Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Conservatives closing the gap on reform

412 replies

Pinkponyclub3 · 21/12/2025 01:23

Any conservative supporters here ?
Recent reports say the gap on reform is closing
Having watched some clips of kemi in action,I was quite impressed
But I don't know much about the party having never voted conservative,
Have they more of an insight in to current feeling than labour?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
JustGotToKeepOnKeepingOn · 08/01/2026 20:57

Snowonground · 02/01/2026 13:45

Why would you need a random podcast to tell you how to think and vote? Try and think for yourself perhaps. Everyone walks in their own shoes and can make their own minds up according to their own experiences.

The Trawl podcast gives a round up of lots of posts on the internet so you can go and look things up, delve a bit more into what’s going on. Try it. You might like it.

fairyring25 · 06/01/2026 19:03

Clavinova · 06/01/2026 17:47

Rejoining Erasmus is going to cost the UK government £570million

That's just for the first year and the government claim they have negotiated a 30% discount - so the cost could be over £800 million a year.

Roughly 10,000 UK students took part in study exchanges before we left Erasmus. So it is going to cost the taxpayer roughly £57,000 for a UK student to study in Europe and possibly £80,000 per student in the future! That is a lot of money when we have a budget deficit.
UK universities are saying that there will be no financial benefit to them either as subsidised fees for EU students means that they can't get the full international fee. Roughly 16000-17000 students came from the EU to the UK on the Erasmus scheme before we left, so more students come into the UK than go to other countries. If the government only have so much to spend, surely the money would be better spent elsewhere.

Clavinova · 06/01/2026 18:00

Southernecho · 05/01/2026 09:52

No, it is not, fallen due to Labour policies, Labour are in power now, have been for 18months.

Its on them now, isn't that what right wing posters keep telling us?

BBC Report 27 November 2025

Good news for government - but Tories will also claim credit for the drop

The numbers have come down since they have been in power.
However, migration experts have pointed out that much of this reduction is actually because of measures brought in by the Conservatives in 2024.
So you can expect lots of political argument about who is actually responsible for the drop...

Clavinova · 06/01/2026 17:53

BIossomtoes
Again: what have Labour introduced?
Key Changes (July - December 2025)

Published statistics only go up to year ending June 2025 - therefore policies introduced July - December 2025 have not been measured yet.

Clavinova · 06/01/2026 17:47

Rejoining Erasmus is going to cost the UK government £570million

That's just for the first year and the government claim they have negotiated a 30% discount - so the cost could be over £800 million a year.

Snowonground · 06/01/2026 13:42

Southernecho · 06/01/2026 12:41

None, i didn't really get your "point" just seemed like a snipe really, i was trying to move on but your not interested and just like to argue.

Leave you to it.

So you did miss my point entirely! Why have you been going on off on the wrong track then repeatedly despite being told by several people you had? You chipped in presumably just in order to argue a point that wasnt actually made.

As I said, I'm all for wasting other people's time and you do it so well.

Southernecho · 06/01/2026 12:41

Snowonground · 06/01/2026 09:19

Why are you asking me as to the benefits of Erasmus? What relevance has that to my point?

None, i didn't really get your "point" just seemed like a snipe really, i was trying to move on but your not interested and just like to argue.

Leave you to it.

strawberrybubblegum · 06/01/2026 09:47

Now we just need to get some of our 946,000 young NEETS into those vacancies instead.

strawberrybubblegum · 06/01/2026 09:30

BIossomtoes · 05/01/2026 09:16

Again: what have Labour introduced?

Key Changes (July - December 2025)
Skilled Worker Route:
Higher Skill Level: Increased required skill level for most jobs from RQF Level 3 (A-Level) to RQF Level 6 (Graduate level).

Salary Thresholds: Increased salary requirements for Skilled Worker, Global Business Mobility, and Scale-up visas.

Care Workers: Stopped new Health & Care Worker visa applications for overseas social care workers (SOC codes 6135, 6136) from July 2025.

Immigration Salary List (ISL) & Temporary Shortage List (TSL): Introduced these for some jobs below degree level, but with no dependants allowed for TSL roles.

Family & Private Life (Appendix FM):
New Suitability Rules: Stricter 'good character' requirements, including mandatory refusal for serious criminal convictions (12+ months prison) and tougher rules for immigration breaches.

Financial/Sponsorship Costs:
Increased Immigration Skills Charge (ISC):Raised for sponsors from December 2025.

Illegal Working:
Expanded rules to cover contractors and gig workers.

Upcoming (Early 2026)
English Language Requirement: Increased to B2 (Upper Intermediate) level for most work-related visas from January 8, 2026, including Skilled Worker and Scale-up routes, impacting dependants too.

