Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Left wingers seem as bad as right wingers

281 replies

secureyourbook · 17/09/2025 16:10

I’ve seen so many people this last week who see themselves as such “right on” virtuous people posting the most horrible things on social media.

One replied to a post about Charlie Kirk, it was basically a “sorry not sorry” post because he’s so hateful. When asked by someone if she’s actually seen any of his debates she said she didn’t need to, the facts are there that he was basically a fascist who incites violence. FWIW I’ve watched several of his videos since seeing her post today and seen nothing that suggests this, even though I don’t agree with his opinion on many things (but apparently he’s doing it in code, whatever that means)

Another friend was ranting about the protest in London and using really horrible terms to describe people that went. I hate what the flags have come to represent, and I don’t doubt that there were many thugs there just wanting to stir up hate. Surely though, describing all who went to the protest as the same (basically they’re all thick as shit racist hooligans) is no better than someone describing all immigrants as benefit chasing potential rapists (or insert any other racist stereotype)

Am I missing something? Or is it considered acceptable to make sweeping generalisations as long as you’re on the left side of the political spectrum?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Morningsleepin · 25/09/2025 21:35

OneAmberGoose · 17/09/2025 16:41

One of your ‘tolerant left’ just put a bullet through a young mans neck. In front of his wife and children. Have a word with yourself.

Nobody knows if the suspect is the killer or what motivated him

1dayatatime · 23/09/2025 12:02

Here's a good short simple explanation on left and right wing politics in regards to fascism:

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/QiIIKguYjlY?feature=shared

TooBigForMyBoots · 23/09/2025 00:20

Right wingers really hate nettles.
Left wingers are meh🤷‍♀️ about nettles.

A1984 · 22/09/2025 13:49

I agree and appreciate this post. I'm left wing but I think extremism from either side is just really unhelpful, and is a part of what led to Brexit, as well as stirring up the 'culture wars' when frankly there are so many more important things to be writing and thinking about. I do think it's an online problem too - there's a reason negotiating is usually best done in person as we're so much better at communicating face to face than simply verbally. Listening to another viewpoint in good faith is a lot more important than trying to make your own point perfectly, I think.

llizzie · 21/09/2025 21:20

crossstitchingnana · 19/09/2025 09:22

Left, right we’re all people. Some are kind and loving, some like to “other” people different to them, then attack.

There are really only two types of people in the world: law abiding and criminal.

They come in all shapes and sizes, creeds and colours.

TooBigForMyBoots · 20/09/2025 22:31

Right wingers buzz off Old Testament gods.

ThatDreamyLemonBiscuit · 20/09/2025 22:14

I've been around mumsnet long enough to know its pointless trying to have a conversation with llizzie.

llizzie · 20/09/2025 21:22

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 07:04

ISIS's tactics and ideology align more closely with religious extremism than fascist totalitarianism.
You misunderstand fascism. Here is the sign from the US Holocaust memorial museum to help you understand what it actually is

Hitler routed out all the Jews and others because he did not want them to live in Germany with the 'pure Aryan' race. He was called a fascist.

What do you call the ISIS leader who did the same, threatened to rid the world of Jews, Christians, and their followers?

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:51

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:48

Is it absurd though? It was a suggestion I made, because groups like ISIS, Boko Haram , Islamic Jihad have in the past given that as a reason for their killing people.

You are very defensive of islam. That does not mean it is right for you to defend Islamic extremists. They are no respecter of persons. They will kill muslim and Christian alike if it suits their purpose. Boko Haram have started border raids and kidnapping young girls for their harems. Assad killed muslims, Iran kills muslims, Taliban kills muslims. If British muslims are being threatened, then it is more likely they are killed by other muslims and atheists than Christians.

Be sure that when you are defending muslims, you are defending the right muslims and not those under the spell of violent leaders.

I brought up ISIS because their leader posted the threat to Britain last night. I would not have brought it up for any other reason. Shooting the messenger is not usually a good idea until you know what the message is and who sent it.

Read the post, which was copied word for word, and tell me what you think about that, not about my reaction to it.

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:48

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 20:29

I didn’t say “Britons killing Muslims”? The fact that you brought ISIS into this thread is evidence in and of itself that Muslims are being targeted, otherwise why bring it up? Do you think Islam indistinguishable to ISIS?
And honestly no, me (or anyone else) who SAYS that Muslims are being targeted is not why ISIS is threatening Britain 😂😂 frankly that’s absurd. The UK’s role in the Gaza conflict (or indeed the ACTIONS of the far right towards Muslims are) is far more likely to exacerbate tensions than me calling them out!

