Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Kingsdale Foundation School

187 replies

WhatILoved · 07/10/2024 14:47

What's so great about this school? I'm navigating choices and have been to visit this one we and others in the area. It is massively over subscribed and people really want their kids to go there. It feels huge. If I'm honest I didn't get a real feeling for it, probably hampered by fact I could only visit in a Saturday whilst other schools I've seen in action during the week. However whenever I ask local parents of older children there if they recommend it I very rarely get outstanding recommendations for it. I've had at worse "don't even think about sending your child there!" And at best " yes my kids have done really well but it's not all that"
I'd love to know therefore why it has waiting lists that go to infinity.

OP posts:
LindorDoubleChoc · 07/10/2024 22:18

DadJoke · 07/10/2024 17:43

They want the intake to be evenly distributed between ability bands each year, so they test everyone and take an even number from each quintile (perhaps quartile). The real test of a good school is the value-added school -how much they deliver on results based on the nature of the intake and the are in the top 7% country-wide. They also have excellent pupil to teacher ratios (13:1).

It's a large school, and quite impersonal. If you are focused on academic results it's a good choice. I've heard it's not so great if the children aren't rule followers.

They have a maths scholarship as well as half and full music scholarships.

"They are in the top 7% country wide".

Where does this info come from please @DadJoke ?

I live locally and have known lots of children who've gone through the school. I wouldn't say it's exceptional in any regard. Of the children I know best - two had to re-take one or more A levels.

BroccoliSurprise · 07/10/2024 21:44

mugboat · 07/10/2024 21:35

the 2 top progress 8 scores in Bromley borough are 2 superselective grammars... so even with high achievers, there is definitely value to add

Yeah I wasn't very convinced by that as a defence tbh. I was just trying to think what the counter might be to my view that it's a really poor score.

HarrietBond · 07/10/2024 21:40

Phineyj · 07/10/2024 21:19

DD only sat one banding test for a Harris but it seemed to be a percentage from each band, each with a different distance - are you saying they set it to give a desired number in each band?

Gosh, machiavellian!

I didn't put that school first as I couldn't see how to calculate the chances of her getting in...

If you look at the various distances for banded schools you’ll usually see that the distances for last place offered are further at each end of the scale. Rather than getting the 300 kids that live nearest the school, most of whom are likely to be in the middle, you can only admit a certain percentage of them but ensure you are admitting more able kids who live further away. To be fair, it also means they are taking a certain percentage of kids who are scoring below the average, and the system is known as fair banding.

mugboat · 07/10/2024 21:35

BroccoliSurprise · 07/10/2024 21:33

I suppose a defence of the progress 8 score is that they have a high achieving cohort and the cohort are meeting their expectations so there's not much value to add. But with their banding they should have a balanced cohort surely. In which case they ought to have some kids making progress. Maybe not an issue if you have a high achieving kid.

the 2 top progress 8 scores in Bromley borough are 2 superselective grammars... so even with high achievers, there is definitely value to add

BroccoliSurprise · 07/10/2024 21:33

I suppose a defence of the progress 8 score is that they have a high achieving cohort and the cohort are meeting their expectations so there's not much value to add. But with their banding they should have a balanced cohort surely. In which case they ought to have some kids making progress. Maybe not an issue if you have a high achieving kid.

BroccoliSurprise · 07/10/2024 21:26

I know a few people with kids who've been at Kingsdale and none of them overly sing it's praises. I've never quite understood why people get so enthused, especially with those Progress 8 scores. There are under subscribed schools in Lewisham getting better scores than that.

Phineyj · 07/10/2024 21:19

DD only sat one banding test for a Harris but it seemed to be a percentage from each band, each with a different distance - are you saying they set it to give a desired number in each band?

Gosh, machiavellian!

I didn't put that school first as I couldn't see how to calculate the chances of her getting in...

HarrietBond · 07/10/2024 21:10

So by admitting a set percentage from each band, on a distance criteria, you can reach out further for your more able kids rather than risk lots of more local average kids. Private Eye has spent quite a long time puzzling over the kids that Harris Crystal Palace manages to admit.

Phineyj · 07/10/2024 20:58

Banding tests are on the normal distribution aren't they? So you'd expect most to be in the middle?

Dinnerplease · 07/10/2024 20:45

Their A Level average result is also in line with national and borough average (B- in old money). I don't think there are any valid progress scores for A Level at the moment due to covid and teacher assessed grades (no baseline).

I don't get the hype to be honest. I'm sure it's absolutely fine and kids enjoy it (it's bang on average in fact) but having to game your intake so much to get average scores - the same as the totally non selective schools nearby in lewisham- means there's something a bit odd going on. They also had their knuckles rapped by Dfe for excessively high pay for the head (one of the highest for a single school trust in the country) and I think had a legal challenge to their admissions process at some point as well.

