Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Good on Kemi!

510 replies

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 15/01/2026 15:17

I'm no fan of Kemi Badenoch, but I'm even less of a fan of Robert Jenrick, and I'm rather delighted to see that she has sacked him and withdrawn the whip before he could jump to Reform.

She has definitely had the last laugh here. He must be spitting bullets!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
EasternStandard · 16/01/2026 10:07

Fulmine · 16/01/2026 10:01

The corruption, incompetence and lying around Covid is certainly a factor in judging the 2019-24 régime, but it is definitely not all of it. What made it poor was a whole combination of factors including the crumbling schools, courts, prisons and hospitals, ever-deteriorating care system (and whatever happened to that promise about care home fees?), ignoring the Post Office scandal, tanking the economy, and especially the succession of scandals and constant lying. Those things were happening before Covid and their continuation really cannot be blamed on it.

It was always obvious Rwanda wouldn't work. It was unlawful, it wasn't going to have any effect on immigration, and it cost an absolute fortune. It was very typical of the regime's approach to politics - they wanted something showy that would appeal to the right wing, they were happy to give the appearance of being nasty to ethnic minorities, but they hoped they could keep its failure under wraps long enough that they wouldn't be around to be blamed for it when it became clear.

People defending it tend to forget conveniently that Johnson was ultimately forced out because he appointed a sexually predatory person to a position of power within the party and lied about it, leading to the resignations of 62 government ministers, PPSs, trade envoys and party vice-chairmen, with numerous other MPs refusing to take their places and serve under him. On any interpretation that is the marker of a spectacular failure as a government, only outstripped in the incompetence stakes by that of Truss.

Well we’ll see if people give Labour a beating in the May elections and beyond. Many are not enjoying their leadership and will show that when voting.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 10:04

Fulmine · 16/01/2026 10:01

The corruption, incompetence and lying around Covid is certainly a factor in judging the 2019-24 régime, but it is definitely not all of it. What made it poor was a whole combination of factors including the crumbling schools, courts, prisons and hospitals, ever-deteriorating care system (and whatever happened to that promise about care home fees?), ignoring the Post Office scandal, tanking the economy, and especially the succession of scandals and constant lying. Those things were happening before Covid and their continuation really cannot be blamed on it.

It was always obvious Rwanda wouldn't work. It was unlawful, it wasn't going to have any effect on immigration, and it cost an absolute fortune. It was very typical of the regime's approach to politics - they wanted something showy that would appeal to the right wing, they were happy to give the appearance of being nasty to ethnic minorities, but they hoped they could keep its failure under wraps long enough that they wouldn't be around to be blamed for it when it became clear.

People defending it tend to forget conveniently that Johnson was ultimately forced out because he appointed a sexually predatory person to a position of power within the party and lied about it, leading to the resignations of 62 government ministers, PPSs, trade envoys and party vice-chairmen, with numerous other MPs refusing to take their places and serve under him. On any interpretation that is the marker of a spectacular failure as a government, only outstripped in the incompetence stakes by that of Truss.

The original discussion was "is this Labour the worst government ever".

The PP said no ..it was 2019-2024.

I think the Labour government was worse before Thatcher swept in in 1979. I also think this Labour government is worse than 2019-2024.

What do you think?

Fulmine · 16/01/2026 10:01

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 08:49

The immigration issue I agree with.

Proroguing Parliament was something made of nothing. Ridiculous fuss and epitomised how utterly spineless and pathetic the whole of Parliament was, trying to fight back using any weapon against the result of the referendum and undermining the UKs position. They all disgraced themselves. Particularly Keir Starmer. Who has subsequently proven he really is no believer in democracy anyway.

Truss is usually wheeled out as some great disaster. I think Rachel Reeves will turn out to have shafted everyone a lot worse unfortunately. And in any event the polls agree that Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are the most unpopular people who have ever held their respective jobs. So most people judge them to have performed worse than Truss and Kwarteng.

Rwanda...pointless because we never knew if it would work. Because Keir stopped it before it even started, without anything effective to replace it with. He will end up with something similar I expect. Another U turn.

And as I said the majority of that period was covid and the effects of covid subsequently.

Edited

The corruption, incompetence and lying around Covid is certainly a factor in judging the 2019-24 régime, but it is definitely not all of it. What made it poor was a whole combination of factors including the crumbling schools, courts, prisons and hospitals, ever-deteriorating care system (and whatever happened to that promise about care home fees?), ignoring the Post Office scandal, tanking the economy, and especially the succession of scandals and constant lying. Those things were happening before Covid and their continuation really cannot be blamed on it.

