Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

New poll finds only privileged people will vote for Labour - but why?

261 replies

ProudAmberTurtle · 02/05/2026 13:49

This is a new IPSOS poll. It finds that among the least well off in society, support for Labour has collapsed - it's now just 10%.

Even among people who are 'just about coping' financially, they're a distant fourth in the polls, and would be wiped out if it was just them voting.

But - here's what might be surprising - among wealthy people they are first in the polls, in fact their lead is so big that if only rich people could vote, it would be a landslide for Labour.

Any thoughts as to why it is now that only the most privileged people in society are voting Labour?

https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2026-04/Ipsos%20Apr%202026_Political%20Monitor%20charts_Public.pdf

New poll finds only privileged people will vote for Labour - but why?
New poll finds only privileged people will vote for Labour - but why?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
ConstantlyPeeing · 03/05/2026 14:09

BIossomtoes · 03/05/2026 13:57

You watch the UK borrowing rate shoot up if Farage gets a whiff of power. The IMF would be on the doorstep in weeks.

No that is not right at all. The markets want to see someone make good financial decisions to bring the UK back to financial viability.

So for a country in debt who increases this debt each month good decisions are things like cutting spending, growing economy, investing in industries, apprenticeships for young people.
Bad decisions that signal to the market we have no intention of trying to return to financial viability is pumping more money into the NHS, an ever increasing welfare bill etc

It's actual a move to the left that will cause the markets alarm. So if KS gets the boot and is replaced by someone more left wing or worse god forbid the greens were in charge.

plsdontlookatme · 03/05/2026 14:06

I'm not a Starmer enthusiast but I agree that it's probably not good for our economy/international standing to vote in a populist grifter

plsdontlookatme · 03/05/2026 14:05

Have Reform actually costed up any of their policies? Or do they just say pithy things like "take benefits off scroungers"?

ConstantlyPeeing · 03/05/2026 14:03

CircleComplete · 03/05/2026 10:54

One of the challenges in public decisions is that not everyone fully understands the realities of leadership and managing change. Whether in industry, public service, education, or small business, there are some consistent truths about effective leadership.

Leaders who inherit broken systems as Labour have, rarely see immediate results. Meaningful change often takes years before positive outcomes are fully felt. During that process, resistance to change is inevitable, particularly when difficult decisions must be made. Strong leaders also recognise that it is impossible to please everyone all of the time. Instead, they rely on evidence, data, budgets/funding limitations, professional expertise, relationship-building, diplomacy, and long-term thinking to guide their decisions.

Often, the first leader willing to confront deep-rooted problems is the one who absorbs the criticism and “takes the flack.” Later leaders are then able to build on those difficult foundations, frequently benefiting from progress that has already been made.

In my own experience turning around failing and inadequate schools, I have seen first-hand how essential leadership is in difficult circumstances. Real improvement requires resilience, consistency, and the willingness to make unpopular decisions in pursuit of long-term outcomes.

Keir Starmer demonstrates many strong leadership qualities during an exceptionally challenging period. Whether people agree with every decision or not, leadership should be judged not only by immediate popularity, but by the ability to navigate complexity, make difficult choices, and work towards sustainable long-term change. You can’t please everyone all of the time!

Do the general population of the UK really understand the strong leadership required of anyone running the country (or any other organisation)?

I absolutely agree with your post re leadership but do you really think KS is a strong leader? He has made lots of U turns and does not seem able to make tough decisions at all. He has also increased welfare and given pay rises to train drivers for one (which seemed strange to me) in a time where the UK pays out more each month than it brings in. Not a good position to be in.

I thought he was right to means test the WFA for pensioners but then he u-turned on it. This type of thing has lost him credibility.

If I saw him recognising the financial hole we are in and slowly but steadily start fixing it then I would be okay with him only making baby steps. This does not seem to be happening at all though.

ProudAmberTurtle · 03/05/2026 13:59

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 13:19

Any data to back that up ?

Do I have any data to support points that state that wealthy people are more likely to send their children to private schools than poor people, or that immigration puts more pressure on housing?

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 03/05/2026 13:57

ConstantlyPeeing · 03/05/2026 13:53

I'm probably going to vote reform. Used to vote Tory. Uni Educated, further professional qualification, in high tax bracket by about 26 until I retired at 51.

So I don't think I fit your criteria.

My reasons for voting for them is right now the UK borrows money each month. That means the debt we pay is going up and up. The rate we get charged to borrow is also high now as we (the UK) are now being recognised as making a financial balls up of things.

So I'll say that again each month the UK spends more than it brings in.

Reform are the only one that has recognised some of the problems and are saying they will change things. This is not what people want to hear. It's what needs to be done. So the NHS - we can't afford it so it needs to go in it's current form. Heck we can't afford it and it doesn't even work very well in lots of areas either. So not a vote winner to say this but true all the same.

Other things that might be unpleasant but are also true. We have too many people now squashed into a small island. Everywhere is too crowded. Roads, small houses, noise, schools are overcrowded, can't get GP appointment. Charity is one thing but at what point did we stop looking after our own country and our own citizens. Someone needs to tell UK to put it's own oxygen mask on before it helps others. So yes we do need someone to do something about immigration. Not because we hate people from other places but because we are drowning and we need to help ourselves (illegal ones who commit crimes should be put on a row boat and pushed back out to sea, no excuses). Why are we paying France a fortune to stop them leaving France and coming here. We should employ our own people (creating jobs) and control it ourselves.

Law and Order - policing is on it's knees. Shoplifting, antisocial behaviour, lack of respect. It's a mess. The number of frontline officers is shocking low. Reform have promised us better law and order and more fitting punishment.

They are by no means perfect. They are keeping the triple lock which I actually think is a mistake (they are obviously wanting to retain the grey vote of which I am one). However I think it would be fair to just increase state pension by say inflation each year and be done with it. However they have promised to address our bloated welfare bill. Far too many people not working due to conditions that do not warrant it.

Again not what alot of people want to hear but it needs to be done.

Do I think NF is in it for himself. Of course he is. They all are. I actually think KS is a decent man but he just does not have the balls to run a country and make tough decisions. We need someone who is going to change things because they need changed and they are not going to be popular when they do it. Remember Maggie Thatcher - lots hated her (I didn't) but dam she was tough and firm and didn't back down. It's a shame we can't clone her.

We help ourselves now (and it's going to be ugly) or we wait for the markets to charge us so much interest we can't afford it (or worse refuse to lend to us at all). Alternatively we wait for the IMF bailout (seventies anyone?) and then they will slash welfare, NHS anyway.

The ugly truth is the UK is currently not financially viable. We are very vunerable to the current war because we import so much of our power and so much of our food. Growth is stagnant, inflation is a problem (again anyone remember the seventies with inflation). Unemployment is rising, welfare is rising and the UK now pays more to borrow than Greece and Morocco. Now that is just embarrassing.

You watch the UK borrowing rate shoot up if Farage gets a whiff of power. The IMF would be on the doorstep in weeks.

ConstantlyPeeing · 03/05/2026 13:53

SpareFurniture · 03/05/2026 01:27

I thought this was due to low income = lower educational level = more susceptible to Reform’s ‘politics’.

I'm probably going to vote reform. Used to vote Tory. Uni Educated, further professional qualification, in high tax bracket by about 26 until I retired at 51.

So I don't think I fit your criteria.

My reasons for voting for them is right now the UK borrows money each month. That means the debt we pay is going up and up. The rate we get charged to borrow is also high now as we (the UK) are now being recognised as making a financial balls up of things.

So I'll say that again each month the UK spends more than it brings in.

Reform are the only one that has recognised some of the problems and are saying they will change things. This is not what people want to hear. It's what needs to be done. So the NHS - we can't afford it so it needs to go in it's current form. Heck we can't afford it and it doesn't even work very well in lots of areas either. So not a vote winner to say this but true all the same.

Other things that might be unpleasant but are also true. We have too many people now squashed into a small island. Everywhere is too crowded. Roads, small houses, noise, schools are overcrowded, can't get GP appointment. Charity is one thing but at what point did we stop looking after our own country and our own citizens. Someone needs to tell UK to put it's own oxygen mask on before it helps others. So yes we do need someone to do something about immigration. Not because we hate people from other places but because we are drowning and we need to help ourselves (illegal ones who commit crimes should be put on a row boat and pushed back out to sea, no excuses). Why are we paying France a fortune to stop them leaving France and coming here. We should employ our own people (creating jobs) and control it ourselves.

Law and Order - policing is on it's knees. Shoplifting, antisocial behaviour, lack of respect. It's a mess. The number of frontline officers is shocking low. Reform have promised us better law and order and more fitting punishment.

They are by no means perfect. They are keeping the triple lock which I actually think is a mistake (they are obviously wanting to retain the grey vote of which I am one). However I think it would be fair to just increase state pension by say inflation each year and be done with it. However they have promised to address our bloated welfare bill. Far too many people not working due to conditions that do not warrant it.

Again not what alot of people want to hear but it needs to be done.

Do I think NF is in it for himself. Of course he is. They all are. I actually think KS is a decent man but he just does not have the balls to run a country and make tough decisions. We need someone who is going to change things because they need changed and they are not going to be popular when they do it. Remember Maggie Thatcher - lots hated her (I didn't) but dam she was tough and firm and didn't back down. It's a shame we can't clone her.

We help ourselves now (and it's going to be ugly) or we wait for the markets to charge us so much interest we can't afford it (or worse refuse to lend to us at all). Alternatively we wait for the IMF bailout (seventies anyone?) and then they will slash welfare, NHS anyway.

The ugly truth is the UK is currently not financially viable. We are very vunerable to the current war because we import so much of our power and so much of our food. Growth is stagnant, inflation is a problem (again anyone remember the seventies with inflation). Unemployment is rising, welfare is rising and the UK now pays more to borrow than Greece and Morocco. Now that is just embarrassing.

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 13:29

I think it’s also more than finance and comfort. Besides actual impacts, and perceived impacts (which might be true or not), or even incorrect conclusions. There’s also expectations.

People who are educated, tend to move to big cities or strong economic areas which are melting pots. So no one is expecting a city to be anything but multicultural. It’s transient, it’s mixed and diverse. You don’t really notice immigration in this setting as it’s expected.

But this country is much larger than a few cities. People do expect local areas to be native. You can baulk at the word native there and I chose that specifically because I am not just talking about ‘white’ or British. Cornish people expect Cornwall to be Cornish. Welsh people expect wales to stay Welsh. Midlanders do not want to be flooded by wealthy southerners increasing their house prices. People are tribal whether we like it or not.

Cornish people are not racist to white people buying second homes. And two thirds of the country are not simply racists. I believe people do quite simply have the expectation that England (outside major cities) remains predominantly English and in recent decades its becoming increasingly not so at a rapid rate in many medium and small towns across the country.

I think the villages and the countryside are still predominantly English but these people visit towns for amenities and services. So they are not exempt from noticing the change.

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 13:19

ProudAmberTurtle · 03/05/2026 13:17

There's plenty of obvious reasons, but off the top of my head:

  1. Immigrants, especially recent or lower-skilled arrivals, disproportionately enter low-wage, semi/unskilled service, care, construction and hospitality jobs. Poorer UK-born workers (lower education, bottom of wage distribution) compete most directly with them.
  2. Rapid population growth from immigration increases demand for housing, especially in urban/low-cost areas.
  3. Poorer natives compete for school places, GP appointments and social housing. Wealthier people use private alternatives and are less sensitive to queues or overcrowding.
  4. Higher-income areas are more insulated, with better resources for integration and less direct exposure.

Any data to back that up ?

ProudAmberTurtle · 03/05/2026 13:17

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 13:11

I think you need to explain why immigration impacts financial comfort.

There's plenty of obvious reasons, but off the top of my head:

  1. Immigrants, especially recent or lower-skilled arrivals, disproportionately enter low-wage, semi/unskilled service, care, construction and hospitality jobs. Poorer UK-born workers (lower education, bottom of wage distribution) compete most directly with them.
  2. Rapid population growth from immigration increases demand for housing, especially in urban/low-cost areas.
  3. Poorer natives compete for school places, GP appointments and social housing. Wealthier people use private alternatives and are less sensitive to queues or overcrowding.
  4. Higher-income areas are more insulated, with better resources for integration and less direct exposure.
OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 13:11

ProudAmberTurtle · 03/05/2026 13:07

The latest YouGov poll on issues that affect voters the most found this (those polled could pick more than one):

  1. Economy (54%)
  2. Immigration (51%)
  3. Defence (29%)
  4. NHS (28%)

It really shouldn't be a surprise that people want change when so far this decade the two main parties have been appalling on the two issues that are far and away the most important to voters at the moment. Calling them 'batshit' or 'stupid' just suggests you're financially so comfortable that you're not impacted by immigration.

I think you need to explain why immigration impacts financial comfort.

ProudAmberTurtle · 03/05/2026 13:07

The latest YouGov poll on issues that affect voters the most found this (those polled could pick more than one):

  1. Economy (54%)
  2. Immigration (51%)
  3. Defence (29%)
  4. NHS (28%)

It really shouldn't be a surprise that people want change when so far this decade the two main parties have been appalling on the two issues that are far and away the most important to voters at the moment. Calling them 'batshit' or 'stupid' just suggests you're financially so comfortable that you're not impacted by immigration.

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 12:46

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 12:43

So I googled and its coming up two thirds…
https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/two-thirds-britons-believe-total-number-people-coming-uk-too-high

How many of them are so pissed off they would vote reform is another question.

Fair enough.

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 12:41

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 12:37

Immigration policy. And I think anyone anti reform will say that. Because it is true. The difficulty comes, I think, in trying to explain why that is number one for reform voters.

And I think its interesting that your follow up is abortion access. Because I think the anti abortionists might be quite similar to reform voters when it comes to immigration. They both have characteristics that drive the most vocal. Racism for Reform, and religion for pro-life. But the vocal of both these groups have become adept at deflecting from the core reasons I think.

Thing is this isn’t the most vocal.

It’s literally half the country. I am going to actually hazard more than half the country at this point.

It’s the silent majority who are unhappy with the level of immigration.

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 12:37

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 12:15

Can you for example, as you can see both sides, say what policy of the far right is most attractive. And why that policy is correct ? That is, why would you vote reform?

And the answer to that is their anti immigration policies.

That policy is obviously going to be seen as correct if you don’t like the immigration we have historically had/ continue to have.

I am not voting for reform because I don’t think it’s something you can reverse. And also I am quite tin hat about how far I think they are willing to go. I genuinely believe they want to increase the white population by banning abortion.

Immigration policy. And I think anyone anti reform will say that. Because it is true. The difficulty comes, I think, in trying to explain why that is number one for reform voters.

And I think its interesting that your follow up is abortion access. Because I think the anti abortionists might be quite similar to reform voters when it comes to immigration. They both have characteristics that drive the most vocal. Racism for Reform, and religion for pro-life. But the vocal of both these groups have become adept at deflecting from the core reasons I think.

keepswimming38 · 03/05/2026 12:35

Of course remainers didn’t understand leavers motivations. That’s because they were batshit!

I live in Spain but I’m going to vote for Brexit. Er!!

Im a farmer in Lincolnshire that needs my fruit picking but I’m going to vote for Brexit. Er!!

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 12:35

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 12:24

Interesting article. Sort of shows turkeys voting for Christmas.

😂

I have no idea how that’s what you took from the article.

The three major themes are economy, sovereignty, and immigration - all pretty important headline themes politically.

To me the take away was re. the ‘left’ - because they are more educated, that is proven - are so behind on this. The default should be they understand MORE. And yet statistically they came out streets behind. That is hugely significant. It’s more than a gap. They are clearly capable.

And as a centre voter it’s super frustrating. The headline issues above are important to everyone. By making them left and right we have completely screwed ourselves over and it’s a huge driver of why we are where we are today.

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 12:24

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 12:12

No they actually understand it less than the other way around. There are studies on this.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/05/04/leavers-have-a-better-understanding-of-remainers-motivations-than-vice-versa/

Interesting article. Sort of shows turkeys voting for Christmas.

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 12:15

Can you for example, as you can see both sides, say what policy of the far right is most attractive. And why that policy is correct ? That is, why would you vote reform?

And the answer to that is their anti immigration policies.

That policy is obviously going to be seen as correct if you don’t like the immigration we have historically had/ continue to have.

I am not voting for reform because I don’t think it’s something you can reverse. And also I am quite tin hat about how far I think they are willing to go. I genuinely believe they want to increase the white population by banning abortion.

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 12:12

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 12:04

Re not understanding things. I think a good example is Trumps tariffs. That is really easy to understand. They are an import tax that the importer pays. So boom. That is the concept.

However, Trump himself keeps saying the exporting nation pays. But that is just not true. Yet he and his followers just keep parroting it.

So it's not a case of the left, or whoever, not understanding their opponents, it's a case of understanding it, but being somewhat bewildered as to why people consistently do not.

Apply that to the far right and Brexit. It is more nuanced yes, but pretty much the same applies as per Trumps tariffs.

Can you for example, as you can see both sides, say what policy of the far right is most attractive. And why that policy is correct ? That is, why would you vote reform?

No they actually understand it less than the other way around. There are studies on this.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/05/04/leavers-have-a-better-understanding-of-remainers-motivations-than-vice-versa/

Leavers have a better understanding of Remainers’ motivations than vice versa - LSE BREXIT

Why did people really vote to Leave or Remain? Noah Carl (Centre for Social Investigation) examines four different polls, and finds that immigration and sovereignty headed Leavers' reasons - contrary to suggestions that the vote was intended to 'teach...

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/05/04/leavers-have-a-better-understanding-of-remainers-motivations-than-vice-versa/

RedTagAlan · 03/05/2026 12:04

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 11:46

And can I make a point on this too.

It is not surprising to me poorer people have lower levels of education. As PP points out there’s a trillion reasons for this.

What to this day still surprises me is how blind (and yes I am using that word but you could write uneducated, unaware, head in sand, wilfully ignorant) the ‘left’ (again I don’t like that as I don’t think it’s actually left) are to the drivers and reasons behind the rise of the right.

You saw this quite clearly with Brexit. They just could not understand it.

And that’s really interesting because leavers very clearly understood remainers.

That is really interesting to me. I am a centre swing voter. I really do see clearly both sides. Why don’t they get it?! Is it classism, identity based blockage in the brain, lack of emotional intelligence, literal complete naivety, parallel lives, virtue signalling, echo chambers? Honestly I do not know. But that I struggle to understand more than leavers/ far right voters. And there’s ‘left’ really need to get to the bottom of that.

Re not understanding things. I think a good example is Trumps tariffs. That is really easy to understand. They are an import tax that the importer pays. So boom. That is the concept.

However, Trump himself keeps saying the exporting nation pays. But that is just not true. Yet he and his followers just keep parroting it.

So it's not a case of the left, or whoever, not understanding their opponents, it's a case of understanding it, but being somewhat bewildered as to why people consistently do not.

Apply that to the far right and Brexit. It is more nuanced yes, but pretty much the same applies as per Trumps tariffs.

Can you for example, as you can see both sides, say what policy of the far right is most attractive. And why that policy is correct ? That is, why would you vote reform?

Sherbs12 · 03/05/2026 12:03

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 11:46

And can I make a point on this too.

It is not surprising to me poorer people have lower levels of education. As PP points out there’s a trillion reasons for this.

What to this day still surprises me is how blind (and yes I am using that word but you could write uneducated, unaware, head in sand, wilfully ignorant) the ‘left’ (again I don’t like that as I don’t think it’s actually left) are to the drivers and reasons behind the rise of the right.

You saw this quite clearly with Brexit. They just could not understand it.

And that’s really interesting because leavers very clearly understood remainers.

That is really interesting to me. I am a centre swing voter. I really do see clearly both sides. Why don’t they get it?! Is it classism, identity based blockage in the brain, lack of emotional intelligence, literal complete naivety, parallel lives, virtue signalling, echo chambers? Honestly I do not know. But that I struggle to understand more than leavers/ far right voters. And there’s ‘left’ really need to get to the bottom of that.

