Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Does your STATE school ask for a regular donation?

83 replies

TeenTimesTwo · 24/02/2018 11:11

Prompted by some of the feedback on the what are London state schools really like.

I am wondering how commonplace it is for schools to ask for regular donations, and how much this varies by school type, area, or whatever. Part of me thinks DD's school might be missing a trick, and part of me thinks it is nice that people aren't being pressured.

So, if anyone would care to answer the following I'd be interested. The bits in are my suggestions, feel free to add any categories I've forgotten:

Type of school:

Is school part of an academy:
Type of area:

Contribution:

Your views:

My DD's school is:

Comp, non faith
Single convertor academy
Prosperous small town
£0 contribution requested

I think they should consider asking for something like 'If you feel you can afford it we would like to ask for contributions from parents, perhaps £500 if you think you may be in the top 10% of wealth in our school, £200 if you are in the 10-20%, and £20 if you are in the 20-50%'

With 1000 parents that could nett (100x£500+100x£200+300x£20)=£76k. Wow that's a lot! Perhaps I'm pitching too high.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
MarigoldGloveHotel · 27/02/2018 00:02

I would immediately on receiving such an envelope make a formal complaint to the chair of governors as to how this is being allowed to happen. It is bullying.

Yup, it's bullying. You choose your battles and await your youngest child to turn 11 with this school admissions . And. Keep. Thinking. Happy. Thoughts.

Astronotus · 26/02/2018 23:43

MarigoldLoveHotel. This is the post I made earlier:
There are Dept of Ed rules as to how a UK school should act in asking for donations, such as "The governing body or head teacher must make it clear to parents that there is no obligation to make any contribution". Also, "When making requests for voluntary contributions, parents must not be made to feel pressurised into paying as it is voluntary and not compulsory. Schools should avoid sending colour coded letters to parents as a reminder to make payments and direct debit or standing order mandates should not be sent to parents when requesting contributions." I complained to the Dept of Ed and got the direct debit forms posted to parents stopped."

Marigold - your school is not allowed to send reminders in this way. You can complain to the Dept of Ed, Ofsted and the EFSA. You can state that you wish to remain anonymous and they will speak to the school without using your name. In your position I'd do this, but don't tell the other parents, keep it to yourself. You'll be doing all the parents at that school a favour and the school will have to think of another way to raise funds that is within the rules.

newmummycwharf1 · 26/02/2018 23:22

@donquix precisely as @yvest said. Not to derail the thread but employees do pay 45% and to suggest the only way to fund public services are to increase this rate is simply picking on a small proportion of society, many of whom (not all by any means) make alot of sacrifices to enable this amount of gain. And their current higher rate is a significant proportion of the public purse.

I do think letters can put undue pressure on families that can't afford donations.

I say as a society we aim for higher wages and more people in work, to fund the quality of life we desire (excellent free education and health)

MarigoldGloveHotel · 26/02/2018 21:49

I suppose it's the office staff who produce the list of non-payers and stuff the envelopes Tiggy. I'd imagine the SMT and governors would have a list or how can they tell who has paid and who hasn't? There must be list of who has paid for class trips, isn't this similar?

The class teachers don't necessarily know what's in the envelopes. Although as it's been going on a whiles do some of the teachers and TAs are also parents at the school I think it's an open secret.

Tbh I was a but surprised at receiving the first "non-payment" letter. I suppose I'd assumed all the voluntary contributions would be anonymised-the school would know how much money they had but not who have it. I don't know why I thought that though.

admission · 26/02/2018 21:37

That is so wrong and just shows how out of touch with reality some schools become.
I would immediately on receiving such an envelope make a formal complaint to the chair of governors as to how this is being allowed to happen. It is bullying.

TalkinPeace · 26/02/2018 20:58

When the parents don't pay the child gets handed an envelope with their name on to give to their parents. In that envelope is a reminder to pay the voluntary contribution. This happens each term.
I'd love to know how that complies with data protection
as teachers SHOULD NOT know about the finances of parents

MarigoldGloveHotel · 26/02/2018 19:07

I agree Teen.

TeenTimesTwo · 26/02/2018 18:59

When the parents don't pay the child gets handed an envelope with their name on to give to their parents. In that envelope is a reminder to pay the voluntary contribution. This happens each term.

That's just all shades of wrong.

