Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

VAT and Bursary impact

288 replies

tam255 · 02/08/2024 13:49

For some parents in London on a reasonable income who can’t afford to buy in the catchment of a good/ outstanding school, sending to a private school with partial fee assistance/ bursary is the next best option.

Often these big private schools in London in fact often support the state sector, local schools in their area with use of facilities, pools, drama studios etc and are very generous indeed even with teaching staff, Saturday schools etc supporting local schools. This important fact just seems to be forgotten.

As for the student intake, in fact in London most of the private schools have more diversity than the superselective Grammar schools!! Getting a place into a superselective Grammar school for a child in London requires deep pockets. A bright child who cannot afford all the numerous tutors and mock classes etc has no chance of getting through a superselective grammar school and if you can’t afford to live in the catchment area of a good comprehensive will miss out there too.

The reality is that, if a child on a part bursary is in primary school yes, you could have an option to move to a state school at some point. However if a child on a part bursary say is in private secondary school yr 9 onwards ( where subject choices etc have been made) it’s going to be impossible to just change them to the state sector till sixth form.

Yes, there will always be millionaires and billionaires in the private schools but also a lot of parents who are covered partially with bursary’s. With all the vat added it will impact the bursaries which is sad and more importantly the support the private schools offer to the local state schools around in their catchment.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
MumGPT · 04/08/2024 20:14

tam255 · 02/08/2024 13:49

For some parents in London on a reasonable income who can’t afford to buy in the catchment of a good/ outstanding school, sending to a private school with partial fee assistance/ bursary is the next best option.

Often these big private schools in London in fact often support the state sector, local schools in their area with use of facilities, pools, drama studios etc and are very generous indeed even with teaching staff, Saturday schools etc supporting local schools. This important fact just seems to be forgotten.

As for the student intake, in fact in London most of the private schools have more diversity than the superselective Grammar schools!! Getting a place into a superselective Grammar school for a child in London requires deep pockets. A bright child who cannot afford all the numerous tutors and mock classes etc has no chance of getting through a superselective grammar school and if you can’t afford to live in the catchment area of a good comprehensive will miss out there too.

The reality is that, if a child on a part bursary is in primary school yes, you could have an option to move to a state school at some point. However if a child on a part bursary say is in private secondary school yr 9 onwards ( where subject choices etc have been made) it’s going to be impossible to just change them to the state sector till sixth form.

Yes, there will always be millionaires and billionaires in the private schools but also a lot of parents who are covered partially with bursary’s. With all the vat added it will impact the bursaries which is sad and more importantly the support the private schools offer to the local state schools around in their catchment.

The school where my DDs are studying offers a bursary program. I have already suggested closing the program to the headmaster.

HateMyRubbishBoss · 04/08/2024 18:52

Boater · 04/08/2024 18:41

Got to fund KH somehow - should planning permission ever be granted

i can’t imagine what the fees will look like once kids move there

planning our exit

Boater · 04/08/2024 18:41

HateMyRubbishBoss · 04/08/2024 18:35

Dukes education is absolutely for profit, they made some stupid fees increases with nothing to back these up with

they also sent a childish letter in response to Vat decision last week

the only reason I don’t regret accepting that 11+ offer is because now I know what a awful, entitled , money grabbing school looks like .

Got to fund KH somehow - should planning permission ever be granted

HateMyRubbishBoss · 04/08/2024 18:35

Dukes education is absolutely for profit, they made some stupid fees increases with nothing to back these up with

they also sent a childish letter in response to Vat decision last week

the only reason I don’t regret accepting that 11+ offer is because now I know what a awful, entitled , money grabbing school looks like .

Boater · 04/08/2024 18:34

You’ve become hung up on a particular point despite it being utterly irrelevant to the reality that some schools are owned by Private Equity and similar structures in order to generate a return for their owners.

Whereas if they have charitable status there is no such return because any surplus is taken to reserves for later investment in the school.

Boater · 04/08/2024 18:30

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 18:26

Not sure how that relates to my statement that in the UK all of the private schools as per law can not have " for profit" status as a business entity.

I’m certain you don’t understand it but it doesn’t make you right.

Ionacat · 04/08/2024 18:26

Our tax laws are so complex that what has happened is that private equity companies have found ways of buying private schools and then I suspect they structure their companies so that they comply with the law. If there wasn’t profit to be had, private equity companies wouldn’t bother or sniff around.

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 18:26

Boater · 04/08/2024 18:06

And turnover is revenue or in this case fee income, not profit plus expenses - though they will sum to the revenue number.

Companies cannot control their revenue but subject to any interest from HMRC they can control their costs and indeed choose them and structure them to achieve their own ends.

Not sure how that relates to my statement that in the UK all of the private schools as per law can not have " for profit" status as a business entity.

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 18:24

Scattery · 04/08/2024 17:23

@PeachSalad "re-invested in school, salaries etc"

Profit is what's left after you pay the costs. Salary is one of the costs. They don't charge fees intended to "make a profit" they charge fees calibrated to the costs they predict to cover. The size of the salary and the amount of staff etc is discretionary. Surely you can see the shades of grey there.

Anyway, something like 93% of students are state-educated.

Yet over the past decade, the gap between private school fees and state per-pupil spending has more than doubled (in England). The London state secondary my friend's daughter attends used to provide laptops to students on FSM, but took them back because they could no longer afford the scheme. Where were the local private schools and their charity then?

I don't accept that private schools shouldn't have to pay VAT. The inequality is too stark.

The size of the salary and the amount of staff etc is discretionary. Surely you can see the shades of grey there.

Absolutely. And I have never questioned anybody saying what you stated above.

I am just absolutely tired of people here saying that private schools are for profit. Not they not. It is not allowed in UK. They all have status as not for profit and charities.
But it doesn't mean they cannot give the directors an obscenely large salaries.
Yet this cannot be called profit

The rest of your post - I don't understand why you telling me that. Did I ever stated that I am against VAT on private? No. I am just trying to explain few people that in UK all private schools are not for profit because that is the law

Boater · 04/08/2024 18:06

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 15:53

Turnover is profit and expenses. Profit is after the expenses.

In the private schools the profit doesn't go to the private owner because they are " not for profit " organisations. It is invested in the school, students

And turnover is revenue or in this case fee income, not profit plus expenses - though they will sum to the revenue number.

Companies cannot control their revenue but subject to any interest from HMRC they can control their costs and indeed choose them and structure them to achieve their own ends.

Boater · 04/08/2024 18:01

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 16:05

Income does not mean profit. Every private school has an income. But the profit has to be re-invested in school, salaries etc

Dukes Holdings is an organisation that have salaried directors implement their duties under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006. Salaries are not profit but income in return of work. Directors are in the board and they appoint a headmaster.

For profit organisations are e.g. private entities ( owner takes profit to his pocket and if his companu bankrupts he also does), partnership ( non limited because there are also limited) and corporations ( the profit is sold as shares)

Schools in UK are not allowed to be for profit. They can be registered as charities and as not for profit organisations. They are managed by the boards ( salaried or not)

This is agonising.

I didn’t say fee income was profit. I said the majority of fee income came from the UK, I,e, from UK private schools. This was so you didn’t say it was from oversea private schools.

I assume you’ve read the accounts, at least the income statement? And will note that Dukes is generating positive EBITDA. This then turns to an operating loss primarily due to a large amortisation charge and financing costs because the company is leveraged to reduce tax. The former is non-cash, the latter due to structuring the debt to achieve a particular end.

You are wrong. And Wikipedia is not helping you.

Boater · 04/08/2024 17:50

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 16:09

@Boater
Dukes Education is not for profit as all private schools in UK. At a higher education level only exist some private, for profit.

That particular bit of googling says that the ISC is a not for profit organisation. It doesn’t say anything about Dukes

Scattery · 04/08/2024 17:23

@PeachSalad "re-invested in school, salaries etc"

Profit is what's left after you pay the costs. Salary is one of the costs. They don't charge fees intended to "make a profit" they charge fees calibrated to the costs they predict to cover. The size of the salary and the amount of staff etc is discretionary. Surely you can see the shades of grey there.

Anyway, something like 93% of students are state-educated.

Yet over the past decade, the gap between private school fees and state per-pupil spending has more than doubled (in England). The London state secondary my friend's daughter attends used to provide laptops to students on FSM, but took them back because they could no longer afford the scheme. Where were the local private schools and their charity then?

I don't accept that private schools shouldn't have to pay VAT. The inequality is too stark.

Helpmymumplease · 04/08/2024 16:46

And Dukes Education is backed by Private Equity by the way.

Helpmymumplease · 04/08/2024 16:19

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 15:57

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/forprofit-schools-have-no-place-in-britain-says-tory-education-secretary-nicky-morgan-10257148.html

Independent doesn't mean for an individual profit. Please make an effort of reading this article because you are wrong

This article is referring to profit making in the state sector. Not in the independent sector. Are you confused because free schools and academies are technically ‘independent schools’ ? These schools are not allowed to make a profit

really, trust us on this one. Profit making is absolutely allowed and there are plenty of institutional investors in the private fee paying school sector. They aren’t in it for the philanthropy.

