Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Changes to immigration rules announced by Starmer

658 replies

OneAmberFinch · 12/05/2025 14:27

Full white paper here is extensive and announces changes to all avenues of migration - basically their approach to resolving the issues of massively increased migration from 2019-2023/4.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6821aec3f16c0654b19060ac/restoring-control-over-the-immigration-system-white-paper.pdf

And Starmer's commentary on the BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ce810e3z6dkt

Handful of headline changes: default timeline to get ILR to go to 10 years instead of 5; abolishing new care worker visas; raising skills threshold for Skilled Workers back up to graduate level; increasing minimum grades required for student visas; various bits and pieces around English language requirements among several other policies

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6821aec3f16c0654b19060ac/restoring-control-over-the-immigration-system-white-paper.pdf

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 12/05/2025 19:00

Digdongdoo · 12/05/2025 18:56

I'd love to know how social care is supposed to cope... unemployed Brits are hardly going to fill the gaps are they? Costs will shoot up, standards will fall. Good luck Granny.

Why do you think k that?

Do you really think that every single low paid care worker we have imported is dying to do care work? They do it because they have to, the same way British care workers will. Same thing.
At least the British workers might speak better English.

SloppyThePoodle · 12/05/2025 18:59

GlitteringFeeling · 12/05/2025 18:49

Rationally, I do agree with a lot of what is in the paper. Points like English language requirements for dependents, tightening up criminal deportations etc. I hope the graduate visa changes will make it easier for UK graduates to land roles

But as someone whose partner is very close (<7 months) to getting ILR, the 10 year settlement period is tough to swallow. I don’t know if a points based system will be nuanced enough for our situation - higher rate tax payer (£100k+ salary) but not in science/engineering/medicine. Before we were quite committed to staying for DP to get ILR and then citizenship. But if that’s another 5 years away, if I’m honest we’ll probably look abroad…especially if it’s harder to sponsor a skilled worker, as there’s a chance his career would stagnate at his current firm.

It does feel unfair when we’re net contributors to the UK - both higher rate tax payers, no kids to educate, use our private health insurance as first port of call etc. Honestly crossing our fingers the new settlement rule isn’t sorted out before November!

But, I do see the bigger picture and we do need some interventions to reduce some forms of migration. I wonder where all the social care workers are going to come from, and I’m sceptical of how we’re really going to implement skills programmes as we seem to have little success. but if on the whole migration for non-skill gaps jobs reduces then maybe that is the right thing.

Is your partner here on a spouse visa, or is this through a worker one? Sorry if I'm asking silly questions, it's all so confusing.

OneAmberFinch · 12/05/2025 18:59

Digdongdoo · 12/05/2025 18:56

I'd love to know how social care is supposed to cope... unemployed Brits are hardly going to fill the gaps are they? Costs will shoot up, standards will fall. Good luck Granny.

I don't see how it can be fully state funded in the long run tbh. Not that I dislike it on principle but I just think the true costs of it (when you can't import migrants) will be too much. Maybe some combination of wages going up a bit, and people having to either care for their own family members or contribute to carers costs...

OP posts:
GlitteringFeeling · 12/05/2025 18:58

@Holluschickie probably the Middle East - both in industries which have good opportunities there. DP is American but neither of us keen to move to the US.

But who knows - maybe we won’t need
to or choose to, but if there’s better career opportunities overseas than here it would be hard to say no. If I sponsored DP as a spouse, his ILR clock would reset because of changing type of visas. It just makes you rethink priorities and there’s absolutely an emotional reaction where it feels like DP isn’t wanted here 🙁

BrokenDollFoot · 12/05/2025 18:57

TimeTaken · 12/05/2025 18:50

Absolutely, rather than the typical, throw away, stereotypical comments.

It would be so good to have a thread based on facts. (rather than misinformation and confusion).

Some PP’s have no basic understanding of the terms associated ( immigrant, illegal immigrant, asylum seekers) never in how this impacts on the legal processes and agreed programmes of support.

In regards to your last paragraph, I disagree. I see this line trotted out on every discussion forum, that people are " too thick" to know the difference between ' illegal' or ' asylum seeker'etc, as a sort of gotcha moment where they can they can then go on to demonstrate their intellectual superiority against the stupid, racist thickos. It's nonsense and doesn't wash anymore. People aren't stupid, they know the terminology. Do they get muddled occasionally, sure, but that's being human.