DadJoke · 07/10/2024 20:16

@newmum1976 I trust your source far more than mine. That's not good. It makes Kingsdale look not as special from my POV. I withdraw my previous remarks.

newmum1976 · 07/10/2024 20:07

DadJoke · 07/10/2024 20:00

I looked here:

"A level value added score Top 8% nationwide"
I can't really find anything much more useful.

schoolopinion.co.uk/london/southwark/kingsdale-foundation-school-6320

No idea where that comes from but their Progress 8 is 0.1, so children make the progress you’d expect- nothing special. In fact, it’s one of the worst Progress 8 scores in Southwark. www.compare-school-performance.service.gov.uk/schools-by-type?step=default&table=schools&region=210&geographic=la&for=secondary&basedon=Progress%208&show=All%20pupils

DadJoke · 07/10/2024 20:00

newmum1976 · 07/10/2024 19:29

I don’t think they are, are they? Their progress score is barely above 0.

I looked here:

"A level value added score Top 8% nationwide"
I can't really find anything much more useful.

schoolopinion.co.uk/london/southwark/kingsdale-foundation-school-6320

Dinnerplease · 07/10/2024 19:57

Their progress 8 is around national average. It's not 'good'. Their attainment scores are high but that's because of their selection policy. It makes me laugh they compare it to the Borough average when loads of the kids are from out of Borough, it's totally meaningless.

Dinnerplease · 07/10/2024 19:45

Yes and we are at a primary near Kingsdale and the school has a woeful music offer. DC is in year 6 and they've only just started offering peri lessons. There's not even a choir.

It's selection by privilege, that's why I loathe it. Sure, those opportunities are in London, but very few are free and they all involve a significant investment of parental time and energy.

Banding tests are also a form of stealth selection but you're bloody stuck with them everywhere locally apart from Sydenham and FHB (which are both good schools and actually have a strong music offering as well).

I had the same report from a friend on sports as well! Mixed boys and girls totally dominated by the boys.

HarrietBond · 07/10/2024 19:32

I should say I speak as the parent of a scholarship winner. But sadly one with SEN so the above posts apply.

HarrietBond · 07/10/2024 19:31

DadJoke · 07/10/2024 18:25

They do test all the kids, but only to ensure they are in three even bands of achievements. So, your kid might do really badly, but get a place because there were fewer kids in that achievement band.

However having a proportion devoted to sucessful scholarship applicants within the bands does skew things somewhat, as does having any tests at all - even if the results don't matter. Middle class parents are more likely to send their darlings to be tested.

But if you look at the value added scores, it's clear they are teaching kids much better than the average state school.

I’m talking about the scholarships. Most of the local schools do the banding so, while it does of course have the same benefit for all schools, it’s so ubiquitous that it’s a lost cause.

newmum1976 · 07/10/2024 19:29

DadJoke · 07/10/2024 19:18

This is excellent work, but how are their value-added scores so good if that's the case?

I don’t think they are, are they? Their progress score is barely above 0.

DadJoke · 07/10/2024 19:18

newmum1976 · 07/10/2024 18:52

I think their banding test is very dodgy. If it was done accurately, they would have a spread of high, low and middle prior attainers, but as you can see they don’t. Their results are quite good but only because they take mainly high attainers. My DD took the banding test 5 years ago and was put in one of the lowest bands, despite this Summer getting nearly all grade 9 and 8 at GCSE.

This is excellent work, but how are their value-added scores so good if that's the case?

Araminta1003 · 07/10/2024 19:12

It isn’t necessarily mad re banding test because they only assess non verbal reasoning. I have one DC who is amazing at verbal reasoning but overthinks non verbal reasoning and although typically does extremely well academically, would probably not do that well in a test that is just non verbal reasoning.

newmum1976 · 07/10/2024 19:11

WhatILoved · 07/10/2024 19:02

Ah glad she did well. Yes that's mad!

Thanks. She didn’t go to Kingsdale, I’ve realised I didn’t make that clear. I knew she was in the lowest band as we were trying to get in on the waiting list.

ItsYourMoneyRalf · 07/10/2024 19:11

I've heard some very bad things about that school. lots of low level disruption, kids walking out of classrooms etc

WhatILoved · 07/10/2024 19:02

Ah glad she did well. Yes that's mad!

OP posts:
mugboat · 07/10/2024 19:01

newmum1976 · 07/10/2024 18:52

I think their banding test is very dodgy. If it was done accurately, they would have a spread of high, low and middle prior attainers, but as you can see they don’t. Their results are quite good but only because they take mainly high attainers. My DD took the banding test 5 years ago and was put in one of the lowest bands, despite this Summer getting nearly all grade 9 and 8 at GCSE.

good sleuthing

newmum1976 · 07/10/2024 18:52

I think their banding test is very dodgy. If it was done accurately, they would have a spread of high, low and middle prior attainers, but as you can see they don’t. Their results are quite good but only because they take mainly high attainers. My DD took the banding test 5 years ago and was put in one of the lowest bands, despite this Summer getting nearly all grade 9 and 8 at GCSE.

Kingsdale Foundation School