Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Trump taking over Greenland?

405 replies

Cantonet · 06/01/2026 10:50

Will anyone stop him?
What will Nato do?
What will Denmark do?
Are there plans in motion to stop this other than friendly diplomacy & gentle words?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
22
1dayatatime · 21/01/2026 08:30

ShesTheAlbatross · 20/01/2026 22:06

He’s not saying it to champion rights of people in the Chagos Islands though, is he. I doubt he even knows if they’re inhabited aside from the US military base. He’s also clearly forgotten his previous view about the deal “I’ve got a feeling it’s going to work out very well”.

I completely agree that Trump doesn't give a shit about the wishes of the Chagossians anymore than he cares about the wishes of the Greenlanders.

But the core point is that the only people who should have a say in the status of Greenland should be the Greenlanders (not the US and not Denmark) and the only people who should have a say in the status of the Chagos Islands is the Chagossians (not the UK and not Mauritius).

Alexandra2001 · 21/01/2026 07:08

1dayatatime · 20/01/2026 21:05

I truly believe in self determination so the only people who should get a say in the status of Greenland (as in whether it is part of Denmark or the US or independent) is the Greenlanders themselves.

But equally I believe that the only people who should get a say in the status of the Chagos Islands (part of the UK or Mauritius) should be the Chagossians.

On that basis Trump is right that the UK paying Mauritius to take them is a very bad deal. Although it is completely hypocritical of him to champion the wishes of the Chagossians but ignore the wishes of the Greenlanders!

Trump did fully back the Chagos deal just 6 months ago, said it was an inspired deal.

So why the change?

To take the heat off him and Greenland plus to "punish" Starmer for daring to challenge him on Greenland.

Listening to Sky's security/military expert on this, he said "the deal gives the UK and the US the legal basis to challenge any hostile actions by China/Russia"

All the criticism strikes me as similar to the Chinese Embassy stuff, the Tories sold China the building AND gave outline permission for a new Embassy but now its suddenly a threat to national security.....

ShesTheAlbatross · 20/01/2026 22:06

1dayatatime · 20/01/2026 21:05

I truly believe in self determination so the only people who should get a say in the status of Greenland (as in whether it is part of Denmark or the US or independent) is the Greenlanders themselves.

But equally I believe that the only people who should get a say in the status of the Chagos Islands (part of the UK or Mauritius) should be the Chagossians.

On that basis Trump is right that the UK paying Mauritius to take them is a very bad deal. Although it is completely hypocritical of him to champion the wishes of the Chagossians but ignore the wishes of the Greenlanders!

He’s not saying it to champion rights of people in the Chagos Islands though, is he. I doubt he even knows if they’re inhabited aside from the US military base. He’s also clearly forgotten his previous view about the deal “I’ve got a feeling it’s going to work out very well”.

1dayatatime · 20/01/2026 21:05

I truly believe in self determination so the only people who should get a say in the status of Greenland (as in whether it is part of Denmark or the US or independent) is the Greenlanders themselves.

But equally I believe that the only people who should get a say in the status of the Chagos Islands (part of the UK or Mauritius) should be the Chagossians.

On that basis Trump is right that the UK paying Mauritius to take them is a very bad deal. Although it is completely hypocritical of him to champion the wishes of the Chagossians but ignore the wishes of the Greenlanders!

BestZebbie · 20/01/2026 19:21

TheMerryJoker · 06/01/2026 21:55

why not someone has to be in power what makes any other country better than america, besides you could all prefer a one world govt instead like the federation from star trek then theres no individual countries etc

Star Trek is a post-money economy, the USA is very very very much not.

Cantonet · 20/01/2026 16:50

It will be Interesting to see how border control on the Canadian side is affected over the coming days.

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 20/01/2026 16:40

MrsTerryPratchett · 20/01/2026 16:12

Elbows up!

The first thing to remember: There's no substitute for cold steel. They do not like it up 'em, they DON'T LIKE IT UP 'EM

MrsTerryPratchett · 20/01/2026 16:12

DeepBlueDeer · 20/01/2026 16:09

Absolutely. Yes, the US can invade Canada, but it would prompt the largest insurgency in history.

We're attending our first lesson at a shooting range next month. Can't be too prepared...

Elbows up!

DeepBlueDeer · 20/01/2026 16:09

MrsTerryPratchett · 20/01/2026 15:15

My take on this. He can probably take Canada. They have the military force to do it. They can't hold Canada. Canadians are well-armed themselves, much scarier than their nice image portrays, and have the longest (currently) undefended border in the world. There will be cross border raids everywhere. America likes to start wars (police actions) where there are no consequences for the citizens of America and the people they're murdering don't look like them.

Good luck.

Absolutely. Yes, the US can invade Canada, but it would prompt the largest insurgency in history.

We're attending our first lesson at a shooting range next month. Can't be too prepared...

MrsTerryPratchett · 20/01/2026 15:15

Luddite26 · 20/01/2026 15:06

Wait till he finds out Canadians won't allow this to happen.

My take on this. He can probably take Canada. They have the military force to do it. They can't hold Canada. Canadians are well-armed themselves, much scarier than their nice image portrays, and have the longest (currently) undefended border in the world. There will be cross border raids everywhere. America likes to start wars (police actions) where there are no consequences for the citizens of America and the people they're murdering don't look like them.

Good luck.

Luddite26 · 20/01/2026 15:06

RedTagAlan · 20/01/2026 14:28

Wait till he finds out France has territory in the area.

Wait till he finds out Canadians won't allow this to happen.

RedTagAlan · 20/01/2026 14:59

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 20/01/2026 14:56

They do?

Newfoundland. Same general area.

I never knew till about a month ago.

Saint-Pierre and Miquelon | Map, History, Population, & Facts | Britannica

Edit to add. If we never knew, there is zero chance of Trump knowing :-)

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 20/01/2026 14:56

RedTagAlan · 20/01/2026 14:28

Wait till he finds out France has territory in the area.

They do?

RedTagAlan · 20/01/2026 14:28

Cantonet · 20/01/2026 14:18

Trump has apparently now listed a photo of Canada & Greenland as part of the U.S.
Making his intentions perfectly clear.

Edited

Wait till he finds out France has territory in the area.

Cantonet · 20/01/2026 14:18

Trump has apparently now listed a photo of Canada & Greenland as part of the U.S.
Making his intentions perfectly clear.

OP posts:
EverythingGolden · 20/01/2026 08:03

RedTagAlan · 20/01/2026 07:37

You forgot the free market, then socialist command economy part of MAGA.

And the small government then big government stuff.

Yes this too. Confusing and unpredictable, which is why it’s such a worry for the rest of us.

Polls are suggesting the foreign expansion isn’t popular while the economy is flagging.

RedTagAlan · 20/01/2026 07:37

EverythingGolden · 20/01/2026 07:18

The MAGA ‘ideology’ is so confusing. One minute neoliberal isolationist, the next police state/military intervention and expansion. It isn’t an ideology as such because Trump is so easily influenced by whatever he thinks suits him and his ego.

They are deploying thousands of troops to Minnesota (and to anywhere else with protests?) so will they have resources to do this and also foreign operations? I know they have a lot of resources but there must be a limit. But Trump isn’t an intelligent strategist so fuck knows what they will do which will allow Putin to then do what he likes.

Edited

You forgot the free market, then socialist command economy part of MAGA.

And the small government then big government stuff.

EverythingGolden · 20/01/2026 07:18

luckymumandnowluckygranny · 19/01/2026 18:24

For "USA interest" read "Donald J Trump's interest".... He cares nothing for his own citizens

The MAGA ‘ideology’ is so confusing. One minute neoliberal isolationist, the next police state/military intervention and expansion. It isn’t an ideology as such because Trump is so easily influenced by whatever he thinks suits him and his ego.

They are deploying thousands of troops to Minnesota (and to anywhere else with protests?) so will they have resources to do this and also foreign operations? I know they have a lot of resources but there must be a limit. But Trump isn’t an intelligent strategist so fuck knows what they will do which will allow Putin to then do what he likes.

Wizeman · 19/01/2026 18:59

Cantonet · 06/01/2026 10:50

Will anyone stop him?
What will Nato do?
What will Denmark do?
Are there plans in motion to stop this other than friendly diplomacy & gentle words?

  1. Low chance anyone will be able to stop him from grabbing Greenland,
  1. I think nato will go to war with the u.s, could start a war on 2 fronts with u.s, Russia. Nato has 2 big problems 1. The navy isn't big enough, Greenland is in a massive ocean. 2. Most of natos other big players have large land armies, thats great if Trump plans on invading mainland Europe, but useless if we dont have the ships to get them into Greenland.
  1. Nothing without nato.

4.yes 100%

  1. The biggest navy in Europe is the royal navy, this means if things kick off Britain will be a massive target. Doesn't help that half the fleet is in port.
luckymumandnowluckygranny · 19/01/2026 18:24

For "USA interest" read "Donald J Trump's interest".... He cares nothing for his own citizens

RedTagAlan · 15/01/2026 11:47

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 15/01/2026 11:21

There is no strategic advantage for Russia or China in owning Greenland - or, at least, nothing that wouldn't be massively outweighed by the cost of trying to invade.

The strategic advantage from Russia/China's point of view is getting NATO to tear itself apart in response to Trump's threats to invade.

There is that yes. But it is Trump doing that, so.....

Yup. There we have it.

Taiwan is the test really. And incredibly, the pub discussion now is if Trump will have the US Pacific forces help China ferry it's PLA over the Straight. Rename Taipei 101 as Trump Tower Asia. Such is the parallel universe we now live in.

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 15/01/2026 11:21

RedTagAlan · 14/01/2026 17:43

Yup, I actually got DDs Globe out her room to check the map I clipped. Mercator projection flat maps are really misleading for the arctic, so I needed help to visualize it more accurately.

Greenland is nowhere near the North East passage. I just can't see any strategic advantage for Russia or China.

I do know China is interested in Antarctica though. For it's Southern Ocean and Krill. It is building a fleet of Krill fishing vessels. It can use the Krill to make fish pellets for domestic aquaculture.

It bought a Krill boat from Norway, and is churning out copies.

There is no strategic advantage for Russia or China in owning Greenland - or, at least, nothing that wouldn't be massively outweighed by the cost of trying to invade.

The strategic advantage from Russia/China's point of view is getting NATO to tear itself apart in response to Trump's threats to invade.

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 15/01/2026 11:12

PerkingFaintly · 14/01/2026 17:30

This map has prompted me to get an inflatable globe.

I want to be able to see the far north clearly in my mind, not be captive to the Mercator projection cut at the International Date Line.

Google Earth (the app, not Google Maps) is handy for this kind of thing as it'll show a proper globe view.

dwordle · 15/01/2026 08:33

Id say the yanks want it for the resources, but I suspect this personal for Trump. In his first term he was ridiculed for the suggestion. Knowing how Trump goes after his critics then I wouldn't put starting a war off his to do list merely to attack a vocal critic

Cantonet · 14/01/2026 19:34

The result of the Greenland/Danish talks doesn't look too positive in terms of the body language of the two representatives this evening. Apparently the meeting lasted less than an hour.

OP posts: