Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

BP and taxpayers

40 replies

gingercat12 · 03/06/2010 12:40

Am I the only one worrying about BP eventually being bailed out by British taxpayers? It would not be the first case (see our glamorous banking system). They are too big to fail (just think about our meagre pensions) and do not seem to have a handle on the oil spill at all.

OP posts:
Quattrocento · 06/06/2010 15:00

Have any of you actually looked at the financials for BP?

There is a wider concern that oil and gas is becoming a sunset industry, but it'll go for a good few years yet.

In the meantime, BP has a fantastically strong balance sheet. It could afford several hundred spills of this nature. Its share price was overvalued next to its peers, now it's taken a hammering, especially as it may not pay a dividend. So now is the time to invest in BP, actually.

blueshoes · 06/06/2010 14:45

I would agree with Coolfonz.

This is a rare buy opportunity for BP shares.

Alouiseg · 06/06/2010 14:37

We need a beta dad on this thread. He has "knowledge" of the industry.

TheCoalitionNeedsYou · 06/06/2010 14:35

What exactly was Obama expected to do?

gingercat12 · 04/06/2010 17:07

Who said they will nationalise BP?!

I would rather not react to the rest of your patronising post. FYI I do know how much an oilfield costs. And not only from googling it like you.

OP posts:
Coolfonz · 04/06/2010 15:10

The US can't nationalise BP!

This isn't a time to get rid of BP it's a time to fill your boots with their shares. The reaction is way over the top.

BP won't fail...you don't understand the economics of the company or how these things work...BP is mainly owned by US banks anyway. No one is going to nationalise them (although they should be nationalised by the UK govt imo but that's another thing...)

Jesus...no one's pension is screwed this is all crazy talk.

You are talking top whack $10bn. Big deal...how much do you think a major oil field costs?

All the work at the field was overseen - as are all fields in the US Gulf - by the US mineral management service...

Why not do some reading about the company, or even bother to look at its accounts...all there on the old internet...

gingercat12 · 03/06/2010 16:26

Earlybird BP made Obama think this is a small oil spill, and his early comments were all about how everything is under control and that it is not the end of the world (I cannot find the exact quotes I am sorry). Although they say he was deeply concerned right away. Anyway, the public perception was that the weeks were ticking by, and not much has happened, and in the US it was all compared to Hurricane Katrina - quite unjustly IMHO. The increasingly threatening rhetoric towards BP really only started in earnest not so long ago.
I think their PR should have gone into overdrive straight away instead of just him giving a right bollocking to his aides ('Plug the damn hole' - I remember this quote).

longfingernails What makes you think Republicans who have been proving themselves increasingly incompetent for 8 years can make it better for us?

OP posts:
longfingernailspaintedblue · 03/06/2010 14:52

No-one looks good here.

BP didn't conduct appropriate safety checks, subcontracted out too much of the crucial work, and ignored some of the ones they did do.

Obama dithered (maybe he spent too much time with Gordon Brown), is incredibly weak politically as a result, and is now overcompensating by trying to destroy BP.

Whatever happens the British exchequer, not to mention countless British pensioners via their pension funds, are all screwed.

On this narrow point, the best hope for Britain is that the Republicans take back control of at least the House, and permanently take away the Senate supermajority. It might all be too late by then though.

Earlybird · 03/06/2010 14:37

gingercat12 - can you elaborate a bit on how you think Obama has been made to look incompetent? What do you think he/his administration should have done differently?

gingercat12 · 03/06/2010 13:59

I am so happy that I am not the only one fretting.

Earlybird I can't see them surviving either. They made Obama look totally incompetent, so I do not think they can expect much favours from that corner.

BelleDame I suppose the pension funds must be absolutely frantic trying to get out.

Claig I do not think we are liable, but then we weren't liable for the banking system.

I'll go and find the other thread.

OP posts:
Earlybird · 03/06/2010 13:09

I can't imagine the US nationalising BP. It simply isn't a 'too big to fail' company in America.

Personally, I'd get it out of your investments. There is now talk about suspending the dividend until the oil spill/financial liabilities have been covered. The value of the stock has plummeted since the spill began, and if the (very generous) dividend is suspended, why in the world would an individual/pension fund/etc want to own it?

I think you are right to be worried about the future of the company. Personally, I don't think it can/will survive. Thoughts posted on another thread reproduced here:

I am not so sure that BP will survive this disaster. BP has lost one third of its' market value since the oil spill began.

All the figures quoted (money spent to date, and money projected) to stop the flow of oil doesn't begin to address the company's liability to the businesses/communities/individuals damaged and/or destroyed by the spill. There will be huge environmental costs, not to mention astronomical legal fees. Those figures will dwarf the money spent to stem the flow. If BP is found to be negilgent in the oil spill, the financial costs could (and probably will) crush the company.

And then there is the issue of the coming indictments/criminal charges from the US Federal government - all this results in a liability list that will go on for years, and that even BP, with its $20 billion free cash flow and $12 billion dividend to draw on cannot withstand.

claig · 03/06/2010 12:56

yes there will be losses in pensions and dividends I expect, plus a hit on profits.

BelleDameSansMerci · 03/06/2010 12:54

I would also be worried about pensions... There will be loads of them who've invested in oil companies as a "sure thing" lately. We should also all be worried about how much money will be lost in tax revenues from BP if they're not profitable.

This could be really, really bad news for the UK all round.

claig · 03/06/2010 12:52

good point. I never thought about that. I thought they were fully private, are we actually liable in some way?

lljkk · 03/06/2010 12:44

I am more worried about the US govt. nationalising BP's assets (even if supposedly temporarily). That would cause other companies the world over to stop investing in the USA; the US economy would tank badly as a result, and if they tank, the whole world will go down with them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread