shorter journey.

Foxesandsquirrels · 26/10/2024 15:08

I don't know Wilson's but QE boys is not very diverse, if your son isn't of a SE Asian/ Indian background they may struggle.

TheWrongBus · 26/10/2024 10:40

QE I’m told does not teach computer science at GCSE or A level, or offer much/any football. These may be deciding factors if it were my son, but it’s not!

They are both amazing schools so I would personally now focus on where I would rather live.

CaptainOhMyCaptain · 26/10/2024 10:25

And getting public transport is a brilliant way of building independence. Mine took public transport - a 45 minute journey door to door, from day 1, accompanied the first couple of days. They made “train friends” they dealt with the occasional delay/cancellation/diversion, and they were completely comfortable doing the journey within about a month.

CaptainOhMyCaptain · 26/10/2024 10:21

StrugglingPa · 26/10/2024 09:54

Is public transport safe? If I give a basic phone, air tag, will a kid be safe. I have only heard about muggings and kids being in danger. QE does offer coaches but these are oversubscribed and you only get a confirmation after national offer day, it's too late by then

QE is in Barnet, no? That’s pretty safe. The vast majority of secondary school aged children in this country get public transport to school, apart from maybe some very rural areas.

puffyisgood · 26/10/2024 10:12

Honestly, they have identical budgets per head, teach an identical syllabus, have identical demographic of kids [both well on the way to being exclusively attended by mostly Indian kids who've been tutored since the cradle], the differences between the two are not worth giving a second thought. UK schools, especially state schools, are nothing like universities, where the very best places teach slightly better courses, have stronger academics in their teaching departments, and so on - they're broadly all the same, certainly two 'similar' schools like two super-selective grammars, are identical.

StrugglingPa · 26/10/2024 09:54

CaptainOhMyCaptain · 26/10/2024 09:50

Honestly, most children will take public transport. So look at where your son can get to by tube/train/bus.

Is public transport safe? If I give a basic phone, air tag, will a kid be safe. I have only heard about muggings and kids being in danger. QE does offer coaches but these are oversubscribed and you only get a confirmation after national offer day, it's too late by then

OP posts:
CaptainOhMyCaptain · 26/10/2024 09:50

Honestly, most children will take public transport. So look at where your son can get to by tube/train/bus.

StrugglingPa · 26/10/2024 09:46

I will need to rent, what are the areas I could rent around QE? I don't want to drive one-way to the school for more than 20 minutes in peak traffic. Will need a 3 bed which isn't very expensive

OP posts: