Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

City vs Forest vs Belmont?

38 replies

chicagogirl · 17/10/2015 12:46

We are in the process of applying for City Boys, Belmont/Mill Hill and Forest at 11+. The number applying for the small number of spaces is just absurd and only North Bridge house seems to be a sure thing. I know everyone takes more than one but I'm trying to ascertain how difficult it is to get into Belmont & Forest as my son really likes both. City extremely selective as far as I can see! Help!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Twisties · 16/02/2020 22:32

@chicagogirl I'd love to know how it worked out for you too :) also info/experience on the school your DS is attending would be super helpful!

worriedandstressedAAA · 08/11/2018 11:21

Chicagogirl, where did your DS end up? I am interested in these schools for DS.

thankgoditsover · 03/11/2015 08:32

I can't remember exactly, but I'm pretty certain he wasn't a 5 for writing. He stuck on a high 4 for ages and couldn't quite add enough to go higher. The knack of over writing (and it is over writing - cramming in adjectives, adverbs, metaphors etc) came v last minute (Christmas!).
Maths was different, he was just about a 5 at the end of y4.
So not a genius at all, especially in comparison to mn kids. Why not go for ucs or Highgate in addition (whichever you prefer) as I don't think 4 exams is excessive. And don't write off Highgate woods, I hear great things about it and it's a shame the families at your primary aren't putting more faith into their local school (are results so dissimilar to Fortismere?).

chicagogirl · 02/11/2015 19:41

Thankgoditsover
Can you tell me roughly what level your boy was at the end of year 5- I'm assuming for these schools you must be a 5c or 5b going into Year 6?

OP posts:
squeaver · 02/11/2015 10:32

No rugby at Highgate, just to make your choice easier.

Dustylaw · 01/11/2015 21:01

For what it's worth, I went to Mill Hill for a rugby match recently. Lovely buildings and grounds (just amazing for still being in London) and college work staff very polite and helpful with directions, as were the pupils. Good game - no nastiness or bad behaviour so that is a good sign. Interesting displays on the corridor boards etc - OK, it coincided with the Founders Day or some such but it was a good show for that and more importantly felt good. There are some schools where the staff seem quite indifferent as to whether you can find a loo or find the sports pitches and I think it tells you a lot about the place when staff/caretakers take the time to show you or direct you. Slightly different point - also some supposed boarding schools where you won't find anyone to ask on a Saturday afternoon. Anyway, I thought that Mill Hill looked like thumbs up and the new head, Frances King, is a capable and interesting head who should do good things. Just to add that we know someone who goes to Forest and he and his parents are happy but if you want rugby (he is cricket mainly) then Mill Hill. Wouldn't worry too much over the results vs City because City have the pick from everywhere that can commute into the City (huge, obviously) and the trade off on sport is that they do mostly indoor sport or what can be done with playing fields a 30 to 40 minute drive away - this isn't a dig at City which is a great school but just different ie it is a different experience.

nightsky010 · 30/10/2015 23:25

Ps. I don't think he won't get in to Highgate / UCS, just that so many people try that you really can't count on it by a long way.

nightsky010 · 30/10/2015 23:24

glad you've chosen MTS, Belmont, Forest. I'd be tempted to add in NBH as another backup? Or You could always try your luck with one of Highgate / UCS? 3 schools doesn't seem like enough to apply to IMHO.

chicagogirl · 30/10/2015 22:12

Yes so going to skip on the super-selectives and fingers crossed on MTS, Belmont, Forest! Its hard just feeling very out of control and also trying to manage my child's expectations. What do I do if he does all this prep and doesn't get a place anywhere?

OP posts:
chicagogirl · 30/10/2015 22:09

Highgate woods is our local. Sadly of the 14 boys in my sons current class only 2 families have stayed. The rest have moved for APS. Or Fortismere. I'm not opposed to it in theory but would just like more organised sports teams onsite. This will be key to keeping my child out of trouble.

OP posts:
thankgoditsover · 30/10/2015 20:52

I feel awful that I've given the impression that you need a boy genius to be offered a place at City/Highgate/ucs. Mine really isn't and nor are his new school mates. I completely shared your pessimism and v nearly didn't put in the applications as I couldn't face the rejection.

Anyway, he was offered two of the three and although he's v strong in one subject, he is also v careless.

I'd add that he developed a lot during the process. He was definitely average bright in y5 and then came on a long way.

But if you're in crouch end, are you not considering Highgate woods? The reason we only did three, pretty selective, schools is that we weren't totally sold on private in the first place.

chicagogirl · 30/10/2015 17:38

Yes sports key for my boy. I'd say he's sports obsessed and very good but not county level or anything like that.

If I'm being honest, while I adore City as a school we are only applying as 3 members of my husband's family have graduated from there. DH very keen for him to go but it's not right for him.
I personally love MTS & Belmont for the sport and academics but Belmont has so many children apply, I can't see how they even choose!
Forest is brilliant- loved but no rugby.
NBH great back-up but no sports? Anyone know about sports at NBH.
I'm a totally normal rational person and I've managed to get myself into such a tizz! I need to get a grip!
But what if he doesn't get a place anywhere?

OP posts:
nightsky010 · 30/10/2015 00:03

I would not say MTS is a backup for the above mentioned academic schools - I'd say it's on a par more or less with UCS etc academically but with fewer applying so perhaps more statistical chance. I'd say MTS is viewed more as a backup for Harrow due to its location?? I may not be the best person to ask though.

Belmont MH is definitely a backup for the academic ones above. You're lucky they've abolished Saturday lessons! Brilliant campus and sports.

So what's your latest list? Aldenham & NBH as backups, Belmont in the middle and Forest & MTS for preference?

scabby1 · 29/10/2015 23:51

Highgate has about 80-90 places for year 7 entry, City around 50-52.

City, UCS and Highgate-chances are that if you are offered a place at one of them you'll be offered a place at all of them.

City has no Rugby. If your Ds loves Rugby, I think this is another reason to cross it off your list.

Good luck Chicagogo.

chicagogirl · 29/10/2015 19:30

Sorry I meant top sets.

OP posts:
chicagogirl · 29/10/2015 19:03

Yes both NorthBridge & Aldenham will be our back up schools.

I know Highgate UCS and City are all too academic and more importantly oversubscribed for my little love.

I just assume that many people use Belmont & MTS As backup for the above mentioned schools. Also MTS only have 340 sit, with 220 given an interview then 170 offers for 50-60 places. So odds not terrible? It's just if my kid's levels ( above national average but not too set) are good enough. Most kids in too set at our school are 5c at the end of year 5.

I don't want to make him take exams for no reason. I think I better ring the admissions people and go from there.

It seems easier for girls. He is an academic child but just not wildly so. He values sporty, extra-curricular greatly.
I think Forest might be a winner. We went to the open day and loved it. It's not quite on the radar yet....yet!

OP posts:
nightsky010 · 29/10/2015 17:23

The "normally" bright non gifted kids don't appear to exist in London Preps ;-) There are many (too many) kids in London with very pushy parents with a lot of money who will do whatever it takes, and have been planning from conception. (Apparently you have to conceive at the right time of year to make sure DC will be a September / October / November birthday so eldest in year!...... My jaw dropped when I heard that!!)

Merchant Taylor's and Aldenham are leagues apart academically. Really a very long way. Id say if you're even thinking about the other schools of the Highgate/ merchant Taylor's sort of calibre as a half realistic prospect then you're not an Aldenham person!

Mill Hill would be a better school for academics than Aldenham.

If you think Highgate / city, UCS are waaaay out of your league I'd say Merchant Taylor's would be tough too. I could be wrong, but I think they want 65% at Commin Entrance (8 subjects) which I'd say is a high B, but within a fairly demanding curriculum. Do check on entry requirements though, in case I'm wrong.

If DC is pretty normal think Mill Hill sounds like an excellent choice with Aldenham as a backup if something goes wrong?

chicagogirl · 29/10/2015 14:38

Thanks ladies!

That is amazing information! Yes I assumed City, Highgate UCS very competitive- where are all these little geniuses coming from??? Based on this advise may pass on City, Highgate & USC as they don't seem possible.

My son wants a rugby school and opportunities for swimming which Mill Hill have. I recently been told about Merchant Taylor's which has a bus coming through Crouch End but a bit of a schlep. Does anyone know about how tough it is to get into?

I just wonder where all the not gifted and talented, but bright above average kids go? It's very distressing. I like what I hear more and more about Aldenham but no rugby or pool! Honestly!

Any advice on Merchant Taylor's much appreciated!

OP posts:
Needanadulttotalkto · 29/10/2015 04:22

Thnkgoditsover

Assuming you're right on the numbers then I'd totally agree.

thankgoditsover · 25/10/2015 12:25

I'd argue that City is easier to get into than either UCS or Highgate by dint of numbers - they've got so many more spaces to offer.

Having said that I know people who've been offered places at one but not the other two in each of them (but more who've been offered all three or nothing). I don't think any of them can be used as 'back-ups'. UCS def harder than St. Albans - there's only 20 something places at 11.

Needanadulttotalkto · 24/10/2015 02:50

Hi, regarding the schools you've mentioned:

City - probably the third most sought after school in London after Westminster & St Pauls. Very tough entry. If Belmont MH is 'more at DC's level' I'd not even bother with City.

Habadashers - roughly as hard to get into at City, especially in the last couple of years. Very pressured. Amazing campus!

St Albans - nearly as hard as Habs. Not renowned for good pastoral care, so I have been told. A lot of people apple to it along with Habs.

Forest, Bancrofts, St Edwards - I dont know much about these. Not as famous as any of the above. Forest appears more academic than Belmont though, going by league tables.

Highgate - about as difficult as St Albans to get in to, I believe. Stunning school!

University College School - slightly easier than Highgate to get into. All boys. Great facilities. Another really amazing school you should consider.

Belmont Mill Hill - they select pupils from just above average upwards. Best facilities and grounds that far in to London. Would certainly be a great choice for a sporty boy. Lovely school! Becoming very popular.

North Bridge House - i imagine entry is a bit like Mill Hill?? Not too sure what academics are like, but an awful lot of parents were very unhappy with the school a couple of years ago due to management issues. Plenty of Mumsnet threads on this topic!

Aldenham - lowest academic results of any of these schools, but an absolutely lovely place to go. Great campus and pastoral care apparently cannot be faulted. I have never heard a bad word about the school.

Hope that helps!

chicagogirl · 21/10/2015 00:32

Thank you so very much! On my way to the site now! You are a star!

OP posts:
HeighHoghItsBacktoWorkIGo · 20/10/2015 20:24

Go here: www.elevenplusexams.co.uk/forum/11plus/index.php

You will find old threads with lots of gossip and details. Just remember that people often shorten Merchant Taylor's to MTS, so you might have to search on that.

chicagogirl · 20/10/2015 19:47

Yes I am new to this. This is the first time we have done the 11+ and I'm American which makes it harder as I don't know my GCSE from my O level- or is it A level!?

Yes 4 sounds reasonable. I appreciate I'm bouncing around a bit here but does anyone know anything about Merchant Taylor's? My friends son loves it, it's got rugby and swimming and although it's selective it doesn't seem insanely so. Any thoughts?

OP posts:
HeighHoghItsBacktoWorkIGo · 20/10/2015 08:00

Chicagogirl you seem new to all this Smile. So was I. I found the 11+ Forum very useful for picking up opinions, gossip and tips, beyond what I could get at my children's school gates. They are a little crazy over there, but you might find a skim through some of the boards focussing on your geographic area helpful.

My own DD took 4 exams. This was a lot for kids in our area. The children in DD's class took 2 or 3. My understanding is that this would be as nothing for DC in west London who are taking 7 or more routinely. (I am going on hearsay here.)

Interestingly, the two DC who only took 2 exams, got no offers. The fact that Forest is turning DC down now who would have certainly had offers 5 years ago means a lot of families in my area are now sitting St Edmunds as a backup. Or out and out preferring it, if they want a less competitive school experience overall. Or they may have large families and want to choose a school where they feel certain all their DC will be accepted.

Surely you should do this like US college applications: 1 stretch school, 1 safety school, and then about three likely schools.