Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Liberal Facism

39 replies

crystal123 · 16/04/2010 17:53

Is it just me? or are many of the comments
posted on this site bordering on Liberal Facism? Many comments on this site liberally call people racist or facist without knowing what the meaning of the word is. The comments are cruel and offensive. It appears to me that if you don't like the politics of a person or a party, some of you abuse that person verbally. The real facism lies in denying free speech, and stifling free speech through political correctness. Thought control through a liberal agenda is not a good idea!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Coolfonz · 22/04/2010 14:09

Heheheh

Sorry, got to catch the latest episode of Bagpuss, back in a sec. puts down catapult

EldritchCleavage · 22/04/2010 14:01

Ah, and there I was imagining CoolFonz quite quite differently. Ahem.

Coolfonz · 21/04/2010 15:08

Truth hurts.

TheShriekingHarpy · 21/04/2010 13:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Coolfonz · 20/04/2010 21:54

"However, I'd concede that its not just liberals who have the capacity for intolerance.... conservatives do too. So really the right -wingers do not have a monopoly on fascism or jackboot tactics."

You are delusional.

LeninGrad · 20/04/2010 21:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

smallorange · 20/04/2010 21:48

Animula- that was very interesting. Thankyou.

TheShriekingHarpy · 20/04/2010 21:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

crystal123 · 19/04/2010 22:39

Coolfonz. Thankyou for your kind words...

OP posts:
Coolfonz · 19/04/2010 17:27

Well, you spelled you're right for once, so I'd go out while you're still rollin'.

crystal123 · 19/04/2010 16:07

Coolfonz.
I must now leave this highly charged intellectual debate, particularly as you're an anarchist,as I have to water the plants and go to work, but please think of me in your spare moments of kindess. Keep your chin up!

OP posts:
Coolfonz · 19/04/2010 12:57

They are so crazed by their cult of individuality and their dominance of power over the last 30 years they simply can't take dissent. They certainly can't take responsibility for the disastrous state of the world they've created.

So they then equate fascist thugs and murderers - which they still support in places like Saudi Arabia, Equatorial Guninea etc - with anyone who talks back to them.

Some of them can even spell.

Very much like the last 20 years of the Soviet system, hysterical apparatchiks shouting down any dissent etc...

Hi Animula.

policywonk · 19/04/2010 12:31

'Why do right wing people think free speech is them saying whatever they want without reply?' - I've long wondered this. Not all right-wingers of course, but I do tire of the arguments against 'political correctness' that basically boil down to: I should be allowed to say whatever I like, and if you dare disagree with me I will label you an authoritarian.

TheHeathenOfSuburbia · 19/04/2010 12:25

Crystal, sorry to point this out again, but your posts on this thread really do tend more towards personal attacks than debate...

Can you explain how exactly you feel you are being 'suppressed through terminology'?

I don't mean to come across as a 'thick snob', but it kind of reads like you're regurgitating chunks of this book without really thinking about whether it's actually true - or applicable to this country? I presume it's American?

animula · 19/04/2010 11:57

Much depends on how you define "fascist" and "liberal", "right wing" and "left wing".

Simply choosing two objects - fascism and liberalism - and saying "oh, they have points in common, the are therefor the same" will not do. Eg. they are both human political phenomena, forms of political organisation exhibited in bipedal societies, therefore they are the same. Well, er, yes, but there are extremely important differences.

  1. That nazism, for eg, drew some of its political forms from the (wealth of) utopic politics swimming around the early twentieth century, and that socialism, and even liberalism (at its more utopic end,) did too, is a. a well-remarked point b. pretty obvious - how weird if the actors involved had somehow managed to drink, scrupulously from separate cultural pools.

to point to these similar cultural origins, of some of the features, and to note ensuing points of coherence is not enough to ignore the substantial, significant points of incoherence.

for me, the absolute point of incoherence, the utter difference, lies in the way these systems deal with political conflict.

  1. To say that liberalism instantiates its borders, and acts to suppress difference is not a new point. Lots and lots of lefties take issue with Rorty's classic account of liberalism. Can't remember its name, sorry, but he sets up the idea of liberalism as a circular group, of people, discussing things. That's liberal politics.
Lefties, such as my good self, have often pointed out that it sets up a circle of exclusion, with the discussion of those excluded from the "circle of debate" simply (mis-)heard as irrational, shouting, aggressive, violent, noise.

That doesn't, however, mean it is fascist.

Becasue, for me, the crucial difference lies in how the fascist states dealt with that noise and dissent. For heaven's sake, the chief characterstic of fascist states was /is violence. Not symbolic violence, actual, utter violence.

And yes, I know there are other significant differences, one party rule, centralised economy and authority. But the violence thing is so big, and so stomach-turning, I am actually really p off that you can attempt to compare name-calling on a by talkboard to it.

