St Marys Calne

Anyone with latest on St Mary Calne is very much appreciated. Really looking at this achool and keen to know how boarding and pastoral care is esp with regards academic support and bullying now. Looking at 2018 or 2019.
Thank you kknd mums!

Any undated information on St Mary Calne? I have filled up the application form for my daughter from HK but still hesitate to send it out. 2016 exam result still same as last 2 year. Thanks

Oh dear George, you do seem to have a bee in you bonnet about this school don't you? Several threads in a month all negative.

You seem almost desperate for it to fail.

Have you any concrete evidence rather than hearsay and assumptions?

From my investigation and now speaking to parents there, the girls who go to Oxbridge would have got there from a non fee paying school. There were many more girls this year who left with poorer grades than better. Talk of little added value, plus too much private tutors needed. Not easy to set up from overseas. Good for you, but you seem to be in the minority.

Thanks to replies. My questions now answered.

As a parent of a recent leaver I can tell you that's not true. Lots of girls apply after A Levels every year and 4 of those applying are girls applying to Oxbridge. The A Level results were really good and some of my daughter's friends got better grades than they had hoped and therefore didn't accept their Uni place as they want to try for a better Uni. Gap Years are really popular. I don't think you can beat the teaching and support at St Mary's.

What are the well recognised routes? Assume you mean PGCE, because personally I don't think GTP or Teach First are very well recognised, although some would disagree.

I've just looked at our school list - there are 15 PhDs and 7 of them have PGCEs too. The number of other teachers with no PGCE is at least a third though. So some of these non-PhDs probably 'ended up' in teaching as well. And the same can be said of some people taking a PGCE. Or of any job at all, for that matter.

FWIW I don't disagree that you should have a PGCE to teach, but I don't think you should be judged for having other excellent quals too, or previous non-school experience. I don't think it tells you very much about what that person will be like as a teacher.

As someone who hopes to do a PhD sometime I'm not quite sure what you mean about the "aspirational side of things"? If a I did a PhD it would not be because I didn't know what else to do it would for one reason alone I love my subject.
By the way it would be if absolutely no relevance to my current occupation. If at the end of it a job came off it where a I could actually use it all well and good but that is not why Id do it. Having spent all that time on it, maybe I'd look at teaching because it's got to be better than my current shitty profession because at least Id still be in the world where my wonderful subject was being talked about.

1. I don't think all teachers with PhDs are rubbish.

1. Appreciate about it being difficult to find decent work in HE.

I would still worry about the aspirational side of things, though, and would still rather choose teachers who have come into the profession via the well recognised routes. I know too many people who took PhDs because they didn't know what else to do and then eventually ended up teaching. However, I don't doubt that some of them have made good teachers.

But Returning, academia is also about research to a huge degree. Lots of people don't want to publish or perish, they just want to teach, and that really doesn't exist in most academic fields these days. (Particularly the sciences, and in my experience most teachers with PhDs are scientists.) Ergo, teaching becomes the chosen profession for some of these people.

Also the idea that "anyone who is really good" will be teaching in Higher Ed is quite laughable. I think we have all had terrible lecturers at uni. Teaching ability often doesn't seem to come into it

Tansie "how many of his classes did you sit in" none but I listened to many children (prep school age) talking about his wonderful lessons! I watched the looks on the children's faces when around him, they just thought he was the bees knees.
"truly wonderful and inspiring" well he has his own admiration society formed by the boys. Frankly I have no idea how many As the boys he teaches got, nor do I care, but I do know that he opened my DS's eyes to things, literature, opera, poetry and much more and my DS isn't the only one so I couldn't give a monkeys how many A's his pupils get.
The driest lecturer when I was at Uni had a PhD from a top Uni, boring as hell. The best lecturer (voted university lecturer of the year) got his PhD at a good but not top Uni, he made his subject (not initially one that appealed to me) absolutely come alive.
As I've said having a PHD doesn't make you a failure in your area or a crap teacher neither does it always make you an inspiring fantastic one either, but frankly I'm not convinced having a PGCSE makes an inspiring fantastic teacher either.

happy, oh happy! Do not do this! Returning has not said 'all teachers with PhD are rubbish teachers'. Your naive simplification kind of makes you sound like one-of-those-private-parents who can only 'talk the talk' to a certain level ('fascinating' -how many of his classes did you sit in?, 'truly wonderful and inspiring teacher'- how many of his classes did you sit in?...'passionate'- I used to believe in passionate til I realised that passionate is as passionate does..... I hope you don't mean by fascinating and inspiring 'the teachers that got As out of the boys who were destined for As?) then resort to mud-slinging.

For the record, I went to a girls GS in 1973. My best, and my worst teachers had PhDs. One had a deep passion for his subject (English), and yes, was truly inspirational (in Y10-11 'O' level, and in particular, 'A' level... Y8 took him to pieces, at a GS!)- the other was useless. Maths. Genuinely completely out of his depth. Dull. Maybe passionate in his own bathwater, but being able to impart that passion requires a whole different set of skills.

So returning are you saying all teachers with PhD are rubbish teachers?
Do you have any proof of this?
I agree the obvious choice would be academia but we're not all the same are we?
Or maybe like all teachers there are fantastic passionate one, and the good, ok, mediocre and rubbish.

Well, I get the points about people doing PhDs simply for the love of a subject, but if all else was equal, I'd choose a school full of young, keen, newly trained graduates who haven't been stuck in academia for too long, over a bunch of PhDs anyday. Afterall, surely if you are doing a PhD for love of a subject and really want to teach, then anyone who is really any good will be teaching in Higher Education.

The PhD debate is an interesting one. One of the teachers at my DS's prep school had one, he was an amazing teacher and the children were fascinated by the subject he did his doctorate in, a eccentric concept like the man himself. One of the dons at DS2's school who has one is adored by the boys, again a completely unique individual and a truly wonderful inspiring teacher and very dedicated to the boys.
Were either failures in their chosen profession? Perhaps there chosen profession was to teach a subject they feel passionate about.
A friend has a PhD sadly for him he never uses it and would be the first to admit that it's not made any difference to his current very successful corporate career. But he dreams of going back to academia to teach others about his subject which underneath the pin stripe suit/corporate man he too is passionate about.

My DDs attended nationally well respected academic indie London day schools that get excellent results, and a proportion of the teachers were newly qualified, though enthusiastic and inspiring, no idea where they did their teaching practises but some may indeed have seen the inside of a state school I, and some of the most high maintenance parents in the country, witness the complete fever that takes hold come 11+, those GCSE / A level results do indeed get picked over with a fine tooth comb, had no problem with paying the £15k a year for that mix of youth and energy and experience. Certainly with both of my daughters it was teachers with just that background who made the most difference in building their confidence and enthusiasm for their subjects. So a bit of a sad and ignorant point of view to dismiss their teaching skills and put any decline in the school's educational effectiveness at their door. It is far more likely to be the leadership they are given and the strategies and frameworks in place not just to support them in delivering excellence but in actually managing and marketing the school.

Returning I can see where you'd coming from but I don't necessarily think so. Contrary to popular belief, a lot of people who do PhDs don't have a long term goal to be an academic. My DH (teacher in indy school) couldn't wait to get out of academia once his was done, he had no interest in research beyond the specific project he had completed. However he always knew he would enjoy teaching, so went on to do a PGCE after a few years in industry. I'd say about 10% of the teaching staff at his school have one, and I'm sure a few of them are failed academics, but others simply decided that they hated the research side of things or the salary and conditions weren't good enough, etc. Teaching in a top independent offers a lucrative salary and very nice working conditions, which I'd imagine is a draw for a lot of people.

Just a comment on teachers with PhDs in the independent sector. Surely, having a PhD and ending up in the classroom suggests an element of failure in chosen profession? I say that as a teacher with an MA, by the way, but my MA was in my subject specialism and qualifies me to do additional, journalistic work on top of my teaching. Post grad qualifications are only useful in teaching if they relate to education and teaching, surely? Not sure I'd be too impressed with a staff list full of PhDs - too many failures!

Why are teachers leaving in droves? What's driving them away?

I apologise! That is a lot. My children's Oxfordshire day school places are nowhere near that.

Most of the 20 not going to uni this year are retaking. Think you've made wise choice and your gut is spot on.

I too take the view that I pay a lot of money and trust the school to do the right thing. His school promotes a parents hands off ethos and that suits me. I lack time and the skill to micromanage my own life let alone "immerse" myself in "every nuance" and "minutiae" of my DS's. I don't spend hours reading the CV's of every teacher but as the lack of teaching qualifications in independent schools is frequently mentioned on here I did once check my DS's schools teachers. I do annually check the Pre U results IGCSE results aren't published.
According to the Good Schools Guide my DS's school has the highest proportion of teachers with PhDs, whilst I think this is admirable, having a PhD or for that matter a PGCSE doesn't necessarily make you a good teacher. I personally don't think either sector has a monopoly on fantastic teachers there are good and bad in both sectors, the truly inspiring great teachers who we never forget are always going to be in the minority. I also frankly don't give a dam if the teachers are from state schools originally or how old they are.

The (Open)Purse though it's more like £15k I now see..

I suspect the elysium fields which you describe, happy is why Calne parents are 'voting'.

For the record, I only know a bit about The Purse () but the parents I know there, tbh, shove their DC 'in' at one end and retrieve them, 5-7 years later, job done. My bestie has no idea (or so she says- I hope not disingenuously!) what curriculum her DS is doing, IGCSE (yes) or not (no); she maintains homework etc isn't her problem as she pays others to 'deal' with it! And tells me many other parents feel the same way: 'I'm paying a lot of money so I don't have to worry about it'. Which is why it's possible that parents at Calne thought the school had it all in hand. Not all private parents, despite what you read on MN, immerse and surround themselves with their DC's private education; every nuance, the minutiae, the qualifications and CV of every teacher, the subtleties of every curriculum! Many feel they're paying their money, they're taking their choice.

For the record, my bestie never fails to tell me how many of her DS's teachers are 'Oxbridge', inference: therefore brilliant (and better than your nasty state school). They'd be slaughtered in many a state comp, but the reality is, with hand-selected DC, they can cope, can't they?

Agggghast contrary to popular belief independent schools are not stuffed with unqualified teachers, middle aged Oxbridge grads or not.
Parents who pay £34k+ a year expect results and schools know this, parents are also very capable of reading the staff list and their qualifications, my DS school sends as termly diary and all staff and their qualifications are listed in it, these parents are likely to be far from stupid, and are able to put two and two together and make four, if they saw rafts of unqualified teachers and the school had poor/or declining results they are likely to what all paying parents do because we are very notoriously fickle and vote with our feet. So why would an independent school worth it's salt employ unqualified teachers who can't teach their subject?