Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

The less good local school or the good one that's hard to get to?

34 replies

melodybear · 29/10/2020 12:07

Another last minute which secondary school thread. I have been backwards and forwards over this decision all year and I still don't know what to do. A key factor is that logistically DH and I couldn't take her/pick her up from either school due to the starting and finishing times of our own jobs

School A: Our local catchment school. We would definitely get in. We live in a small town and it is the only school in the town and therefore has a "centre of the community" feel to it. Most children from DC's class will go there. It is walkable at a stretch or there is a relatively straightforward bus journey or several other local parents who drop children there and pick up who would almost certainly give our DC a lift. I went to the open evening last year. They have a newish building, a new head who I really liked and I spoke to some really nice pupils. The main downside - academically their results aren't great. The most recently published results were below average both for the area and nationally. There isn't data available for previous years (it changed to academy status) but I don't think it's ever had the best reputation for academic results. DD is pretty bright and well-supported at home but I wonder if she needs a more academic environment. The school doesn't have a recent Ofsted as it became an academy since the last inspection but over the previous ten years or so it has been RI, then good, then back to RI just before the academisation.

School B: Faith school 4 miles away. We would qualify on the faith basis and are within the furthest distance that was offered last year so would likely get in. It has a good reputation, very good results and an outstanding Ofsted (although it hasn't been inspected for over 10 years). We know someone who worked there for a while and she said the behaviour wasn't as good as she had expected but academically they were very on the ball. It's obviously the better school, but she wouldn't know anyone going there, the intake is from a wide geographic area so less likely to have local friends and most crucially, it is very difficult to get to logistically. It involves me driving her to the station, a train, then bus and short walk, about 45 minutes in total. On the return journey it would be the same except she would also have to get bus or taxi back from the station. It wouldn't bother me so much if she was a bit older or knew other children doing the journey but there are very few local children who go there because of the faith criteria. She is not used to public transport at all, although obviously we'd try to get her used it it. The bus only runs on schooldays so it's not possible to try out the run in the holidays or weekends.

The other option is taxis both ways, which my parents have offered to help with the cost of but it would work out around £4000 a year. Probably within a year or two we'd feel more confident about her getting public transport but it still seems like a crazy amount to spend. I feel like it might be better to go to the local school and then spend money on tutors.

It seems like I'm making the decision based on logistics, rather than just sending her to the best school, which makes me feel guilty.

OP posts:
PatriciaHolm · 29/10/2020 12:29

Closer school; there are way too many things that can (and will!) go wrong with a journey that requires both a bus and a train. What happens when the train is on strike, broken down so she misses the bus, the bus is late/early, etc. if you can't easily be there to help?

Also presumably that will make it harder for her to do afterschool clubs etc, see friends after school etc.

RedskyAtnight · 29/10/2020 12:25

I'd also go for the closest school.

Of course it's fine to choose a school on logistics! If your DC can't practically get there, then you can't consider it. Remember if you go for the faith school you'll also have to be taxi service every time your DD wants to see friends. And social life is important as a teen.

Have you looked at results vs intake? If the schools' results are purely inline with their intakes this doesn't say anything about whether they are better schools or not.

canigooutyet · 29/10/2020 12:25

Mine cross London as well. When the tube is on strike there are alternatives.

When there's leaves on the line, the wrong type of rain etc, trains get delayed/cancelled. Until she moved, this used to really piss off one of my dd's, arrive on the platform and the train has been cancelled. Next one in 45 minutes, oh great late for work again!

canigooutyet · 29/10/2020 12:21

And as for Ofsted, I personally ignore it because of things like no inspections for several years.
The notice schools get isn't level, some schools get the call as Ofsted are on the way, others get prior warning.

JuliaJohnston · 29/10/2020 12:18

That's not an insurmountable journey, op. I'd be very wary of deliberately going for an inferior school because it's logistically handier...
She'll be secondary age, you'd be surprised at some of the expeditions some of them make, especially in big cities.
Mine cross London 🤷🏻‍♀️

CaptainMyCaptain · 29/10/2020 12:17

I agree with pisspants. Ofsted doesn't always tell the full story anyway.

canigooutyet · 29/10/2020 12:17

I would go for the closer school.
The logistics of the other school aren't worth it. What happens when the train is delayed or they are on strike?
Will she be able to stay for any outside of school things?

How did you both feel at the two schools?
Does your dc have a preference?

melodybear · 29/10/2020 12:16

Thank you, that's kind of what I was thinking.

OP posts:
pisspants · 29/10/2020 12:14

I'd go with the local option and look to get a tutor if she struggles in any particular subjects in due course