Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Pensions Stolen, Hotels Paid: How the State Betrays British Women

156 replies

JessieZoo · 24/07/2025 09:37

So let’s get this straight.
Labour says it would be “unfair” — yes, unfair — to pay British women the pensions they’re rightfully owed. A flat-rate compensation scheme, they argue, would cost up to £10.5 billion. That, apparently, is just too much for the taxpayer to handle. Too heavy a burden. Too expensive. Too inconvenient.
But wait — in the very same breath, they have no issue at all signing off on billions of pounds to house illegal migrants in hotels. Not just hostels or temporary shelters — but full-service hotels, many costing hundreds of pounds per night. Paid for by you. The British taxpayer.

Women who worked all their lives, paid into the system, raised children, supported families — many of them now pensionless, struggling to heat their homes or feed themselves — are told: “Sorry, there’s no money left.” Yet people who entered this country illegally, without contributing a single penny to the public purse, are handed food, shelter, healthcare, and legal aid on a silver platter.
Where is the outrage? Where is the logic? Where is the basic common sense?
Let’s call it what it is: an insult. A slap in the face to every British woman who’s been denied justice. A betrayal of the very people who built this country.

The state is happy to tell working-class women — many of whom were misled, underinformed, or outright ignored when their pension age was quietly raised — that they must simply “get on with it.” But when it comes to those who cross our borders illegally? The red carpet rolls out. No delays. No debates. No “affordability” test.

The message is loud and clear: law-abiding British citizens come last.
Let that sink in.

Because this is no longer just about money. It’s about priorities. It’s about morality. It’s about who this country serves — and who it’s abandoned.
If the government — and Labour in particular — truly cared about fairness, justice, or “proportionality,” then British women would not be fighting tooth and nail for scraps while illegal migrants are put up in comfort using the very taxes those same women paid throughout their lives.

This isn’t a funding issue. It’s a political choice.
It’s not that the country is broke — it’s that those in charge have broken their promise to the people who deserve it most.
And it’s time we said enough is enough.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
HobnobsChoice · 24/07/2025 10:03

Building specific facilities would be so much cheaper than using hotels right? You would only have to
Buy the land
Go through the planning process
Go through the tender process for construction and supplies
Build the thing
Recruit and train staff
Open it up.

And where are your proposing we house all the people waiting for their claims to be processed in the 3 to 5 years while the processing centres are built?

What needs to happen is claims for asylum can be made from abroad. The insanity that asylum claims can only be made within the UK is a huge part of the problem.

Quirkswork · 24/07/2025 09:50

Shnuzzbucket · 24/07/2025 09:41

We cannot afford to pay pensions so early - when you look at the history of pensions, people were only expected to live a couple of years after retirement, now its... 20, 30 years

My dm is 83, so she would have been paid for 33 years on a pension.

Your second point, where would you put the 'illegal migrants' while processing them to see if they are in fact illegal? Prison?

Not hotels in communities. The government estate needs to include purpose built facilities. Clearly. Otherwise things are going to go very wrong, as we can see is starting now.

Quirkswork · 24/07/2025 09:47

Women are unfortunately not the demographic where a human rights lawyer can shine. Immigrants are. The government would far rather look good and worthy to the world than help the population of the UK. (The ones that were born here anyway. As they don't matter as much as immigrants. It would current unfortunately appear).

Shnuzzbucket · 24/07/2025 09:45

The state is happy to tell working-class women — many of whom were misled, underinformed, or outright ignored when their pension age was quietly raised — that they must simply “get on with it.” But when it comes to those who cross our borders illegally? The red carpet rolls out. No delays. No debates. No “affordability” test.

So what do you think the 'illegal immigrants' are getting included with their red carpet?

The message is loud and clear: law-abiding British citizens come last.
Let that sink in.
Nope - you're talking xenophobic bollocks

And you havent even mentioned 'veterans' yet, you know all the brave people who fought for us, living on the streets....

Shnuzzbucket · 24/07/2025 09:42

Thirdly, can you work out what you want to post before posting it and making many changes??

Shnuzzbucket · 24/07/2025 09:41

We cannot afford to pay pensions so early - when you look at the history of pensions, people were only expected to live a couple of years after retirement, now its... 20, 30 years

My dm is 83, so she would have been paid for 33 years on a pension.

Your second point, where would you put the 'illegal migrants' while processing them to see if they are in fact illegal? Prison?