Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Burnham has been blocked!

258 replies

Ohcrap082024 · 25/01/2026 12:11

Just being reported on BBC news now. The NEC has met and refused to allow Andy Burnham to stand in the by-election. This is looking very bad for Starmer.

OP posts:
Soontobe60 · 25/01/2026 18:47

SkyrAddict · 25/01/2026 12:22

I’m not a Labour voter, but I’d like to give AndyB a chance and see what he’s about. I remember him in lockdown and was impressed with how he stood up for his people.

Apart from women who want single sex spaces in Manchester, and victims of grooming gangs who wanted a full inquiry - he blocked both those things.

CheshireCat1 · 25/01/2026 18:43

It was the right decision to block him, the last thing we need is a costly campaign and election for a new mayor in Manchester. I like Andy Burnham but I think it was an error of judgment on his part.

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 18:31

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 18:24

No, not really. They think every single one of their woes is due to immigration. Most of them have little to no insight or ambition beyond that.

Ah!! racist and stupid? Ah you’ve got to love the classics. Good luck with pushing that one again

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 18:24

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 18:05

Perhaps they don’t want to stay on benefits and/or recognise the dangers of such large proportions of working age people living off the state?

No, not really. They think every single one of their woes is due to immigration. Most of them have little to no insight or ambition beyond that.

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 18:23

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 18:08

I am unable to have a sensible discussion with you, as you clearly don't know what you are talking about. Carry on and keep embarrassing yourself

You are unable to justify with being called out, it’s because it’s an unjustifiable position. Start contributing, start putting something into the system then come back here explaining why you support Labour…then you can be taken seriously.

Passingthrough123 · 25/01/2026 18:16

Fluffyholeysocks · 25/01/2026 17:34

I think it's something much simpler - they are just not up the the job of governance. I think the quality of our elected MP's has been on the slide for years. I look back at Blair's cabinet and see the likes of Jack Straw, Robin Cook, David Milliband, Margaret Beckett, Claire Short, Mo Mowlem. Do you see Nandy, Lammy and Reeves in the same league? I just see a lack of competence.

Edited

Definitely agree with you on this!

Fluffyholeysocks · 25/01/2026 18:09

Getting back to the point of the thread - maybe Burnham could stand as an Independent 😁

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 18:08

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 18:02

Nope, nice try though. It’s my business when you support utter odd balls to run the country so you can keep living at working peoples expense. Stop doing it.

I am unable to have a sensible discussion with you, as you clearly don't know what you are talking about. Carry on and keep embarrassing yourself

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 18:05

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 17:55

Actually you're quite some years behind the curve on that one. I live on a large, under privileged council estate in a major city and the majority of those on benefits or in very low paid jobs are Reform through and through.

Perhaps they don’t want to stay on benefits and/or recognise the dangers of such large proportions of working age people living off the state?

MsGreying · 25/01/2026 18:03

Clean air zone nonsense.
The pantomime outside Manchester Central library during COVID.
The bus drivers going on strike almost as soon as he bought them in house.
The lack of police crime stats available.
The knife crime increasingly resulting in the death of young men.

Id rather we didn't waste money on a mayor's office with it's social media staff.

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 18:02

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 17:55

I pay my own bills (work very hard, have a career) so clearly you thinking you can tell was horseshit. Not that it’s any of your business.

Edited

Nope, nice try though. It’s my business when you support utter odd balls to run the country so you can keep living at working peoples expense. Stop doing it.

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 17:55

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:48

It does very much strongly correlate with Labour supporters.

Actually you're quite some years behind the curve on that one. I live on a large, under privileged council estate in a major city and the majority of those on benefits or in very low paid jobs are Reform through and through.

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 17:55

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:52

You’d be right, I am a net tax payer. I can’t vote for Trump so I’ve never given it much thought, I’m too busy …some of us do actually work to pay the bills (and your bills I should add).

I pay my own bills (work very hard, have a career) so clearly you thinking you can tell was horseshit. Not that it’s any of your business.

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:52

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 17:42

This is true and I’m noticing one in you, I would guess you’re also a Trump supporter…

You’d be right, I am a net tax payer. I can’t vote for Trump so I’ve never given it much thought, I’m too busy …some of us do actually work to pay the bills (and your bills I should add).

EasternStandard · 25/01/2026 17:50

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 17:10

@MissMollyanna "Brilliant and that’s from one of the few remaining Labour supporters, so you admit they’ve run the country into the ground."

Hang on. You actually think Labour has singled handedly run the country into the ground? Were you by any chance in a coma during the 14 years of Tory misrule, corruption, sexual assaults, sleeze, blackmail and Brexit lies - as well as a staggering total of 5 Prime Ministers and christ knows how many reshuffles? The country was on its fucking knees when they finally left (and so were they). They heaved a collective sigh of relief when Labour won because they knew they wouldn't be the ones dealing with the fall out.

I think fewer are sticking with this take as Starmer continues. As his rating and the polling shows.

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:48

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 17:45

@MissMollyanna "are you by any chance a net recipient of our glorious tax system?"

No my dear. I'm 69 and a pensioner having worked solidly since the age of 17. However, I don't think that criticism of the past Tory incumbents for their sleeze and rudderless government necessarily correlates with those in receipt of benefits.

It does very much strongly correlate with Labour supporters.

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 17:45

@MissMollyanna "are you by any chance a net recipient of our glorious tax system?"

No my dear. I'm 69 and a pensioner having worked solidly since the age of 17. However, I don't think that criticism of the past Tory incumbents for their sleeze and rudderless government necessarily correlates with those in receipt of benefits.

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 17:42

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:40

You don’t have to be God to recognise personality traits.

This is true and I’m noticing one in you, I would guess you’re also a Trump supporter…

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:40

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 17:36

Ok sure, so you’re God and know everything.. 😂

You’re talking nonsense.

You don’t have to be God to recognise personality traits.

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:39

Pineneedlesincarpet · 25/01/2026 17:26

I can't see how 16 year old will have the vote if the online safety bill restricts what they can see online compared to an 18 year old. Thats just an aside.

The word Nazi in the 70s had connotations to Gen X for example that it doesn't to Gen Z due to over use and tne distance of time since WW2. There's no real bogeyman to refer to.

This is a good point, Labour are also planning ‘social justice’ lessons and to ‘decolonise’ education..I guess long term the plan is to just move the polling booths into schools and tell 16 year olds who to vote for.

ginasevern · 25/01/2026 17:37

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 17:25

So what if she is a recipient of our tax system!! I hope @ginasevern doesn’t dignify this with an answer

Thanks for the support dramaQueen. But I will respond to the not so veiled insinuation.

thedramaQueen · 25/01/2026 17:36

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:30

Well so what if someone was in a coma? Save me the virtue signalling nonsense.

It was a rhetorical question anyway, the answer is entirely obvious…as it is with you.

Edited

Ok sure, so you’re God and know everything.. 😂

You’re talking nonsense.

HappyFace2025 · 25/01/2026 17:35

Ohcrap082024 · 25/01/2026 17:22

The discussion around the voting intentions of young people is really interesting. Assuming we have a GE in summer 2029, it’s kids currently in Year 8 and 9 (those currently aged 12.5 -14) who will be the voting 16/17 year olds. That blows my mind.

And mine!

Fluffyholeysocks · 25/01/2026 17:34

Passingthrough123 · 25/01/2026 17:27

The polls are appalling because Labour have gone back on too many election promises and have stupidly moved too far to the right to appease the undecideds who might vote for Reform, instead of shoring up what they stand for. They are no longer the party of socialism. As a lifelong Labour voter, I am infuriated Starmer has blown this opportunity. He and the party inherited such a fiscal shitshow from the Tories that the only way really was up. Instead, he's had them lurching all over the place and in many areas – education being one – going backwards. If it wasn't for the fact I think a Government coalition headed by Reform is a terrifying prospect (I don't think they can win overall without striking a deal with the Tories), I'd say he and the Labour party deserve to lose big time to them.

I think it's something much simpler - they are just not up the the job of governance. I think the quality of our elected MP's has been on the slide for years. I look back at Blair's cabinet and see the likes of Jack Straw, Robin Cook, David Milliband, Margaret Beckett, Claire Short, Mo Mowlem. Do you see Nandy, Lammy and Reeves in the same league? I just see a lack of competence.

MissMollyanna · 25/01/2026 17:34

Passingthrough123 · 25/01/2026 17:27

The polls are appalling because Labour have gone back on too many election promises and have stupidly moved too far to the right to appease the undecideds who might vote for Reform, instead of shoring up what they stand for. They are no longer the party of socialism. As a lifelong Labour voter, I am infuriated Starmer has blown this opportunity. He and the party inherited such a fiscal shitshow from the Tories that the only way really was up. Instead, he's had them lurching all over the place and in many areas – education being one – going backwards. If it wasn't for the fact I think a Government coalition headed by Reform is a terrifying prospect (I don't think they can win overall without striking a deal with the Tories), I'd say he and the Labour party deserve to lose big time to them.

This also seems to be Labours current thinking, it’s not that their policies have been destructive it’s that they weren’t destructive enough.