Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

The most Socially Selective schools in England.

316 replies

smokepole · 31/12/2014 21:46

Here is a list of the most socially selective state schools in England , total no of pupils entitled to free school meals over the last six years. Dept Of Education Characteristics

  1. Cranbrook School Kent 5
  2. Borlase Grammar Bucks 5
  3. Bishop Words Wilts 7
  4. Pate's Grammar Gloucs 8
  5. Colchester Royal Essex 10
  6. Caistor Grammar Lincs 10
  7. King Edward Louth Lincs 10
  8. Adams Grammar Shrop 11
  9. Colchester High Essex 12
  10. Kendrick Grammar Berks 12
  11. Dr Challinor High Bucks 12
12. Alyesbury Gram Bucks 13 12. Beaconsfield High Bucks 13 12. Newport High Shrop 13 15. Stratford Gram Warks 14 15.Skinners Sch Kent 14 17.Chelmsford High Essex 15 17. Judd Sch Kent 15 17. St Olaves Kent 15 20. Alcester Gram Warks 16 21. Tonbridge Gram Kent 17 22. Kegs Chelms Essex 19 22. Lancaster Girls Lancs 19 24. Skipton High Yorks 20 24. Tunbridge W Gir Kent 20 26 Hockerill Anglo Essex 21 27. Ripon Gram Yorks 22 27. Ermysteds Yorks 22 29. Altrincham Boys Ches 23 30. St Bernards Slough Berks 24
OP posts:
BrendaBlackhead · 02/01/2015 16:49

There are hardly any FSM pupils at dd's school. But - this is not because it is in a particularly wealthy area - it's just that most parents are employed. I get annoyed that people hold up the FSM pupil as somehow being more deserving, more worthy even than the pupil whose parents are trundling off every day to ordinary middling jobs.

Agree as well with Bonsoir - to afford to live in some of the OP's list's catchments you would have to be a seriously high earner. Viz this pile of shite that someone has actually bought in the catchment of Dr Challoner's in Amersham, Bucks:

www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-30981189.html

TalkinPeace · 02/01/2015 16:46

It costs more for a family of four to have season tickets for a premiership football team than it does to own livestock
www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29520299
and yet football does not get slagged off as exclusive

TBH its the skiing trips / teams that get my goat as that is a hobby that involves international travel so is even more exclusive

smokepole · 02/01/2015 16:44

Unaware that not any of them are available to the vast majority of children in the Uk.

OP posts:
OutwiththeOutCrowd · 02/01/2015 16:41

I have very little knowledge of matters equestrian but I did notice when DS moved from a state primary school to a prep school (only one mile away) that the pony-riding quota in his class shot right up.

If equestrianism was truly egalitarian, there would have to be members of the hoi polloi getting into the British Olympic team from time to time - but does that ever happen?

smokepole · 02/01/2015 16:39

Talkin. I went to the Farnborough Air show in July Guess what we had Marling/Stroud High Building Aeroplanes and flying in them.

That is not an opportunity open to anyone from where MoreThan lives. People talk about these opportunities on here in a very "casual" manner, unaware that any of them are unavailable to the vast majority of families or children in the U.K.

OP posts:
morethanpotatoprints · 02/01/2015 16:37

Yes, but owning a pony and riding it in a field, allowing your mates to come over and help for a ride is much different than shelling out thousands of pounds for an elite sport.
Of course there are more children with ponies in rural areas, although as i stated above there weren't any in my ds's schools. The kids that did surprisingly enough went to private schools.

However, you could say its all relative anyway. In my ds school up here a couple were chosen to play tennis and have lessons which were offered free because the dc had good coordination, don't know how they judged them better than the others though. After the free lessons the parents couldn't afford to keep up with the lessons and the kids had to stop, it was such a shame. I often thought they'd have been better not to have done it at all.

peteneras · 02/01/2015 16:32

"Panicking devotees of the magazine can nonetheless rest easy that little Rupert or Hermione are not being asked to rough it in the playgrounds of Peckham or Slough."

No more rougher than your nice and beautiful Bristol, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Sheffield or Glasgow, littleducks. And I haven’t even mentioned London, Paris or New York here! Grin

happygardening · 02/01/2015 16:31

Horses of course can be expensive to purchase but many aren't in fact I can speak from personal experience I couldn't give some of mine away.
Secondly many people have horses but don't ride them much if at all (for some weird reason) and would happily let someone ride/compete on them for free, again I couldn't even pay someone to help me exercise my lot. I would have happily let a keen child ride and compete on some of mine for free.

ArsenicFaceCream · 02/01/2015 16:29

A hacking pony costs a couple of thousand,

That isn't inclusive Talk

happygardening · 02/01/2015 16:26

I doubt many state school have equestrian facilities they probably rent or borrow them if necessary. But it is not uncommon in the world of equestrianism for riders to train separately, often with their own methods trainers etc and just come together when in a team event because there is less requirement to work together as a team than in other sports.

TalkinPeace · 02/01/2015 16:24

smokepole
You are being disingenuous.
A hacking pony costs a couple of thousand, lives in a shed in a paddock and goes to local shows in a shared horse box, or just goes out on common land at weekends.
There are ponies in back gardens of semis round here.
Pop up to Walmer way and see the cheap end of the pony market.

smokepole · 02/01/2015 16:23

"Jesus" things have changed , not so long ago it used to be a sign of "privilege" if you went to a state school that taught Latin .....

OP posts:
ArsenicFaceCream · 02/01/2015 16:19

'Sore rounds' sound sore.

Is it like Billy Elliot 'cept with 'orses?

happygardening · 02/01/2015 16:16

smoke If I could find the link I'd show you two school boys (not from affluent homes) from the north who some years ago trained an arab racing horse having saved up the money to purchase it by doing sore rounds and did jobs they keep it "hidden" on their fathers allotment, they did more paper rounds/odd jobs to pay for the cost of keeping it, they rode him themselves in races and went on to beat the big names including the Arabs themselves. The horse was awarded the most successful arab racehorse of the year.
Sadly plenty of horses are kept in inadequate conditions with owners who are doing it on a shoe string, but as I've said many farmers can keep horses and ponies relatively They certainly aren't paying 100-150k PA there isn't a farmer in the UK who'll channel that kind if money into a horse/pony!

TalkinPeace · 02/01/2015 16:11

No, but all sports offered should be accessible to all.
Mens netball?

ArsenicFaceCream · 02/01/2015 16:08

Not all sports include all pupils.
What state schools should do is try to find sports that between them include all the pupils

No, but all sports offered should be accessible to all.

Besides the cost implications of equestrian facilities are a bit worrying on a state school budget, aren't they?

smokepole · 02/01/2015 16:05

What's next a state school associating itself to a "Racing Car" team where young 14/15 year old pupils can learn to become racing drivers at a cost of £30k per season!. I bet it already happens.....

Talkinpeace. A breeder might be quite "poor" and his/her livelihood might be dependant on selling ponies or horses. (I have been friends with International Equestrian Riders so know how much it /they costs 100-150k Pa)
Seriously though In no way can anyone who is not well or very well off, even afford to stable horses feed ,pay for horse boxes or travel to local Equestrian events without having a very large disposable income indeed!.

It would though be great to see these "Princesses" get trounced by the children of the sellers from the "Appleby " horse fairs !.

OP posts:
happygardening · 02/01/2015 16:04

I can't comment on where you live arsenic but where I live which is a big farming area, primarily livestock many farmers children have ponies. Farmers children go to school and if there is enough of them to form an equestrian team representing the school what is wrong with that? Maybe they have like me when at school they have at best little and realistically no interest in hockey rounders or netball and thus feel excluded and on the edge and being part of a school equestrian team would make them feel more included. I very much doubt the school is financially contributing to the equestrian team so what's the problem with it?

morethanpotatoprints · 02/01/2015 16:04

I think that smokepole has a very valid point though and living in rural areas for 12 years and knowing the areas very well didn't know any working class/poor kids to have ponies or horses.
It was the middle classes and farmers with much land who could afford this for their dc.
So whilst it may not be rich pony club type you still had to have land and money to keep a pony.

TalkinPeace · 02/01/2015 16:00

Arsenic
Not all sports include all pupils.
What state schools should do is try to find sports that between them include all the pupils
which is why comps go for rock wall and trampolining and basketball : sports that can be enjoyed by the non sporty

if its a rural school in an agricultural area, ponies are as inclusive as swimming for example, and smell better than beef cattle

ArsenicFaceCream · 02/01/2015 15:57

smoke you are letting your uniformed prejudices get the better of you. As talkin said in rural farming areas ponies and horses are common and relatively cheap to keep. Would you say the same thing if a school in a rural community had a cattle showing team? I doubt it. Cattle can be as equally expensive to purchase as an average child's pony and like horses require land to graze of, and relatively expensive feed.

Huh? I lived in a village where the traveller DC were as likely to ride as the DC of the upper middles. That doesn't make it an accessible 'open to all' activity. It is a minority an activity and not a desperately cheap one. Most people are not land-owners or even small-paddock-owners, even in rural areas Hmm

ArsenicFaceCream · 02/01/2015 15:53

It's ot an inclusive sport by any stretch of the imagination and I absolutely agree that state education should aim for inclusivity.

happygardening · 02/01/2015 15:51

smoke you are letting your uniformed prejudices get the better of you. As talkin said in rural farming areas ponies and horses are common and relatively cheap to keep. Would you say the same thing if a school in a rural community had a cattle showing team? I doubt it. Cattle can be as equally expensive to purchase as an average child's pony and like horses require land to graze of, and relatively expensive feed.
Also the sort of mega expensive competition horses/ponies your think of with associated with facilities etc are I can tell you from experience are unlikely to lower themselves to being part of the schools equestrian team.

TalkinPeace · 02/01/2015 15:39

smokepole
But if the school was in a rural area, where half the kids had paddocks and ponies of the scruffy little cob variety, not pony club then engaging with an activity that the kids do out of school makes sense.

as happy rightly said, owning horses is by no means the preserve of the rich - many of the breeders of the ponies are on below average incomes.

smokepole · 02/01/2015 15:34

Is it just me that finds it "appalling" and totally inappropriate for a state school to associate it self to an equestrian team!.

For gods sake, we have the numbers of people needing to use foodbanks growing daily yet we have a "State School" actively promoting a sport that is unavailable to the vast majority.

I found it sickening to read people/media stating this as a benefit of attending a certain school . P.S I come from a very "Tory" background . I think after reading this, the world of politics is no longer Black and White but very grey in nature.

OP posts: