Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

What I would like to ask Reform supporters what are the specific Reform policies they support?

688 replies

CurlewKate · 08/05/2026 12:23

Just that really. I am a Labour voter, and I know what Labour policies I support. I think I know what Conservative and Lib Dem policies their supporters like. I don't know about Reform.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
flytyer27 · 11/05/2026 11:13

I think it important to read manifestos. Reform do not say they would abolish inheritance tax, only increase the tax free amount, something that hasn't been done for many years. The tax free amount has not kept up with inflation and house prices, so more and more people (not just the very rich) now have to pay it.
What's interesting is what is difficult or impossible to find. Reform have a clear list of financial estimates at the end of their manifesto -savings versus extra expenditure. The Greens list some tax rises, but not a full balance.
Try and find the greens policy on legalising street prostitution (in certain areas) and legalising Class A drugs. You really have to hunt for it - I wonder why.
What is the Greens policy regarding defence and the armed forces - well they say a ban on first strike use of nuclear weapons, as though that is something that the other parties would be happy to consider. Apart from that there is next to nothing that I can find, other than getting rid of nuclear weapons and depending more on the EU and "peace focused strategies". A pity Russia doesn't plan to do the same.

1dayatatime · 11/05/2026 08:12

fairyring25 · 11/05/2026 07:49

@flytyer27
Thanks for posting the Reform policies you like. I agree with most of these policies too and I think their policies are much clearer than most of the other parties. Lib dem policies are generic pap in comparison.
However, my concern is Reform's budgeting. How will they finance so many tax cuts and maintain public services? I understand that spending less on benefits, civil service administration, immigration hotels etc. saves some money but it is not that much relative to the whole budget. I think when Robert Jenrick joined them they said that the tax cuts cannot happen until they cut spending. They also need to think carefully about what tax cuts help the economy and which ones don't. Only 4% of people pay inheritance tax-the most wealthy. I don't think we should get rid of it as such a minority pay it.
@ilovesleep6
I think you said about the issue with triple lock pensions. This is something that we need to come out of as it is too expensive.

@fairyring25
@flytyer27
@ilovesleep6

Thank you all for posting such thought through, clear and rational posts.

Too often whenever there is a thread on Reform the argument against them is that "they're racist", "their voters are thick" or " they want to abolish the NHS". Most of these posters are simply parroting social media sound bites rather than taking the intellectual effort to read Reform's policies.

Personally I would not vote for Reform for the same reason that you have identified- where is the money coming from for their tax cuts and spending increases?
They talk vaguely about efficiency savings but this is too vague and as you point out will not raise much money. I also agree about IHT not being a priority and triple lock being unsustainable.

Lastly although Reform's policies lack financial credibility they are at least better than the Green Party policy of funding their increased spending by simply printing more money- anyone for hyperinflation?

Pepperlee · 11/05/2026 08:05

StarCurator · 09/05/2026 21:00

I agree. Reform voters are fixated on immigration, but what they really mean is that Britain should be a white country. They often talk about "indigenous" people being pushed out and say that it was better in the UK before WW2, but they don't seem to understand that Britain had an empire that included India, much of Caribbean, much of Africa, etc. (I'll leave out the Romans, Norman, Huguenots, et al) and that people living in those subject nations had the right to come here. Many of those hated brown and black people also fought for the allies in WW2. Many people came in the 1950s and 1960s were recruited to do jobs that the "indigenous" people didn't want to do, and they were treated with hostility.

The hostility we see today is not just towards asylum seekers, but is often directed at public sector workers, including doctors, nurses, and other hospital staff, GPs, and teachers, who are leaving in droves, and then they complain about waiting lists and delays in A&E, and blame that on the Labour government. It's frankly batshit crazy, and I am ashamed to be British these days, something I never thought that I'd feel until Brexit happened.

When the Indians, Pakistanis and Windrush people came in the 50s they did not come to fill the jobs the English wouldn't do. They were invited to fill labour shortages after the war and some came because of partition.In those days nobody had a choice whether to work or not. You went to the Labour exchange and were given a job to go to if you were out of work because if you didn't work in those days you got sod all.They weren't all treated with hostility either. Stop over generalising. They worked alongside the English in the mills and transport and the NHS who were already and still are doing these jobs, apart from the mills which are mainly shut. Who do you think worked in the mills before the immigrants came? They were treated with curiosity. They were different to us. It's human nature and it happens everywhere. The local midwife in my street in the 50s worked tirelessly to help the immigrants who had nothing for their babies and neighbours gladly gave. Stop bashing the English.

fairyring25 · 11/05/2026 07:49

@flytyer27
Thanks for posting the Reform policies you like. I agree with most of these policies too and I think their policies are much clearer than most of the other parties. Lib dem policies are generic pap in comparison.
However, my concern is Reform's budgeting. How will they finance so many tax cuts and maintain public services? I understand that spending less on benefits, civil service administration, immigration hotels etc. saves some money but it is not that much relative to the whole budget. I think when Robert Jenrick joined them they said that the tax cuts cannot happen until they cut spending. They also need to think carefully about what tax cuts help the economy and which ones don't. Only 4% of people pay inheritance tax-the most wealthy. I don't think we should get rid of it as such a minority pay it.
@ilovesleep6
I think you said about the issue with triple lock pensions. This is something that we need to come out of as it is too expensive.

GimmieABreakOr3 · 11/05/2026 07:39

ha

What I would like to ask Reform supporters what are the specific Reform policies they support?
ThingsThatMakeYouGoHmmmmmmmmm · 11/05/2026 00:50

It's immigration, stupid. The subject that the main parties will not touch with a barge pole. And still won't, despite the wave of support for Reform. Asked to address the reasons for Reforms popularity, neither the Tories or Labour spokespeople could bring themselves to mention it. And now, the fight back from Labour ? Gordon Brown as some sort of trade envoy, and bloody Harriet Harman ( the woman, who decades ago, argued for the age of consent to be lowered to 10 ) as some sort of Czar for women and girls !Does Starmer in any world imagine that this rearranging of the deckchairs will impress anyone, least of all Reform voters .These local elections were a dress rehearsal for the next general election. Be prepared for a majority Reform government in a maximum of 4 years time. And the two main parties will have themselves 100% to blame.

Oldwmn · 10/05/2026 23:41

Unphased · 08/05/2026 15:02

£20,000 personal allowance

What are you prepared to do without to get that? It would cost a fortune.

Pepperlee · 10/05/2026 22:39

1dayatatime · 10/05/2026 19:44

I find it morally repugnant to be indifferent to the burning of hotels with or without people inside and I also certainly wouldn't want her as my child minder.

That said she did plead guilty to the charge whereas Ricky Hatton pleaded not guilty to his charge.

Even though the evidence was clear for anyone not blind or deaf. BTW. I think predictive text has changed his name for you.

ForQuirkyFawn · 10/05/2026 21:48

Reform voters vote on emotion not cold hard facts, very similar to other populist parties across the world, see US. Argentina etc...just look at the 5 million bung to farage it doesn't matter to them, but if it was any other political leader, they would be up in arms, reform is a bit like a cult, read about leon festinger and his research about cognitive dissonance, the cult he studied carried on believing no matter what, quite scary really...

1dayatatime · 10/05/2026 19:46

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 18:34

There is indeed - they literally set fire to Manvers though - anyway it’s not ok to incite it either.

But the clear point is that being indifferent to the burning of a hotel is not incitement to the burning of a hotel.

1dayatatime · 10/05/2026 19:44

ChunkyMonkey36 · 10/05/2026 14:39

Huge difference, yes.

The fact is, she plead and was found guilty of a crime. She went to prison for that crime.

As an (less legal!) aside, I’m not sure I’d want a childminder who was “indifferent” to burning people alive.

I find it morally repugnant to be indifferent to the burning of hotels with or without people inside and I also certainly wouldn't want her as my child minder.

That said she did plead guilty to the charge whereas Ricky Hatton pleaded not guilty to his charge.

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 18:34

1dayatatime · 10/05/2026 14:14

For sake of accuracy the exact words from Lucy Connolly were: "set fire to all the... hotels [housing asylum seekers]... for all I care".

This statement does not suggest the burning of people alive. Merely an indifference to the burning of hotels used by asylum seekers.

There is a difference.

There is indeed - they literally set fire to Manvers though - anyway it’s not ok to incite it either.

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 15:28

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 13:23

I can have opinions and protest for our own beliefs - your party will work on removing that right - This is simply not true - Labour has come down far harder on free speech than previous parties - look at Lucy Connolly and her 31 month sentence and compare to many sentences for rapists and violent assaults. Reform are proposing a Free Speech Bill which will potentially counter the left-wing bias. It won't be perfect but when you look at recent news - a Cambridge university student threatened with death by fellow students for visiting Israel in a think tank organised visit meeting both sides of conflict and the college refused to remove the perpetrator / the FSU recently won a case against the Police Federation of England which suspended two chairs because one of them 'told GB news that frontline policing is increasingly shaped by fear of accusations of racism' and the other questioned whether the police are as racist as critics claim / the recent persecution of gender-critical nurses and the Sandie Peggie case - persecuted for voicing their valid concerns about sharing single-sex spaces with biological men - anything which counters the attempts of the left to silence debate and open discussion is a good thing. The next worrying thing will be the 'anti-muslim hostility' definition which the FSU is fighting against - which could bring in blasphemy laws via the back door. You're completely right to worry about free speech - but not from Reform!

It’s not actually my party and I know they have - I’m not happy and will campaign against it where there’s options to do so. But the Tories started restricting rights to protest and Reform will also stand on that side very firmly.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 10/05/2026 14:41

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 14:31

yes I'm not saying it wasn't an awful thing to say - but people are saying awful things now on social media praising Hitler and saying he should have finished the job - praising the recent attacks on Jewish people etc - literally all the time now. Has anyone been arrested for those posts? Ricky Jones's calling for people's throats to be slit wasn't worthy of a sentence? Lucy was remanded in custody for some reason (despite not being a public threat) so was advised she could spend longer in prison waiting for a trial than if she pleaded guilty. Ricky was released on bail and got a trial by jury. Funny how one was a labour councillor and one the wife of a former Tory councillor. One faced extremely harsh consequences for a post which was shortly removed - the other got off scot-free for inciting violence in a public forum. Freedom of speech and consequence for that speech cannot only be applied to one group in a society, which it currently is.

No I quite agree. Rules are rules and should apply to everyone.

I was on here being accused of defending Charlie Kirk after his death, despite not agreeing with a single word the man ever said, because I publicly said that I don’t agree with the consequence for free speech of any kind being murder.

That however doesn’t absolve LC of her responsibility for her own actions, which she appears to still think were perfectly reasonable.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 10/05/2026 14:39

1dayatatime · 10/05/2026 14:14

For sake of accuracy the exact words from Lucy Connolly were: "set fire to all the... hotels [housing asylum seekers]... for all I care".

This statement does not suggest the burning of people alive. Merely an indifference to the burning of hotels used by asylum seekers.

There is a difference.

Huge difference, yes.

The fact is, she plead and was found guilty of a crime. She went to prison for that crime.

As an (less legal!) aside, I’m not sure I’d want a childminder who was “indifferent” to burning people alive.

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 14:31

ChunkyMonkey36 · 10/05/2026 13:42

Lucy Connolly learned the hard way, that freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of consequence.

You cannot suggest burning people alive without consequences.

Or rather, she would have learned that, were she not such an idiot.

Edited

yes I'm not saying it wasn't an awful thing to say - but people are saying awful things now on social media praising Hitler and saying he should have finished the job - praising the recent attacks on Jewish people etc - literally all the time now. Has anyone been arrested for those posts? Ricky Jones's calling for people's throats to be slit wasn't worthy of a sentence? Lucy was remanded in custody for some reason (despite not being a public threat) so was advised she could spend longer in prison waiting for a trial than if she pleaded guilty. Ricky was released on bail and got a trial by jury. Funny how one was a labour councillor and one the wife of a former Tory councillor. One faced extremely harsh consequences for a post which was shortly removed - the other got off scot-free for inciting violence in a public forum. Freedom of speech and consequence for that speech cannot only be applied to one group in a society, which it currently is.

1dayatatime · 10/05/2026 14:14

ChunkyMonkey36 · 10/05/2026 13:42

Lucy Connolly learned the hard way, that freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of consequence.

You cannot suggest burning people alive without consequences.

Or rather, she would have learned that, were she not such an idiot.

Edited

For sake of accuracy the exact words from Lucy Connolly were: "set fire to all the... hotels [housing asylum seekers]... for all I care".

This statement does not suggest the burning of people alive. Merely an indifference to the burning of hotels used by asylum seekers.

There is a difference.

Pepperlee · 10/05/2026 13:56

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 12:10

No I'm not sainted by any stretch - who is? I dislike humans inhumanity to other humans - I also think it ultimately brings down the societies we live in.

It was sarcasm. I'd think anyone dislikes inhumanity...even those who vote differently to you! Maybe not the sledgehammer swingers though.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 10/05/2026 13:42

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 13:23

I can have opinions and protest for our own beliefs - your party will work on removing that right - This is simply not true - Labour has come down far harder on free speech than previous parties - look at Lucy Connolly and her 31 month sentence and compare to many sentences for rapists and violent assaults. Reform are proposing a Free Speech Bill which will potentially counter the left-wing bias. It won't be perfect but when you look at recent news - a Cambridge university student threatened with death by fellow students for visiting Israel in a think tank organised visit meeting both sides of conflict and the college refused to remove the perpetrator / the FSU recently won a case against the Police Federation of England which suspended two chairs because one of them 'told GB news that frontline policing is increasingly shaped by fear of accusations of racism' and the other questioned whether the police are as racist as critics claim / the recent persecution of gender-critical nurses and the Sandie Peggie case - persecuted for voicing their valid concerns about sharing single-sex spaces with biological men - anything which counters the attempts of the left to silence debate and open discussion is a good thing. The next worrying thing will be the 'anti-muslim hostility' definition which the FSU is fighting against - which could bring in blasphemy laws via the back door. You're completely right to worry about free speech - but not from Reform!

Lucy Connolly learned the hard way, that freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of consequence.

You cannot suggest burning people alive without consequences.

Or rather, she would have learned that, were she not such an idiot.

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 13:27

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 12:29

At least it’s not hate filled. Plus they want to improve social care rather than decimate it.

How are they going to fund that? We've got the highest taxes on working people since 1948 so it can't be more taxes on working population. We'd all love great social care and good schools etc but we're already massively in deficit. We need to invest in productivity growth before anything else which is now very difficult in a high interest environment.

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 13:23

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 08:11

I don’t need to search it up - as anyway I would rather do anything else than crowdfund this enquiry for the victims to be used (effectively abused) on the alter of Lowe’s abhorrent ideologies. As I said I am happy there is an official enquiry.

I don’t actually go on specifically Palestine marches no - as I don’t feel I know enough about the whole background to shout a view. I do counter protest the animals shouting abuse outside hotels yes - just so everyone having to hide in there knows that at least some of us in the U.K. do not want to burn them alive. I will March against fascists too until the day I die as I fear for my grandkids’ and their peers’ future.

However, today I am glad that you and I can have opinions and protest for our own beliefs - your party will work on removing that right - harder and faster than labour are!

Btw - you’re still not answering my question as to why the protestors/Tommy associates do have a disproportionately high amount of DA/SA records?

I can have opinions and protest for our own beliefs - your party will work on removing that right - This is simply not true - Labour has come down far harder on free speech than previous parties - look at Lucy Connolly and her 31 month sentence and compare to many sentences for rapists and violent assaults. Reform are proposing a Free Speech Bill which will potentially counter the left-wing bias. It won't be perfect but when you look at recent news - a Cambridge university student threatened with death by fellow students for visiting Israel in a think tank organised visit meeting both sides of conflict and the college refused to remove the perpetrator / the FSU recently won a case against the Police Federation of England which suspended two chairs because one of them 'told GB news that frontline policing is increasingly shaped by fear of accusations of racism' and the other questioned whether the police are as racist as critics claim / the recent persecution of gender-critical nurses and the Sandie Peggie case - persecuted for voicing their valid concerns about sharing single-sex spaces with biological men - anything which counters the attempts of the left to silence debate and open discussion is a good thing. The next worrying thing will be the 'anti-muslim hostility' definition which the FSU is fighting against - which could bring in blasphemy laws via the back door. You're completely right to worry about free speech - but not from Reform!

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 12:29

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 12:26

In response to fairyring25 completely agree with this - lib dems are the most waffly party 😂- they'll literally say anything generic to get in!

Edited

At least it’s not hate filled. Plus they want to improve social care rather than decimate it.

Pange79 · 10/05/2026 12:26

In response to fairyring25 completely agree with this - lib dems are the most waffly party 😂- they'll literally say anything generic to get in!

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 12:18

RedTagAlan · 10/05/2026 12:10

That's why I am asking really. It could be to pay for facilities and witness travel expenses etc. Or it could be to pay a mate to knock one up on a laptop.

There is no info on the Restore website. In fact, there is hardly anything on their website.

So there wouldn’t be - no transparency. This is an interesting article, though not strictly about Lowe’s enquiry https://bylinetimes.com/2024/06/01/special-investigation-the-far-right-is-cynically-taking-advantage-of-child-sexual-exploitation-survivors/

Special Investigation: ‘The Far-Right Is Cynically Taking Advantage of Child Sexual Exploitation Survivors’

Andrew Kersley spent five months speaking to survivors of child sexual exploitation and experts on the ‘grooming’ of vulnerable women by far-right groups to understand why it is happening

https://bylinetimes.com/2024/06/01/special-investigation-the-far-right-is-cynically-taking-advantage-of-child-sexual-exploitation-survivors/

MsJinks · 10/05/2026 12:15

PhilMitchell82 · 10/05/2026 08:17

Anyone who votes Labour or Green is absolutely clueless. Green leader has made many antisemitism comments. Labour have emboldened the hatred for Jews by recognising Palestine and appealing to the Muslim vote. Unfortunately, for people like you until your daughter or grandaughter gets SA by one of these immigrants illegals then you will never see the light. If you love them so much offer to host them, live with them then you find out sharpish about them. You only need to see the countless stories about them.

You can take a horse to water and show it sense but unfortunately it won’t drink it.

And they’re on here too. A guy told me at a counter protest (he was protesting) that he hoped my kids get raped - weird obsession with overpowering and raping women.

Therefore, I’m not gonna encourage your disturbing obsession with SA apart from to say all the SA I have unfortunately come across were white British males and it was with mainly their own families.

Swipe left for the next trending thread