Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

A-level choices: engineering-----architecture

135 replies

istherelifeafter40 · 06/11/2020 16:00

DS has to choose 4 A-levels in November. He is not decided on what he wants to do as a career, but is leaning towards engineering - or architecture (quite a spread!) There seem to be myriads of different kinds of engineering - from mechanical, aerospace, electronic, civil, to biochemical. I don't know much about any of them. (Humanities person here).
I think he might also change his mind and decide to do natural sciences, for instance... I love the idea of natsoc at Cambridge - start wide and narrow down. I am generally against early specialisation...

Currently, he has 8 in maths and all sciences, but also in eng and photography that he loves. He also likes chemistry very much and says that physics is very easy. BUT he dislikes maths, although he does well in it and is in set 2 our of 6 in a selective school.

Our current choice is Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Photography (which would open architecture if he goes this way, but is a course-based work-intensive subject). He accepts that he "has to do maths" (not my doing)

or Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Biology (he dislikes biology, but I think it might be quite a different subject at A-level?).

The school also insists on EPQ, and he will be able to drop 1 A level but can continue with 4.

He is set very much against further maths, which as I understand rules out some of the best mechanical engineering courses or general engineering at cambridge, but can still be ok for the other unis. Imperial has dozens of kinds of engineering and they all require different A levels (and different grades, from A, A, A to AAA). How do you decide at 15?

Any advice? I am worried that doing 3 sciences and an artistic course-based work will be too heavy (+epq)! I wonder if it is too much science work and pressure in case he decides to do architecture (many courses don't specify A levels whatsoever).
He doesn't want to do any humanities' subjects though, or something like economics or politics...

Any advice or just a chat would be great

OP posts:
BikeRunSki · 08/11/2020 04:05

I might be wrong, but I don't think engineers are mathematicians, in how I understand mathematicians. I mean, really, they are not solving Fermat's theorem day in day out.

I’m a civil engineer. You are correct, engineers are not mathematicians in the purest sense, but strong mathematical skills are needed to undertake/understand applied engineering design and modelling.

Marchitectmummy · 08/11/2020 03:40

I am an architect, I'm a partner in a largish practice so can help you with undemanding subjects related to building engineering.

Architecture
The top uni is The Bartlet which is part of UCL. By far, all of the tip architects or firms led by what the media refer to as Starchitects come out of there. Its design led and hugely competitive to get into.

A couple of posters on here have mentioned Bath, that is an OK university for architecture but not considered to be very strong on design, ans is far more practical. Personally, I do not tend to recruit from Bath.

One point not mentioned here is to qualify is a long road, 3 year degree, 1 year minimum in practice, 2 year diploma, then 1 year part time. Most are around 26 at least when qualified. Engineerimg paths are much quicker.

Most architects are then junior for at least 5 years, large projects will often have students, a newly qualified architect, a project architect, a senior or associate and a partner. So it is important to be able to take instruction, and to work collaboratively with the rest of the design team (including engineers) Architects lead the rest of the design team, so civil engineers, mechanical and electrical engineers and structural engineers are led on projects by architects. Structural engineers are considered or treated with higher regard than mechanical and electrical engineers. Structural is maths based lots of calculations of how structures will behave. Architects do not do this, they are not insured to do it. Mechanical and electrical engineers design how the building will be serviced as the name suggests in both mechanical and electrical terms. They specialise generally in one or the other and then choose plant, inform architects of sizes for plant, distribution etc. Civil engineers are probably the bottom of the hierarchy and they design roads, road layouts, parking and communicate with tbe local authorities on those matters.

Studying architecture is considered hard but an enjoyable course if chosen correctly. Students work long hours, its subjective as it is design based and you have to be able to take or learn to take criticism. It isn't exam based, communication and confidence is extremely important during education and certainly as a role.

Combined Architecture and engineering courses again are not respected by architects so I wouldn't advise those.

Architecture is not anticipated to be automated any more than it is now, technology helps speed up drawing but much of the role is not drawing its collaborative working, designing, specifying materials, understanding legislative documents, running the design team and writing quite often engthy documents. And sadly like lots of roles now it is answering dozens of emails.

However, if you have been following Grenfell case its main threat is any mistake made can have enormous consequences and enormous costs associated. Insurance is very expensive and mistakes can end in the extreme in prison.

