Please or to access all these features

Politics

Is changing donation laws for Reform retrospectively unfair or politically justified?

455 replies

Gav1961 · 15/09/2026 08:19

I wonder if others have a view on this:

I should start by saying I am no supporter of the Reform Party… not by any measure… but it sometimes we all have a right and indeed a duty to speak up when we see injustice. Even when done to those we might dislike. An old-fashioned notion I know, but a valuable one none the less.

So… The Labour party (temporality constituting the government) , who have received tens of millions of pounds from union member subscriptions over the years… so effectively from one body… have decided that whilst the massive donations to Reform are currently legal, they, the labour government with the approval of all the other parties, will make the receipt of such currently legal gifts, retrospectively illegal.

Mmmm…

Last month I saw that same government protest that the convicted ringleader of the Rochdale grooming gang, cannot be sent back to Pakistan when he is released from prison… because any law made to do this could not be retrospective…. It just would not be British.

OK I have my disagreements and issues with Reform… but does a legitimate UK political party really deserve to be treated worse than a convicted gang leader of groomers?

Anyone else see that as a bit odd, a bit contradictory, a bit self-serving… unconstitutional and illogical? Come on, don’t be shy… it’s just an opinion.

Funny thing is that whilst the cash would undoubtably have helped reform in its bit to run the UK there is one thing that would be more effective in swelling its ranks…. That is a blatantly unfair and self-serving retrospective law hamstringing their attempts to grow.

For anyone who doubts the unintended effects of grossly and manifestly unfair treatment of a one group over another (regardless of its actual merit)… study internment in N Ireland. The single most effective recruited campaign for any organisation… ever. But then not one had at the time tried to bribe the voting public with £5000 dollars each… 😊

People do not like unfairness. I would go so far as to say that Labour are walking into a trap… So predictable was this reaction. Think about it… maybe these guys never thought their £36m was at risk… or am I now getting a little conspiracy theorist?

What are the strategists thinking? Apart from being unfair, non-democratic and blatantly self-serving… There could be no better way to swell the ranks of Reform. The very thing they want to avoid.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
BIossomtoes · 21/09/2026 09:06

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 09:03

That’s odd, it says: individuals registered on a UK electoral register

Surely that would include any British expat who chooses to register. It won’t rule out anyone.

You have to be resident in the UK to register.

TemperanceWest · 21/09/2026 09:10

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2026 09:06

You have to be resident in the UK to register.

You can register as an over seas voter it seems:

You can register as an overseas voter if you move or live abroad.

You must have previously lived in the UK and be either:

a British citizen
an eligible Irish citizen registering to vote in Northern Ireland

Eta: I remember now. There used to be a 15 year limit on overseas voters, but the Tories removed that restriction before the 2024 GE.

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2026 09:14

the Tories removed that restriction before the 2024 GE.

Funny, that.

TemperanceWest · 21/09/2026 09:15

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2026 09:14

the Tories removed that restriction before the 2024 GE.

Funny, that.

Innit.

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 09:21

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2026 09:06

You have to be resident in the UK to register.

So how does this work then?

individuals registered on a UK electoral register, including overseas electors

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2026 09:23

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 09:21

So how does this work then?

individuals registered on a UK electoral register, including overseas electors

Try reading subsequent posts and all will be revealed.

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 09:27

Okay, went back and read. Sounds likely these guys were registered before they moved abroad and therefore they are registered and can legally donate.

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 09:30

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 09:27

Okay, went back and read. Sounds likely these guys were registered before they moved abroad and therefore they are registered and can legally donate.

They possibly can with current legislation that’s passing through. If Labour try to change it again due to the donations we’ll see.

PerkingFaintly · 21/09/2026 09:45

It certainly used to be the case that British expats not resident in the UK could register to vote in the UK. I've done it several times.

There were criteria you had to meet to register.

So by that list of permissible sources I would have been able to donate to political parties.

Harborne et al have been donating, and Harborne's £5m immediately before Farage announced he was standing for Parliament looks like a permissible donation; Farage's problem there is that he failed to declare it.

What is being proposed now is a cap on the amount Brits abroad can donate.

This makes sense because someone could, say, emigrate permanently to the US and take out US citizenship while retaining their UK citizenship. They could be fully committed to the US – indeed would have taken an oath of allegiance – but continue to have a say in UK politics.

If that "say" is just one vote, that's no more influence than I have. I'm prepared to let that one go for the moment (even if ethically they ought to have less influence than me given I actually live in the UK so what happens here really matters to me).

