Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Starmer sounds deranged at PMQs

144 replies

Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 12:40

Stamer's lost it. He sounds like an angry lunatic in response to questions.

OP posts:
Araminta1003 · 11/02/2026 14:51

He has probably been advised to appear more passionately left wing and less robotic.

“Austerity“ and „right wing media“ are the go to most cliched words of the left. And a bit of shouting to feign some „passion“.

HappiestSleeping · 11/02/2026 14:46

Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 14:37

I don't see that. I just see more of the same. I think the stuff coming about manipulating the waiting list numbers is very Boris like. On Times Radio this morning they were discussing how Labour are the changing the way child poverty is calculated so it will reduce by thousands purely by the maths - again seems quite Boris to me.

There are more NHS appointments available it isn't manipulation (although there are always versions of the truth), net migration is down 69% (if that's your bag, personally I don't think it is a good thing), reducing wait times for asylum applicant processing, more money for policing (new police station opened in my town), council tax frozen, rail fares frozen, and they have either delivered, or are on track for a large proportion of their manifesto pledges (https://fullfact.org/government-tracker/ )

I think as a society, we have bought into the "instant gratification" culture, hence have no patience. It was always going to take years to undo Conservative fuck ups, and actually I am pleased Starmer hasn't buckled under his enormous error of judgement appointing Mandelson. The last thing we need right now is more instability. And let's face it, there is nobody waiting in the wings of the Labour Party who is any more credible than he is. Even less so Reform, Conservative, Liberal Dem, or Green. So we are left with him / them being the least worst.

Government Tracker – Full Fact

Full Fact is monitoring the government’s delivery on its promises

https://fullfact.org/government-tracker/

TheAutumnCrow · 11/02/2026 14:44

PMQs is not a sane representation of parliament.

It’s far worse than that.

But that’s the responsibility of a lot more people than Starmer.

Wolmando · 11/02/2026 14:43

It's always like some pantomime whoever is doing it and whoever is in government, waste of time

Dragonasaurus · 11/02/2026 14:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

????

Whether or not he lost his temper (and I was inclined to think he did), nobody could accuse him of actually answering the questions. I, for one, am very interested to hear his justification for another paedophile-adjacent appointment. He just doesn’t think it matters 😱

Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 14:37

HappiestSleeping · 11/02/2026 14:02

@Dragonflytamer I think you are representative of many. Voted for Labour because you wanted change. So, essentially, Labour didn't win the election as much as the Conservative Party lost it.

Since none of the political parties are good, we are all voting for the least worst. This in turn brings dissatisfaction much more quickly, along with an inability to recognise the achievements.

I am disappointed with Labour, but I still think they are the least worst. At least they have achieved more in their 18 odd months than the Conservatives did in 14 years.

I don't see that. I just see more of the same. I think the stuff coming about manipulating the waiting list numbers is very Boris like. On Times Radio this morning they were discussing how Labour are the changing the way child poverty is calculated so it will reduce by thousands purely by the maths - again seems quite Boris to me.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 11/02/2026 14:34

timetogoandstop · 11/02/2026 14:19

Unfortunately I think all parties know having a leader of colour at these times isn’t what is resonating with the electorate. That’s across all political divides.

I’m not sure what you mean here, she’s beats all the men. She hasn’t always but this week she has, each week her rating goes up as Starmer goes down.

I think any leader with those two things would be happy.

timetogoandstop · 11/02/2026 14:19

EasternStandard · 11/02/2026 13:08

She’s polling ahead of all other leaders in a head to head who would you prefer.

Any of the others would take that happily.

Unfortunately I think all parties know having a leader of colour at these times isn’t what is resonating with the electorate. That’s across all political divides.

finbow · 11/02/2026 14:18

It’s refreshing, isn’t it. For the pm to look like he’s losing it one time rather than being permanently deranged, like the previous people in charge.

TheAutumnCrow · 11/02/2026 14:14

Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 12:59

Did you hear him scream at Ed Davey?

It’s ok, I told him he could take my turn for free.

Goldfsh · 11/02/2026 14:08

How anyone can criticize a PM who engages with the questions is beyond me.

Johnson's answers were absolute gibberish but good ole' Boris eh?

Starmer is 1000 times better than what we've seen in recent years. So he gets rattled, who cares? Everyone complains when he's 'boring'. The man can't win.

HappiestSleeping · 11/02/2026 14:02

@Dragonflytamer I think you are representative of many. Voted for Labour because you wanted change. So, essentially, Labour didn't win the election as much as the Conservative Party lost it.

Since none of the political parties are good, we are all voting for the least worst. This in turn brings dissatisfaction much more quickly, along with an inability to recognise the achievements.

I am disappointed with Labour, but I still think they are the least worst. At least they have achieved more in their 18 odd months than the Conservatives did in 14 years.

ZookeeperSE · 11/02/2026 13:58

outofsounds · 11/02/2026 13:47

Good for Ed Davey. For Keir Starmer to use the excuse that he’d been lied to once is arguably acceptable, to use the excuse a second time is starting to look like idiocy.

It’s worse than that though isn’t it. It was information in the public domain before the appointment. And to counter Badenoch’s repeated questions with ‘But what about lockdown parties’ is ludicrous and incoherent. Whoever is advising her to keep asking the same question, no matter what he replies, is doing a good job. It clearly rattles him. As it should. There is no excuse for the appointment of Doyle.

PandoraSocks · 11/02/2026 13:57

EasternStandard · 11/02/2026 13:08

She’s polling ahead of all other leaders in a head to head who would you prefer.

Any of the others would take that happily.

That is all well and good, but that poll isn't going to make her PM. She needs to win a GE for that and it 's not looking good for the Tories right now (or Labour of course).

Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 13:52

He very much reminded me of the Boris approach to PMQs.

OP posts:
Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 13:51

outofsounds · 11/02/2026 13:47

Good for Ed Davey. For Keir Starmer to use the excuse that he’d been lied to once is arguably acceptable, to use the excuse a second time is starting to look like idiocy.

He must be lying on the Matthew Doyle case - it had already been front page news. It just a classic jobs for the boys. Matthew Doyle has a job for life in the Lords.

OP posts:
outofsounds · 11/02/2026 13:47

Good for Ed Davey. For Keir Starmer to use the excuse that he’d been lied to once is arguably acceptable, to use the excuse a second time is starting to look like idiocy.

averylongtimeago · 11/02/2026 13:44

I’ve just watched it. Starmer was angry, yes. But he had to shout to be heard over the yarboo hollering from the opposite benches. No screaming- good to hear him speaking passionately about what he’s doing.
And if you want to think of pathetic politicians- look at the Tory record- how many unelected Prime Ministers? The turnover of cabinet ministers was so high they should have installed revolving doors at no10.
It is going to take years to undo the damage the Tories have done to the uk.

Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 13:36

Yesitsmeimback · 11/02/2026 13:15

Is it a mumsnet scream everyone 'screams' constantly 😂😂😂

Obviously it's not like Ed Davy jumped out behind to scare him. He merely asked why did Starmer appointed to paedophile associates to senior roles.

OP posts:
FlyingApple · 11/02/2026 13:36

Yes I agree, was uncomfortable.

Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 13:35

According to Times Radio Starmer has now been called to talk to female MPs to defend his actions and address the boys club. Hopefully they will have an impact.

OP posts:
Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 13:33

HopSpringsEternal · 11/02/2026 13:17

I've had to listen, but can't see a clip of the scream? Can you share it?

Its about 13 minutes in. Obviously it is not a scream like scare scream more a the definition shouting loudly at a high pitch i panic type definition.

OP posts:
Dragonflytamer · 11/02/2026 13:30

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I'm not paid! or Russian. I would have thought Labour would be quieter on the Russian links now it turns out Mandelson was involved with them.

I'm more of a floating voter. I voted for Starmer for change but am incredibly disappointed and will be voting for someone else next time. It might be Reform it might to the Conversative.

OP posts:
Nanda66 · 11/02/2026 13:19

I thought he did pretty well today. He sounded angry but passionate.

KnickerlessParsons · 11/02/2026 13:18

I think he is very angry at the situation he’s in, and Mandelson in particular.
It’s good to see he does have some emotions and character but too late I think.
Usually, when politicians say they aren’t going to resign, they resign about a week later. 🙂

Swipe left for the next trending thread