NotMeNoNo · 08/11/2020 02:00

I would agree about maths, it's a tool to solve problems not something I studied for the love of it. IIRC Further Maths is not as much work as a whole different A level because it makes the normal Maths A level feel easy.

NotMeNoNo · 08/11/2020 01:54

If he really doesn't want to do Further Maths he might as well do the subjects he likes. (Have a 15 and 16 year old and know the how much they listen to me).

As long as he's doing the Maths/physics/Chemistry he has a good choice of engineering degree courses. Don't get hung up on Cambridge or "the best" courses. Many less impressive universities run extremely good engineering degrees and work closely with industry. I did the Cambridge engineering course and if I had my time again I'd have gone straight to a normal civil engineering degree at a university with a proper dedicated department like Imperial or Newcastle.

Big Bang Fairs, Engineering Council and the engineering institution websites have sections aimed at students on "What is engineering " etc. From your description he sounds like he would make a great engineer and never be out of work. But he may need to discover it for himself, when he's a little older. I had civil and aeronautical both in mind for a while and investigated them both before UCAS form time.

So in summary as long as doing the Maths and 2 sciences he might as well do Photography, I can't see it rules anything major out and gives him a useful creative edge. The only thing worth swapping it for would be Further Maths.

PresentingPercy · 07/11/2020 23:53

DH feels a lot of design has become about computer programming and not enough about engineering. Engineers have to know what the design should be so they know the computer is correct. Putting in duff info results in poor design. Poor design is expensive to build. Poor design might have to be redesigned so the employer loses money. It doesn’t matter who you work for. Most companies need to make money and they won’t if mistakes are made. DH had a chartered structural engineer design a steel frame that was bigger than the actual building. It was a lot of work and the design was useless. Structural engineering tends to suit the engineers that are happy to sit in their teams beavering away - especially at the big consultancies. DH is FIStructE but doesn’t go near it these days.

A good place to get info about all branches of engineering is to look at the Engineering Council web site. It will then link you to the individual institutions and you can see what they offer to young people who are Interested. If he’s building things, then he’s an engineer!

ErrolTheDragon · 07/11/2020 21:40

I might be wrong, but I don't think engineers are mathematicians, in how I understand mathematicians. I mean, really, they are not solving Fermat's theorem day in day out.

No, I think it's more they need to be good at maths and willing and able to do some pretty hard stuff, using as tools of the trade.

Can you tell me a bit more about what people in this field do nowadays - apart from research route? And what kind of work there is and what is it like? (I don't know any chemists; I think some chemistry departments were very short-sightedly closed in the UK at some point? )

Lots of good chemistry depts stayed open though! As to what work ... again, lots of different paths. DH was in industry - high performance polymer development, getting towards materials science. I'm in a bit of a niche writing software, modelling chemistry eg how drugs interact with protein molecules using computers and maths.

istherelifeafter40 · 07/11/2020 19:47

He also loves construction and from early age was soldering cars and assembling drones; he is good with microelectronics and knows lots of applied physics staff you need to produce a small moving vehicle.

OP posts:
istherelifeafter40 · 07/11/2020 19:46

@ErrolTheDragon You mean Chemistry as a degree? That's interesting. Maybe! He loves chemistry and forever finding some videos explaining some chemical phenomena and he seems to know quite a bit.
Can you tell me a bit more about what people in this field do nowadays - apart from research route? And what kind of work there is and what is it like? (I don't know any chemists; I think some chemistry departments were very short-sightedly closed in the UK at some point? )

OP posts:
istherelifeafter40 · 07/11/2020 19:41

I also have a problem with this thing about 'loving maths' on this thread and also in English culture too. As you might guess, I am foreign. What I observed over years here is rather bad primary school education in maths and an idea that people are either 'good in maths' or not good. This is often decided in the primary, when all the maths encountered is arithmetic! I often see people having like a fog going over their eyes, if you tell them anything related to something perceived as mathematical. As if the brain switches at the first sight of maths. People are trained in this way culturally; and it's not like this in other countries. In many other countries people carry on doing maths until they are 18 at least

I might be wrong, but I don't think engineers are mathematicians, in how I understand mathematicians. I mean, really, they are not solving Fermat's theorem day in day out.

OP posts:
istherelifeafter40 · 07/11/2020 19:33

@ShowingOut Don't worry about gentleness, you are absolutely right. I am not giving this information to DS, only maybe very little drip feed, that there is such a thing as chemical engineering, stuff like that.

I am researching this for my own understanding. I have a tendency to run before a train but I've learnt to hide it. He needs to choose A-levels and I am now content that the first option can open enough routes for him and not foreclose anything much. If I have a map of options in my head, it calms me down.

Ultimately I have no idea which grades he will achieve in GSCE, and to some extent what he is capable of. He is very bright, but not the kind of bright that is working from morning till night to get only the top grades in all subjects without exception throughout the entire school. There are boys like that in his school, and they are not his friends.

He may as well end up going for something else; I don't know - an art school? I certainly won't push him into anything

OP posts:
ErrolTheDragon · 07/11/2020 19:22

He loves chemistry and he says that loves it because he sees its immediate applicability and usefulness. This might develop as he gets older. I also think the way some subjects are at GSCE level might put people off and actually the subjects themselves are quite different at the Uni level or even A level.

Just backtracking to this for a moment - is there any reason he isn't leaning towards chemistry? Some branches of chemistry need good maths but others don't - well, like all stem subjects some is needed including a grasp of statistics but not everyone needs to do particularly tricky stuff and uni courses will include maths options. (I'm a chemist)

errorofjudgement · 07/11/2020 19:09

DS1 studied aerospace and spacecraft design engineering (literally rocket science). Those who didn’t have A levels in FM and Chemistry had to do additional courses in the first year to bring their knowledge up to standard.

DS2 has a MEng in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis on manufacturing systems and robotics.

Maths is central to both these degrees, and I think that if your DS doesn’t enjoy maths then these type of engineering courses would not be for him.

Both DS are post grads and both still use high level maths in their engineering jobs. However both have loved maths from primary school!

Btw re becoming a mathematician - DS1 went to an open day at Bristol Uni in Y12. The lecturer explained that the pure maths degree suits those who love the elegance of maths. Whereas engineers use the maths to make real things. At that point DS realised he would prefer engineering!

ShowingOut · 07/11/2020 18:50

Trying to think of a gentle way to say this, can't - shouldn't your DS be the one doing the research into what he wants to do? It sounds like you're getting info ready so you can direct him in the area that you think he should go.

He's old enough to do all his own background research into subjects, careers, universities, etc.

thesandwich · 07/11/2020 18:29

In these extraordinary times flexibility is good- so many of my dds friends with excellent degrees from a v good uni in aero engineering have had their grad scheme roles cancelled.

JMG1234 · 07/11/2020 17:55

For the avoidance of doubt, I wasn't implying that you need to be sat in an office at 3am to make money from engineering. Nor that engineers can't be well paid. Of course they can.

Simply that my brother in law works incredibly hard for a salary that he feels doesn't reflect how highly qualified he is and his level of seniority. It's not for lack of looking for alternative jobs in his industry either.

bodgeitandscarper · 07/11/2020 17:32

I think doing an MEng in Mechanical Engineering gives a good base for a career in many areas, my son did his at Leeds, in the fourth year they specialise in an area of Engineering that interests them. He went on to do a phd and works as a research and development scientist and throughly enjoys it. They do need to be good at maths though.

istherelifeafter40 · 07/11/2020 17:11

Thanks everyone! The problem with aerodynamics engineering in the UK, I am told, is that you end up designing war machines. But civil and environmental sounds great.

OP posts:
ErrolTheDragon · 07/11/2020 16:36

All engineers can make money if they are commercially minded and even run a company!

Not necessarily their own, of course - some go into managing manufacturing, that type of thing.

thesandwich · 07/11/2020 16:35

Have a look at headstart courses for next summer- not sure if they will be on line or face to face but they are an excellent opportunity to explore what engineering is and is different routes.
Also many unis do study days/ taster days for different subjects- again who knows what will happen next year.
Loads on line about becoming an engineer. Look at the Big Bang fair- will be on line this year.

Decorhate · 07/11/2020 16:19

Ds is doing Civil Engineering. It is a very broad course everywhere & you can go into many different specialties. However when we were looking around it became apparent that most courses are slightly skewed in a particular direction, often depending on what was going on in the local area historically.

Ds ended up preferring 2 courses where there is a lot of collaboration with the Architecture Dept - Bath (where he is) and Sheffield (which was his insurance).

But as someone else said, it does not matter too much in terms of future career where you study (I can vouch for that having done the same degree).

My gut feeling is that there are generally more jobs available for engineers rather than architects.