Coolfonz - I'm astonished - I thought you were someone I "knew" under a different name! Welcome to mn.

crystal123 · 19/04/2010 11:45

Coolfonz. So there we have it! You are just a lonely anti-christ, oh sorry anarchist, when are you going to bring down the government? as so many of your socialist workers mates want to do. Your the real threat to democracy and not other people who want free speech. I say free spelling and free speech for all!

OP posts:
Coolfonz · 19/04/2010 11:31

"your just a thick snob"

x 100. Classic.

No fascism, which you spelled incorrectly many times, is a right wing phenomenon, communism supposedly a left wing one. It's why Belsen and the rest of the camps were full of socialists, trade unionists, anarchists and so on as well as the majority Jewish victims of your right wing comrades in Europe in the 1930's.

Me I see Soviet communism after Lenin as a right wing phenomenon, state capitalism. Where the wheels of capital were simply transferred to another bunch of thugs. If you want to see that in modern terms look at China, state capitalism at its finest.

I believe in democracy which is why I am an anarchist.

Oh and I would have loved to go to a girl's school, but sadly, being a fella, I went to one full of blokes.

crystal123 · 19/04/2010 10:53

The issue of free speech must be addressed and that is why I started this thread. Free speech was curtailed in Europe in the 1930's and is now happening in Britain.

OP posts:
abride · 19/04/2010 10:37

'When it all comes down to it, are you on the side of socialism or fascism?'

This is a very dangerous and false argument. It lead to the desperate situation of Europe in the thirties.

There is a middle ground and it is a respectable and workable one.

crystal123 · 19/04/2010 10:30

Coolfonz. You miss the point, what I am saying is that you don't have to be stomping around in jackboots to suppress people you can do it through terminology. You are a classic example of this, you say it was not a typing error when I used the word fascist, how do you know?
Are you so intellectually superior? Perhaps you went to a great girls public school and are so much more educated than the rest of us plebs! Understand facts, fascism properly understood in NOT a phenomenon of the right, it has always been a phenomenon of the left, an inconvenient truth to you, facism and communism (probably you have communist leanings) are one of the same. You think your intellectual but unfortunately for you, your just a thick snob, the sort of person who denigrates people like my father who fought for this country so that you could have free speech.

OP posts:
Ninjacat · 19/04/2010 00:10

Is it liberal fascists or fascist liberals that are stalking the internet? Now that's an oxymoron my English lit teacher would have been proud of.

Choosy you are right with the labels. The word "Slave" is a perfect example.

Is it me or does the op's argument not just eat itself?

Coolfonz · 18/04/2010 22:39

Nick Cohen isn't left wing. At all.

The liberal FASCISM (not facism for God's sake, you can't spell, it's not atyping error, two different things) is a nasty extreme right wing concept that tries to make out liberalism, especially in a US context is a bad thing. It's a sick idea, part of this wave of neo-conservative extremism. Just name calling in the same way the same people say islamic fascism to try and hide the fact it is people like them - the US right - that actually supported and financed fascism around the world. And still do.

I don't care whether your father went to Belsen or anywhere else. Pretty sick to play that card, and the race card as well, as if race makes any difference to politics. I never called you a fascist, I called you part of the post-fascist US/European right. Which you are.

Would you rather live in Pinochet's Chile or Chavez's Venezuela?

choosyfloosy · 18/04/2010 22:24

crystal I do want to read the JG book, and if anyone were to be labelled a liberal fascist, I guess I would be one of them. I wouldn't say that my dislike of certain kinds of language is very well thought through or logical, but there are at least some ideas behind it that I really don't think are fascist. I think that labels and language do matter, and labelling someone is a very early step on the road to dehumanising them. I think it is certainly possible to create an unwelcoming or brutalised environment for people purely using words. I also dislike bad manners, and see incorrect, illegal or rude language as the worst of manners. But, for sure, what makes me the guardian of others' language? - at least partly, it is the current political environment (well, current until 6 May I guess ) in that the government would see itself as a progressive force, and I jump on the coattails of that and try to be progressive in a rather clueless manner.

I'm certainly extremely shocked whenever I hear certain words. That may make me sound like a Victorian maiden, and I suppose politically I am - I loathe ugliness and hate. But as a liberal fascist, what did I do when my boss used the word 'nigger' in a meeting? - I resigned. Not exactly brutal repression on my part IMO.

crystal123 · 18/04/2010 21:17

Claig, please don't feel that I have beeen poorly treated. The response to my thread was exactly as I had anticipated. Jonah Golbergs book talks about how some Liberals stifle free speech through terminology. If Nick Cohen from the Guardian gave this book a goood write up I know I'm making sense!

OP posts:
onagar · 18/04/2010 18:19

I don't think Crystal123 has been poorly treated in this thread. Her first post was about people being rude to those who disagreed with them and her second was her being rude to someone who disagreed with her.

I think Anastaisia summed it up with "I think its the same as anything. Some people are rude and intolerant. Some liberals are rude and intolerant. Some conservatives are rude and intolerant. Some breast/bottle feeders are rude and intolerant"

Swipe left for the next trending thread