What are the implications of Olly Robbins’s testimony for Starmer?
There was so much in his testimony that was damaging but surely the worst was that:
- He was instructed by No. 10 to find an ambassador's job for Starmer's then director of communications, Matthew Doyle
- He was told not to tell the foreign secretary about this
- Robbins considered leaving his role because this request was so unusual and inappropriate
- Doyle was then suspended from the Labour Party due to his links with a convicted paedophile (not Epstein).
And on Mandelson, he said there was "constant pressure" for him to fast-track the appointment, there was no interest in the vetting from the PM, concerns about the vetting were dismissed by No. 10 and Mandelson had already been given IT access that should only have been granted after the vetting process.
What can Starmer do now? Say Robbins was lying?