PresentingPercy · 07/11/2020 15:39

DH is a civil and structural engineer and also works on highways and environmental engineering. There are always jobs for engineers and university doesn’t matter too much. Ability to do the job accurately and quickly does! DH is an employer and has interviewed and employed hundreds of engineers down the years! It’s a mid sized consultancy. DH has worked with very many architects. Few architects trust themselves to do the calcs for their complex buildings!

However for any of these careers, he needs maths. There are great courses at Bath for Architecture but other universities re great choices too. The profession fluctuates though and continued work isn’t guaranteed in times of depression.

Ditto Civil and Structural engineering. Environmental engineering (part of civil engineering) is the big thing right now. Structural engineering is very maths based and computer programs are what it’s all about. If he likes buildings, he needs to consider if he’s interested in the design of buildings or doing the calcs to make them stand up!

Maths and Physics gets him anywhere he wants to go . I wouldn’t recommend general engineering for most students. And aerodynamicists cannot find work! So few jobs out there. If he’s interested in the built environment he should look at Civil and Structural Engineering. Building Services engineering is also an option. Look at MEng courses if you can and they must be accredited. Sheffield, Bristol, Southampton, Nottingham, Leeds, Bath, Loughborough, Portsmouth, Surrey and Warwick are all excellent for Civil Engineering. Not sure about Architecture!

All engineers can make money if they are commercially minded and even run a company! Sitting in an office until 3am really isn’t required!

bruffin · 07/11/2020 13:47

DS went to Surrey for ME in 2015 and wouldnt recommend it, they started taking way too many students, they were having to use local cinemas because the lecture halls were too small, library overcrowded putting freshers out of town and there was absolutely no pastoral care. DS dropped out in the end

ErrolTheDragon · 07/11/2020 13:05

It may (possibly) be that the 'RG' tag makes some difference for students doing some sort of arts/humanities degree with the intention of going into some sort of 'graduate scheme' which doesn't require specific skills. I don't think that reflects well on recruiters.

STEM isn't really like that. For engineering, there are many excellent courses at non-RG unis (Surrey as mentioned, Bath, Loughborough just off the top of my head and not exhaustive!) and appropriate for different types of applicant. Links to industry may be important, which factors in to where some of the good engineering departments are located (nowadays for some fields 'industry' will include science parks).

istherelifeafter40 · 07/11/2020 12:31

dignit there was a poster up the thread who very strongly supported your point!

There are so many factors in play when choosing a place to study. Where it is is important - Bristol or Brighton is a great place to live as a student. I am not sure DS would want to go north. Surrey you either have to commute or live locally in a commuter belt - could be a decision factor.

Obviously, it is important to have good education, but I think it is also important not to lose perspective. I've done a degree in something quite different to what I teach now as an academic. It's a long journey and the uni part is only the beginning. And also just going through life you know that happiness and success and fulfilment don't often correlate to the reputation of the Uni you went to - it becomes such a minor thing as you move on in life!

OP posts:
istherelifeafter40 · 07/11/2020 12:25

Thanks everyone, very interesting and most useful!

I haven't asked the school about whether he can do physics without maths. I feel - and he feels - that not doing maths rules so many options out, that it's not an option. Some of his friends who are not good with maths are not doing maths and are focusing on architecture or design, for instance. He thinks (or maybe I do) that if he is one of those who CAN do maths, he might as well get some hard skills (as well).

Civil Engineering and Architecture or Structural Engineering is an interesting option. Maybe that would be the best fit for him. Bartlett has a course in architectural and engineering design. I am not sure if it's one of those recently introduced to attract a certain demographic of students without having any other clear aim, but I guess if it is accredited, it's OK.

He loves chemistry and he says that loves it because he sees its immediate applicability and usefulness. This might develop as he gets older. I also think the way some subjects are at GSCE level might put people off and actually the subjects themselves are quite different at the Uni level or even A level.

Aerodynamic engineering is attractive to him - but needs FM for entry,- he doesn't want to do it at this point. I also think doing FM at A level and doing much of the same maths later on at Uni as part of the degree (as I understand that this is how it is sometimes arranged) might be quite different (maturity, context, clear idea why he is doing this; etc)

Thanks for the pointers re: Bristol. This might be such a fun place to be a place. I wouldn't think that design engineering is an engineering degree! (shows my level of naivety)

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread