Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Showing a 15 film to 11 year olds in school

64 replies

chocolateflapjack · 15/10/2012 13:26

Now, do please tell me if you think IABU

As part of a history lesson, year 7s (many barely 11) were shown an extract from a cerificate 15 film. (The Life of Brian). This extract was inocuous.

For homework they are ancouraged to access this extract for themselves on youtube.

The response from the head of history is this:
We have shown the clip in class for a number of years and it is always received well by students; they enjoy the comedy and it is a good introduction to the topic, and for this reason we will continue to use it next year.

My concerns are

  1. A child is being introduced to something potentially unsuitable, which they wouldn't have come across otherwise, and it would be easy to view other (less suitable) clips from this film on youtube.
  2. A 15 film classification decision is reached by trained film classifiers, so it's not really the teacher's job to decide whether this is OK or not.
  3. I have the right to expect that the classroom at least will be a safe place, and that my child will not be exposed to unsuitable material BY THE TEACHER.
  4. The fact that a film clip is "received well" doesn't justify it.

Does anyone know what the law says about this and has anyone any suggestions for taking this further? I am not quite angry enough for the Daily Mail. Yet.

OP posts:
chocolateflapjack · 15/10/2012 13:46

This is the clip

OP posts:
donnie · 15/10/2012 13:45

I loathe Horrible Histories but that is another story.

There are many better sources of information about the Romans than the Life of Brian FGS. Sounds like the teacher is lazy IMO.

WereTricksPotter · 15/10/2012 13:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

seeker · 15/10/2012 13:44

Then I think it's perfect!

I do think it is a bit odd that L of B is a 15- I wonder why? Blasphemy, I suppose.

WereTricksPotter · 15/10/2012 13:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MaryZed · 15/10/2012 13:43

Added to which Life of Brian (the whole thing) is pretty harmless compared to what most unsupervised 11 year olds will find on the internet.

Life of Brian's take on the Romans and Christianity is rather like a Horrible History book.

When I was a kid it was banned, because of it's irreverent attitude to Christianity Hmm, I'm not sure why it is a 15s now.

WereTricksPotter · 15/10/2012 13:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

blackteaplease · 15/10/2012 13:42

They should be showing age appropriate clips or seeking your consent first.

MaryZed · 15/10/2012 13:41

If the clip itself was innocuous, I don't see the problem.

Just don't let him watch any more at home.

As far as I am concerned branching away from traditional "book-learning", into methods that encourage children to participate and be enthusiastic and interested in a topic is a good thing.

chocolateflapjack · 15/10/2012 13:40

The topic is "What the Romans did for us".

I think Adam Hart-Davies covers it pretty well myself!

OP posts:
chocolateflapjack · 15/10/2012 13:39

But they wouldn't think to type in "Life of Brian" would they?

I personally don't stand over each of my children constantly while they are on the internet. I can't imagine anyone with more than one child / dinner to cook / normally functioning bladder could say they are watching internet usage 100% of the time. I think if children really wanted to view something they thought was 'naughty' they would find an opportunity.

OP posts:
seeker · 15/10/2012 13:36

It depends what th history topic was.

donnie · 15/10/2012 13:34

I agree with you Op. Plus if a history teacher feels compelled to show clips from a film like that, I am inclined to take a rather dim view of their teaching capabilities. And I am a secondary school teacher myself. Since when did the Life of Brian become an historically accurate depiction of events?

SamSmalaidh · 15/10/2012 13:29

If the clip itself is suitable for the age group I'm not sure of the problem. Children could view anything on YouTube, at 11 I would expect parents to be supervising their internet usage.

Swipe left for the next trending thread