Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Government has failed to evaluate potential harms to pupils

153 replies

1stMrsF · 29/04/2021 15:23

It's been reported in the Telegraph and Daily Mail that PHE "did not consider" the negative health impacts of requiring children to wear facemasks in the classroom.

Nick Gibb, Minister for School Standards questioned about this today commented that children 'didn't seem to mind' wearing masks, even though the Government's own survey found that 80% of children are struggling to communicate wearing a mask and more than 50% felt it was affecting their ability to learn.

The government cannot produce any evidence that the benefits of this policy outweigh the potential harms, as the scientific evaluation hasn't been done. Whilst it's possible (but not confirmed) that face coverings in schools will be removed in Step 3 of the government roadmap, this will be at the earliest from 17 May, still 3 weeks away. The government has not confirmed under what criteria this measure will be removed, so still has the ability to push out this date, nor has it ruled out any future reintroduction.

There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that wearing mask for prolonged periods can have a negative impact on physical and mental health, especially in children who are more susceptible to the effects.

This article collates information from 44 experimental studies and 65 publications on the side effects of face masks. A wide variety of statistically significant confirmed side effects and dangers are reported and the article notes “Children are particularly vulnerable and may be more likely to receive additional harm” and “repeated exposure over longer periods is relevant. Long-term disease-relevant consequences of masks are to be expected.”

This study published in Germany where data was collected from a total of 25,930 children wearing a face mask for an average of 270 mins a day found that 68% reported impairments including irritability (60%), headache (53%), difficulty concentrating (50%), less happiness (49%), reluctance to go to school (44%), malaise (42%), impaired learning (38%) and drowsiness or fatigue (37%)

The government guidance for schools impels them to 'ensure face coverings are used where recommended' but makes them responsible for carrying out a risk assessment and consequently a legal case is being brought against a UK school and is in court tomorrow. Most schools will be unaware of this terrible position the Department for Education has put them in.

If you share my concerns, please write to your MP asking them to call for facemasks in the classroom to be removed immediately (no school needs a one week notice for this) and permanently, as we cannot continue with any measure for children in the knowledge that safety has not been evaluated.

You can also write to your school, making them aware of this issue. I have no doubt this policy has been implemented in good faith by schools who have dutifully followed all government guidelines without intending to harm children, but it is nonetheless their responsibility to safeguard the children in their care.

OP posts:
ChloeDecker · 03/05/2021 11:00

Bungle I don’t understand why it is so difficult for you to acknowledge the fact that although over 40s since Friday can now book, that doesn’t mean that they have been vaccinated.

Like many, I am over 40 but was only able to get my first appointment from Thursday 6th May (no appointments before then on the site, not that I was picky) and therefore, currently unvaccinated, which is a fact.

It is also a fact that even by 17th May, just 11 days after my jab, I will not be as protected as you claim, yet.

I also have Psoriasis which is an auto-immune condition. Probably why, when I caught Covid last year through schools, it only affected me in the most awful burning rash over my face and body. None of the other well known symptoms promoted by the gov and NHS. My GP theorises that catching it again could make my body response worse/dangerous, as is often the case with immune systems and allergies, for example, but because, (I assume) PHE have not really acknowledged this symptom, Psoriasis was backtracked from being included in group 6 unless you are on steroids basically or put on any shielding list.

Currently, I have three classes/close contacts in different year groups who had to start self isolating due to 3 positive tests from PCRs plus about 6 or so other pupils self isolating as a family member has it. It’s not gone away and although it’s wonderful to hear the stats going down, that is not much comfort to the young people and staff having to self isolate again currently. As always, they are forgotten about in other people’s desire to return back to normality. I mean, it’s as if no one else wants to return to how it was before but life isn’t like that.

I am personally grateful to be allowed masks in classrooms at the moment (acknowledging parents can exempt their children if they so wish) as an unvaccinated teacher in classrooms since March. I am fully supportive of them being withdrawn, just not right now, this minute.

noblegiraffe · 03/05/2021 10:54

Well, I'm arguing because suggesting that it's ok to remove masks in classrooms on May 17th because by then over 30s may have had vaccine bookings opened to them is basically the same crap argument that was made for opening schools with no mitigation measures on 8th March (which thankfully didn't happen) because 'the vulnerable will have been vaccinated by then' - redefining vulnerable to exclude group 6 and ignoring the fact that a lot of older people would not have been 3 weeks post jab by then. It also redefines vaccinated to 'has had their first jab'.

