Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

What the poor really need is to go to a Military School

30 replies

noblegiraffe · 03/04/2018 14:19

...says Gavin Williamson who also has one eye on the army recruitment crisis, no doubt.

“The Tory MP has already said Armed Forces schools in deprived areas would boost the ‘life chances, confidence and self-discipline’ of youngsters.”

metro.co.uk/2018/04/02/government-backing-plans-create-military-schools-help-poor-children-7434494/

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
mathanxiety · 05/04/2018 19:05

I think there are some kids, maybe boys especially, who benefit from a strict regime, and perhaps they even need someone breathing down their neck 24/7. Some don't cope well with having lots of free time to manage themselves. Some really need the feeling of esprit de corps and some benefit from having something very concrete to kick against.

However, to imply that the problems of all the poor or underperforming are down to lack of discipline (as represented by military schools) is basically an attempt to present a narrative that blames impoverished and overstretched parents and underfunded schools for the dire academic underperformance figures, the ASBO rates, the lack of preparedness for employment of so many young people.

The real story is that parents live with the enormous stress that comes from working dead end, underpaid jobs and dealing with the welfare system as housing costs skyrocket and the owner class gets richer on their backs, schools that can't cater for the complex needs of children living in grinding poverty, and the very sorry state of both youth and adult mental health and addiction services.

mpsw · 05/04/2018 19:03

Serenity you are Sir Humphrey and I claim my £5.

Perhaps they've been watching re-runs of Bad Lads? Yes, the military experience can be the very making of some people. But it's not a panacea and I would be very wary of making this policy in general. That said, in a big conurbation, they'd probably get enough pupils. But it would be pretty dreadful for anyone who was allocated it because their actual preferences were full

KittiesInsane · 05/04/2018 18:55

I realise that you're talking about general education, but teenage DS is a part-time army musician and has learnt a huge amount that he wasn't prepared to hear from school staff or his parents - physical fitness, time management, ironing, getting up early, and how to reshape a damp woolly beret, for starters.

mathanxiety · 05/04/2018 02:01

You get the impression that deep down the Tories believe that reintroducing corporal punishment in schools would solve all the ills of society.

IntheMotherhood · 04/04/2018 22:23

Yes - the report seems a little dated now - it'll be interesting to see what fresh evidence the Tories come up with given the fact that Troops to Teachers didn't fare well. Also wonder which countries have been doing this well (and whether they are at all comparable to UK in any way).

I don't think this policy would necessarily be to provide a pipeline of kids to join the army (maybe some would join at 18)...I think the greater anticipated benefit would be for school workforce and financing issues...

You could imagine how unpopular military schools would be in certain parts of the UK. Hmm

Ylvamoon · 04/04/2018 20:23

Ha Ha it should read .... great prospects!

Ylvamoon · 04/04/2018 20:22

On the upside... I know someone (poor Hmm) who joined the military. He passed several selection processes both physically and mentally. He did his driving licence working his way up past a lorry all the way to a tank.
Firstly, it's not that easy to join up - you need to demonstrate some stamina.
Secondly, said person would never have been able to afford to learn to drive a vehicle any time soon because of his background coming from a (financially) poor family.
Thirdly, the military does offer the right person great products.
Lastly, nobody is forced to join the military...

BubblesBuddy · 04/04/2018 19:30

The military have always recruited from the poor. They used to take those who couldn’t get jobs elsewhere. Often from deprived areas and those with poor schools. No change really! Now they kill and maim soldiers and everyone knows about it, there are fewer recruits. No suriruse there either. Even the poor don’t want to get killed!

HPFA · 04/04/2018 14:31

Why do people always want to mix up the military and education?

The same reason politicians want to do most things - pretend there are easy solutions to complex problems, garner a few good headlines in the right newspapers and ignore the actual problems.

noblegiraffe · 04/04/2018 12:25

Motherhood that report hasn’t aged well. It mentions the Phoenix military school as an interesting case - the one whose free school application was rejected by the DfE. It also confidently announces that the schools could be staffed through the wonderful Troops to Teachers program and that these troops would stay longer in teaching than bog-standard teachers because they would be better at discipline. Pity the Troops to Teachers program had to be closed because no one wanted to do it!