Is it absurd though? It was a suggestion I made, because groups like ISIS, Boko Haram , Islamic Jihad have in the past given that as a reason for their killing people.

You are very defensive of islam. That does not mean it is right for you to defend Islamic extremists. They are no respecter of persons. They will kill muslim and Christian alike if it suits their purpose. Boko Haram have started border raids and kidnapping young girls for their harems. Assad killed muslims, Iran kills muslims, Taliban kills muslims. If British muslims are being threatened, then it is more likely they are killed by other muslims and atheists than Christians.

Be sure that when you are defending muslims, you are defending the right muslims and not those under the spell of violent leaders.

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:37

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 20:29

I didn’t say “Britons killing Muslims”? The fact that you brought ISIS into this thread is evidence in and of itself that Muslims are being targeted, otherwise why bring it up? Do you think Islam indistinguishable to ISIS?
And honestly no, me (or anyone else) who SAYS that Muslims are being targeted is not why ISIS is threatening Britain 😂😂 frankly that’s absurd. The UK’s role in the Gaza conflict (or indeed the ACTIONS of the far right towards Muslims are) is far more likely to exacerbate tensions than me calling them out!

I brought it up because the announcement was made yesterday. What do you call a 'race of like minded people of one creed whose leader puts out a directive to kill anyone of a certain race or creed?

That is the latest threat to Christians and Jews and their followers, followed by suggestions on how to kill them.

You know all about labelling people, what would you call that?

TooBigForMyBoots · 20/09/2025 20:35

Lefties buzz off windmills.

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:32

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 19:08

Yes ISIS shares totalitarian traits like oppression of women, rejection of democracy and use of propaganda and violence.
However it's fundamentally a theocratic movement driven by faith-based hatred, not nationalism. Calling it religious extremism or jihadist terrorism is more accurate and helps understand how to fight it.
Fascism tends to orientate around a cult of personality, around a leader often incorporating elements like corporatism and racial nationalism. ISIS, by contrast, rejects modern nation-states in favour of a borderless caliphate governed by a strict interpretation of Islamic law. Their violence is framed through religious eschatology.
They do have similar traits but Religious crusaders like Isis, although brutal and authoritarian, are not fascists. They base their claim to superiority on access to divine revelation rather than ethnic or national identity. Isis welcomes converts, unlike the Nazis, who did not allow Jews to escape death camps by joining them.
I would argue that both movements are deeply concerning. I’m not quite sure why ISIS was brought into this thread unless to pivot to an anti Muslim sentiment.

?
Religious eschatology refers to a religion's teachings, beliefs, and ideas about death, the afterlife, and the end of the world or "end times". While the term originates from the Greek word for "last," it encompasses various aspects, including individual judgment after death, the resurrection of the dead, a final Day of Judgment, and the ultimate fate of the world, such as a Messianic age or a new heaven and earth. Different religions and denominations have distinct beliefs regarding the specifics of these events

Islamic extremist group leaders are those who want to be in power and create a stricter type of Islam in the hope of convincing muslims that theirs' is the only true way. Christian cults do the same, but are more easily got rid of.

After the last fall of ISIS in Iraq and Syria, there was a broadcast on TV of interviews with Russian muslim mothers trying desperately to get their daughters back, but were refused. They explained that they had sent their daughters there because they were promised a stricter type of muslim teaching and they would not be influenced by western decadence.(today the Taliban banned the internet for the same reason). Those Russian mothers said they had sent their daughters there because they were also promised that their daughters would marry the leaders. It wasn't just Russia. Muslim girls who were considered out of control in other countries were sent to ISIS hoping the new Islam would be better for them.

Muslims in countries where Islamic extremism exists understand these new controls even less than other religions do. They have centuries of Islam running through their DNA and I think it is harder for them to understand than we think.

These Islamic extremists want power over people, as simple as that. The only way they think they can get that is through violence. The ordinary muslims are also victims. The problem is that we cannot identify them, and ordinary muslims are loath to point them out to security people.

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 20:29

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:08

Don't you think that phrases like ''demonising muslims' and 'Britons killing muslims' might be why the ISIS leader has threatened Britain?

You have no evidence of that, just stirring up the pot.