Viviennemary · 12/05/2025 18:57

What a load of waffle. All talk no action. Sorry I voted for them.

Digdongdoo · 12/05/2025 18:56

I'd love to know how social care is supposed to cope... unemployed Brits are hardly going to fill the gaps are they? Costs will shoot up, standards will fall. Good luck Granny.

OneAmberFinch · 12/05/2025 18:56

@GlitteringFeeling your DP's situation sounds similar to mine. FWIW I'm hoping there is some kind of tax payments exemption but if there's not then I'll consider transferring to a spouse visa to have the job flexibility at least.

I do wonder if this will remove the weird quirk of the current system where you can be 4.5 years into a work visa, transfer to a spouse visa and have to restart your 5 years...

(FYI to those not fully up to speed on ILR intricacies: the current rule actually IS that the default path is 10 years to ILR, it's just that there are exceptions for basically everything so people think it's 5 years. But you generally have to stay on the same visa type)

OP posts:
ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 12/05/2025 18:54

Simonjt · 12/05/2025 18:53

Do we? As someone who was a net contributor surely under your system where all immigrants are a cost I should he receiving a fairly hefty tax refund.

So because you are a net contributor then every single immigrant is a net contributor as well?

Holluschickie · 12/05/2025 18:53

Where will you go @GlitteringFeeling ? Just being nosey. Don't answer if you don't want to.

Simonjt · 12/05/2025 18:53

Mypinkchequebookholder · 12/05/2025 18:04

OK but they still cost the taxpayer money whatever definition you use.

Do we? As someone who was a net contributor surely under your system where all immigrants are a cost I should he receiving a fairly hefty tax refund.

Mypinkchequebookholder · 12/05/2025 18:51

TimeTaken · 12/05/2025 18:46

The White Paper has only been presented to parliament today…

And this is what it says ; Para 29

And we will separately set out new reforms to asylum and border security to
reduce small boat crossings, smash the gangs responsible for them, increase
deportations and returns, bring the asylum system back under control and end the use of asylum hotels

I don't see the "how" in this word salad.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 12/05/2025 18:51

There is no need to @ me.

I will reply to you or not, if I choose to.

The passage you underlined is about border controls and deportation. Nothing to do with smashing anything at the moment, but at some point in the future.

Maybe you should read it yourself first?

TimeTaken · 12/05/2025 18:50

OneAmberFinch · 12/05/2025 18:47

By the way, the white paper (linked in OP) is very long but you can skip to page 73 to see the specific list of policies they are proposing. It would be good to discuss some of the specifics.

Absolutely, rather than the typical, throw away, stereotypical comments.

It would be so good to have a thread based on facts. (rather than misinformation and confusion).

Some PP’s have no basic understanding of the terms associated ( immigrant, illegal immigrant, asylum seekers) never in how this impacts on the legal processes and agreed programmes of support.

GlitteringFeeling · 12/05/2025 18:49

Rationally, I do agree with a lot of what is in the paper. Points like English language requirements for dependents, tightening up criminal deportations etc. I hope the graduate visa changes will make it easier for UK graduates to land roles

But as someone whose partner is very close (<7 months) to getting ILR, the 10 year settlement period is tough to swallow. I don’t know if a points based system will be nuanced enough for our situation - higher rate tax payer (£100k+ salary) but not in science/engineering/medicine. Before we were quite committed to staying for DP to get ILR and then citizenship. But if that’s another 5 years away, if I’m honest we’ll probably look abroad…especially if it’s harder to sponsor a skilled worker, as there’s a chance his career would stagnate at his current firm.

It does feel unfair when we’re net contributors to the UK - both higher rate tax payers, no kids to educate, use our private health insurance as first port of call etc. Honestly crossing our fingers the new settlement rule isn’t sorted out before November!

But, I do see the bigger picture and we do need some interventions to reduce some forms of migration. I wonder where all the social care workers are going to come from, and I’m sceptical of how we’re really going to implement skills programmes as we seem to have little success. but if on the whole migration for non-skill gaps jobs reduces then maybe that is the right thing.

OneAmberFinch · 12/05/2025 18:47

By the way, the white paper (linked in OP) is very long but you can skip to page 73 to see the specific list of policies they are proposing. It would be good to discuss some of the specifics.