Ironically, you’re making blind generalisations and failing to understand a significant amount of ‘the left’ - I’ve said already on this thread and others, but many of us on the left are from working class communities where Reform support seems to be thriving. I hate it, but I understand how we got here. And unlike populists on both the left and right would have us believe, the reasons are many and the solutions complex.

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 11:46

keepswimming38 · 03/05/2026 10:49

Wow you really do jump to the far extreme don’t you op. That’s not what I said in my post at all. Plus there are numerous polls that a very quick search would reveal that identify educational level and voting preference. The reasons for that correlation are varied and nuanced.

Heres one such report:

https://natcen.ac.uk/news/educational-experience-primary-driver-uks-divide-immigration-and-politics

There are many others.

And can I make a point on this too.

It is not surprising to me poorer people have lower levels of education. As PP points out there’s a trillion reasons for this.

What to this day still surprises me is how blind (and yes I am using that word but you could write uneducated, unaware, head in sand, wilfully ignorant) the ‘left’ (again I don’t like that as I don’t think it’s actually left) are to the drivers and reasons behind the rise of the right.

You saw this quite clearly with Brexit. They just could not understand it.

And that’s really interesting because leavers very clearly understood remainers.

That is really interesting to me. I am a centre swing voter. I really do see clearly both sides. Why don’t they get it?! Is it classism, identity based blockage in the brain, lack of emotional intelligence, literal complete naivety, parallel lives, virtue signalling, echo chambers? Honestly I do not know. But that I struggle to understand more than leavers/ far right voters. And there’s ‘left’ really need to get to the bottom of that.

Blahblahblahabla · 03/05/2026 11:04

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 03/05/2026 02:44

The almost-certainly-trafficked workers where I live (northern suburb) and work (northern inner-city) are:

  • Young brown men, probably from north and east Africa, riding electric bicycles with food delivery bags and covering their faces in all weathers.
  • Similar at the hand car washes.
  • East asian and south-east Asian women and men in nail salons, all wearing surgical masks, that take cash only and have frosted-effect film on the front windows so you can't see in.

That's why I'm talking about dark-skinned people: it's what I see near me. These people are exploited by criminals. It's a criminal offence to pay less than NMW. These people are imported like goods to work in conditions that we have rightly outlawed and they tolerate it because it is, or at least seemed like for a while, a better situation than the one they came from. Are you trying to claim that British people are competing for these illegal jobs?

Everyone else I can identify as foreign either runs a family business (the Polish shop I pass on my way to work, the Chinese and Indian takeaways), came here from the EU before Brexit, is a student, or is here to fill a skills gap. A foreigner without a visa and right-to-work cannot be lawfully employed here.

I am talking about all lower end jobs, and businesses too. Just because you are a xyz and hire yourself doesn’t make you devoid of the ripple effect of that.

Further than that I am just talking generally. The country has become rapidly more multicultural the past few decades and less cohesive, and less affluent. I am not saying that’s cause and effect. But that’s what people see.

I think people need to stop taking this so personally and we do need to have discussions and conversations on good faith. Unfortunately it’s actually getting worse in this regard because whilst many are actually opening up to having conversations now; actual racist people are now emboldened with the rise of the right. & Normal people don’t want to associate with that so the normal part of this conversation no one wants to have or be associated with which leaves people to act privately at the ballot box.

And to clarify again so there’s absolutely no confusion about what I am saying:
There’s nothing wrong or racist about being unhappy about the town you were born and grew up in becoming increasingly non British. Recognisably so. In the shops, in your workplace, in the schools, in the A&E waiting room. Poorer people are more likely to have been born, live, work and die in the same communities. They are more likely to see this change.

That doesn’t mean I don’t like the kind Sikh man who owns the corner shop, or my polish window cleaners or my non British friends. Or my non British colleagues. It’s not a personal thing. It’s a cumulative thing.

And no I am not going to vote reform. They are clearly racist to me, so much so I fear they will actually go down the eugenics route and ban abortion to try to get the white population up again. But lots of people don’t think that. And there’s a large portion of our society who whether we like it or not have this as such a single issue point who have repeatedly voted against immigration for over a decade now that it’s clear they are quite willing to take us all to hell in a hand basket in an attempt to resolve it.