However our hypothetical US/UK dual citizen may decide that although they are committed to their foreign life and never intend to live in the UK again, they want a more substantial say in how the UK is run – purely for the benefit of their foreign (ie US) interests. They may try to do this by channelling vast sums of money into UK politics from their foreign life.

It's actually been a bit of an anomaly that they've been permitted to do it all these years.

(I'm pretty sure the survival of this anomaly has been to do with the tendency of such wealthy expats to support the Tories, and we've mostly had Tory governments. The exception to the Tory government was the Blair/Brown Labour government which needed to keep Murdoch onside and also Mandelson's friends... so weren't going to spoil the wealthy expats' fun either. Now we have a different Labour government and half the top Tories have defected to Reform, so the remaining Tories have suddenly discovered it's not such a great wheeze after all.Hmm )

PerkingFaintly · 21/09/2026 09:47

X-posted with lots of people explaining the criteria to be an overseas voter.

TemperanceWest · 21/09/2026 09:49

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 09:27

Okay, went back and read. Sounds likely these guys were registered before they moved abroad and therefore they are registered and can legally donate.

Deleted as got confused about what the rules are now and what is being proposed.

PerkingFaintly · 21/09/2026 09:49

What is being proposed now is a cap on the amount Brits abroad can donate.

Or rather what was being proposed. I've lost track a bit as the Bill goes through Parliament.

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 09:53

@Notsurewhattodonowattheendyou may right and it’s allowed rn but it could change. Burnham backed down on caps here due to the unions earlier this year, so it depends whether he sticks to that. Or somehow his party get more changes through.

TopPocketFind · 21/09/2026 10:03

The Bill was first discussed in Parliament on 12th Feb and re-introduced on 14th May

The donations came just before the HoL second reading.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/representation-of-the-people-bill-policy-summaries

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 10:06

Burnham raised, as in talked about, caps before the donations, the unions objected. He backed down. Now he’ll have to decide what to do. I doubt carving out unions will go down well but we’ll see.

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 10:11

If it’s not tax residency, then I wonder how many days in the country they need to have to count as residents for political donation purposes.

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 10:11

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 10:11

If it’s not tax residency, then I wonder how many days in the country they need to have to count as residents for political donation purposes.

I think it’s the electoral roll and a year.

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 10:13

That would create a situation where someone is here for 92 days and therefore has to pay UK taxes, but cannot make political donations. Seems wrong.

pointythings · 21/09/2026 10:15

BIossomtoes · 21/09/2026 09:14

the Tories removed that restriction before the 2024 GE.

Funny, that.

I don't have a problem with the removal of the restriction. I haven't lived in the Netherlands for 29 years but can still vote in Dutch General Elections. They make it really easy to register too. I can't vote here, but laws made in my home country can still affect me, so this is reasonable.

TopPocketFind · 21/09/2026 10:25

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 10:06

Burnham raised, as in talked about, caps before the donations, the unions objected. He backed down. Now he’ll have to decide what to do. I doubt carving out unions will go down well but we’ll see.

Edited

How has he backed down?

PerkingFaintly · 21/09/2026 10:26

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 10:11

If it’s not tax residency, then I wonder how many days in the country they need to have to count as residents for political donation purposes.

At the moment they get representation without taxation.

While the right to register as an overseas elector exists, they will continue to get representation without taxation.

However their ability to get more significantly more representation than me (a mere taxpaying UK pleb) via their vast donations, will be slightly diminished.

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 10:26

Notsurewhattodonowattheend · 21/09/2026 10:13

That would create a situation where someone is here for 92 days and therefore has to pay UK taxes, but cannot make political donations. Seems wrong.

Maybe. Labour want to ring fence their donations and lower others.

TopPocketFind · 21/09/2026 10:33

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 10:26

Maybe. Labour want to ring fence their donations and lower others.

You keep saying this without any evidence to back it up. Maybe add 'in my opinion' or 'my hunch is'

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 10:39

TopPocketFind · 21/09/2026 10:33

You keep saying this without any evidence to back it up. Maybe add 'in my opinion' or 'my hunch is'

Your link below had clauses from Labour MPs to exempt unions. Did you read it? Stella Creasy and two others.

TopPocketFind · 21/09/2026 10:42

EasternStandard · 21/09/2026 10:39

Your link below had clauses from Labour MPs to exempt unions. Did you read it? Stella Creasy and two others.

You had affiliation fees explained to you.