The vaccine dates didn't line up with 8th March and they don't line up with 17th May and I'm pretty fed up of people trying to make out that they do. If you want to argue for masks to be gone on 17th May in classrooms then find an argument that doesn't make out that teachers will either be immune, really young, or 'vaccine refusers' by then.

BungleandGeorge · 03/05/2021 10:31

I’m not sure why people want to argue about this but they’re now saying 70% of all people on gov website. Above 62% is a week ago and England only I think and some devolved nations have done more. There is loads of vaccine available, if people are concerned about getting covid then I’d expect they’d be willing to travel to get it. About 95% of over 50s have had it already but I doubt that would be the same when it gets to the 21-39 group but it will be offered to them very soon,

borntobequiet · 03/05/2021 07:43

COVID-19 Vaccination Statistics Week ending Sunday 25th April 2021
(Latest weekly release)

www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/04/COVID-19-weekly-announced-vaccinations-29-April-2021.pdf

Of the 2,941,890 vaccinations reported in the week ending 25th April, around one-fifth (637,559) were first doses. This took the total number of people vaccinated with at least one dose as of 25th April to 28,153,756 (61.9% of the population aged 16 and over1).
 The majority of vaccinations reported in the week ending 25th April were second doses (2,304,331). This took the total number of people vaccinated with both doses as of 25th April to 11,001,440 (24.2% of the population aged 16 and over1 and 39.1% of those vaccinated).

I was rather surprisingly (it surprised the doctor too) able to book a second vaccination via the doctor’s website some weeks ago, so naturally I took it. My official appointment was 29th April (naturally I cancelled it).
I teach, I’m 67 and have a heart condition so I was very pleased to be fully vaccinated, but I wouldn’t be fully protected even now had I not taken the early opportunity for the second jab.

TeenMinusTests · 03/05/2021 07:28

Bungle 65% of adults have now had one jab coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations but you seem to be forgetting the vitally important fact that we have done vaccinations by age group from the top. There won't be many(any?) teachers in the 70+ age group which is why the % of teachers vaccinated is going to be lower than the overall percentage.
Yes there will be some group 6 teachers but not a significant number.

There has been something extraordinary like 95% uptake of the vaccine of those who have been offered it so far. (I accept that may be out of date and lower now age groups are lowering). It stretches credibility to think that teachers are going to have higher than average refusal rate considering the amount of people they have to mix with.

DancesWithDaffodils · 03/05/2021 07:11

Bungle it's over 40 it be invited.
Just like Noble above, I've been invited, but cant get a slot until mid may. Well, I possibly could, but I wasnt prepared to drive 50 miles each way for it.

Where do you get the 7 out of 10 figure from? I thought that was doses, including second ones (so some people are in the figures twice), and the figure for at least one vaccine was in the 40s source

RachelRaven · 02/05/2021 22:53

Teachers have a low average age in the uk, which would explain why so few as a percentage have been vaccinated.

BungleandGeorge · 02/05/2021 22:46

@TeenMinusTests

Lets face it, most teachers are in the age range 22-62. We have currently actually vaccinated down to 42 - only about half way down the actual teacher age range. So although at first I was somewhat surprised that 41% of teachers are unvaccinated, when I thought about it, I was surprised it wasn't more like 50%.
It’s 40 now (over 30 in Northern Ireland) Plus anyone who is a carer, plus people who live with someone CEV, plus all CV, plus all CEV. According to the government 7 out of 10 adults have already had at least one vaccine.
noblegiraffe · 02/05/2021 18:37

Cheers, working!

Teen it's probably because some councils broke ranks, went against the govt and gave their spare vaccines to teachers as keyworkers. Some of the younger teachers would have been vaccinated in group 6 as well.

workingtowards · 02/05/2021 18:15

I just want to tip my hat to noble giraffe for their unrelenting defence of common sense.

TeenMinusTests · 02/05/2021 16:53

Lets face it, most teachers are in the age range 22-62.
We have currently actually vaccinated down to 42 - only about half way down the actual teacher age range.
So although at first I was somewhat surprised that 41% of teachers are unvaccinated, when I thought about it, I was surprised it wasn't more like 50%.

borntobequiet · 02/05/2021 16:31

There is no social distancing, unlike other places where people are currently wearing masks.

This is a really important point that many people don’t seem to understand. Possibly they have been misled by unrealistic depictions of classrooms in the media with five or six passive looking children sitting two metres apart in a very big room.

noblegiraffe · 02/05/2021 16:27

Not refusers, Bungle. I’m unvaccinated, I booked my vaccine as soon as I was able and it’s still not for a week and a half.

Being ‘offered a vaccine’ isn’t the same as being vaccinated.

BungleandGeorge · 02/05/2021 16:23

@noblegiraffe

We’ve done so many vaccinations that I don’t see May as unrealistic

But we're talking specifically about schools here where the kids are unvaccinated (and I don't know any CEV 12+ year olds who have had one), 41% of teachers are unvaccinated (so won't be 3 weeks post vaccination by May 17th) and where infections spiralled out of control last time schools were open without masks. I know we also have LFT testing but those are the only two mitigation measures. There is no social distancing, unlike other places where people are currently wearing masks.

People who are arguing about masks indefinitely generally are talking about on the bus or whatever, not in schools.

The vast majority of children who initially received a shielding letter no longer need to shield as it emerged that very few were at risk. It will only be offered to the most at risk (eg learning disabilities) although many did chose to keep shielding, I’d be surprised if there are many in mainstream. I agree that teachers should be prioritised and offered ASAP but if the figure is as high as 41% and only 21-39 without vulnerabilities not offered yet I presume there are quite a lot of refusers included in that number. Those who want it should definitely have the opportunity
SoupDragon · 02/05/2021 15:11

I know, right!

FoolsAssassin · 02/05/2021 12:19

@SoupDragon

The OP seemed keen for a discussion

They absolutely didn't 😂

No, really? I’,m absolutely shocked 😮😂
FrippEnos · 02/05/2021 12:09

@Dozer

When DfE update their guidelines I’d like them to outline the rationale and evidence base: both with respect to current covid risks to school staff and their families, and impact of masks on pupils’ learning and wellbeing.
The DfE has been completely useless from the start and has allowed teachers to take the full force of shit from their decisions.

Actually putting something down on paper (or whatever) would mean them actually taking some responsibility for their actions (or lack of)

Dozer · 02/05/2021 11:21

When DfE update their guidelines I’d like them to outline the rationale and evidence base: both with respect to current covid risks to school staff and their families, and impact of masks on pupils’ learning and wellbeing.

noblegiraffe · 02/05/2021 11:20

We’ve done so many vaccinations that I don’t see May as unrealistic

But we're talking specifically about schools here where the kids are unvaccinated (and I don't know any CEV 12+ year olds who have had one), 41% of teachers are unvaccinated (so won't be 3 weeks post vaccination by May 17th) and where infections spiralled out of control last time schools were open without masks. I know we also have LFT testing but those are the only two mitigation measures. There is no social distancing, unlike other places where people are currently wearing masks.

People who are arguing about masks indefinitely generally are talking about on the bus or whatever, not in schools.

SoupDragon · 02/05/2021 11:14

The OP seemed keen for a discussion

They absolutely didn't 😂

ineedaholidaynow · 02/05/2021 11:13

DS doesn’t mind wearing a mask. He feels happier with some restrictions in place at school, especially when they first went back.

FoolsAssassin · 02/05/2021 11:09

The OP seemed keen for a discussion, wonder if they are coming back to engage in the points people are making?

DancesWithDaffodils · 02/05/2021 10:22

I'll take a small negative association of mask wearing in secondary classrooms (with adjustments for hard of hearing students) over a massive negative association of remote learning (which despite the teachers greatest efforts is not the same as being in the classroom) and the social isolation caused by schools and/or bubbles closing.

BungleandGeorge · 02/05/2021 10:15

@noblegiraffe

Which vaccine is approved for use on children over 12?

I certainly don’t want masks indefinitely but arguing that May 17th is the right date because over 30s will have been offered the vaccine by then doesn’t follow.

Unlicensed use it is contained in the JCVI guidelines. The vast majority of children were taken out of the CEV category though as very few are at risk, so will apply to a small minority. The second point was not directed towards you but there are people saying it should continue long term, I can’t see that happening when we’re meant to be out of all restrictions soon. We’ve done so many vaccinations that I don’t see May as unrealistic but if it’s not then presumably they’ll go in June which is not much difference
FoolsAssassin · 02/05/2021 06:57

I can imagine Teens. They annoy me too. I know all age groups have suffered and it’s not a competition but I have noticed that a lot of teens are really struggling with the transition to adulthood that is never easy but it’s really noticeable at the moment and the topic of conversation a lot with friends - especially those who have older DC as a comparison.

Anything at all that can be done to keep as many in school for as much as possible is a good thing in my book. It’s not just the education aspect, it’s their social development. I look forward to the day when discussions like this aren’t necessary and masks are a distant memory but I don’t feel we are there yet.