Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Claire’s Accessories goes under - blaming Rachel Reeves for the 1,300 jobs lost

280 replies

ProudAmberTurtle · 27/04/2026 17:38

Claire’s Accessories has just gone bust - and over 1,300 people have lost their jobs.

I know it’s overpriced plastic and the piercing guns were always a bit controversial, but it’s been a total rite of passage for many girls. First earrings, birthday parties and that excitement of spending their pocket money on some glittery rubbish... it feels like another bit of childhood nostalgia is being wiped out.

But what’s really grating is why. According to the owner, the final nail in the coffin was the massive hike in National Insurance contributions from Rachel Reeves. It wasn't the only factor obviously - the high street is doing very badly, but it was the decisive factor.

How can a business that relies on young, part-time staff survive when their overheads have just been hiked through the roof? It’s not just the big brands; it’s the independent shops too. We’re going to be left with nothing but vape shops and empty units at this rate.

There was a report yesterday that Starmer will sack Reeves if the local elections go badly for him. Why can't they both go whatever the result?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Sesma · 27/04/2026 19:34

Monzo1ss · 27/04/2026 19:27

Also I don’t think Claire’s accessories is a rite of passage for girls at all.

if the UK can survive without Topshop, I am sure we will be totally fine without Clare’s accessories of all things.

Top shop is a concession in JL

Smeuse · 27/04/2026 19:31

There was a report yesterday that Starmer will sack Reeves if the local elections go badly for him.

@ProudAmberTurtle what report was this?

TemperanceWest · 27/04/2026 19:28

Oh @ProudAmberTurtle how many Labour bashing threads have you created? You are dedicated, I must say!

Monzo1ss · 27/04/2026 19:27

Also I don’t think Claire’s accessories is a rite of passage for girls at all.

if the UK can survive without Topshop, I am sure we will be totally fine without Clare’s accessories of all things.

Monzo1ss · 27/04/2026 19:26

Grow up, what a foolish post! national insurance contributions have nothing to do with it

I’m in my 20s and Claire’s Accessories have not been relevant for about 20 years. The whole social media era arrived and has been established for over a decade, yet Claire’s was left in the dust. Never do I hear anyone going to Claire’s accessories, not even by the time I was in secondary school. The downfall of this business is just down to the owner’s inability to adapt to the market.

DeathMetalMum · 27/04/2026 19:23

Our Claire's was six shops down from local Primark. You could get 80% of the stuff sold in Claire's in Primark for a fraction of the price.

I will miss their collection of sterling silver earrings though. There are not many high street shops that sell them.

80smonster · 27/04/2026 19:23

Good riddance. That store was daylight robbery for plastic tat. They should be ashamed of themselves for going under at that prices, pretty sure they tried to charge me £15 for a key ring once.

singthing · 27/04/2026 19:23

"There was a report yesterday that Starmer will sack Reeves if the local elections go badly for him"

At some point, the man has got to stop sacking people and whining that it was not his fault or he didn't know or someone didn't tell him or whatever excuse it is today. Part of being PM is that the buck stops with you. Don't like it? Sack yourself!

JulietteHasAGun · 27/04/2026 19:22

Agree their stuff was expensive. You can get costume jewellery and hair accessories for cheaper in Primark as well as online. A small bundle of hair bobbles was £5 when I last looked a couple of years ago. Was £1 in Primark and Sainsbury’s.

Itsmetheflamingo · 27/04/2026 19:22

marmaladygaga · 27/04/2026 19:20

I do think the government is partially to blame (this one and the last one) but for letting Temu and Shein enter the British economy without paying proper corporation tax - that’s let them offer prices that no one can compete with.

Primark also suffering from the same cause although their European sales propped up peak trading - countries such as France have legislation in place to try and penalise ‘ultra fast fashion’

How could they be made to pay corporation tax? They’re Chinese companies, they export their stuff here. They pay corporation tax in China

Sesma · 27/04/2026 19:22

A lot of the High Street fashion shops will probably close. Some will get swept up by Next who will keep the shops they want but will mostly be added to the online Directory like many before them. These shops generally employ students that find it hard to get jobs anyway so not really a good thing but MN is rejoicing

SpottyAlpaca · 27/04/2026 19:20

Good. That’s thousands of tons of pointless throwaway plastic tat which won’t be sold every year. I hope the people affected by redundancy can find less damaging, more sustainable & socially useful work as soon as possible.

marmaladygaga · 27/04/2026 19:20

I do think the government is partially to blame (this one and the last one) but for letting Temu and Shein enter the British economy without paying proper corporation tax - that’s let them offer prices that no one can compete with.

Primark also suffering from the same cause although their European sales propped up peak trading - countries such as France have legislation in place to try and penalise ‘ultra fast fashion’

BurntBroccoli · 27/04/2026 19:18

35965a · 27/04/2026 19:16

You can buy all the shite they had in there from places like Temu at a fraction of the price. They just became out of date, as many businesses do eventually. They can’t justifiably blame 1 person.

Every business that closes lately is blamed on Rachel Reeves despite many of them failing since the pandemic.

We have changed shopping habits massively!

BurntBroccoli · 27/04/2026 19:17

TheLightSideOfTheMoon · 27/04/2026 18:43

Claire’s staff pierced babies. Actual babies. Even if they were crying.

Babies. WTF?

I’m glad they’re gone.

Yup and they used a piercing gun which is the worst thing you can do for piercing.

Their prices were too high for basic cheap tat.

35965a · 27/04/2026 19:16

You can buy all the shite they had in there from places like Temu at a fraction of the price. They just became out of date, as many businesses do eventually. They can’t justifiably blame 1 person.

Clafoutie · 27/04/2026 19:14

TheFormidableMrsC · 27/04/2026 18:25

Claire’s Accessories was shockingly overpriced and did not read the room with other shops undercutting them significantly for the same products. My adult child has loved Hello Kitty since she was little and I saw a Stanley type cup in there. It was £40. Wtf? It was just an in house product with stickers on it. Loads and loads of tat that was far too expensive. I’m surprised it lasted as long as it did.

I agree. As much as people love to hate Rachel Reeves, this is a stretch.

BrownBookshelf · 27/04/2026 19:13

They were hardly in a good position before Labour got in. But it sounds better to blame the government than to admit their business model no longer worked and they either couldn't or wouldn't address that.

Sunglade · 27/04/2026 19:12

If a business can't pay its staff a decent wage then it in inviable and deserves to end. We need jobs that actually pay, not more ways of funnelling our wealth the hands of an inbred few.

Itsmetheflamingo · 27/04/2026 19:12

Yep they’re owned by modella capital. They said in their own going concern statement it was demand they have most been impacted by.

Katypp · 27/04/2026 19:11

Jellycatspyjamas · 27/04/2026 19:10

It’s not about moral superiority though, their business model stopped working. I’m sad to see it go having spent much time with my DD picking all kinds of stuff for her allowance. It stopped being cheap enough for pocket money, was expensive for what it was and kept expensive premises. I’m sure NI increases impacted - because young part time labour was also cheap labour, but it was always going to end badly.

I agree. It sounds like they did not move with the times. A fatal mistake.

However that does not excuse the posts rejoicing they have gone.

Jellycatspyjamas · 27/04/2026 19:10

Katypp · 27/04/2026 18:53

The OP asked:
How can a business that relies on young, part-time staff survive when their overheads have just been hiked through the roof? It’s not just the big brands; it’s the independent shops too. We’re going to be left with nothing but vape shops and empty units at this rate.

Yet all she has had are responses moralising about how awful Claire's was and the usual 'plastic tat' comments.

How anyone can think they are morally superior by rejoicing at the loss of 1,300 jobs in a cost of living crisis is beyond me, but that's MN for you.

It’s not about moral superiority though, their business model stopped working. I’m sad to see it go having spent much time with my DD picking all kinds of stuff for her allowance. It stopped being cheap enough for pocket money, was expensive for what it was and kept expensive premises. I’m sure NI increases impacted - because young part time labour was also cheap labour, but it was always going to end badly.

PhilosophicalCheeseSandwich · 27/04/2026 19:10

I went in about 5 years ago looking for a gift for a friend's daughter. I couldn't believe how expensive it was - shockingly bad value! I voted with my feet, as I imagine most people did. Hence their demise.

ChildrenofGilead · 27/04/2026 19:09

I wonder how much Claire’s Accessories was really paying in employers NI anyway, as not all of their part time workers would have been above the threshold to start paying it.

I’m not a great fan of Rachel Reeves, but it would seem unfair to put the closure purely at her door. Claire’s clearly hadn’t updated its business model for sometime and unable to stay competitive with online rivals

Swipe left for the next trending thread