Please or to access all these features

Politics

Farage receives second £36m donation in two days for Reform

930 replies

Greyrock79 · 12/09/2026 13:47

Farage receives second £36m donation in two days.

Reform’s biggest donor Christopher Harborne matched record donation given on Friday by fellow cryptocurrency billionaire Ben Delo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 19:27

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 19:00

As it happens, I was made redundant from a previous job because of Brexit - and yes, that was the specific reason cited by my former employer. Leaving the EU hit some sectors very hard.

I'm not going to pretend that the redundancy didn't come at a very good time for me personally or that things didn't actually work out very well for me. If I'm honest, I'm very grateful for it now as it gave me the nudge that I needed to do something a bit different, which has ultimately worked out very well for me. But my personal anecdotes don't tell the wider story of how Brexit has impacted on the economy.

Are you suggesting that you disagree with the consensus of most mainstream economists that Brexit has made our economy significantly smaller? Or are you saying that you don't really understand how a smaller economy actually impacts on the lives of ordinary people?

Edited

I am saying that the tales of woe are exaggerated, and ten years after Brexit large numbers of people in the UK are still living beyond their means on credit and pretending to be celebrities with their face glued to a phone, where are the riots, where is the economic collapse, where are the starving people due to Brexit? The collapse is coming but it will be because the bond market forces up interest rates, nothing much to do with Brexit.

https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/06/05/eurozone-economy-shrinks-by-02-in-the-first-quarter-of-2026

Eurozone economy shrinks by 0.2% in the first quarter of 2026

Eurozone economy shrinks by 0.2% in the first quarter of 2026

The 21-member euro area has entered negative territory for the first time in over a year, with a dramatic Irish contraction masking more nuanced performances across the bloc's major economies.

https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/06/05/eurozone-economy-shrinks-by-02-in-the-first-quarter-of-2026

caringcarer · 13/09/2026 19:23

Ihateboris · 12/09/2026 14:16

What do you think the donor wants in return? A peerage maybe? Or is he just being philanthropic?

Farage has clearly stated unlike the Conservatives and Labour he won't be giving any Reform donors a peerage.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 19:18

Greyrock79 · 13/09/2026 19:07

If Labour bans donations, I doubt it will prove consequence-free for them.

Who could forget Starmer’s plan to delay the May local elections, before performing the inevitable pirouette.

I think it's perfectly justifiable to ban donations from people who don't even live in the UK. I also think it's sensible to cap donations from any given source - allowing huge donations from any source has the potential to undermine democracy as big donors will inevitably have a lot of influence.

I'm not sure where I stand on the question of backdating changes in the law. That instinctively feels wrong to me, but I don't know enough about the legal rationale that would be used to justify this, so I haven't made up my mind on that bit yet.

Switchnow · 13/09/2026 19:17

KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 18:36

The benefits are less and less, the main players, Germany for example are swinging to the right politically, just a matter of time before more EU countries start making their own rules on border controls etc.

We’ll see I guess. But none of that will improve the situation of the UK.

Warmlight1 · 13/09/2026 19:12

Greyrock79 · 13/09/2026 19:07

If Labour bans donations, I doubt it will prove consequence-free for them.

Who could forget Starmer’s plan to delay the May local elections, before performing the inevitable pirouette.

It's a ban on donations from without the country. What do you imagine the consequences would be?

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 19:11

Greyrock79 · 13/09/2026 19:07

If Labour bans donations, I doubt it will prove consequence-free for them.

Who could forget Starmer’s plan to delay the May local elections, before performing the inevitable pirouette.

Yes it’s more of the same. I’m glad he didn’t win on that one - even though he ‘never loses a fight’.

Greyrock79 · 13/09/2026 19:07

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 18:46

Well, yes. Naturally they will want to keep it and Labour (and the other parties if they're honest) will want to stop them. I am not going to pretend that I know what a court might decide.


If Labour bans donations, I doubt it will prove consequence-free for them.

Who could forget Starmer’s plan to delay the May local elections, before performing the inevitable pirouette.

OP posts:
MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 19:03

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 18:50

So not what you put in your earlier post. That they never intended for them to receive it.

No, I said that the person I heard on TV this morning suggested that they might never have intended for Reform to keep it. From my perspective, that's a possibility but I don't think any of us can really know.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 19:00

KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 18:40

And give me one example of a person you know losing their livelihood, a viable job or business not a free money bung to keep them in the political project, and starving or losing their home since Brexit.

As it happens, I was made redundant from a previous job because of Brexit - and yes, that was the specific reason cited by my former employer. Leaving the EU hit some sectors very hard.

I'm not going to pretend that the redundancy didn't come at a very good time for me personally or that things didn't actually work out very well for me. If I'm honest, I'm very grateful for it now as it gave me the nudge that I needed to do something a bit different, which has ultimately worked out very well for me. But my personal anecdotes don't tell the wider story of how Brexit has impacted on the economy.

Are you suggesting that you disagree with the consensus of most mainstream economists that Brexit has made our economy significantly smaller? Or are you saying that you don't really understand how a smaller economy actually impacts on the lives of ordinary people?

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 18:50

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 18:46

Well, yes. Naturally they will want to keep it and Labour (and the other parties if they're honest) will want to stop them. I am not going to pretend that I know what a court might decide.


So not what you put in your earlier post. That they never intended for them to receive it.

PerkingFaintly · 13/09/2026 18:49

When it reached the Lords on 3 September, the Representation of the People Bill already had provision for the ban on c-money donations and cap on overseas donations to be retrospective to 25 March 2026.

It's not a response to Harborne & Delo's announcements this week.

You can find the Bill in its various stages here:
https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4080/publications

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 18:46

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 18:35

Your version doesn’t stack up with the order of events. In any case it’ll probably go to court and Reform will fight to keep it.

Of course they want to keep it, and Labour want to stop them from having it.

Well, yes. Naturally they will want to keep it and Labour (and the other parties if they're honest) will want to stop them. I am not going to pretend that I know what a court might decide.


KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 18:40

LizzieSiddal · 13/09/2026 18:30

Again your ignorance and assumptions are astounding.

I’m not wasting my time giving you real examples of people losing their livelihoods due to Brexit or those not able to get medications they’ve been relying on for years. You obviously don’t give a shit.

Well done Brexiteer.

And give me one example of a person you know losing their livelihood, a viable job or business not a free money bung to keep them in the political project, and starving or losing their home since Brexit.

KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 18:38

LizzieSiddal · 13/09/2026 18:30

Again your ignorance and assumptions are astounding.

I’m not wasting my time giving you real examples of people losing their livelihoods due to Brexit or those not able to get medications they’ve been relying on for years. You obviously don’t give a shit.

Well done Brexiteer.

Just tell me how bands managed to tour in Europe before the EU.

KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 18:36

Switchnow · 13/09/2026 18:16

If those were your reasons then fair enough, but one of the consequences of voting to leave is that we are no longer members and don’t have access to the benefits. Obviously for Leave voters that was a price worth paying, but you can’t complain about ‘red tape’ after the fact.

The benefits are less and less, the main players, Germany for example are swinging to the right politically, just a matter of time before more EU countries start making their own rules on border controls etc.

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 18:35

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 18:33

Well, like I said, who knows.

I'm aware that they allegedly broke it to the Telegraph because they realised that the Times was going to run a story on it. But we don't really know where the Times got their story from or who wanted them to have access to that information and for what purpose.

Your version doesn’t stack up with the order of events. In any case it’ll probably go to court and Reform will fight to keep it.

Of course they want to keep it, and Labour want to stop them from having it.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 18:33

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 18:29

I don’t think do. They only did their own release because The Times were going to run a critical story.

Reform went to a rival paper to head that off a few days earlier. This was discussed on Times radio.

Well, like I said, who knows.

I'm aware that they allegedly broke it to the Telegraph because they realised that the Times was going to run a story on it. But we don't really know where the Times got their story from or who wanted them to have access to that information and for what purpose.

LizzieSiddal · 13/09/2026 18:30

KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 16:54

  1. Loss of subsidies - got it.

  2. No one cares about "musicians" now, the less they tour the better, who wants to stand in a room with a bunch of diddies waving their phones in the air? Just watch them on YouTube, how do you think musicians managed to tour Europe in the 1960"s and 70"s? Ask Elton maybe he knows? How did anyone manage anything before we were in the EU, LOL.

  3. Most people don"t need these drugs, the red tape is deliberately there as punishment for Brexit.

  4. We need less cars not more, the planet is broken because of cars and planes, so again no one sensible should care.

Bless your absolute gullibility in taking on board so much crap from EU central command! A sensible EU would deal properly with the 5th/6th biggest economy on it"s doorstep, but they can"t bring themselves to do that because they are politically and ideologically motivated towards controlling other nation states!

Again your ignorance and assumptions are astounding.

I’m not wasting my time giving you real examples of people losing their livelihoods due to Brexit or those not able to get medications they’ve been relying on for years. You obviously don’t give a shit.

Well done Brexiteer.

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 18:29

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 18:27

Yes, I heard about the possible backdating of the bill this morning. However, the person who I heard talking about it was rather more cynical than you. Rather than assuming that the donors had failed to do their research, she was suggesting that the announcements might never have been made in good faith anyway - she was basically pointing out that there would be substantial political mileage for Reform in being able to complain that the government and/or the establishment had prevented Reform from keeping the money that had been donated to them, all at no actual cost to the donors at all.

And of course, having some whopping great donations to talk about has the added benefit of moving the news cycle on from talking about the various criminal investigations which are currently being carried out into Reform's finances, as well as the assault at the Reform conference as well. Which is rather convenient for them.

So it might be that Reform will never get to keep the money because it was never actually the intention for them to receive it anyway. Who knows.

Edited

I don’t think do. They only did their own release because The Times were going to run a critical story.

Reform went to a rival paper to head that off a few days earlier. This was discussed on Times radio.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 13/09/2026 18:27

Pearlstillsinging · 13/09/2026 18:18

There is a Bill going through Parliament atm, to stop people who live abroad donating to British political Parties. Apparently it will be backdated to the date (25/3/26?) that the Reportit is based on was published. It looks as if Reform and their donors didn't bother to research properly.

Edited

Yes, I heard about the possible backdating of the bill this morning. However, the person who I heard talking about it was rather more cynical than you. Rather than assuming that the donors had failed to do their research, she was suggesting that the announcements might never have been made in good faith anyway - she was basically pointing out that there would be substantial political mileage for Reform in being able to complain that the government and/or the establishment had prevented Reform from keeping the money that had been donated to them, all at no actual cost to the donors at all.

And of course, having some whopping great donations to talk about has the added benefit of moving the news cycle on from talking about the various criminal investigations which are currently being carried out into Reform's finances, as well as the assault at the Reform conference as well. Which is rather convenient for them.

So it might be that Reform will never get to keep the money because it was never actually the intention for them to receive it anyway. Who knows.

Switchnow · 13/09/2026 18:25

KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 17:56

Reform want an independent sovereign nation with controlled borders, a lot of voters also want that, the two main parties didn"t want that, it is really that simple I think, the term "protest vote" is best kept for the Greens, or probably the Tories now because you are not voting for anything sensible just making a statement that is basically pointless anyway in our voting system.

And that’s fine, but what else do Reform want? What’s their vision for healthcare, the economy, foreign policy, education, the environment? It’s not always easy to see the substance. I think it’s unclear what the Greens vision is, and I agree a fair amount of the popularity has been for the same reasons Reform have been popular - protest, a statement. Tories are in a bit of a quagmire but Kemi is getting better, not sure that would be a protest vote.

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 18:24

Pearlstillsinging · 13/09/2026 18:18

There is a Bill going through Parliament atm, to stop people who live abroad donating to British political Parties. Apparently it will be backdated to the date (25/3/26?) that the Reportit is based on was published. It looks as if Reform and their donors didn't bother to research properly.

Edited

They’re not o/s still. Seems uncertain whether they’ll have to return the money.

Pearlstillsinging · 13/09/2026 18:18

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 12/09/2026 16:40

He's a British expat so it's allowed.

I don't think donations should be allowed from people who have chosen to be domiciled overseas, but under the current rules, there is nothing to stop this.

There is a Bill going through Parliament atm, to stop people who live abroad donating to British political Parties. Apparently it will be backdated to the date (25/3/26?) that the Reportit is based on was published. It looks as if Reform and their donors didn't bother to research properly.

Switchnow · 13/09/2026 18:16

KeepPumping · 13/09/2026 18:09

Because we originally voted for a "common market" not a political union and we are one of the largest economies in the world, if Germany (3rd or 4th largest in the world) leaves there is no more EU. Tariffs worked out so well for that other great global businessman didn"t they?

If those were your reasons then fair enough, but one of the consequences of voting to leave is that we are no longer members and don’t have access to the benefits. Obviously for Leave voters that was a price worth paying, but you can’t complain about ‘red tape’ after the fact.

Warmlight1 · 13/09/2026 18:10

I think these donations followed the disastrous conference and interviews given by the leaders
It was apparent to everyone it was awful
Now they are saying the billionaires are expressing confidence.....?
Well who'd be confident after that?
They need to stop.throwing good money after bad.
If you are a philanthropist do something genuinely good with your money, when was the last time you assaulted a woman? Don't collude with it.
Don't waste your money and your energy. It's not going to improve.
Edit- no matter how badly you want to do your thing with crip toe. It won't get better.