Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Wilsons, Wallington, Tiffin, Sutton – why so many applications? Are parents kidding themselves?

111 replies

TheWomanOnTheBus · 27/06/2012 13:41

I went to the Wilsons open day last night, and in relation to admissions the Head at his talk said basically the following:

Yes, there are 1400 applicants. And yes Wilsons have 150 places. However, the chances of entereing is not as bad as that sounds since each of those 1400 applicants is also likely to apply for all the Sutton grammars and also Tiffin. (And some will no doubt also be applying to/preferring indies - my point not his). In total, throughout those 4 schools there are 510 places. He encouraged anyone to apply whose DS was likely to get a good 5 in KS2 (ie 5a and 5b).

Now it is true that some DSs will have a bad day. But if they take 4 tests, and they were at the level the Head said they need to be to get in, then the chances of them having a bad day (if they are at the right level) at all of them is minimal.

So are 900 or so of the parents kidding themselves (nowhere near predicted to get "good 5")? Are their DSs nowhere near that level and they are applying anyway? That many?

Or is the Head being disingenuous and in fact you need DSs at a much higher level?

IYSWIM.

OP posts:
legallady · 28/06/2012 10:11

Womanonthebus,

Don't panic yet! Smile

I'm no expert on this, but the one thing I would strongly recommend is practice timing, timing, and more timing. The Tiffin test (particulary NVR) is very very difficult to complete in 50 minutes and that's what seems to trip many children up. There's no point in getting the first 65 questions right and then having to guess the last 15 because you've run out of time.

Most tutors won't do anything that you can't do at home, but the one advantage I think that some provide (particularly when it is group tutoring) is that the children will sit many, many timed tests surrounded by other children all doing the same thing. This is invaluable experience. Has your DS sat the sutton mock? Again, invaluable experience.

I actually think most children don't sit all four exams. Our closest school is Tiffins (10 min bus ride away) but very very few local children sit the exam. Most parents don't think it's worth the effort as they think their children won't get in or they have just heard it's extremely pressured once you're in and they don't want that for their children. Of the very few who do sit the Tiffin test, a very low percentage of them will sit for Sutton Grammar as well but a negligible number will sit for Wallingtons and the same for Wilsons. It's just too far a slog across two boroughs.

Sutton and Tiffins are pretty accessible on the train, but Wallington and Wilsons less so and so I think this naturally prevents many children applying.

The other thing I've learnt (this is my third time through this horrendous process) is that it's such a lottery and the children you would put money on getting a place frequently don't.

Good luck to all our DC for the months ahead Grin

TheWomanOnTheBus · 28/06/2012 09:51

One other point. The Head did emphasise that there was no need to tutor (all stuff was in national curriculum). Indeed, he said they dropped the VR (or was it NVR) precisely because it was skewed towards people

Is he just wrong? Or mischievous? Or what? I suppose hehad no choice really but to say that. He can't very well say: don't apply unless either DS is a genius or you can afford a tutor. But then why did they drop the reasoning paper if he didn't really believe what he said?

OP posts:
TheWomanOnTheBus · 28/06/2012 09:36

On tutoring ......

gazzalw - By ?pass? did you mean actually offered a place, rather than the preliminary artificial step of being told you ?passed the test? before the CAF is filled in? If any case, out of the DS classmates you mention: any view as to whether they were all the same quality and whether proper tutoring (and at what type of intensity) made a material difference?

mumzy for these schools? does it really matter that you get, say, a ?Tiffin specialist?. Or will any good general tutor do the trick. If you have to get a school specialist and you apply for a handful, it might be expensive and rather intense. :) I read the 11* forum pages on Tiffin Shock and it scares the hell out of me. Do I need to turn into that sort of obsessive mum with ?category cards? (whatever they are) and strict regimes of two test practices a day and so on. (If I did have to, its too late now anyway.) I was assuming that that sort of stuff is just too extreme - and repeating myself - the end product of a tutorial/practice arms race of obsessiveness. But given what people say on this thread perhaps not - perhaps I do need to do all that.

I suppose more generally, does it need to be a commercial tutor or what people are really saying is that you can?t just rely on the primary to get them ready ? you need to do practice papers at home (which we are doing). DS is comfortably finishing them on time with minimal errors. I was somehow hoping that would be enough. (Obviously these are not the Wilson?s tests ? since they don?t publish samples ? but Bond papers and papers downloaded from other schools.)

I guess that?s why I took comfort from the heads talk. DS is bright, but not by any means the only bright DS in his cohort and whilst he might be in the top 2 or 3, they are not that far ahead of everyone else. I suppose he?s then in the goldilocks zone that Greythorne / tiggy describes. And I was assuming that everyone at his level (predicted 5a/5b at KS2 ? certainly not predicted 6) would be able to do those papers to the same sort of level. Do I need to then go beyond just practicing papers at home and getting a specialist tutor?

