Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Wilsons, Wallington, Tiffin, Sutton – why so many applications? Are parents kidding themselves?

111 replies

TheWomanOnTheBus · 27/06/2012 13:41

I went to the Wilsons open day last night, and in relation to admissions the Head at his talk said basically the following:

Yes, there are 1400 applicants. And yes Wilsons have 150 places. However, the chances of entereing is not as bad as that sounds since each of those 1400 applicants is also likely to apply for all the Sutton grammars and also Tiffin. (And some will no doubt also be applying to/preferring indies - my point not his). In total, throughout those 4 schools there are 510 places. He encouraged anyone to apply whose DS was likely to get a good 5 in KS2 (ie 5a and 5b).

Now it is true that some DSs will have a bad day. But if they take 4 tests, and they were at the level the Head said they need to be to get in, then the chances of them having a bad day (if they are at the right level) at all of them is minimal.

So are 900 or so of the parents kidding themselves (nowhere near predicted to get "good 5")? Are their DSs nowhere near that level and they are applying anyway? That many?

Or is the Head being disingenuous and in fact you need DSs at a much higher level?

IYSWIM.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
innertiger · 20/07/2012 14:50

Wallington PTA run a mock exam - not only does this give your DS valuable exam experience but you will be able to see from the results where your DS sits against his peers. I know of a number of parents who stopped tutoring based on the results, as they felt that if they were not in the top 200 they most probably wouldn't get in to one of the grammar schools. It still meant a certain amount of tutoring, but they felt that they benefitted from that anyway.
With regards to tutoring in general, if you take a relaxed non-pressurised approach to it, then the chances are your DS won't find the experience a negative one. My DS was tutored for 1 year, with a specific Tiffin tutor, and he had 1 hour a week with her and then a maximum of 2 hours homework. I felt that he wasn't over worked and he had plenty of time for being a child. We only tutored him because we knew he was consisitently performing well at school and we didn't have great local choices for him.
Some children are put through this experience because of parental expectations rather than their natural ability. But we also had a tutor who was VERY honest, and would not continue tutoring children after a certain point if she felt (with many years of experience) that they were not doing sufficiently well. Harsh but ultimately kind?? Who knows - it's a minefield but you know your DS, you know best how well he will cope and if he's bright and a high achiever then he won't need the huge amounts of work that some children are put through. Good luck :)

happyAvocado · 13/07/2012 12:13

don't have time to read the whole thread, but if I remember well format of Sutton Grammar answer sheets is different from the rest.

check that with your son so he understands it

gazzalw · 13/07/2012 08:07

No you don't really need to - I wouldn't really formalise the process but incorporate fun learning into day-to-day life - finding synonyms for things, doing puzzles etc.... I personally think more formalised work on Bond books etc... should only start in Year 5.

They are children and six to nine months of practising papers should be enough if you have a bright child!

Maliki · 12/07/2012 23:29

Hi everyone!

I'm new to the whole grammar school entrance scene and need some advise. My son will start year 4 in September and is fairly bright. He is working on a 3a/3b level at school. Recently we got in contact with a 11+ tutor who assessed him. The tutor felt that my son was focused and was doing well enough to start tutoring him in year 5. In the meantime, I can work with him at home as I do. I am wondering if this is the right way to go about things, or should children start tutoring in year 4?

gatheringlilac · 12/07/2012 20:45

Mind you - I need to follow that advice myself!! I've just realised I'm now starting on the secondary transfer nightmare treadmill with dd!!!!

gatheringlilac · 12/07/2012 20:42

TheWomanOntheBus - I think the Wilson's head speaks the truth. My informant (ds) says that the maths paper really did only cover maths they'd done at school, the English was straightforward, and the VR and NVR just like the ones you buy from WHSmith. He came out with level 5s. The school didn't reveal what level of level 5 - mainly because it was a very low-octane state school that had no interest in enhancing the learning experience provided to their students beyond the bare minimum for the national curriculum. Hth - don't despair/give in to the hysteria.

Hardboiled · 11/07/2012 15:25

correction..."to tutor or not to tutor"

Hardboiled · 11/07/2012 15:24

TheWoman, I don't think the Wallington head included the "to tutor or not tutor" in his soliloquy. He may have, I think I dozed off half way through...

TheWomanOnTheBus · 11/07/2012 13:16

Good points, Tiggy.

Yes, Hardboiled, agree with your Hmm. I had the Wilsons Head tell me (disingenously as it turns out from this thread): don't worry, if you have a level 5 predicted you will get a place. I had the Tiffins Head downplay the need for tutoring/coaching/practising ...

I missed Wallington last week so if anyone could summarise the lie line they are peddling there I'd appreciate it.

OP posts:
Hardboiled · 11/07/2012 12:54

Or in short, "we here at Tiffin have an exam which has NOTHING to do with what your child has been doing at his state primary and passing it has EVERYTHING to do with techniques, speed, accuracy and preparation, as studies and experience have shown. But please, please, do not tutor your child." Hmm

tiggytape · 11/07/2012 10:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

tiggytape · 11/07/2012 10:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheWomanOnTheBus · 11/07/2012 09:06

Thanks, 11PlusAdvisor, that all makes sense.

I went along to the Tiffin Open Evening last night and there were tutoring firms giving out leaflets outside the school gate on the way in.

The Head in her talk simply said: absolutely no need to tutor, ignore all those people outside (the are simply businesses trying to drum up businesss). She did say that all you should do is familiarise the DS with the exams over a period of weeks (I think she said 7 - but that sounds a little too precise :-)).

I must say, reading all the above, and other threads, I tend to agree that for us that will be the correct approach. The tutoring industry - to me - seems to pander to the fears off the parents, sites like this (posters like me that participate in this), all give rise to an incredible vicious circle of "if they do it, and my DS does not, then mine will be at a disadvantage".

The truth is no one can really know. It needs a properly controlled statistical study!

Yes, posters will say - X was so bright wasn't tutored and didn't get in. And Y was not so bright, was tutored and did. But this anectodal stuff is not really evidence. (X may not have been as bright as was imagined, might have had a fit of nerves - absent which he may have sailed in.)

I would have thought the heads of these schools would know whether or not it makes a difference. That sits nicely with my insinct and with what the head says.

Of course it could be that the Head was lieing and she knows all along that tutoring makes signficant differences!

OP posts:
Hardboiled · 09/07/2012 22:18

The 11+ industry I mentioned includes DIY too! In the form of books, more books, CDs, websites, apps, mocks...
And chill pills for the parents.

11PlusAdvisor · 09/07/2012 17:03

TheWomanOnTheBus - my personal experience of sending my child to tiffin tutor went something like this: child goes for one and half hour session in group of 8; sits timed paper; swaps paper with another child to mark; goes over corrections (mainly by himself). However, in my child's case, there were so many corrections and not enough time to go over them (he hadn't done any previous practice on VR and NVR). From speaking with fellow Mums in the area, this seems to be a very common scenario, although I accept some tutors do offer a bit more guidance.
I removed my child from these sessions after 5 weeks and £125 wasted pounds later. Neither child nor parent were any the wiser - and I later came to realise the practice papers he was given were so ancient and not relevant to the current tiffin test.
The key to success - research the test type (in case of Tiffins it is multiple choice set by GL assessment, not Bond or anyone else) and prepare your child specifically for that test; go through a method and technique course for each different question type; sit timed tests; pinpoint weaknesses and practice those question types; use plenty of incentives to encourage child to increase speed and accuracy. Sit a couple of mock tests to get a feel for the exam experience.
Following that sort of process, scores will increase dramatically (no specialist tutor required). But anyone doing that for 2 years is crazy ? 9 months is quite enough and will prevent boredom setting in.
I wish you luck with your preparations.

tiggytape · 09/07/2012 13:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TheWomanOnTheBus · 09/07/2012 12:53

11PlusAdvisor Throwing money at a specialist tiffin tutor is not necessarily the best solution, as I learnt from personal experience.

Just wondering if you would expand on this. not being particularly local, and so no access to any word-off-mouth or recommendations on specialist tutors, I am planning to do it myself (as you say).

What was your personal experience? Do you agree with the other strong sentiment expressed here that a (specialist?) tutor can boost the results by 20% (as per Hardboiled's post just now). I am inclined to think a DIY route - doing lots of practice, timed tests, and so on - should be enough (assuming you have the time of course).

OP posts:
Hardboiled · 09/07/2012 11:49

The general consensus was that you can improve a "natural" score by upto 20% with tutoring for these subjects.

Absolutely. Hence a booming tutoring industry.

CecilyP · 07/07/2012 15:13

Aren't VR and NVR in IQ tests because they would not normally have been taught? Well not until they appeared in entrance exams, that is.

tiggytape · 07/07/2012 12:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

gazzalw · 07/07/2012 12:13

DS attends a state primary which gave no help to the grammar-school aspirant cohort. Ironically DS obviously upped his game with the inclusion of VR/NVR in some of the 11+ papers. He didn't get into Wilson's, whereas he got offers at the other two, and I'm sure that was entirely down to the fact that his English is relatively weak and the NVR/VR boosted his marks.

But I personally don't think NVR/VR can necessarily be taught easily - it's not without good reason that they form the basis of IQ tests

Hardboiled · 07/07/2012 11:00

In our case, after months of debating, comparing, asking ourselves "do we really like these schools? or are we just buying into the mass hysteria?" we have reached the conclusion that we only like Wilsons. (And so does DS). Which means we can drop VR and NVR during the summer and concentrate on maths and english. I have no words to express the relief I feel about this!!! I am stopping to put my child through hours of learning something that is useless other than for passing the 11 plus. IMO all schools should be testing DCs on what they have learnt in the classroom.

BeingFluffy · 07/07/2012 10:22

Frankly, I wish they would stop publishing league tables - at least based on exams grades. I think this is one of the reasons why people are so desperate to get their kids into these schools. The elevenplusexams website is quite frightening - preparing for 2 or 3 years - it has become an arms race.

Tiffin Girls' is a lovely school - but at the end of the day it is just a school. There are a lot of good schools. I feel some parents think it is the Holy Grail of education and their daughters will come off the conveyor belt in 7 years time straight to Oxbridge of Med School. I think academic girls would do well at any school.

CecilyP · 07/07/2012 09:54

When I went to grammar school, many years ago, the classes were 30-31, but split into 20s for things like art and science.

BeingFluffy · 07/07/2012 09:43

Tiggy,

RE the class sizes at grammars... I can only speak for TGS. Yes they are in forms of 30 to begin with. As with other schools there are smaller groups for those needing more help in maths and in the GCSE option classes later on. In my younger DD's comp the top stream are taught in classes of 30 up to GCSE with much smaller classes for those struggling or with EAL.

My DD came from a very small independent where they were taught in classes of about 12-15. She much preferred the bigger classes at Tiffin Girls. I have never heard parents complain about it as it is pretty much the norm at state schools; if parents really don't know they haven't done their homework! I certainly don't think it impairs their learning. All the girls are clever and they move at a fast pace above and beyond the national curriculum.

It was similar at my own grammar school 30 years ago - forms of 30 or 31 and then split into smaller option groups later on.