It was always obvious Rwanda wouldn't work. It was unlawful, it wasn't going to have any effect on immigration, and it cost an absolute fortune. It was very typical of the regime's approach to politics - they wanted something showy that would appeal to the right wing, they were happy to give the appearance of being nasty to ethnic minorities, but they hoped they could keep its failure under wraps long enough that they wouldn't be around to be blamed for it when it became clear.

People defending it tend to forget conveniently that Johnson was ultimately forced out because he appointed a sexually predatory person to a position of power within the party and lied about it, leading to the resignations of 62 government ministers, PPSs, trade envoys and party vice-chairmen, with numerous other MPs refusing to take their places and serve under him. On any interpretation that is the marker of a spectacular failure as a government, only outstripped in the incompetence stakes by that of Truss.

hattie43 · 16/01/2026 09:58

Livelovebehappy · 16/01/2026 09:06

And Reeves would have gone the same way after her ‘mistake’, but fortunately for her there was bigger news at the time which pushed her under the radar. They’re all as crooked as they come in the Labour Party. It’s true when they’re described as champagne socialists. Want to put their foot on the heads of the upper working classes and middle classes, but are quite happy to adopt the same lifestyle for themselves, by lies and fraud if they need to.

I don’t actually know who Labour are for because most sane people despise them . I’m sure only the people are socialist idealists who want to change the world on other peoples money .

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:52

Alexandra2001 · 16/01/2026 07:46

Badenoch & others on this thread, totally trashed Starmer for threatening to ban X over sexualised images on Grok.

X stepped back and will reprogram Grok...

Badenochs approach would have meant these images would have continued.

Starmer showed, when it matters, he can be strong, same over Trump and Greenland.

Sacking someone who has already said he is defecting, isn't strong, she had no choice, as has said herself.

Yes. Hes strong on pictures.

But fought against carrying out a proper investigation of child rapes nationwide. Until he U-turned obviously.

EasternStandard · 16/01/2026 09:51

FlyingApple · 16/01/2026 09:22

Fantastic for reform, not so good for the conservatives. I think a lot of posters are desperately deluded.

I think Kemi is very good and if she does it it’s down to her strength and ability but Reform will be tough to get past. I guess we’ll see over next year or so which ways this impacts, if any.

2026willbebetter · 16/01/2026 09:50

Alexandra2001 · 16/01/2026 07:46

Badenoch & others on this thread, totally trashed Starmer for threatening to ban X over sexualised images on Grok.

X stepped back and will reprogram Grok...

Badenochs approach would have meant these images would have continued.

Starmer showed, when it matters, he can be strong, same over Trump and Greenland.

Sacking someone who has already said he is defecting, isn't strong, she had no choice, as has said herself.

But this is just one issue. So far in this goverment I feel like overall he has shown a lack of strong leadership. I am disappointed by this.

GeneralPeter · 16/01/2026 09:41

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:33

Didn't he resign from that post because he disagreed with the Conservatives policy?

Yes, I had to look it up. He resigned saying that he felt the govt hadn’t defended the Rwanda plan sufficiently. But also positioning for leadership.

The big objection now for Reform types seems to be numbers though, and he was minister when immigration hit its peak (he didn’t initiate the wave though, that was Johnson/Patel).

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:38

BIossomtoes · 16/01/2026 09:37

Exactly what it says. It’s hardly ambiguous.

72 years old and still arguing like a child.

BIossomtoes · 16/01/2026 09:37

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:37

"to the disappointment of people like you"

What's that supposed to mean?

Exactly what it says. It’s hardly ambiguous.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:37

BIossomtoes · 16/01/2026 09:35

The economy isn’t booming but, to the disappointment of people like you, nor is it crashing and the IMF is unlikely to come knocking anytime soon as some posters were predicting not long ago. It will be interesting to see where we are at this point in 2029.

"to the disappointment of people like you"

What's that supposed to mean?

BIossomtoes · 16/01/2026 09:35

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:06

Unfortunately most people in the UK dont share your joy and optimism at this allegedly great booming economy. As shown by the polls. Most people have real life experience of Labour's policies in some way or another hence why we all hate them. Or most of us.

I feel sorry and scared for young people mostly.

The economy isn’t booming but, to the disappointment of people like you, nor is it crashing and the IMF is unlikely to come knocking anytime soon as some posters were predicting not long ago. It will be interesting to see where we are at this point in 2029.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:33

GeneralPeter · 16/01/2026 09:32

I don’t know about disgraced, but Jenrick seems most angry about the Tories’ immigration record.

He was the immigration minister.

Didn't he resign from that post because he disagreed with the Conservatives policy?

GeneralPeter · 16/01/2026 09:32

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:22

Is Robert Jenrick "failed and disgraced"?

What about Danny Kruger?.

What about the new leader of Reform in Scotland? He has had an amazingly successful life.

I don’t know about disgraced, but Jenrick seems most angry about the Tories’ immigration record.

He was the immigration minister.

FrizzyFrizbee · 16/01/2026 09:29

HK16 · 15/01/2026 20:08

People just want to see the end of this awful Labour government.

As with so many elections in the UK, the outcome will most likely revolve around votes against a particular party as opposed to votes in favour of another.

I will vote in whichever way is best to remove Labour. That means my vote would be different depending which constituency I live in. I am far from alone with that approach.

Yes, this will be my approach in the next election as well. At the moment I have no idea who I will be voting for, as it’s difficult to tell just now who has the best chance of winning the seat and scuppering the Labour MP.

Livelovebehappy · 16/01/2026 09:24

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/01/2026 09:19

We actually know quite a lot about Reform. It's just that some people are choosing not to look.

We also knew quite a lot about Labour, but unfortunately we had very few options and voted them in thinking they might have changed. They haven’t.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:22

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/01/2026 09:21

You mean the failed and disgraced Tories?

Is Robert Jenrick "failed and disgraced"?

What about Danny Kruger?.

What about the new leader of Reform in Scotland? He has had an amazingly successful life.

OhDear111 · 16/01/2026 09:22

@Alexandra2001 The government is the lawmaker. I’d prefer them to have tougher laws on some things.

We mined from 4 District councils and a county council here. We had the elections for the districts prior to a unitary county being formed. They formed a shadow unitary council along with the existing county council but only lasted for 2 years. They oversaw all the transition arrangements prior to the unitary authority taking over. So no elections missed and these councillors, to be fair, worked hard to ensure a pretty seemless change. It’s a huge job gojng from 5 of every back serving to one never mind streamlining contracts, offices and blending staff. They should hold the elections but of course a load of Reform people will rock the boat.

FlyingApple · 16/01/2026 09:22

Fantastic for reform, not so good for the conservatives. I think a lot of posters are desperately deluded.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:21

Whattodo541289 · 16/01/2026 09:20

She has definitely improved but lets face it, who has ever arrived in a job on day 1 and didnt need some time to bed in. I think she is growing into the role and it might be a long shot, but id love to see her take the next election and be our PM. She might be less polished and make a few mistakes but I trust her and its been a long time since I felt that way about a politician.

Yes that is definitely one thing you can say about her. I think she is honest.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/01/2026 09:21

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:19

Good that they are getting some different people in post then.

You mean the failed and disgraced Tories?

OP posts:
Whattodo541289 · 16/01/2026 09:20

GeneralPeter · 16/01/2026 08:48

Yes I like that about her a lot, even though she is further right that me. She did badly when she was first leader but I think she’s improving. And she makes a nice contrast to Starmer who is hard to pin down.

I think she should be less attacky though. That just reminds me she’s a politician. She is far stronger in her “common sense” style.

She has definitely improved but lets face it, who has ever arrived in a job on day 1 and didnt need some time to bed in. I think she is growing into the role and it might be a long shot, but id love to see her take the next election and be our PM. She might be less polished and make a few mistakes but I trust her and its been a long time since I felt that way about a politician.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:19

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/01/2026 09:19

We actually know quite a lot about Reform. It's just that some people are choosing not to look.

Good that they are getting some different people in post then.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/01/2026 09:19

Livelovebehappy · 16/01/2026 09:12

But Labour have already proven that they lie and adopt criminal behaviour, so we know who they are. We don’t know that that’s going to be the case with Reform, as it’s all whataboutery. Maybe they will turn out to be liars, but until we see that if/when they’re in power, who knows? Unfortunately experience has shown us that most politicians are out for themselves, and will be corrupt if they think they can get away with it. The only way we’re going to find out if this is the case for a Reform government is to try them I guess.

We actually know quite a lot about Reform. It's just that some people are choosing not to look.

OP posts:
Pineneedlesincarpet · 16/01/2026 09:18

Alexandra2001 · 16/01/2026 09:11

No councils are asking for this but i think those calling for pojntless elections on councils about to be abolished, should pay for the elections with higher council tax....

Almost all trials resulting in a jail sentence are not held under a jury system already...

Banging people up for online abuse? you do realise the Govt don't prosecute people... let alone sentence them...

They're hardly examples of a supporter of democracy.

Im simply saying that to be fussed about proroging parliament which had little practical effect and ignoring the profound effects of the far more anti democratic measures that Labour are carrying out is ridiculous. Thats to the PP by the way..the one I was discussing this with originally.

Swipe left for the next trending thread