Why do people always want to mix up the military and education? Discipline in order to get kids to learn stuff they don’t want to and discipline in order to create a fighting unit capable of defeating the enemy from people who have chosen to be there are surely two different things?

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 03/04/2018 21:16

Oh good find, Motherhood. Let’s see in September how closely the final report matches that one!

This bit was interesting:

“The teaching would be delivered by graduates qualified to teach in the normal manner initially recruited into the Reserves’ through University Officer Training Corps (and Naval and Air equivalents), as well as teachers who subsequently choose to join the Reserve Forces. Suitably qualified or experienced ex-regular service personnel would also be a vital part of the staff. Civilian teaching staff who express support for this unique approach founded in a military ethos should also be able to join.”

Because recruiting bog standard teachers isn’t hard enough!

OP posts:
IntheMotherhood · 03/04/2018 21:00

Looks like Gavin had dusted this report off...
I went straight to the conclusion and the three level headings are;

  • revitalising the reserves
  • rescuing the young
  • helping society

[reaches for chilled glass of wine]

www.respublica.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/jnw_ResPublica-Military-Academies.pdf

mathanxiety · 03/04/2018 20:36

It's 1897 again.

noblegiraffe · 03/04/2018 19:38

An application for a free school in Oldham to be run by former military personnel was rejected by the DfE in 2012. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-18832576

Can’t make their minds up.

OP posts:
Ivebeenaroundtheblock · 03/04/2018 19:13

In my experience starting out (once you’ve completed secondary) is difficult. Getting an apprenticeship if you have no connections or live in an area that doesn’t support apprenticeships makes it harder. If you have no exposure to employment options it’s hard to know what you want to do.
As with all things youth who have financial and family support often have other options, or enter later after some education at officer level.

IntheMotherhood · 03/04/2018 19:07

I'm looking forward to seeing what the evidence gathering says!

Is this to meet a School financial sponsor need? Or an anticipated skills shortage in combat and non combat recruitment? Is this soft entry towards returning to national service? Why target poor kids?

I suspect Gavin W probably doesn't know either.

Sprinklesinmyelbow · 03/04/2018 19:01

Surely the military have made it clear, for many years now, that they want professional service men and women and not to be a safety net for those with no other prospects

It’s not as though countries with national service don’t have any poor people is it?

Mind you my BF didn’t do national service ina country that had it. He’s gay, and his dad never shuts up about how if he’d done service he would’ve been “sorted out”

From being gay? 😂 what are the army going to do about that?

Ylvamoon · 03/04/2018 18:57

What the poor really need is to go to a Military School...
and all the other members of the "Snowflake Generation"! Shock

nursy1 · 03/04/2018 18:56

It smacks a little too much of “ poor blaming” as in “ military service will sort them out” like they are trouble makers.
NO Gavin, money and equal life chances would sort them out!
I have worked in the military and seen them do wonderful things for kids from troubled backgrounds, but it’s not the answer for every poor kid. For every one that gets a sense of belonging another fails and feels even more on the margins.

AlonsoTigerHeart · 03/04/2018 18:51

Ahhh use the thick poor as cannon fodder

noblegiraffe · 03/04/2018 18:51

military service is a good option for some

I’m sure it is. I just wonder why it’s considered as a good option specifically for the poor.

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 03/04/2018 18:50

The Duke of York’s Military Academy is 40% girls.

What the article doesn’t mention is that it’s a boarding school. I expect it is easier to set up a ‘military ethos’ when you can control every aspect of their lives.

So are they suggesting that poor kids need to be sent to boarding school on top of military discipline?

OP posts:
Ivebeenaroundtheblock · 03/04/2018 18:48

military service is a good option for some, and certainly needs to be promoted as an honorable option. where i live the military programs often are a little different than the national apprenticeship standards (for electrical technician for example) and are not exactly transferable after you have completed your service. that could be improved.
i would also like to see a service stream dedicated to non combat (say boarder control or emergency response) that might improve uptake.

Dolphincrossing · 03/04/2018 14:58

Just for boys, or for girls too?

BexleyRae · 03/04/2018 14:57

I hate the suggestions of military school or national service. I was in the army and have family still serving. Serving in the armed forces is not a punishment, its a bloody hard job for people who want to be there.