Thoughts on Colin Brazier’s critique of Labour’s performance

Are you saying that care worker isn't a proper job?

It’s rammed full of facts.

• politicians used to be limited to reading notes at the dispatch box
• former PMs were deep complex individuals who authored and spoke multiple languages
• politicians used to be decorated military, now not so much
• we are now a pampered online bunch not really experienced in the same hardship of the wartime generations.
• Labour’s revelling in self pity, spitefulness “Tories are scum”, class envy and hatred
• Cancelling of local elections
• Excodus of millionaires
• the dangerous dependence on high income earners tax contributions
• 50th anniversary of our IMF bailout when we run out of money.
• Reeves proposal to tax global wealth (UK citizens resident in other countries)
• Taxing private schools, and the lies that money would benefit state schools, no 6000 extra teachers
• family farm tax, farm sell offs

It’s rammed full of facts.

• politicians used to be limited to reading notes at the dispatch box
• former PMs were deep complex individuals who authored and spoke multiple languages
• politicians used to be decorated military, now not so much
• we are now a pampered online bunch not really experienced in the same hardship of the wartime generations.
• Labour’s revelling in self pity, spitefulness “Tories are scum”, class envy and hatred
• Cancelling of local elections
• Excodus of millionaires
• the dangerous dependence on high income earners tax contributions
• 50th anniversary of our IMF bailout when we run out of money.
• Reeves proposal to tax global wealth (UK citizens resident in other countries)
• Taxing private schools, and the lies that money would benefit state schools, no 6000 extra teachers
• family farm tax, farm sell offs

It’s rammed full of facts.

• politicians used to be limited to reading notes at the dispatch box
• former PMs were deep complex individuals who authored and spoke multiple languages
• politicians used to be decorated military, now not so much
• we are now a pampered online bunch not really experienced in the same hardship of the wartime generations.
• Labour’s revelling in self pity, spitefulness “Tories are scum”, class envy and hatred
• Cancelling of local elections
• Excodus of millionaires
• the dangerous dependence on high income earners tax contributions
• 50th anniversary of our IMF bailout when we run out of money.
• Reeves proposal to tax global wealth (UK citizens resident in other countries)
• Taxing private schools, and the lies that money would benefit state schools, no 6000 extra teachers
• family farm tax, farm sell offs

That's quite the list of bullshit, distortions and opinion founded on toxic nostalgia for 'the good old days'. Not unexpected from this man. Did he ever apologise for the ghoulish suitcase trawl?

I wish our new PM would be interviewed by Andrew Neil.

He's regurgitating nonsense, though if you're happy to lap it up, so be it 😀

It’s rammed full of facts.

• politicians used to be limited to reading notes at the dispatch box
• former PMs were deep complex individuals who authored and spoke multiple languages
• politicians used to be decorated military, now not so much
• we are now a pampered online bunch not really experienced in the same hardship of the wartime generations.
• Labour’s revelling in self pity, spitefulness “Tories are scum”, class envy and hatred
• Cancelling of local elections
• Excodus of millionaires
• the dangerous dependence on high income earners tax contributions
• 50th anniversary of our IMF bailout when we run out of money.
• Reeves proposal to tax global wealth (UK citizens resident in other countries)
• Taxing private schools, and the lies that money would benefit state schools, no 6000 extra teachers
• family farm tax, farm sell offs

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/20/sky-news-presenter-brazier-mh17-luggage-crash

This Colin Brazier who went through victim's suitcases?

It's a fantastic analysis. You will get a lot of pushback on here if people bother to listen to it. Or will they dismiss it as biased garbage? It's true, Labour is a spiteful party whose MPs operate on victimhood. It's no wonder many of their voters do the same - the party they admire enables that. Loved his discussion about Ann.

Labour introducing VAT on private schools for no other reason than bitterness and spite is a pretty solid fact.

I enjoyed his monologue.

Labour introducing VAT on private schools for no other reason than bitterness and spite is a pretty solid fact.

Labour introducing VAT on private schools for no other reason than bitterness and spite is a pretty solid fact.

It's an anti-Labour piece from a right-leaning journalist but that doesn't mean there isn't a kernel of truth. Labour used to have MPs from genuine working-class backgrounds - now it's Angela Rayner and a bunch of people who worked as SPADS or in the third sector. At the last election the majority of the party's support came from voters in the ABC1 (professional and non-manual) sector so in reality its MPs reflect their voters ... middle management and clerical types.

It doesn't mean that Labour have to throw in the towel but perhaps MPs from the current generation have less sense of what a Labour government is supposed to be for.

Of course, the moment facts get in the way, it’s all subjective.

Do you know that when you put beliefs over truth, it has more to do with religiosity than politics or intellectual debate?

Your ilk is like religious zealots at this stage, probably why the left sees no issue allying itself with non-secular religions.

Of course, the moment facts get in the way, it’s all subjective.

Do you know that when you put beliefs over truth, it has more to do with religiosity than politics or intellectual debate?

Your ilk is like religious zealots at this stage, probably why the left sees no issue allying itself with non-secular religions.

Of course, the moment facts get in the way, it’s all subjective.

Do you know that when you put beliefs over truth, it has more to do with religiosity than politics or intellectual debate?

Your ilk is like religious zealots at this stage, probably why the left sees no issue allying itself with non-secular religions.

Of course, the moment facts get in the way, it’s all subjective.

Do you know that when you put beliefs over truth, it has more to do with religiosity than politics or intellectual debate?

Your ilk is like religious zealots at this stage, probably why the left sees no issue allying itself with non-secular religions.