Nigel Farage has 41 mentions in the Epstein Files and counting

What else would you call people that incite racial hatred?

Theres a difference between "discussion" and talking absolute nonsense.

"Vote fascist if you want" QED.

Word salad. Thanks for the permission.

That's what happens on discussion forums. Discussion. Not just an echo chamber.

Vote fascist if you want. At least you have the right to vote.

Once more another revealing post that is another clear example of intolerance and authoritarianism namely planting false information or stories repeatedly in the hope that even a small portion of it will stick and create doubts.

You see stating that "Party X attracts violent criminals" and claiming that there is "supporting evidence" without actually providing that "supporting evidence" doesn't make it true. It's a bit like the Stalinist show trials where political dissidents were convicted on the evidence of surveillance or witnesses that couldn't be disclosed.

Or for a more simple example, stating that the moon is made of cheese and claiming there is "supporting evidence " but not disclosed that evidence doesn't make it true. Whereas an Apollo mission sample taken from the moon showing it to be comprised principally of Cheddar with an inner core of Camembert and trace elements of Wensleydale might be a more compelling case.

But cheese aside please keep responding as your posts are such easy and clear examples for people to understand about left wing authoritarianism and intolerance.

OK, so clearly you just don't really care that there is evidence that Reform attracts violent criminals. Says it all really.

OK, so clearly you just don't really care that there is evidence that Reform attracts violent criminals. Says it all really.

Thank you again for yet another revealing post.

Stating a linkage between domestic violence convictions and voting for reform doesn't make it true simply because you write in BLOCK CAPITALS. You actually need real evidence and links. The reality is that this is impossible to prove or disprove because political affiliation does not form part of the prosecution case for domestic violence.

That said I can understand that you may sympathise with intolerant authoritarian far left regimes where actual evidence is not necessary for a conviction, simply holding an opposing view is enough.

But your posts are very helpful on revealing the intolerant far left mind set and please keep responding.

The mask, as you call it, is the thin veneer of civility worn by suited thugs such as Farage and Yaxley-Lennon.

There is clear, statistical evidence of CONVICTIONS for domestic violence within Reform supporters. As in arrested and convicted in court.

How do you misunderstand that? I presume you accept the judgement of the British legal system?

So you're pro Trump as well as Farage eh?

Thank you for your response and it is a perfect example of how the real threat of intolerance and authoritarianism now comes not from the far right but from the far left.

You state that everyone is entitled to their own opinions but if those opinions are contrary to your own then you are a racist and a thug and most likely a perpetrator of domestic violence. It is a small step to go from such extreme intolerance to outlawing opposing opinions (after all they all racist, thick wife beating thugs).

So thank for slipping off the mask and showing us how you really think.

Obama is mentioned…

Better an armchair sneer than violence towards minority groups. You're aware that among Reform protesters and flag flyers, between 1/3 and 1/2 have domestic violence convictions.

Now, of course they're entitled to hold political opinions. And if you're happy to be part of a group of supporters such as those, not to mention the Reform councillors who have publicly espoused racist beliefs and comments, then you do you.

But you're not siding with the great thinkers of the world. So call it snobbery if you want. But siding with thugs and racists isn't an intelligent choice.

I'm no fan of Kier Starmer, but I can tell the difference between him as a politician and Farage.

Well better the leader of the free world than an Egyptian anti semite who wants to kill us all as we are dogs and monkeys.

A man is known by the company he keeps.

Sadly the 'great thinkers of the world' seem to be absent from every political party in the UK atm.

Better an armchair sneer than violence towards minority groups. You're aware that among Reform protesters and flag flyers, between 1/3 and 1/2 have domestic violence convictions.

Now, of course they're entitled to hold political opinions. And if you're happy to be part of a group of supporters such as those, not to mention the Reform councillors who have publicly espoused racist beliefs and comments, then you do you.

But you're not siding with the great thinkers of the world. So call it snobbery if you want. But siding with thugs and racists isn't an intelligent choice.

I'm no fan of Kier Starmer, but I can tell the difference between him as a politician and Farage.

This is a bit rich coming from a poster who has on this thread called people who don't agree with her mental, called another poster deranged and accused more than one poster of being liars.

Better an armchair sneer than violence towards minority groups. You're aware that among Reform protesters and flag flyers, between 1/3 and 1/2 have domestic violence convictions.

Now, of course they're entitled to hold political opinions. And if you're happy to be part of a group of supporters such as those, not to mention the Reform councillors who have publicly espoused racist beliefs and comments, then you do you.

But you're not siding with the great thinkers of the world. So call it snobbery if you want. But siding with thugs and racists isn't an intelligent choice.

I'm no fan of Kier Starmer, but I can tell the difference between him as a politician and Farage.

Rather condescending of you. Leftish snobbery is not nice. Particularly as a lot of Reform voters were the old working class former Labour voters. Like the Red Wall voters.

But Labour don't represent the working class any more I suppose.