TwoTerrors - thanks, I will probably give it a go. I have no confidence I?d find an appropriate tutor in time if that is what the consensus is. We are not local to the schools ? so wouldn?t even know where to start. But perhaps I will start asking around. If anyone knows an appropriate tutor in the Battersea/Clapham area, then do let me know by PM or by posting.

OP posts:
twoterrors · 28/06/2012 08:05

My impression (very anecdotal) is that the children who live locally and who have a good chance will have a go at several. For those trying from further away, I suspect more than a handful will just go for one - because it is a long shot, a long journey, that particular one is on the right train line, near a parent's workplace, there are other local options, etc. It depends how easy it is to fill your CAF though.

I agree about tutoring - the line that they won't cope when they get in there just doesn't stack up for the superselective schools (the same applies to the Graveney test). Not only is there no room for error, there is no room for sneezing, scratching your head, wondering why the boy in the seat next door has green ears, nothing.

Most children are not born with those powers of concentration; and I suspect most who can score reasonably well on those tests first go would do just fine at those schools, but they are unlikely to get in without practice. It can be easier to get the practice in with a tutor.

OP, I would have a bash, so then you know, unless either you or your son are of a particularly sensitive disposition!

tiggytape · 27/06/2012 22:59

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

mumzy · 27/06/2012 22:09

What Tiggy says about the Tiffin exam is very realistic. The tutoring which goes on is unbelievable and nowadays you will not get in if you weren't very able and tutored to the zenith.

gazzalw · 27/06/2012 20:12

Not sure how you would come by that information? The Registrar at Sutton Grammar used to be most helpful but she's gone onto pastures new at Graveney. Not sure whether anyone in the Education Department at Sutton Borough Council would furnish you with the relevant information? Might be worth a try?

But I would guess more than a handful. Know that a few of DS's classmates only sat Tiffin and a couple did Sutton and Wallington but not the others. If that is representative of patterns at other schools then I could imagine that there could have been tens of unique applicants. Pure guesswork though!

OhDearConfused · 27/06/2012 19:35

Also, not all of the 1400 will be applying to all the four schools.
We might apply to Tiffin say for transport reasons from Clapham, but not the other three.

I'd be interested to know how many unique applicants there are for all those four schools.

Any info anyone ?

gazzalw · 27/06/2012 18:48

DS passed the three Sutton Grammar School 11+ exams, got an offer at one on Offers Day, missed out on his second choice because of the distance criteria used for the boys scoring the cut-off mark but then was offered a place at that school a couple of weeks down the line. We weren't ever told how many boys had scored the same mark as DS but he lost out because we live out of Borough and obviously further away than boys with the same score. He was 9th on the waiting list on Offers Day so would anticipate that at least ten boys had got the cut off score but it could have been considerably higher.

Apparently Tiffin does offer places to all the boys with the same score - look at the 11+ Forum for more information. And by some miracle the parents seem to know exactly how many children scored each mark! Not sure the other schools are so transparent about their results but maybe the parents don't ask the salient questions.

For whatever reason Tiffin does seem to be regarded as the most sought after grammar school in the Surrey/Kingston area - I'm not totally sure why!

What would be interesting for Sutton Borough to collate would be a venn diagram showing the overlap of boys passing all three, numbers passing one or two or none.

On the basis of DS's classmates results with the grammar schools, eight took at least some of the four local 11+ exams, two passed at least three (DS only took three but his classmate took and passed four), two failed by a narrow margin (but got into one of the local partially selective comprehensives) and the other four failed by more than five points.

tiggytape · 27/06/2012 18:13

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

tiggytape · 27/06/2012 18:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheWomanOnTheBus · 27/06/2012 18:11

I know addressed to Tiggy, but I think what she is saying is right.

The rule above only applies when there is tie in the first score where there are more people than places. So, first you give places to the DSs that got top score, then the next lot, and so on. Until you get to a score where there are more DSs than places left. For example, if after all the DSs who got a higher score are already in, and there are only, say, 5 places left for the people who got the next score down the list (lets say 20 got that score), then out of those 20 the rules above apply. First, Sutton kids (and if more than 5 of those by distance). Secondly, non-Sutton kids (and between those by distance).

That's what the head said yesterday, and what the policy says.

OP posts:
tiggytape · 27/06/2012 18:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

mumwithtwokids · 27/06/2012 18:07

tiggytape - Are you sure that's right? So for example if a group of 20 boys scored the same top score would all of them get a place or would they apply the rule mentioned above?

All this still confuses me Confused

TheWomanOnTheBus · 27/06/2012 17:50

Thanks, Tiggy, you have answered the obvious question as to how many kids does that tie-break apply to .... phew. (It would make a difference if the scores were so scrunched up - all super bright DSs don't you know - so that there were 50 with top marks and 100 with just one mistake!)

We are not 50 miles away, but certainly out of borough...

So I won't report the school to the admissions adjudicator (or whatever it is called) for having an unlawful policy :)

OP posts:
tiggytape · 27/06/2012 17:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

mumwithtwokids · 27/06/2012 17:34

Oh this has changed from last year as before they kept I believe 20 places for boys who lived in the borough.

TheWomanOnTheBus · 27/06/2012 17:04

Thanks, all, but just following up on the "tie-breaker" point. I just checked the policy here which says the following:

^Where candidates have the same rank order and where the admission of all would exceed the number of places available, places will be allocated in the following order:

?firstly to candidates whose home address is within the London Borough of Sutton in the order of the distance of their home address measured in a straight line from the main front door of Wilson?s School;

?secondly to those candidates who live elsewhere in the order of the distance of their home address measured in a straight line from the main front door of Wilson's School. ^

So it is a preference for in-borough kids. And I still wonder how this is reconcilable with the judgement in Greenwich.

OP posts:
mumwithtwokids · 27/06/2012 16:13

Theas18 - agree, we spoke with my DS's teacher before putting him forward. The whole experience is quite stressfull and it used to break my heart when I saw children coming out of the exam crying :(

Theas18 · 27/06/2012 16:08

Same in Birmingham. There is a cohort of kids that apply for grammars, and that cohort applies for many schools, but each child can obviously take only up one place- it's pretty impossible to find out really how many kids apply per place- but it's at least 10:1 .

Brum schools again are super selective so start filling with the highest marks and top when all places allocated there is no pass/fail mark. In a very good cohort or an easy exam the places might be allocated from say 100% down to 98%, a hard paper or less clever cohort means that lower scores will get a place.

500 total places and 1500 applicants isn't actually too bad odds at all, assuming your child is of the required standard- there are a lot who apply just " on spec" here anyway without the child really being up to it (why, if your child is in the middle stream at primary, so really very average would you put them through the 11+- I've no idea!)

Greythorne · 27/06/2012 16:07

TheWomanOnTheBus

That's why people tutor!

It's such a silly exclusively MN thing to say, "the bright don't need tutoring". That's true for the absolute cream, the top 200 in my model above. But for the 1000 fighting for 300 places, just one or two extra marks make a very big difference.

The whole "if you tutor, yiou are setting your child up for failure when they get to the school" thing makes me smile wryly. I think 40 years ago, when the 11+ was nationwide and there were hundreds and hundreds of places for the kids who tested well, then yes, it made sense not to tutor. The 11+ was a test which selected those who performed on the day. And besides, hardly anyone tested, so there was no nuclear arms race of testing.

But with such limited places today, the competition is so fierce and so tutoring doesmake sense.

mumwithtwokids · 27/06/2012 16:05

Oh..with Wilson's there were a number of places I think 20 which were reserved for kids who lived in the borough. Don't know if this has changed since last year though but think this is fair.

To clarify the odds of getting a place. My DS sat all three entrance exams last year. For all schools around 1400 applications were recieved however only roughly 450 passed Wallington and Sutton and 365 Wilson. Given that most people will apply to all school's, if your son passes the entrance exams then he has a good chance of getting a place at one of the grammars. Even once offers have been made there is always movement a bit of movement on the waiting list so I wouldn't discount it.

mumwithtwokids · 27/06/2012 15:55

No it's distance and nothing to do with borough. If two boys achieve the same score the boy living nearest to the school will be offered a place. For high scorers it's irelevant as you will be awarded a place regardless of where you live.

TheWomanOnTheBus · 27/06/2012 15:53

And I suppose going back to my OP, the Head is being disingenous in leading us to think we stood a good chance when in the end its - taking grethhorne's numbers - 1000 kids chasing 300 places. Those are not good odds.

Why would he do that? [Hmm]

OP posts:
TheWomanOnTheBus · 27/06/2012 15:47

Oh dear :( then I was wishfully thinking he'd have no problem...... thanks for putting me right.

One further point though - the Head also said the tests would not test anything that was not part of a standard curriculum for the time of the test (ie end Year 5). Is that right? Then - certainly for Maths at least - nothing for Sat level 6 will ever likely come up (although of course someone at that level, will find the time pressure easier for level 5 material IYSWIM)...

Yes, I was wondering about the "catchment" tie break - although I don't think its a "distance criteria" - its an in or out of borough distinction.

I thought a court judgement (Greenwich) banned discrimination between boroughs and Wilsons say that in the event of a tie between two boys it is not distance from school which counts (which would be fine) but the in-borough boy who gets the place (who might be furthe away than the out-of-borough boy).

I assume its legal, since otherwise they wouldn't do it, but hard to reconcile with the Greenwhich case unless I am missing something.

OP posts: