Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

CLSG or G&L

37 replies

JaneO11 · 10/02/2023 22:29

My daughter got offered a place from City of London School for Girls and Godolphin & Latymer. We like both schools, and can not decide.

Looking for views on both schools. Thanks a lot.

OP posts:
adhw · 16/02/2023 09:17

@cw34 - thanks for this extensive feedback , it really helps parents like us who are worried about the commute .. it gives an overall aspect of the school which is valuable in this time crunched decision making process ..

UKMum2021 · 15/02/2023 16:26

Lolakath19 · 11/02/2023 19:42

My daughter likes sport but she is not particularly sporty. Otherwise we would not be choosing G&L. Putney, whs and LU are way more sporty in my opinion. She is very academic and loves languages.
I love the diversity from City where I have the impression GL is less?? Although they do offer IB

The diversity at CLSG is definitely better than G&L. The location is actually a factor for the diversity. I have a few friends who have their DD there. They mentioned the strong academic aspect of CLSG but not really any sports.

Notcontent · 15/02/2023 13:39

My dd is at clsg and she was previously at another very good independent school. Clsg is a great school and I do think it is a bit more diverse than others - I think this is due to its location, large number of bursaries and overall ethos.

CW34 · 15/02/2023 12:51

Hi, I can only offer an opinion on CLSG based on first hand experience - can't really comment on G&L - due to proximity, wasn't really on our radar to do further research - it would seem to be a great school based on results, reputation etc. but can't add much more.

My daughter is currently in year 9, and honestly we couldn't be happier with the school. She has an approx door to door commute of 45 mins to an hour (based on luck with trains, dawdling with friends etc.). We moved from an independent through school (large green campus and grounds, great facilities) which was much closer to home, and where she had a place for the senior school. To be honest, the first time we visited the school, I questioned the commute, and even when we got to the building I was feeling apprehensive, but that all changed almost immediately when we entered, met some of the girls and got a feel for the school.

First of all the experience over the last 2 and half years has been fantastic. Saying the school is very academic would be correct, but then that would paint only half the picture. I think you have to make a clear distinction between what you would call a pushy environment to one with high expectations - and the important thing is those expectations are not limited purely to academics, but also the co-curricular side of things. The girls are encouraged to participate in drama, music, sports and many other activities. Yes, the campus isn't sprawling green fields, but I think they have extracted every bit of value they can from the space they have, and actually results in some quite innovative spaces for performances, sports and other activities.

If I had to list the different activities she has done over the years, it goes on and on - School Play, Choir, Robotics, Tennis Team, Athletics team, Cricket team, Inter-school entrepreneurship case competition at the LSE...it just goes on and on, so any perceived lack of facilities has absolutely zero impact on opportunity.

In terms of academics, it isn't easy - very frequent testing - but it seems to be done without a cut-throat approach - with strong support from teachers, lunchtime clinics for optional support. In year 7, we even had a weekly call with a year 11 student to help in languages.

And the pastoral care has been excellent - strong support on study skills from a dedicated team, fantastic support for mental health and wellbeing with a full time counselling service.

Overall we couldn't be happier - like I said, I don't want to comment on other schools without first hand experience, but it ultimately comes down to fit which for us, CLSG has been brilliant. Happy to answer any specific questions.

Norwoodmummy · 11/02/2023 19:49

From what I know G&L is the better all round option. CLGS is fine if you want an inner city location, but we wernt impressed with the facilities when we went to an open day a few years back when co sidering schools to any for. Focus on the academics obviously, but it all felt very one dimensional. Came away feeling it was a little overrated. G&L felt far more rounded, re the extra curricular and sport offering, in addition to the academics (which probably all round slightly above CLSG) but didn't work for us when factoring in the travel time for DD.

Lolakath19 · 11/02/2023 19:42

My daughter likes sport but she is not particularly sporty. Otherwise we would not be choosing G&L. Putney, whs and LU are way more sporty in my opinion. She is very academic and loves languages.
I love the diversity from City where I have the impression GL is less?? Although they do offer IB

SamPoodle123 · 11/02/2023 19:34

Lolakath19 · 11/02/2023 10:13

Following as in a similar position :)

Is your dd into sports? G&L has great facilities. I am not sure about CLSG, but my dd has done netball camps at G&L.

Utility · 11/02/2023 19:20

Where do you live?

Utility · 11/02/2023 19:19

They are very different schools!
And on opposite sides of London.
Architecture, atmosphere, facilities, general 'vibe'!
Which did your daughter prefer?
What do you want from the school?
Particular sport, music or drama?

Lolakath19 · 11/02/2023 10:35

it is almost similar. The downside at the moment for me in terms of commute is more in the morning where she will have to take the district line at 8.00 where it is packed :( afternoon commute would be less busy.

woohooho · 11/02/2023 10:19

What's the journey like to both?

Lolakath19 · 11/02/2023 10:13

Following as in a similar position :)