Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Zero Tolerance, No Excuses...what should happen to pupils who can’t behave?

207 replies

noblegiraffe · 17/03/2018 13:09

There are an increasing number of schools across the country adopting ‘No Excuses’ behaviour policies where the slightest misdemeanour is cracked down on and punished. Children are removed from the classroom and isolated if they break the rules. The level of expulsions is creeping up.

A tribunal has just criticised a school for putting its zero tolerance behaviour policy above the education of a child with special needs.
The student has ADHD and epilepsy, the behaviour policy was applied rigidly and the school now has to issue a letter of apology to the student for its failure to make reasonable adjustments.

www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/academy-put-zero-tolerance-policy-above-pupils-education-tribunal

Do you think that schools should be allowed to have zero tolerance?

OP posts:
Starlight2345 · 18/03/2018 00:01

Reading this post scares the life out of me . My son with ADHD is going to secondary school in September.

He tries very hard to behave , is a sociable boy and has a high Iq, loves learning but fidgets, doesn’t listen to instructions properly at times, and sometimes it is all too much .
He already has low self esteem. Handled well he does really well, handled badly he will be far more disruptive.

noblegiraffe · 17/03/2018 23:54

I haven't come across a school with a zero tolerance policy on behaviour

Me either, but I understand that it is becoming a ‘thing’ in education.

The school that ended up at the tribunal clearly meant zero tolerance when they said zero tolerance. The kid with ADHD was expelled so it’s not like they’ll actually have to make adjustments for him, just apologise for not doing so.

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 17/03/2018 23:49

But then that’s not a zero tolerance behaviour policy, it’s just a behaviour policy. You can’t say ‘no excuses...except Tourettes, ADHD, recent trauma...’

If these zero tolerance schools are putting off students with SEN from attending, then that increases the burden on surrounding schools too. Remember the first £6000 of any SEN intervention has to come from the schools own funds.

OP posts:
tiggytape · 17/03/2018 23:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GreenTulips · 17/03/2018 23:43

Well aren't you talking about zero tolerance for the majority and an individual behaviour plan for those with additional needs?

DS for example can not hear or understand complex instructions if they are in a noisy environment - if the teacher doesn't get his attention first he may appear disobedient or rude and get a behaviour mark, - it's invisabel

AlexanderHamilton · 17/03/2018 23:37

I wish all teachers were as questioning as you noble.

Onceuponatimethen · 17/03/2018 23:37

I think tiggy the problems often arise from two issues:

There are many pupils who do not come with a neat disibility label and have no dx. Often there will be no agreement by a school that they merit an adjustment

One school’s reasonable adjustment is another’s unreasonable

noblegiraffe · 17/03/2018 23:32

Ah whereas I’m thinking that a school cannot have a zero tolerance policy and make reasonable adjustments which allow some tolerance for some pupils.

OP posts:
tiggytape · 17/03/2018 23:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Onceuponatimethen · 17/03/2018 23:13

I completely agree with your questions

Onceuponatimethen · 17/03/2018 23:12

That was to tiggy not you noble

Onceuponatimethen · 17/03/2018 23:12

It is always going to be a balancing act. My dc is v timid, so if another child in future were to have anger issues and is receiving help with those of course my child will find any shouting etc hard.

This is not a reason for the child struggling with anger not to be there and have reasonable adjustments made.

noblegiraffe · 17/03/2018 23:07

But if the school cannot accommodate the reasonable adjustment, then what happens to that child? That’s where I’m not following you.

OP posts:
tiggytape · 17/03/2018 22:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

noblegiraffe · 17/03/2018 22:40

Tiggy I don’t think I understand your comment here then:

If you cut some slack for one child as part of reasonable adjustment, you are going against what is best for another child who also needs reasonable adjustment for a quieter and calmer environment.

So you’re saying that you should cut some slack for the child with ADHD despite that being potentially distracting for the other child? I was confused when you then went on to say that low level disruption should not be tolerated.

OP posts:
Floottoot · 17/03/2018 22:34

Exactly, Onceupon. Schools have to acknowledge that a child has specific issues to begin with, and our experience is that very often they don't unless a pupil has a statement or the equivalent, which accounts for the minority of SEN children.

I notice from the comments on the article Noble linked to that there is still a feeling that issues like ADHD are "alleged diagnoses" , ie an excuse for bad behaviour.

AlexanderHamilton · 17/03/2018 22:33

Reasonable adjustments ds’s Previous school refused to make:

Giving Homa double sided red/green card so the teacher could see when he was overwhelmed & needed to take a minute

Allowing him to eat somewhere other than the dining room

Allowing him to eat according to his sensory issues (eg not allowing plain pasta without sauce or chips without chicken pieces or plain rice & veggies) but allowing free reign to buy as many cakes/crisps as he wanted.

Not making allowances for his slow processing apart from 25% extra time. Eg he had 90 mins homework per day that took him 2.5-3 hours. We suggested in subjects like maths answering every other question.

Giving numerous detentions for rudeness (when he was being literal) or poor organisation.

Onceuponatimethen · 17/03/2018 22:27

Tiggy sadly I don’t think all schools actually make the reasonable adjustments as examples on here show

tiggytape · 17/03/2018 22:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Onceuponatimethen · 17/03/2018 22:24

Oh I am so so sorry pie Flowers

piebarm · 17/03/2018 22:08

My autistic child had a break down and has developed long term issues with her mental health after attending a school with a zero tolerance policy

There are no special school options for academically able children with asd in my area and the 3 nearest secondaries are part of the same MAT so have the same behaviour policy

Knowing what I know know I would have moved house to get her into a different school

The pressure of never being allowed to make a mistake meant that she was petrified of going to school and incapable of asking for help because saying you couldn't do the homework was treated the same as not doing the homework because you couldn't be bothered -you were punished for it

Catgotyourbrain · 17/03/2018 21:31

This sort of thing makes my blood run cold. Seriously.

DS has ADHD. It’s controlled by medication and he’s a clever and imaginative boy.

He’s also left with anxiety and immaturity due to delays in diagnosis and management. He hasn’t mastered public transport and live a bit further from school than many pupils. Schools is hot on late detentions but I have had a proper dialogue with them about encouraging him to go on public transport (which can sometimes be late due to distance) and they have cut him slack. Unfortunately a little too late as he’s gone backwards and won’t get the bus at the moment, but if they were zero tolerance he would be in a massive problem by now. (And I would have been ‘that’ patent for two terms). What about the kids who’s parents aren’t set up to be ‘that’ parent and fight their DCs corner

tiggytape · 17/03/2018 21:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Floottoot · 17/03/2018 21:20

It's desperate, isn't it? DD and her friend were only 12 at the time. She called us to say her mum had gathered up a load of pills and had driven off. We called the police and they suggested we look after the girl, rather than involve SS. If you could have seen her packing her bag so carefully, with clean uniform and even dental floss - it broke my heart. Her older sister continued to live with the mother but was expelled from the same school less than 6months later...for having the wrong colour hair.
When we brought up the subject of DD's friend and what had happened with the head of key stage, who was also SENCo AND deputy head, she replied that the girl was a liar and trouble and we should keep DD away from her. Previously, the girl had told DD and another friend that her mum had hit her, leaving bruises. DD and the other friend reported it to a teacher and the school's response was to call the mother and ask her if it was true - mother denied it so the school decided the girl was lying.

The school in question gets glowing inspection reports.

HeidioftheAlps · 17/03/2018 21:20

Ionacat's example sounds good

Swipe left for the next trending thread