OP posts:
TimeTaken · 12/05/2025 18:46

Mypinkchequebookholder · 12/05/2025 18:35

Yes and it doesn't answer those questions.

It also doesn't answer why we have foreign criminals taking up space in our jails?
At present we have 10,355 (12% of prison population) I understand the largest % are Albanian. I thought we had a returns agreement with Albania ?

The White Paper has only been presented to parliament today…

RaininSummer · 12/05/2025 18:44

DuncinToffee · 12/05/2025 18:10

Who are you talking about?

Immigrants pay taxes

Asylum seekers can start working once their claim has been granted and will start paying taxes then as well.

They may well pay for your benefits if you ever need to claim

The problem with is that most don't speak English and many have had no prior education so we are talking years before they can work.

OneAmberFinch · 12/05/2025 18:43

"Legal" work and study visas comprise the vast majority of immigrants.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/immigration-system-statistics-year-ending-december-2024/summary-of-latest-statistics#how-many-people-come-to-the-uk

You can see the numbers here.

When you're talking about 400k people in EACH of these two categories entering the UK, you can't just say "ah all of them are here to work or study so it's fine". (For context, I do think we should address illegal migration too but the numbers are an order of magnitude smaller.)

The conversation needs to delineate between different profiles within these huge groups. Someone coming on a scholarship to Oxford to study advanced neuroscience is totally different from someone signing up to some third-rate "business college", never going to classes and making money off a rented Deliveroo account. Likewise a highly skilled surgeon or executive with niche global skills, vs a takeaway shop manager or even a junior programmer doing commodity IT body-shop work.

The last 5 years in particular included a lot more of the lower-skilled workers and students than one would hope for.

OP posts:
Holluschickie · 12/05/2025 18:43

Fair enough @TimeTaken I will read it. Only read the press reports so far as was at work.

Mypinkchequebookholder · 12/05/2025 18:41

DuncinToffee · 12/05/2025 18:06

So do you, me and everyone else

Well I pay tax and have done all my life from age 15.

At one stage I was losing a third of my salary in stoppages

BrokenDollFoot · 12/05/2025 18:40

DuncinToffee · 12/05/2025 17:51

Asylum seekers are not immigrants.

Which benefits do immigrants get dished out like confetti?

Once asylum seekers are processed and are granted refugee status, they can then claim benefits. Whilst waiting for the decision, they are entitled to free board, nhs treatment and spending money etc

RafaistheKingofClay · 12/05/2025 18:39

hyggetyggedotorg · 12/05/2025 16:31

I’m interested to know how we are going to fully staff care homes in future? Care companies have sought to recruit overseas because they can’t fill the vacancies otherwise.

In an ever aging population, is this really sensible? A Carer for, for example, elderly dementia patients in a home for people with challenging behaviour is not a glamorous or easy job. Wages are generally NMW or a tiny shade above. Does anyone appreciate how hard it is to fill these jobs?

A large tax increase and a massive pay rise. Hopefully all those hard off higher earners that are eternally winging on here are happy to stump up a bit more and have some of their avoidance loopholes closed.

SloppyThePoodle · 12/05/2025 18:39

All of this makes me so anxious. My immigrant husband is also my carer and every time they "tighten immigration rules" it just makes me panic that we will be separated.

jasflowers · 12/05/2025 18:36

Mypinkchequebookholder · 12/05/2025 18:03

I don't know the answer to that.

Years ago people looked after their elderly relatives themselves and nursing/care homes were unheard of.
We had our grandfather living with us for years.
Other people with funds available have "granny flats" built on or have static caravans in the back garden.
They cope with care/nursing support..

Some did, as they very much do now.

However, most didn't, they lived out their days in Geriatric wards, very traumatic places - my mum worked on one for a few weeks, the demented could be sent out of sight to Victorian asylums in the countryside, now exclusive flats or golf clubs.

Nursing homes were not unheard off, the wealthy used them, there were also Council run ones.

People also died of their ailments, now they live for many years.

Pre war, one of my Mums childhood memories was the stink from her Grans incontinence, no pads, no washing machines, tumble driers or detergents, her own mother could do this because her husband - Naval Officer - was well paid and she didn't need to go out to work.

You, like most people who witter on about the Good ole days have no fucking clue.

Swipe left for the next trending thread