Overall Goal
These changes stem from the May 2025 White Paper, "Restoring Control," aiming to significantly reduce net migration and tighten eligibility for legal routes, according to DLA Piper and Richmond Chambers.

That's true, there are a few changes in 2025 which nicely extend Sunak's immigration changes. But they were far less significant than the Conservative policies in impact, and some were just extending the Conservative policies.

The Student visa changes Sunak announced in early 2023 were clearly the most significant by far, given that 44% of total entry visas (excluding visitors) in 2023 were for study, a quarter of which were for student dependents.

You can see from the chart I posted that immigration only started going above pre-pandemic levels in early 2022 - and there's obviously a lag in getting accurate figures. Do you remember how the original estimate of 700k net for the year to June 2023 jumped up to 900k when the numbers became a bit clearer in early 2024? That's when it really hit everyone's awareness. You can also see it with the dotted lines in the graph - which show the difference between previous estimate and current estimate for dates in the past. Sunak did incredibly well to bring in policy which addressed the biggest issue within such a short time - announced in 2023, just 1 year after the numbers started rising above pre-pandemic levels.

And you can see that well-targetted Conservative policy taking effect, with immigration topping out immediately after he announced the student dependents visa change.

Skilled worker visas still need some tweaking. I am glad Labour increased the skilled visa salary thresholds: but it was just an inflation-level continuation of Sunak's policy. Sunak increased the threshold from £26,200 to £38,700 per year in April 2024 - that's a significant change. Labour increased it from £38,700 to £41,700 to align with 2024 ASHE data on salary inflation. Good, but not actually introducing anything - just continuing good Conservative policy.

Immigration Skills Charge is tiny: increasing it from £1000 to £1,320 (£480 for small businesses) is an irrelevant drop in the ocean of recruitment costs - certainly not a deterrent.

Stopping the care workers route and also dependents for the TSL were good though - I'll give Labour that. There were 146,000 care worker visas in 2023 - obviously nothing like as significant a gap to plug as the 650,000 student visas issued in 2023 (down to 440,000 now). But both those routes were hugely abused as a way of 'buying a way in' to the UK and it's good Labour stopped the care worker route.

Snowonground · 06/01/2026 09:19

Southernecho · 06/01/2026 08:46

That comment applies to you, i'm afraid.

I said you didn't do it deliberately & stated i don't like class definitions, so wasn't arguing against anything at all.
Then asked you a question on Erasmus but instead of accepting that, you carry this on.

So i'll try again, do you think Erasmus is good or bad?

Why are you asking me as to the benefits of Erasmus? What relevance has that to my point?

Southernecho · 06/01/2026 08:46

Snowonground · 06/01/2026 08:29

I'm all for a bit of time wasting on here by tilting at windmills and arguing against a point that hasn't actually been made. You do it well!

That comment applies to you, i'm afraid.

I said you didn't do it deliberately & stated i don't like class definitions, so wasn't arguing against anything at all.
Then asked you a question on Erasmus but instead of accepting that, you carry this on.

So i'll try again, do you think Erasmus is good or bad?

Snowonground · 06/01/2026 08:29

Southernecho · 06/01/2026 08:19

Just because someone sees something differently, doesn't mean they are twisting the comment
I don't agree with class definitions, to me they are designed to keep people in their lane.

Most blatantly done with Rayner, though she hardly helped herself (though she tried!)

I'm all for a bit of time wasting on here by tilting at windmills and arguing against a point that hasn't actually been made. You do it well!

Southernecho · 06/01/2026 08:19

Just because someone sees something differently, doesn't mean they are twisting the comment
I don't agree with class definitions, to me they are designed to keep people in their lane.

Most blatantly done with Rayner, though she hardly helped herself (though she tried!)

EasternStandard · 06/01/2026 08:09

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 21:23

You've misunderstood. Probably deliberately.

What did you think of the original DM quote? Did you think it hilarious too like the PP?

Idk why anyone would twist your comment, it was obvious.

Southernecho · 06/01/2026 06:28

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 21:23

You've misunderstood. Probably deliberately.

What did you think of the original DM quote? Did you think it hilarious too like the PP?

No, still reads like you think the person making this comment should stay where they are BUT i don't think you meant it that way.

Why even assume WC ? what does that even mean now a days?

On the comment, Honestly?

I thought the original comment was stupid and was worthy of the reply, which i didn't think was hilarious at all, but was what my Gran would have called "Quick"

Now one for you! Do you think that re joining Erasmus is a betrayal of Brexit?

Moving on, I do find it amusing that many on the right, want a new GE, with 1 poster wanting Trump to "Take out Starmer" based on "We were lied too"

But the Brexit Referendum result is forever.

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 21:23

Southernecho · 05/01/2026 20:39

I read your reasoning and subsequent remark, still sounds like you think the less educated should stay where they are.
You re making assumptions, you don't know either their political beliefs or if they are "WC" in fact even calling someone WC is snobbery personified.

Erasmus is now open to a huge range of learners, in areas perhaps more heavily represented by the so called working classes.

You've misunderstood. Probably deliberately.

What did you think of the original DM quote? Did you think it hilarious too like the PP?

EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 20:56

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 20:29

No. Ive already explained why I thought it was an awful snobby comment upthread so may I refer you to my previous answer.

Yep you were clear.

TheNuthatch · 05/01/2026 20:46

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 20:29

No. Ive already explained why I thought it was an awful snobby comment upthread so may I refer you to my previous answer.

You have, and you were right. No need to repeat yourself.

Southernecho · 05/01/2026 20:39

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 20:29

No. Ive already explained why I thought it was an awful snobby comment upthread so may I refer you to my previous answer.

I read your reasoning and subsequent remark, still sounds like you think the less educated should stay where they are.
You re making assumptions, you don't know either their political beliefs or if they are "WC" in fact even calling someone WC is snobbery personified.

Erasmus is now open to a huge range of learners, in areas perhaps more heavily represented by the so called working classes.

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 20:29

Southernecho · 05/01/2026 20:27

How do you know that DM contributor was left of centre?

Erasmus is open to all, inc working class, and benefits UK Uni's in that we get the best of EU students studying here, many chose to stay, working in our skills scarce economy.

Sounds like you think the Working Classes should stay in their lane....

No. Ive already explained why I thought it was an awful snobby comment upthread so may I refer you to my previous answer.

Southernecho · 05/01/2026 20:27

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 09:56

Typical smug snobbery. The left looking down on the working classes. I would have kept quiet about that one, PP....

How do you know that DM contributor was left of centre?

Erasmus is open to all, inc working class, and benefits UK Uni's in that we get the best of EU students studying here, many chose to stay, working in our skills scarce economy.

Sounds like you think the Working Classes should stay in their lane....

fairyring25 · 05/01/2026 16:45

@QuickJadeFinch Rejoining Erasmus is going to cost the UK government £570million. It is much more expensive than the Turing scheme and we cannot afford to be spending money on nice-to-haves when we have a huge budget deficit.

@ArseInTheCoOpWindow
I think finding the right match in terms of work for someone with mental health issues is important. Many jobs can be done from home now and some jobs are more stressful than others. 16% of young people 16-24 years are unemployed in the UK and I don't think we are doing them any favours by setting them up for a life on benefits.

Calliecarpa · 05/01/2026 15:47

QuickJadeFinch · 05/01/2026 09:54

And, more recently, Labour have been instrumental in the UK rejoining the Erasmus program.

I did see a rather apt online comment about that. A DM-reading Brexiteer foolishly posted that rejoning Eramus was a "betrayl [sic] of brexit", only to be further humiliated by the next poster who gently pointed out "Oh there's no need to worry; Erasmus is all about education, so it won't affect you in the least".

Nothing 'gentle' about that remark; it's smug, superior, sneering and nasty. (And there should be a comma after the 'Oh'; maybe the person who wrote it isn't as brilliantly educated as s/he thinks s/he is.)

Interesting that you added a '[sic]' after the typo made by someone you call a 'DM-reading Brexiteer', yet failed to notice that you typed 'rejoining Erasmus' as 'rejoning Eramus'. Just gently pointing it out.

EasternStandard · 05/01/2026 10:47

Snowonground · 05/01/2026 10:13

No. Its a smug superior response to someone that hasn't benefitted from as good and education as you or I. Everyone is allowed an opinion and shouldn't be mocked for the way it was expressed. That post was awful.

Half the trouble is the comprehensive system (introduced by Labour) has failed to educate vast swathes of the electorate. Thats not their fault and they shouldnt be laughed at when they are trying to articulate their own opinion.

Why couldnt the poster just have argued the point that was being made rather than being condescending?

Edited

It’s also that person likely relies on people who do trades or didn’t follow a higher education and it really is off putting to see that kind of sneering.

1dayatatime · 05/01/2026 10:37

Southernecho · 05/01/2026 09:32

Can't argue with facts or figures!

Immigration has fallen under Labour, not the Tories.

Year ending June 2025

Total Immigration:898,000 (down 31% from the previous year).
Total Emigration: 693,000 (up 7% from the previous year).
Net Migration: 204,000 (down 69% from the previous year).

There's also a net outflow of British citizens, estimated at 109,000 for YE June 2025.