Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Latest mansion tax should be on top % homes locally not nationallu

261 replies

Lionfisher · 27/10/2025 22:37

Rachel Reeves is front running yet another class warfare policy in the press, this time suggesting everyone who lives in a home over £2m should have to pay 1% on anything above 2m.

First - I’m fine with this. I live in SW London and would probably have to pay some.

But I’m ONLY fine with it if everyone round the country does too. Meaning that it should be on the top 5% of homes by REGION (I’ll leave it to other people to argue what region means, all the data is there to do it).

We could happily sell our 4 bed home and move somewhere else in the country and buy a 10 bed castle. Or just buy another 4 bed home and stash the rest in the markets. TBH we might even do that if this comes in.

But people don’t want us to do this because it prices them out of local homes etc. Which is pretty much what this policy would do, price people out of local homes so they move elsewhere and prices up somewhere else instead.

But more than anything you can be far more rich on far less money in other parts of the country. So this isn’t a tax on property it’s a tax on the south.

As long as top X% of homeowners elsewhere are paying their 1% above their threshold I’ve no issues with this.

But people won’t agree with me as it’s easier to think it should always be “other people” who pay…. or will they?

OP posts:
ShesTheAlbatross · 30/10/2025 16:03

mamagogo1 · 30/10/2025 15:55

@Lionfisher

im guessing you are se based. As soon as you live outside of the se you realise you are a second class citizen, we have 3 buses an hour, a luxury compared to the next village along which now has zero public transport, zero (bus company pulled out during pandemic, council can no longer afford to run subsidised services) we get our rubbish picked up every 3 weeks, we have no children’s centres, elder care centres or anything other than bare minimum unless run as a charity with no public support, and our council no longer funds 6th form travel meaning you can’t got to sixth form unless you can afford £1100 a year for a bus pass. The museum (crappy local museum) is £6.80 to visit whereas in London they are amazing and free.

I think you have a weird idea of the SE as some big uniform blob with all the facilities of London. The SE town I grew up in had 2 buses an hour 20 yrs ago, I think it’s down to 1 now. The SE village I now live in has 1 an hour, 1 every 90 mins on the weekend, and has a 3 weekly rubbish collection schedule. Yet you list these things as examples of being a second class citizen outside of the SE.

ETA - to be clear I’m not saying there is no regional inequality. It just makes me laugh this idea that those within “the SE” have no idea the awful misery of 1 bus an hour and 3 weekly bin collections that they’d experience if they stepped out of the utopia bubble they live in

mamagogo1 · 30/10/2025 15:55

@Lionfisher

im guessing you are se based. As soon as you live outside of the se you realise you are a second class citizen, we have 3 buses an hour, a luxury compared to the next village along which now has zero public transport, zero (bus company pulled out during pandemic, council can no longer afford to run subsidised services) we get our rubbish picked up every 3 weeks, we have no children’s centres, elder care centres or anything other than bare minimum unless run as a charity with no public support, and our council no longer funds 6th form travel meaning you can’t got to sixth form unless you can afford £1100 a year for a bus pass. The museum (crappy local museum) is £6.80 to visit whereas in London they are amazing and free.

Leavesfalling · 30/10/2025 15:48

Pjnow · 30/10/2025 15:46

Well yes, it would be, seeing as it doesn't actually exist.

Let's just wait and see...we haven't had the Budget yet, read out by one of the most popular Chancellors in living memory.

Pjnow · 30/10/2025 15:46

Leavesfalling · 27/10/2025 22:58

Just enjoy your unearned wealth. People from the north don't need to be shafted even more.

The whole mansion tax idea is rubbish anyway.

Well yes, it would be, seeing as it doesn't actually exist.

Cantseetreesforthewood · 30/10/2025 15:41

Lionfisher · 30/10/2025 15:07

So to be clear, you support the tax rises as long as you’re not paying it? Or as long as everything you pay goes directly towards benefitting yourselves. Got it!

Nope. Happy to pay so long as everyone benifits, and not, as we see time and time again, the SE get the lions share and benifits, and the NE (and other forgotten regions) get screwed over yet again.

Lionfisher · 30/10/2025 15:07

Cantseetreesforthewood · 30/10/2025 07:53

OK, so our house possibly hits the top 5% for our region - it would depend on exactly how big the regions were.
If I pay an extra charge, please can our region have school outcomes like the SE? Public facilities like maintained parks and (free?) museums like the SE? Public transport that runs past 5pm, so it's actually usable for a commute?

It's not just a tiny uplift in salary that the SE gets. It's massive Publicly funded investment and subsidies. Let's stop pretending the NE is just like the SE with lower costs of living. It absolutely isn't. The NE has been decimated time and time again.

So to be clear, you support the tax rises as long as you’re not paying it? Or as long as everything you pay goes directly towards benefitting yourselves. Got it!

OP posts:
Cantseetreesforthewood · 30/10/2025 07:53

OK, so our house possibly hits the top 5% for our region - it would depend on exactly how big the regions were.
If I pay an extra charge, please can our region have school outcomes like the SE? Public facilities like maintained parks and (free?) museums like the SE? Public transport that runs past 5pm, so it's actually usable for a commute?

It's not just a tiny uplift in salary that the SE gets. It's massive Publicly funded investment and subsidies. Let's stop pretending the NE is just like the SE with lower costs of living. It absolutely isn't. The NE has been decimated time and time again.

Lionfisher · 29/10/2025 22:01

Kellykukoo · 29/10/2025 20:23

Rachel Reeves is the stupidest Chancellor there ever was. All her ideas are shit. Her tactics of upsetting the market by leaking all her stupid ideas to gauge which will stick is fundamentally flawed. She is singlehandedly making the UK economy the most unstable in Europe.

Tbf I can’t stand Rachel, but ALL chancellors have done this she’s far from the first

OP posts:
Kellykukoo · 29/10/2025 20:23

Rachel Reeves is the stupidest Chancellor there ever was. All her ideas are shit. Her tactics of upsetting the market by leaking all her stupid ideas to gauge which will stick is fundamentally flawed. She is singlehandedly making the UK economy the most unstable in Europe.

abracadabra1980 · 29/10/2025 20:19

Leavesfalling · 27/10/2025 22:58

Just enjoy your unearned wealth. People from the north don't need to be shafted even more.

The whole mansion tax idea is rubbish anyway.

People in the north - and everyone else 30 years ago, were told there would likely be no state pension when they retired, so were advised to invest in property. It’s not their fault and yes, I’m in the North. I also think it’s a nonsensical tax, and that anyone within the M25 / 30 mins out of the M25, and similar highly priced areas, should be discounted if it does get passed.

NorthXNorthWest · 29/10/2025 20:15

A wealth tax will force many people who have been prudent out of their home because they will not have the disposable income to pay the annual tax. Those larger home will be bought by corporates who will subdivide and build three homes where there was once one. Expensive matchbox sized town houses with postage stamp size gardens.

It is a tax on workers who have been prudent all of their lives, not those with the broadest shoulders.

It will do nothing to protect tenants and tax payers from the corporate greed and the shit political leadership that is killing this country. That is where the government should be focusing their attention. That and the fact they can't cover their own pension commitments.

Araminta1003 · 29/10/2025 20:06

Clearly everyone is desperate to contribute themselves and not just expecting others to pay more tax!

Bumblebee72 · 29/10/2025 19:52

Completely agree. It needs to be regionally weighted otherwise people in the north won't have as much opportunity to contribute to the pot than those in the south.

Bufftailed · 29/10/2025 15:48

CinnamonCinnabar · 29/10/2025 14:25

Yep - way less hassle and cheaper to put in a stair lift and ground floor shower in a big house than to move.

I’m 40s so not yet - ha ha!!!

CinnamonCinnabar · 29/10/2025 14:25

Bufftailed · 28/10/2025 08:46

Stamp duty is a big one

I want to downsize next few years, get rid of the big mortgage and free up my 4 bed 2 bathroom. Stamp duty as it is really putting me off

Yep - way less hassle and cheaper to put in a stair lift and ground floor shower in a big house than to move.

RosesAndHellebores · 29/10/2025 08:28

And so it begins.
Chairman Mau suits will become compulsory purchases and fines implemented to ensure they are worn. The pigs will take control.

3.5 years until the next election. Let's march.

dottiehens · 29/10/2025 08:15

Regardless it is theft and it is criminal. For what is worth is to live in a country your hard earnings is all about paying taxes. Work hard to pay for the people on benefits and people arriving to claim asylum . Do not forget the inheritance tax of 40 percent.

Leavesfalling · 29/10/2025 08:09

Araminta1003 · 29/10/2025 07:59

Yes and a mansion tax would be similar surely because 0.6% of properties is a minuscule amount but to set up a system to value them properly (and how will inflation and increases be dealt with) will surely outweigh much of what they take in. So yet another “stuff the rich”, but stuff the taxpayer too! Just like the private school VAT.
As a taxpayer I object to these symbolic supposed vote winners (they are buying their voter base with my tax money!) that actually end up in us paying more tax. Because they mess things up.
And no I do not have a mansion worth 2 million, just basic common sense.
They will bleat about “oh AI will do the valuations”, all BS.

Farming...set a limit on APR to piss off that rich toff Clarkson. It may lead to the suicide of farmers, the breakup of the family farm held through generations, affect our own food production so we have to pay more to import and raise less money than it takes in administering it. But it sticks it to the rich guy! And that's what matters to us all apparently!

Araminta1003 · 29/10/2025 07:59

Yes and a mansion tax would be similar surely because 0.6% of properties is a minuscule amount but to set up a system to value them properly (and how will inflation and increases be dealt with) will surely outweigh much of what they take in. So yet another “stuff the rich”, but stuff the taxpayer too! Just like the private school VAT.
As a taxpayer I object to these symbolic supposed vote winners (they are buying their voter base with my tax money!) that actually end up in us paying more tax. Because they mess things up.
And no I do not have a mansion worth 2 million, just basic common sense.
They will bleat about “oh AI will do the valuations”, all BS.

Leavesfalling · 29/10/2025 07:42

Araminta1003 · 29/10/2025 06:35

The private school VAT was ambushed mid academic year unexpectedly so the first take of VAT will be higher, precisely because many schools past most of the cost straight through to parents and increased fees rather than absorb the VAT. However, apparently more than 25000 pupils left and more are still leaving and not joining at usual points. Of course, Labour will bleat about the first ambushed VAT take, that is all they have got.

Exactly. Deliberately destructive timing.

Another factor will be harder to determine but probably the biggest sum to add to the taxpayer's bill being how many parents would have chosen private but for the VAT. This will add years of payments for children to go to state school that would otherwise have been able to be spent by the Education budget on other things. Such as these mysterious teachers we hear so much about.

Araminta1003 · 29/10/2025 06:35

The private school VAT was ambushed mid academic year unexpectedly so the first take of VAT will be higher, precisely because many schools past most of the cost straight through to parents and increased fees rather than absorb the VAT. However, apparently more than 25000 pupils left and more are still leaving and not joining at usual points. Of course, Labour will bleat about the first ambushed VAT take, that is all they have got.

HawaiiWake · 29/10/2025 06:30

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 29/10/2025 06:24

The private school thing has raised more revenue than expected.

That is one statistic figure, to get a fuller complete picture we need to know the cost of students entering state from private, the private schools closure and employment figures impact, the VAT reclaim from private schools.

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 29/10/2025 06:24

Araminta1003 · 28/10/2025 21:07

It’s not 20000 on 2 million. It’s 1 per cent of the value above 2 million!! So like an extra council tax band that increases progressively. But there is no system in place to value houses accurately and easily so it cannot be easily implemented. The fear of it is what will crash the housing market. It’s only 0.6 per cent of properties that are worth more than two million, but the policy itself will likely cause more damage (if implemented) than revenue raised. It’s like their private school fees VAT and backtracking on winter fuel allowance. Nothing they are proposing is actually raising additional revenue overall! We have well and truly hit the Laffer curve. Taxation has become a political symbolic tool rather than revenue raising which is absurd.

The private school thing has raised more revenue than expected.

Araminta1003 · 28/10/2025 21:07

It’s not 20000 on 2 million. It’s 1 per cent of the value above 2 million!! So like an extra council tax band that increases progressively. But there is no system in place to value houses accurately and easily so it cannot be easily implemented. The fear of it is what will crash the housing market. It’s only 0.6 per cent of properties that are worth more than two million, but the policy itself will likely cause more damage (if implemented) than revenue raised. It’s like their private school fees VAT and backtracking on winter fuel allowance. Nothing they are proposing is actually raising additional revenue overall! We have well and truly hit the Laffer curve. Taxation has become a political symbolic tool rather than revenue raising which is absurd.

dottiehens · 28/10/2025 19:11

Communism it is. I believe Labour is the worse of all governments. So much misery and taxes in education and basic human rights like a house. How can this be legal £20.000 is also after taxes. Homeowners will have to earn a lot more to have £20.000 for the tax. This government is criminal.

Swipe left for the next trending thread