One request of the type 'if it is possible please .... but if you can't or don't wish to then fine' per year is about all I think would be acceptable.

OP posts:
MarigoldGloveHotel · 26/02/2018 18:52

When the parents don't pay the child gets handed an envelope with their name on to give to their parents. In that envelope is a reminder to pay the voluntary contribution. This happens each term.

The letter's are written to tug at our heart strings and the method of personal reminders is nigh on bullying to my mind. I'm sure some of them have been on different coloured paper, so "colour coded" which the admissions policy doesn't allow.

It's such a waste of admin time as of course these parents haven't forgotten, they are not paying for whatever reason. Everyone knows what these letters contain and most of them end up torn to pieces in the school bin.

It's really not a way to form a positive home-school partnership.

Sort your finances out, be less friendly with the (I consider to be ) money-grabbing church and show me you can understand the financial implications of various decisions and I would be more inclined to pay.

allpurpose · 26/02/2018 17:49

Type of school: secondary academy
Is school part of an academy: part of a small MAT
Type of area: prosperous London suburb
Contribution: They suggest £15pcm. We pay £30 pcm via DH's workplace giving scheme - but it comes out of his pre-tax income so it only actually costs us £18 pcm. Plus, his employer doubles any charitable contributions so the school end up getting £60 pcm! We'll double that when DS2 starts there.

They make it very clear what they spend the money on - extra-curricular stuff rather than core teaching. They have a good range of after-school activities and they're all free, whereas at other local schools most of the activities cost money if they're run by external providers.

Some other local schools ask for £30pcm, which they use to prop up the general budget, and one (super selective grammar) in the next borough asks for £45pcm.

Slimefactory · 26/02/2018 08:39

Academy
Affluent area of London
Monthly donations by direct debit encouraged. Lowest suggested sum £5 and highest £75.
Not sure how many pay, I expect half. I don’t.

ReelingLush18 · 26/02/2018 06:59

At the end of the day it's the governments job to fund schools, if not they soon find people will vote them out Not if they don't use those schools in the first place. And I wonder who many voters (with children beyond school education age) consider it when they're deciding who to vote for, even the socially aware ones?

user1471450935 · 25/02/2018 23:06

Some asked if you can find out how schools spend it's income, think it used to be on Ofsted, especially PP premiums.
Interesting how schools in London with much higher income/pupil ask for highest donations.
Like I said above on first page, we don't get asked, too many parents fall into BlueDogLead's position.
But we do have to give £2 for bus travel to sports fixtures, buy revision guides and even pay for travel to GCSE/A level field day trip (even though the government says you shouldn't)
Many parents/students return revision guides back after exams, so the poor families can have them for free.
Like I said the school and it's students raise funds for two girls to attend secondary school in Africa, we get yearly updates, first two we met in 2012, DS1 yr8, are now training to be a doctor for her town and other is already teaching back at her school. They have also raised £10000 in a decade for Teenage Cancer trust, much happy to contribute to those funds.
At the end of the day it's the governments job to fund schools, if not they soon find people will vote them out

spacecadet48 · 25/02/2018 15:29

My DS attends a London junior non faith school in a very nice area which asks for a voluntary donation of approx £80 a year. This goes towards helping those that cant afford the various trips and music lessons etc which I think is money well spent and very happy to contribute. Would happily pay more if it helped those that cant afford it.

Theworldisfullofidiots · 25/02/2018 13:44

iwantawhippet

Our primary gets about £2.7 K per child. Every year we've managed to balance our budget or get a small surplus. We've manage to fund improvements to the fabric of the school through applying for grants (which take a long time rather than asking parents). We've always struggled financially and always cut our cloth accordingly. It's ridiculous in our area that many schools cannot afford their own headteacher but have to share with a partner school. It does not make for a better more efficient primary. It makes for worse results.

whensitmyturn · 25/02/2018 13:21

Faith primary

Asks for contribution of £15 per child per year

donquixotedelamancha · 25/02/2018 13:20

If only! When You’re on PAYE you pay the full rate of tax same as everyone else

Yes, I know. My point was:

  1. Most rich people do not pay 45% of their whole income .
  2. For very rich people who have such a big income (millions) that their rate should effectively be 45% a very large proportion make sure they are not on PAYE for the whole amount e.g. setting self up as company. Obviously some people pay almost 45% on their whole income.
LoniceraJaponica · 25/02/2018 13:16

Secondary comprehensive in rural market town - mostly students from "naice" areas

Last two ofsted reports were Good

Over 80% 5 A* - C including English and maths GCSE results

Extremely underfunded until very recently - a concerted fairer funding campaign from the parents, SLT, local MP, being featured on local and national TV has resulted in more funds being allocated to the school

The school has never asked for donations from any parent (while DD has been there anyway)

No PTA and no other fundraising for the school by parents has taken place while DD has been there

Obviously school trips have to be paid for by the parents, but that is normal

Astronotus · 25/02/2018 13:05

Admission. Thank you for your post., I completely agree with you. In my opinion our school had poor financial management over a long period and refused to consider making changes to the extremely high, over 90%, costs of staffing. Parents' donations do hide the real problems beneath the surface in some cases. However many schools are well run and are desperate for extra funds, although I notice locally that these are the schools asking for lower amounts.

Bluedoglead. Thank you for your input and for adding balance to this discussion. I wholeheartedly agree with you that the letters should not be sent.

AveEldon · 25/02/2018 12:37

The school I'm hoping for on 1 March asks for £50 pa
2000 kids = £100K extra a year

Bluedoglead · 25/02/2018 12:10

Fuel in the car. Every ten miles costs me roughly £1. Maybe £1.10. Can you imagine how that feels? Before you decide if you’re going somewhere you factor in the fuel cost and if you can afford the extra £2.20 on top of your weekly budget.

This is a good month. I get paid tomorrow and I have £32.33 left in my bank account, about £25 in my purse and I don’t need any groceries.

Where am I magicking extra money from? The demands are DESIGNED to tug the heart strings. To make people donate. That’s the point of them.

TeenTimesTwo · 25/02/2018 12:07

Slack I agree that the method you had would be shocking. The teachers shouldn't know who has donated, and the child should not need to be involved in the process at all. If donations are going to happen it should stay between the school and the admin/finance team.

On the whole with this thread I think I've been swayed most by Admission's argument that asking for donations 'stops' schools from managing their budgets effectively and 'hides' the issues of under funding. Plus the arguments from Blue and many others regarding feeling pressured to pay when asked, even if people can ill afford it.

So I think I've gone from being 'pro' asking for parental donations to against.

Though unless parental donations were banned I don't see how schools in more affluent areas are going to stop 'unfairly' benefitting from them.

OP posts:
Bluedoglead · 25/02/2018 12:06

Think about it.

Your budget is done to the PENNY. a request for £1 for a non-uniform day has you panicking. Needing a specific gcse calculator at £12 means you have to figure out what’s being cut elsewhere.

But you want a different life for your kids. And one has been lucky enough to get to the grammar. And you desperately want him to fit in and make the most of his opportunity so you want him to be the same as everyone else.

But some of his friends won’t come round because council house. And he gets bullied for the wrong bag. And Lidl lunch box stuff.

And then you get a letter asking for £££ a month. And here’s what all we do with it - like it or not you will put pressure on people like me.

TeenTimesTwo · 25/02/2018 12:00

Sorry Blue I really really don't mean to.

I'm just trying to understand why you think asking for people to self-grade their donations is worse than asking people for donations they can't afford. And your answer made sense when I thought about what I have read about why some people avoid second hand uniform.

On the face of it, it doesn't seem obvious that people should feel more offended by being told they aren't being asked for a donation than being asked for one when they can't afford it. But obviously it does make sense to you so there is clearly something I'm missing.

I might not be asking is a good touchy-feely way as I'm not very good at that, but I am aware I live in my own 'bubble' and I'm genuinely trying to understand others' points of view.

OP posts:
SlackPanther · 25/02/2018 11:10

Filling in tne donation form was in the Induction booklet that Dc worked through with a teacher as part of the Induction Interview.

I would have felt IMMENSE pressure to contribute, or intense anxiety at the idea of Dc going into that interview with the ‘no donation’ box ticked.

Though I would perhaps have ticked the ‘donation made online ‘ box as a lie if we couldn’t have afforded it.

Informal means testing or making donations look in any way ‘opt out’ rather than ‘opt in’ is shocking.

The very purpose of our state education system is to ensure an educated society, regardless of individual circumstances.