Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Why do people not like Jeremy Corbyn?

263 replies

Grace040712 · 30/07/2025 02:55

I was at a family lunch the other day with my in-laws and they were all slating the man. However, when I asked why my mother in law could only come up with her lives in an ex council house and she doesn't like his suit.

These aren't attributes I particularly care about in politicians (or really in people in general). I much prefer to find out if they are kind, think of others, hard working, honest etc ...

So! To those who dislike and to those who do... What are our thoughts on Jeremy Corbyn?

OP posts:
Lavenderflower · 31/07/2025 10:11

I think he hated by the media but very popular with his constituents - I been told that his office does actually do a lot of letters for people.

Jamaicanmoon · 31/07/2025 10:07

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 20:43

Oh here we go again "anti semitic" how about I just call you Islamaphobic for insinuating Muslims secretly control everything behind the scenes? Or we could debate like adults instead of rushing to sling insults and ott accusations?

But I am not saying muslims secretly control things. I am pointing out the fact that they have a sizeable voter base, particularly some parts of the UK. Its no secret either that most muslims have strong feelings about the Gaza situation. Voter base & intentions and politicians reacting to that is democracy, not secretly controlling.

You on the other hand were arguing that KS's policy was dictated by Jewish interests even though Jews don't have the numbers to be able to influence politicians behaviour to gain their votes, so what else are you saying their influence, you claim they had, is based on?

Neolara · 30/07/2025 22:23

Because he was completely incompetent as leader of the Labour party which allowed Boris and friends to take power and stay in power despite Boris being a morally bankrupt self-serving serial liar, which then had the knock on effect of wreaking havoc on the country.

DeLaRuiz · 30/07/2025 22:17

Allisgoodtoday · 30/07/2025 07:16

Another elderly white man who has some whacky ideas and a thirst for power. We have too many of these as leaders in the world today.

Corbyn is very evasive when questioned about his stance on various issues, which makes him appear untrustworthy. As I don't know him personally, I can only go on how he comes over on the news/media, and apparent untrustworthiness doesn't appeal.

I would prefer someone who is younger, open and transparent, and with fresh ideas for the country. Corbyn's few proposals in past years re. fiscal policy etc. do not align with my thinking and therefore I'm not going to vote for him.

the Racism and ageism at the start of your post is offensive.

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 22:16

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 22:01

Ok so perhaps Starmer's reluctance to call Israel out on their behaviour was due to paranoia about the anti semitism accusations about the Labour party?

Oh and he has previously stated his support for Zionism, maybe thats relevant I dont know.

Why does any policy on Gaza now have to be based on preconceived notions and "sides". Youre either "pro Gaza" (whatever that means) or a "Zionist".

Things are mad these days.

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 22:10

Although it probably is within Corbyn's circle.

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 22:09

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 22:01

Ok so perhaps Starmer's reluctance to call Israel out on their behaviour was due to paranoia about the anti semitism accusations about the Labour party?

Oh and he has previously stated his support for Zionism, maybe thats relevant I dont know.

Thinking that Israel has the right to exist and defend itself isn't controversial is it?

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 22:01

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 21:23

But there’s a famous and longstanding conspiracy theory that Jews secretly control the world.

Also why would British Jews base their vote on policy towards Israel? That’s also a suggestion that should be avoided.

Both these feature on the IHRA definition of antisemitism.

https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

Ok so perhaps Starmer's reluctance to call Israel out on their behaviour was due to paranoia about the anti semitism accusations about the Labour party?

Oh and he has previously stated his support for Zionism, maybe thats relevant I dont know.

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 21:23

But there’s a famous and longstanding conspiracy theory that Jews secretly control the world.

Also why would British Jews base their vote on policy towards Israel? That’s also a suggestion that should be avoided.

Both these feature on the IHRA definition of antisemitism.

https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

What is antisemitism?

With the IHRA working definition of antisemitism, the IHRA built international consensus around an answer to the question, what does antisemitism mean?

https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 20:43

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 19:34

No, that couldn’t be said because Jews are a tiny percentage of the UK population and Muslims a sizeable population.

One would have to be very stupid and extremely ill informed to make the claim in your post.

In fact, it is so spectacularly ill informed that one can’t help suspecting that there is underlying anti-Semitic thinking that Jews secretly control things behind the scenes. Because quite clearly their ‘voting power’ can’t be doing that as they are tiny in number.

Edited

Oh here we go again "anti semitic" how about I just call you Islamaphobic for insinuating Muslims secretly control everything behind the scenes? Or we could debate like adults instead of rushing to sling insults and ott accusations?

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 19:34

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 17:36

Or it could be said the reason why Starmer has refused to recognise the scale of the horror in Gaza until now, and chose to actually assist Israel in their war crimes, was his fear of losing the Jewish voters.....

No, that couldn’t be said because Jews are a tiny percentage of the UK population and Muslims a sizeable population.

One would have to be very stupid and extremely ill informed to make the claim in your post.

In fact, it is so spectacularly ill informed that one can’t help suspecting that there is underlying anti-Semitic thinking that Jews secretly control things behind the scenes. Because quite clearly their ‘voting power’ can’t be doing that as they are tiny in number.

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 18:23

SisterTeatime · 30/07/2025 18:10

Muslims make up about 6.5% of the voting population though, outnumbering Jewish voters about 14 to 1.

Hi don't thonk for one second Starmer has prioritised muslim feelings about the Gaza conflict, he has staunchly defended Israel's actions for the last two years - until now. So what changed? Public pressure and pressure from within his own party, the public horror and disgust just couldn't be ignored any longer. Still no sanctions though eh?

SisterTeatime · 30/07/2025 18:10

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 17:36

Or it could be said the reason why Starmer has refused to recognise the scale of the horror in Gaza until now, and chose to actually assist Israel in their war crimes, was his fear of losing the Jewish voters.....

Muslims make up about 6.5% of the voting population though, outnumbering Jewish voters about 14 to 1.

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 17:53

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 17:36

Or it could be said the reason why Starmer has refused to recognise the scale of the horror in Gaza until now, and chose to actually assist Israel in their war crimes, was his fear of losing the Jewish voters.....

Think they were lost a long time ago. Remember who the subject of this thread is.

MissyB1 · 30/07/2025 17:36

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 16:35

Its not most of the British public. PP is right that most people are not motivated enough by the ME for it to effect how they vote. It is, however, a big deciding issue for Muslim voters and KS is scared of losing their votes, as are his MPs who reliant on the Muslim vote to keep their seats. .

Or it could be said the reason why Starmer has refused to recognise the scale of the horror in Gaza until now, and chose to actually assist Israel in their war crimes, was his fear of losing the Jewish voters.....

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 16:56

CurlewKate · 30/07/2025 16:43

It wasn’t a donkey jacket and it wasn’t Jeremy Corbyn. Apart from that, you’re spot on!

The PP knows that. Read her post.

CurlewKate · 30/07/2025 16:43

Charlottejbt · 30/07/2025 14:20

He wore a donkey jacket at the Cenotaph, and his election loss wasn't merely a loss but "the longest suicide note in history" (melodramatic, much?)

Okay, that was a previous Labour leader, but it goes to show that these things don't change. If the media piles on to somebody with sufficient vehemence, the hard of thinking just follow automatically. School bullying works in much the same way. Relatively few people are determined to give a fair hearing to somebody who appears to be universally derided, even if the charges against them amount to a few trivial objections coated in vulgar abuse.

As to why the billionaire-owned press wants to make Corbyn a laughing stock, I think that's fairly obvious...

It wasn’t a donkey jacket and it wasn’t Jeremy Corbyn. Apart from that, you’re spot on!

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 16:35

Arafina · 30/07/2025 15:39

Considering we're aiding and abetting Israel it really is our business, world politics affects us all, Keir Starmer wouldn't be threatening to recognise Palestine if most of the British public weren't switched on about Gaza, I don't believe for a second he personally cares

Its not most of the British public. PP is right that most people are not motivated enough by the ME for it to effect how they vote. It is, however, a big deciding issue for Muslim voters and KS is scared of losing their votes, as are his MPs who reliant on the Muslim vote to keep their seats. .

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 16:31

Arafina · 30/07/2025 15:39

Considering we're aiding and abetting Israel it really is our business, world politics affects us all, Keir Starmer wouldn't be threatening to recognise Palestine if most of the British public weren't switched on about Gaza, I don't believe for a second he personally cares

I don't think it's high on the priorities of most normal people. Sorry.

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 16:28

Thulpelly · 30/07/2025 16:09

He kept his stance on Brexit quiet but he also didn’t lie about his own opinion, when there was immense pressure to do so.
I’m not sure how you think the third paragraph is a contradiction.

A man of integrity who doesn't just do what is needed to get votes (as you claim), does not lie by omission by not telling people what his stance really is (there was also immense pressure on him to tell the truth of his position which he failed to do).

A lot of posters have pointed out that Corbyn was often unclear and evasive about his real position and this led them not to trust him.

Hardly the man of integrity you are claiming.

Thulpelly · 30/07/2025 16:09

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 13:43

Your last paragraph contradicts your second paragraph, and, though less directly, your third.

He kept his stance on Brexit quiet but he also didn’t lie about his own opinion, when there was immense pressure to do so.
I’m not sure how you think the third paragraph is a contradiction.

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 16:04

Grace040712 · 30/07/2025 13:39

I see! Thank you for all the comments!

As far as I have seen from Jeremy Corbyn he has been pro peace for his whole career through discussion (yes sometimes with the IRA or Putin), but surely you cannot be a diplomat without diplomacy? And diplomacy is build on communication - not bombs.

He's not a diplomat. So he can't do any diplomacy. He has no power or influence to broker peace. That isn't why he is there.

He visits these people because he admires and agrees with them.

This ' he is a peace broker' myth has been invented by his fans who don't want to face up to what is right in front of them.

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 15:54

VioletandDill · 30/07/2025 08:45

It is not true that he's 'in bed' with terrorists. He is all about peace and resolution through diplomacy, which has meant that he is open to talk with all sides of conflict, in order to facilitate talk. As Desmond Tutu said, (I think) peace isn't achieved by only taking with your friends.
The media destroyed his image with a very successful smear campaign. I don't know how he would have done as leader, but he's a very principled, hard working man and it's a shame to see people perpetuate lies.

This is such a bad argument.

For it to make any sense at all Corbyn would have to be a man who had power or influence to negotiate peace.

He did not.

He was an inconsequential back bench MP to spent his whole life deliberately avoiding making the connections and building the alliances that he would need to be able to influence anyone towards peace. He was in no position to negotiate peace. That is not why he went.

You only need to look at how he ruled as party leader to see this was a man with no skills whatsoever in building alliances or bridges or negotiation. In fact, he very clearly had no interest in such enterprises at all. Which is probably why he clearly never bothered to invest time in building those conflict resolution skills.

He spent his time talking to terrorists across the world, attending ceremonies to celebrate them and their terrorism and refusing to condemn terrorism because he liked them and was sympathetic to them and their causes. That's the simple truth of it.

Arafina · 30/07/2025 15:39

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 08:54

True. But not everyone in the UK is switched on about Gaza. If you have to focus on keeping your head above water then Keir Starmer interfering in a conflict that is none of our business rather than concentrating on his own country which is going badly wrong is obviously a bit ridiculous.

Considering we're aiding and abetting Israel it really is our business, world politics affects us all, Keir Starmer wouldn't be threatening to recognise Palestine if most of the British public weren't switched on about Gaza, I don't believe for a second he personally cares

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 15:26

Charlottejbt · 30/07/2025 15:22

@noblegiraffe Corbyn was right to wait for evidence before accusing Russia over the novichok poisonings, even though it turned out to be Russia's doing. Wanting to be sure is not the same thing as siding with the enemy.

Why does he not wait for similar confirmation on things supposedly done by e.g. Israel?

Swipe left for the next trending thread