I didn’t say “Britons killing Muslims”? The fact that you brought ISIS into this thread is evidence in and of itself that Muslims are being targeted, otherwise why bring it up? Do you think Islam indistinguishable to ISIS?
And honestly no, me (or anyone else) who SAYS that Muslims are being targeted is not why ISIS is threatening Britain 😂😂 frankly that’s absurd. The UK’s role in the Gaza conflict (or indeed the ACTIONS of the far right towards Muslims are) is far more likely to exacerbate tensions than me calling them out!

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:20

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 07:04

ISIS's tactics and ideology align more closely with religious extremism than fascist totalitarianism.
You misunderstand fascism. Here is the sign from the US Holocaust memorial museum to help you understand what it actually is

Don't tell me I misunderstand Fascism. You do not know me. Why would you say that on the strength of my disgust at the ISIS threat?

You read stupid American adverts designed to turn people's minds against government and tell me I don't understand what fascism is???

That is America, not Britain. They are hysterically trying to convince everyone that Republicans are fascists, because in their minds they don't like that the American Constitution allows their president to be a dictator.

That is not Britain.

Most likely ISIS supporters are reading on threads like this that Britain is killing muslims, demonising them.

When that was relayed to Putin that Russian citizens in other countries were being threatened, demonised, killed, it gave Putin the excuse he needed to invade other countries, like Ukraine, to protect the interests of expat Russians there who had reported they were under threat. The same happened in the Balkans.

Two years ago Putin announced conscription and tens of thousands of Russians fled to Georgia, no doubt settling in one place near the Russian border. Wait a while, and Putin might well invade on the pretext of 'ensuring the well being of Russians in Georgia''. It is how he works.

ISIS might well do the same. After all, we don't know who the boat people are do we?

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:11

SammyScrounge · 20/09/2025 03:11

I agree. They are brainwashed and parrot their ideology without thinking.

They are both extremists. They set people's teeth on edge.

llizzie · 20/09/2025 20:08

Circularmadness · 19/09/2025 08:20

No. Fascism is a far-right, ultranationalist political ideology and movement that emphasizes extreme loyalty to the nation (often above the individual or other groups) dictatorial leadership, forcible suppression of opposition, and centralised control over society and the economy.
It originated in early 20th century Europe, most notably with Benito Mussolini's regime in Italy, and shares core traits like militarism, a rejection of liberal democracy, and the glorification of a mythical national past or hierarchy.
There's no single, universally agreed-upon definition because it evolved across contexts (e.g., Italian Fascism vs. Nazism, which added explicit racial elements), but its generally accepted that it involves at its core; authoritarianism, nationalism, and anti-egalitarianism.
The idea of fascism as "someone that kills everyone they don’t like" is way way too simplistic, whilst it captures the violent tendencies (like state-sponsored terror against perceived enemies) it misses the ideological framework. Regimes like Mussolini's or Hitler's did use mass violence, genocide, and purges as tools to enforce conformity, but fascism isn't defined by random killing; it's a structured worldview that justifies such acts through appeals to national rebirth, racial or cultural purity, and the leader's infallible will. In short, it's much more of an ideology an aspirational "ideal" for its adherents about remaking society under a strong, unified state than just a personality trait or isolated brutality. That said, in practice, it almost always leads to authoritarian repression and war.
In America Trump has repeatedly called for the cancelling of Kimmel, Colbert and Fallon. From a fascist lens, this could be seen as suppressing oppositional media which is a hallmark of fascist regimes that used state or proxy pressure to silence critics and enforce narrative control. The Trump administration has aggressively pursued policies targeting "woke" or "ideological" materials in public and federal institutions, often framed as protecting "American values" from "indoctrination." They ordered the removal of books from several libraries, like Maya Angelou’s Caged Bird whilst allowing Hitlers Mein Kampf to remain. They threaten universities with defunding, if they feel that it doesn’t align with the ideology. When journalists used the term “gulf of Mexico” and not the approved language of the regime, Trump threatened to cancel any access. These actions don't make the administration fully fascist, but they align with fascist tendencies toward authoritarian control over discourse, especially when paired with ultranationalist rhetoric.
In the UK the flag marches were driven by the far right and whipping up dangerous anti immigrant hatred. Whilst Nazi Germany targeted Jewish people, now it’s the demonising of Muslim people. The protestors were aggressive towards Asian people and also intimidating to women ( singing “get your tits out for the lads”) These type of marches normalise prejudice by associating national symbols with anti-immigrant hostility, making minority communities (Muslims, South Asians) feel unsafe. There were numerous council leaders who reported “intimidating" atmospheres in diverse neighborhoods. I actually feel shame to see my nations flag being used like this, I want to feel proud of my country and I do, to some extent, but events like this sicken me. I understand people are concerned by immigration but behaving as the protesters did was sickening and shameful. These protesters that bang on about protecting “our women” from immigrants but 2 in 5 (40%) arrested in the Farage riots had previous convictions for domestic violence.

Don't you think that phrases like ''demonising muslims' and 'Britons killing muslims' might be why the ISIS leader has threatened Britain?

You have no evidence of that, just stirring up the pot.

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 19:08

Imnobody4 · 20/09/2025 16:52

I think ISIS maps on to fascism pretty closely. It merely replaces the nation state with the Ummah. It's totalitarian, scorning democracy and bases laws on an all compassing guide to life. It despises and oppresses women.

Islam has historically been close to fascist Germany, not only harbouring Nazi war criminals, but using their expertise in interrogation, propaganda and ethnic cleansing.
It's unwise to expect a repeat of Hitler - it will come in a different guise.

Yes ISIS shares totalitarian traits like oppression of women, rejection of democracy and use of propaganda and violence.
However it's fundamentally a theocratic movement driven by faith-based hatred, not nationalism. Calling it religious extremism or jihadist terrorism is more accurate and helps understand how to fight it.
Fascism tends to orientate around a cult of personality, around a leader often incorporating elements like corporatism and racial nationalism. ISIS, by contrast, rejects modern nation-states in favour of a borderless caliphate governed by a strict interpretation of Islamic law. Their violence is framed through religious eschatology.
They do have similar traits but Religious crusaders like Isis, although brutal and authoritarian, are not fascists. They base their claim to superiority on access to divine revelation rather than ethnic or national identity. Isis welcomes converts, unlike the Nazis, who did not allow Jews to escape death camps by joining them.
I would argue that both movements are deeply concerning. I’m not quite sure why ISIS was brought into this thread unless to pivot to an anti Muslim sentiment.

Imnobody4 · 20/09/2025 16:52

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 07:04

ISIS's tactics and ideology align more closely with religious extremism than fascist totalitarianism.
You misunderstand fascism. Here is the sign from the US Holocaust memorial museum to help you understand what it actually is

I think ISIS maps on to fascism pretty closely. It merely replaces the nation state with the Ummah. It's totalitarian, scorning democracy and bases laws on an all compassing guide to life. It despises and oppresses women.

Islam has historically been close to fascist Germany, not only harbouring Nazi war criminals, but using their expertise in interrogation, propaganda and ethnic cleansing.
It's unwise to expect a repeat of Hitler - it will come in a different guise.

KeebabSpider · 20/09/2025 11:35

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 07:04

ISIS's tactics and ideology align more closely with religious extremism than fascist totalitarianism.
You misunderstand fascism. Here is the sign from the US Holocaust memorial museum to help you understand what it actually is

You say "the US holocaust museum"

Has this come to the attention of the orange orangutan yet?

And how many of these statements can be ticked?

In terms of US politics we think that fascism is the likely outcome of this lurch to the right. Some might argue that has already happened.

Circularmadness · 20/09/2025 07:04

llizzie · 20/09/2025 03:12

What, then, do you make of this latest from ISIS?

"Isis has issued a horrific threat to Britain as it urged its followers to attack "Jews, Christians and their allies".
A spokesman for the Islamic State, Abu Hudhaifa al-Ansari, encouraged supporters to pursue individuals of the two faiths throughout America, Europe "and the world".

The message, titled "O Zealous Monotheists", outlines multiple methods for carrying out assaults.
They include explosive devices, firearms, bladed weapons and vehicles as instruments of attack."

Now that, is fascism.

ISIS's tactics and ideology align more closely with religious extremism than fascist totalitarianism.
You misunderstand fascism. Here is the sign from the US Holocaust memorial museum to help you understand what it actually is

Left wingers seem as bad as right wingers
TooBigForMyBoots · 20/09/2025 03:13

The Right like foot binding and circumcision.
The Left like chickpeas.

llizzie · 20/09/2025 03:12

Circularmadness · 19/09/2025 08:20

No. Fascism is a far-right, ultranationalist political ideology and movement that emphasizes extreme loyalty to the nation (often above the individual or other groups) dictatorial leadership, forcible suppression of opposition, and centralised control over society and the economy.
It originated in early 20th century Europe, most notably with Benito Mussolini's regime in Italy, and shares core traits like militarism, a rejection of liberal democracy, and the glorification of a mythical national past or hierarchy.
There's no single, universally agreed-upon definition because it evolved across contexts (e.g., Italian Fascism vs. Nazism, which added explicit racial elements), but its generally accepted that it involves at its core; authoritarianism, nationalism, and anti-egalitarianism.
The idea of fascism as "someone that kills everyone they don’t like" is way way too simplistic, whilst it captures the violent tendencies (like state-sponsored terror against perceived enemies) it misses the ideological framework. Regimes like Mussolini's or Hitler's did use mass violence, genocide, and purges as tools to enforce conformity, but fascism isn't defined by random killing; it's a structured worldview that justifies such acts through appeals to national rebirth, racial or cultural purity, and the leader's infallible will. In short, it's much more of an ideology an aspirational "ideal" for its adherents about remaking society under a strong, unified state than just a personality trait or isolated brutality. That said, in practice, it almost always leads to authoritarian repression and war.
In America Trump has repeatedly called for the cancelling of Kimmel, Colbert and Fallon. From a fascist lens, this could be seen as suppressing oppositional media which is a hallmark of fascist regimes that used state or proxy pressure to silence critics and enforce narrative control. The Trump administration has aggressively pursued policies targeting "woke" or "ideological" materials in public and federal institutions, often framed as protecting "American values" from "indoctrination." They ordered the removal of books from several libraries, like Maya Angelou’s Caged Bird whilst allowing Hitlers Mein Kampf to remain. They threaten universities with defunding, if they feel that it doesn’t align with the ideology. When journalists used the term “gulf of Mexico” and not the approved language of the regime, Trump threatened to cancel any access. These actions don't make the administration fully fascist, but they align with fascist tendencies toward authoritarian control over discourse, especially when paired with ultranationalist rhetoric.
In the UK the flag marches were driven by the far right and whipping up dangerous anti immigrant hatred. Whilst Nazi Germany targeted Jewish people, now it’s the demonising of Muslim people. The protestors were aggressive towards Asian people and also intimidating to women ( singing “get your tits out for the lads”) These type of marches normalise prejudice by associating national symbols with anti-immigrant hostility, making minority communities (Muslims, South Asians) feel unsafe. There were numerous council leaders who reported “intimidating" atmospheres in diverse neighborhoods. I actually feel shame to see my nations flag being used like this, I want to feel proud of my country and I do, to some extent, but events like this sicken me. I understand people are concerned by immigration but behaving as the protesters did was sickening and shameful. These protesters that bang on about protecting “our women” from immigrants but 2 in 5 (40%) arrested in the Farage riots had previous convictions for domestic violence.

What, then, do you make of this latest from ISIS?

"Isis has issued a horrific threat to Britain as it urged its followers to attack "Jews, Christians and their allies".
A spokesman for the Islamic State, Abu Hudhaifa al-Ansari, encouraged supporters to pursue individuals of the two faiths throughout America, Europe "and the world".

The message, titled "O Zealous Monotheists", outlines multiple methods for carrying out assaults.
They include explosive devices, firearms, bladed weapons and vehicles as instruments of attack."

Now that, is fascism.

SammyScrounge · 20/09/2025 03:11

ThejoyofNC · 17/09/2025 16:11

The far left are much worse in my opinion.

I agree. They are brainwashed and parrot their ideology without thinking.

llizzie · 20/09/2025 03:07

Barbadossunset · 19/09/2025 16:20

Overtheatlantic · 17/09/2025 16:38
The left have never been and will never be as bad as the right. Their values are completely different

Absolutely! Look at Pol Pot, Stalin, Honecker, Mao. Perfect poppets all of them.

Isis has issued a horrific threat to Britain as it urged its followers to attack "Jews, Christians and their allies".
A spokesman for the Islamic State, Abu Hudhaifa al-Ansari, encouraged supporters to pursue individuals of the two faiths throughout America, Europe "and the world".

The message, titled "O Zealous Monotheists", outlines multiple methods for carrying out assaults.
They include explosive devices, firearms, bladed weapons and vehicles as instruments of attack.