Helpmymumplease · 04/08/2024 16:12

@PeachSalad I don’t know how to put this differently. You. Are. Completely. Incorrect. Profit making and taking is completely allowed unless you have charitable status.

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 16:09

@Boater
Dukes Education is not for profit as all private schools in UK. At a higher education level only exist some private, for profit.

VAT and Bursary impact
PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 16:05

Boater · 04/08/2024 11:28

Knock yourself out https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14268725/filing-history

The 2023 accounts are 63 pages but the revenue note shows the vast majority of fee income is from the UK £200m versus total revenue of £230m.

Income does not mean profit. Every private school has an income. But the profit has to be re-invested in school, salaries etc

Dukes Holdings is an organisation that have salaried directors implement their duties under section 172 of the Companies Act 2006. Salaries are not profit but income in return of work. Directors are in the board and they appoint a headmaster.

For profit organisations are e.g. private entities ( owner takes profit to his pocket and if his companu bankrupts he also does), partnership ( non limited because there are also limited) and corporations ( the profit is sold as shares)

Schools in UK are not allowed to be for profit. They can be registered as charities and as not for profit organisations. They are managed by the boards ( salaried or not)

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 15:57

Helpmymumplease · 04/08/2024 12:01

@PeachSalad you need to use better sources than wiki. That is just plain incorrect. For-profit schools are absolutely allowed in the UK. If they are independent and not charities.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/forprofit-schools-have-no-place-in-britain-says-tory-education-secretary-nicky-morgan-10257148.html

Independent doesn't mean for an individual profit. Please make an effort of reading this article because you are wrong

For-profit schools have no place in Britain, says Tory Education

The position appears to be different from the one outlined in September 2014

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/forprofit-schools-have-no-place-in-britain-says-tory-education-secretary-nicky-morgan-10257148.html

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 15:53

Boater · 04/08/2024 11:16

What is turnover and not profit?

They are quite different and not usually mixed up.

Turnover is profit and expenses. Profit is after the expenses.

In the private schools the profit doesn't go to the private owner because they are " not for profit " organisations. It is invested in the school, students

SpaceRaiders · 04/08/2024 12:34

SEND is a complete racket. I was having a discussion with a parent whose child receives 90k+ per annum of EHCP funding to attend an autism specialist setting, granted that may be the only suitable local placement for that child. He was ardently pro VAT, no other experience of the independent sector and was convinced that any school charging less than 90k is substandard. Looking at the schools accounts was very interesting!

I find it absolutely obscene that local authorities can justify that level of spending on ONE child. And as awful as it sounds there has to be some checks and balances. Spending over 500k of taxpayers money, educating a single child whose outcomes aren’t guaranteed doesn’t sound like a good investment to me.

Helpmymumplease · 04/08/2024 12:04

Taking as an example the profit-making parts of the independent special schools sector, several are owned by sovereign wealth funds or other large private equity firms. And profit making is not limited to the independent special schools sector. Any independent school that is not a charity is wholly permitted to make healthy profits.

Helpmymumplease · 04/08/2024 12:01

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 10:09

Please read UK section here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/For-profit_education

Not " many" . It is not allowed in UK

@PeachSalad you need to use better sources than wiki. That is just plain incorrect. For-profit schools are absolutely allowed in the UK. If they are independent and not charities.

Boater · 04/08/2024 11:28

PeachSalad · 04/08/2024 10:57

Yes but you don't understand that thia money have to be invested in school and cannot go just in anybody's pocket unless it is a salary for specific job. This is not profit. This is turnover and not profit. You clearly don't have understanding the basic principles of business and what is profit

I am still waiting for the examples for profit based schools.-?

Knock yourself out https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14268725/filing-history

The 2023 accounts are 63 pages but the revenue note shows the vast majority of fee income is from the UK £200m versus total revenue of £230m.

DUKES EDUCATION HOLDINGS LTD filing history - Find and update company information - GOV.UK

DUKES EDUCATION HOLDINGS LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual return, officers, charges, business activity

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/14268725/filing-history

Ionacat · 04/08/2024 11:17

I wasn’t sure about for profit, so I googled it and very quickly came up with the following articles.

This article is how private equity firms are making money out of the SEND sector.
https://schoolsweek.co.uk/how-investors-are-making-millions-from-the-bankrupt-send-system/

And a quick google about for profit education in the UK showed this, an old article, but they are still going and have been bought by another education company.
https://www.ft.com/content/4756c4b0-a5c4-3dd2-adea-fba44cfab244
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/alpha-plus-group