Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

English Baccalaureat

79 replies

GettinTrimmer · 01/05/2016 20:05

I was reading a thread earlier on and someone said their dc are in an outstanding secondary school that is offering a more varied range of subjects to study, they are not just sticking to the EBacc.

My ds goes to an outstanding state secondary - he is OK with EBacc subjects and would be delighted if he could also do history (Religious Studies GCSE is compulsory), but if things stay the same my dd won't be able to do Art and PE, she's great at both, year 7 in September.

I am just wondering what the consequences for the school would be if they were to ignore the EBacc and offer more choice. I know they would not be high in the league tables. Out of interest, does anybody know if this would also threaten their outstanding status and funding etc?

OP posts:
EdithWeston · 01/05/2016 21:32

I thought EBACC was moving to Progress8?

Also, timetable clash between particular pairs of subjects is almost invariably because of the individual school's timetabling choices and limitations. And there were, in some schools, impossible subject combinations long before EBACC was ever dreamed of.

eyebrowse · 01/05/2016 21:26

I am not sure this government will last much beyond the EU referendum however I am also not sure that anything better will come a long to replace it...

PonderingProsecco · 01/05/2016 20:26

Really? Compulsory? Hope not.....

noblegiraffe · 01/05/2016 20:23

Ebacc is supposedly compulsory for all students from this Y7. It was in the conservative manifesto.