Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

OMG!

210 replies

CardyMow · 22/06/2010 13:13

Could they POSSIBLY hit low single income families worse? Freezing child benefit for 3 years, abolishing the Health in pregnancy grant from April 2011, Getting rid of the baby element on CTC (how that helps us when I'm 3 months pg and DP only earns £16,000 is beyond me...), Lowering the thresholds for Housing benefit (we won't be able to pay our rent without the money we get on housing benefit), saying that people in social housing may no longer have a reasonable housing benefit allowance or entitlemnet for a suitably sized property. I note that they are CUTTING tax rates for businesses. Nice to know that they are hitting the poorest of us that chose to work. We are now in the situation where we are really going to have to consider whether we can AFFORD for my DP to have the luxury of having a job when we will be so much worse off than we would be on benefits, I think we may end up homeless otherwise. It might make DP feel like more of a human being to go out to work and slog his guts out for £16,000 pa, but if we can't feed our kids and pay our rent....

OP posts:
StuckInTheMiddleWithYou · 22/06/2010 18:37

Oh for god sake, leave her alone. She's got enough on her plate without people harranging her over her love life!

gingernutlover · 22/06/2010 18:37

very much liek you werent using condoms that is.

gingernutlover · 22/06/2010 18:35

fair enough, your post at 18.07pm made it sound very much like you werent.

It is crap, the whole situation, yes. Everyone is taking hits financially, and many many families are goign to be worse off - including mine and yours . Unfortunatly not a thing we can do about it except get on with things the best we can. Fingers crossed things work out okay for you.

OnlyWantsOne · 22/06/2010 18:35

Not many men in their 30's would put up with a sexless relationship, no matter what difficulties arise from that. And nor should they have to.

So... sex is a right now?

WTF?

TheSugarPlumFairy · 22/06/2010 18:33

just for info OP, baby clothes and outfits are dead cheap on Ebay.

i have just bought a bunch of lovely pumpkin patch outfits for 9 week old DD on ebay for about 99p each. Even with postage it comes to about £3.00 an outfit.

Also, have you considered starting your own business? Sell Avon, make cupcakes for the local grocery store, do car boot sales or start an ebay shop.

leavingonajetplane · 22/06/2010 18:32

Think the OP was actually posting about how low single-income families have been hit by the budget rather than looking for a discussion on on her sex life.

Loudlass there seems to be more reassuring details in the posts in the start of the thread, about who precisely will be affected by what so it may not be as bad for you as youre fearing.

Try not to panic, the details of each measure, and the way they apply each one are what really matters.

CardyMow · 22/06/2010 18:30

And FYI, we WERE using condoms. And I was taking the progesterone-only pill. So as you can see, we REALLY weren't expecting to conceive!

OP posts:
CardyMow · 22/06/2010 18:28

And at least as a family, we are TRYING to work! It's more than most families I see are trying to do. We get regularly lambasted by others because we are living on LESS money than them just because DP gets off his arse and goes to work. So sue me if I'm thinking that this is just going to be the straw that breaks the camel's back, WRT the lack of baby element on CTC and the cuts to housing benefit. Maybe when ANY government accepts that some families can only have one wage earner due to a parents disability/caring responsibilities/both, and pay a decent minimum wage, more people would try to work. We are just scraping by now, this is going to put us over the edge. By the way everyone here is talking, I should be locked away in some asylum and prevented from ever procreating, despite the fact that when I had my first 3 dc's, DD hadn't yet had her problems diagnosed, and I didn't get diagnosed with epilepsy until AFTER dc3 was born. AND both my partner and I were working FT then. Circumstances change, and it's not always through choice!

OP posts:
gingernutlover · 22/06/2010 18:28

so you knew that you had a 15 in 100 chance of gettig pregnant and it didnt occur to you to also use condoms??????

yes as you point out, that still wouldnt be 100 percent foolproof but if you genuinely didnt want to get pregnant again why choose the less effective contraceptive (for you personally)

it is a bit crap that you couldnt get sterilisation or the snip when you asked for it - it is, however, not the PCT's fault you got pregnant.

StuckInTheMiddleWithYou · 22/06/2010 18:27

We have a tory government.

The tories attack the poor and benefit the rich. THAT is what they do.

I'm off to join the Labour Party.

I am disgusted with this.

CardyMow · 22/06/2010 18:22

My pct has agreed that they will sterilise me once dc4 arrives, as by the time I reach the top of the list when he/she will be 18 weeks old, I will be 30, and have 4 dc's. THAT'S how I am ensuring that dc's 5/6 or more don't happen. It's just taken me almost 9 years to persuade my PCT that it is really for the best!

OP posts:
Helennn · 22/06/2010 18:16

My womb is also tilted and no problems so far, I know some makes are better than others though. Re 3 types being no better than one, don't think this is correct. 3 lots of 99% for each one must bring the risk of pregnancy down to just about 0. However, it does look as though you've done all you can bar abstaining, but what happens if number 5,6,7 or 8 comes along? Surely it is not up to us the taxpayer to pay?

If the only safe form of contraceptive is no sex and another baby means nowhere for it to sleep, what will you do?

CardyMow · 22/06/2010 18:11

poshwellies, it's not my fault that our PCT won't fund that, or that on DP's wage we can't afford to do it privately. Each PCT sets their thresholds for these things. My PCT is almost bankrupt. We don't even have certain services that would be classed as essential in other areas...No epilepsy specialist Neurologist (for 4 years, no Neuro at ALL), no epilepsy nurses, no enuresis clinic, a 3 year wait for SALT, an OT that discharges 7yo's who in any other area would still be getting intensive help, that then has to be done by untrained parents at home working of a blurry worksheet...etc etc etc.

OP posts:
CardyMow · 22/06/2010 18:07

My meds aren't teteragenic (harmful to a fetus) but they DO lower the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives. I can't use a coil due to a tilted womb, I had one that had to be removed due to it being extremely painful. I could use 3 types of contraception at once, and still wouldn't be any more protected than with one.

OP posts:
Poshwellies · 22/06/2010 17:37

my dh had the snip after 1 child.

Helennn · 22/06/2010 17:35

I was recently on very strong medication that meant that if I got pregnant the foetus would be severely damaged. I had to have a copper coil fitted and use condoms. I then had to sign a form to say I would use two forms of contraception, like you I can't use anything hormonal. Was this not a possibility?

CardyMow · 22/06/2010 17:25

I first asked to be sterilised when I was working FT and only had 2 dc's. They refused as I was only 20. I then asked after dc3. They refused as I was only 21. So DP asked to be 'done'. As he only had one dc, they refused. yet the PCT were well aware that my meds meant there was a chance we could end up with a fourth child. I don't believe in abortion.

OP posts:
CardyMow · 22/06/2010 17:22

It's ok, that's GREAT that you can ensure that your contraception is 100% effective. (which is bolleaux, as even the best contraceptives are at best 99% effective if taken properly, which means that out of 100 people taking it PROPERLY, one will still fall pregnant) It just so happens that my epilepsy medications lower the efficiency of ALL hormone based contraception. it makes it AT BEST 85% effective. Are you saying that we just shouldn't enjoy a normal sex life? How long would it be before I was a lone parent claiming EVERY benefit possible (bearing in mind my disability) if I did that? Not many men in their 30's would put up with a sexless relationship, no matter what difficulties arise from that. And nor should they have to.

OP posts:
gingernutlover · 22/06/2010 17:12

we cant afford a second child - I make very very sure that I don't get pregnant.

I appreciate what you are saying, but there must be ways you can make ends meet.

Lots of people are in difficult financial situations but have no choice but to work and to ensure they make ends meet, especially if they are paying a mortgage for example, as if you just decide to give up your job when you have a mortgage, then you lose your home.

IngridFletcher · 22/06/2010 17:11

Jeepers! Thats ridiculous. My DH had the snip and it didn't work...it is a farce!

CardyMow · 22/06/2010 17:10

They wouldn't do him either as only my third dc was his. So he only had one, and they won't fund the snip for someone with only one dc.

OP posts:
IngridFletcher · 22/06/2010 17:05

Did you not consider your DP having the snip?

My PCT won't fund my sterilization and I am 37 with 3 kids.

CardyMow · 22/06/2010 17:00

And I've been brought up to have a VERY strong work ethic, with both parents working etc. I HATE being out of work. But in all reality, would you employ me, when I need a job that is 9.30-2.30, could possibly have to take up to 2 days a week off sick, might be called at any time to collect DD from school if she has a meltdown....DP has learning difficulties, therefore is not able to get a higher income job. At least we are TRYING to do the right thing and have him working, which is a lot more than MOST people I know do. If minimum wage was an actual, livable amount, then maybe it wouldn't be such an issue. 12 years ago, DP was earning almost £3 an hour more for the same job than he is today.....

OP posts:
CardyMow · 22/06/2010 16:54

Haha at size of house, I am currently in a house that is, according to my council, 'too small for my needs', I am in a VERY small 3 bed (3rd bed is a nursery size, with a 12yo in), but will get rehoused the other side of never. Aparrently I will be 'entitled to' a 4 bed property once dc4 is born, but there is a 10 year waiting list for 4 beds, by which time I will no longer qualify.

I do not work due to the fact that no bugger will employ me because I have uncontrolled epilepsy. And it's not through lack of trying either, for every shitty shelf stackers minimum wage job in my area, there are 300 applicants, who don't have medical needs, plus my DD is SN, there is no childcare AT ALL for 12yo sn dc's. My DP has no qualifications, and we can't afford for him to retrain, what the heck do YOU propose he does, or I do?

I got rid of all my baby stuff, as I wasn't planning any more dc's (my youngest is 6.5yo). My contraception failing due to my epilepsy meds was not able to be 'planned for'. My local PCT refuse to sterilise anyone under the age of 30 that doesn't have 4 dc's, and only being 28 atm, they have been turning me away for 8 years now (I first asked while pg with dc2). They have finally agreed to 'do me' once this dc is born.

While I don't work, I am currently in receipt of £285 a month DLA, which is £1,000 short on what I was earning before I was diagnosed with epilepsy 6 years ago! So yeah, it sounds awful to say we are considering DP giving up work, we are already getting LESS than we would on benefits, this is only going to make a bad situation WORSE.

OP posts:
starshaker · 22/06/2010 14:16

I fully intend to breast feed but was unable to bf my dd. Formula is about £8 a tin now and you dont get that much of a discount especially if you need to buy twice as much. Yeah baby grows and vests may be cheaper in multipacks (i have stacked up alot already) but they will also need other clothes that are not that much cheaper than what my 5 year old dd wears