Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Illegal immigration - thread no. 101

162 replies

MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 08:08

People smugglers are offering migrants a discount for crossing the Channel if they film their journey so it can be promoted on social media.

Migrants are encouraged to film the journeys and then post them on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook in order to lure others into making the dangerous crossings.

In return, they get a cheaper crossing as the footage boosts business for the smugglers.

The new tactic was revealed by Paul Brisley, from the National Crime Agency (NCA), which has been taking down the social media posts in an attempt to stem the crossings.

OP posts:
Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 13:41

Thoughtsonstuff · 20/03/2025 13:37

It's scary the disconnect between what the majority of this country clearly want.(reduced legal immigration; no illegal immigration) and what politicians will give us. Even Farage is backing down on immigration. Not sure what is going to happen as this crap cannot continue.

Trouble is we need people to do things like pick fruit, slaughter chickens and be Carers in our old folks homes.

Unless we can crack the problem of getting the indigenous population into those jobs we're stuck.

And it's foreign students, paying customers at our Unis, that keeps Further Education afloat.

Thoughtsonstuff · 20/03/2025 13:37

MrsPeregrine · 20/03/2025 13:34

Yes that’s right. Just let anyone in 🤪

It's scary the disconnect between what the majority of this country clearly want.(reduced legal immigration; no illegal immigration) and what politicians will give us. Even Farage is backing down on immigration. Not sure what is going to happen as this crap cannot continue.

MrsPeregrine · 20/03/2025 13:34

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 08:37

The way to get rid of people smugglers is to provided legal routes.

Yes that’s right. Just let anyone in 🤪

DuncinToffee · 20/03/2025 13:32

It's not just small boats

Illegal immigration - thread no. 101
Thoughtsonstuff · 20/03/2025 13:30

Azureshores · 20/03/2025 09:32

What are pp talking about: "there should be legal routes to come here"?
Pretty sure there ARE legal routes to come here. But most immigrants know they won't get in that way so take their chances illegally instead.

Do we really want every Tom, Dick and Harry coming here - criminals? Unskilled people with nothing to offer the economy? The people who think we should allow whomever wants to come here to have at it - what do you see happening to the infrastructure of the country if this is the case? Do you realise we have a housing crisis? That people are waiting months for hospital/dentist appointments - if you are lucky enough to get one. That the country is on its knees with crippling numbers out of work?

I'd suggest those of you who don't have a problem with it aren't yet feeling the impact of this crazy situation. In our city an encampment of tents has recently been moved on (after the council had to obtain a court order, get bailiffs involved etc). They have simply moved 50 yards down the road. That area has become a no go zone now after previously being an attractive part of the city.

Beggars line the route to the city walking amongst the traffic shaking a cup - this was not a thing even just a few years ago. The high street in our "naice" town now has several regular immigrant beggars - it's shocking how quickly things have deteriorated.

Agree. We can't afford both a comprehensive welfare state including PIP for all that need it as well as welcoming and supporting every young strapping man that makes it across the Channel. Some day some government will have to chose.

WiggyPig · 20/03/2025 13:24

EasternStandard · 20/03/2025 12:59

@Bromptotoothe trouble is proposing ending crossings by providing all safe routes then skipping how you’d actually do that with how many you’d provide, is just avoiding a viable solution.

It sounds good but won’t work.

The other big problem with safe routes is that they only work where there is a country at war where everyone's at risk of indiscriminate violence - those who need humanitarian protection rather than refugees.

They wouldn't be feasible for anyone who is a refugee on Convention grounds - someone who fears persecution due to race, religion, political opinion or membership of a particular social group (e.g. gay people). If the government is actively searching for you to lock you up due to being a political dissident or a religious preacher, you can't really make an application at a local embassy and sit back and wait for the outcome.

MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 13:10

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 12:53

A remarkably mature six year old!!!

I've spent enough time on threads like this that just go round and round like a hamster wheel to limit the time/energy I devote to them.

And?

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 20/03/2025 12:59

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 12:14

We're coming at this from different perspectives and debate is of limited value since neither of us is going to change our stance.

I'll agree to differ.

@Bromptotoothe trouble is proposing ending crossings by providing all safe routes then skipping how you’d actually do that with how many you’d provide, is just avoiding a viable solution.

It sounds good but won’t work.

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 12:53

MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 12:35

When my DD was six, she deployed a similar strategy to yours.

A remarkably mature six year old!!!

I've spent enough time on threads like this that just go round and round like a hamster wheel to limit the time/energy I devote to them.

WiggyPig · 20/03/2025 12:41

HermioneWeasley · 20/03/2025 12:15

I really want the government to get a grip on this for lost of reasons. Not least because I know lots of people who are visibly “immigrant” (ie: dark skinned, even if the family has been here for a few generations) and I really don’t want a backlash against them.

I am an immigrant and while I don’t look English, I’m lucky that I’m pale enough and wear western dress that I don’t get any hassle.

Yes. See the poster above for example who seems to think that anyone who hangs out at / is employed in a Turkish barber shop is an illegal entrant economic migrant posing as a refugee 😂they're highly likely to be naturalised Brits.

WiggyPig · 20/03/2025 12:38

The videos I've seen on SM like those mentioned in the OP are economic migrants - they're young men all laughing and cheering and holding iPhones - they're not fleeing war torn countries.

You know you're watching propaganda videos (or, at a push, marketing), don't you? The smugglers tell them what to say, and those iPhones don't belong to them, they get taken back by the smugglers. There's an Egyptian man being prosecuted for organising people smuggling in the news at the moment - he is said to have made all the people on his boats throw their phones in the sea presumably so that their journeys couldn't be traced back to him. (I'm also impressed that you can tell which ones are and are not from war torn countries - it's not always easy from a short video to tell the difference for example between a Kurdish man from Syria and a Kurdish man from Iraq.)

MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 12:35

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 12:14

We're coming at this from different perspectives and debate is of limited value since neither of us is going to change our stance.

I'll agree to differ.

When my DD was six, she deployed a similar strategy to yours.

OP posts:
NautilusLionfish · 20/03/2025 12:22

MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 08:33

And?

To raise awareness of the ever-changing tactics deployed by the wicked people smugglers.

What do you think?

Oh great for raising awareness. There are about a thousand people I know that want to move here and can't do it legally. I will ask them to check out social media. Any accounts specifically? Do you know if they offer refer a friend discounts or vouchers I can spend in foreign shops like Lidl and IKEA?
Thanks again op for raising awareness

wrongthinker · 20/03/2025 12:19

Other countries limit immigration. We are a small island and we cannot handle the sheer numbers of people coming in.

Then there are all the problems associated with bringing low skilled young men into the country from regions rife with misogyny, racism and homophobia.

There needs to be fewer people allowed in and many more rules and safeguards to protect the existing population.

HermioneWeasley · 20/03/2025 12:15

I really want the government to get a grip on this for lost of reasons. Not least because I know lots of people who are visibly “immigrant” (ie: dark skinned, even if the family has been here for a few generations) and I really don’t want a backlash against them.

I am an immigrant and while I don’t look English, I’m lucky that I’m pale enough and wear western dress that I don’t get any hassle.

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 12:14

MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 12:03

A ‘connection to the UK’.

So, following your example - let’s say your Sudanese asylum seeker has family already in the UK. Let’s say that the family have failed to assimilate into our society (I will let you use your imagination as to what that might mean). Let’s say that they are therefore consequently dependent on benefits.

Would you still be supportive of those open channels to the UK?

We're coming at this from different perspectives and debate is of limited value since neither of us is going to change our stance.

I'll agree to differ.

MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 12:04

dodgyplant · 20/03/2025 12:02

I think many people would agree things are in an almighty mess. But racism is not the way forward.
Look at the infantile language we use..." gangs" " small boats" and so on. And the racist language " illegals"
Ironic someboyd mentions Churchill. His Grandson is a major player in SERCO, an organisation that has made billions on the back of this chaos.

Stop there - don’t even think about playing the R card - it’s utter nonsense for the majority.

Just stop.

OP posts:
MyNameIsX · 20/03/2025 12:03

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 11:33

In my world you won't get access to a safe route unless you can show (a) a prima facie claim for Asylum and (b) a connection to the UK.

We'd also need to restore the means to return people to the EU.

A ‘connection to the UK’.

So, following your example - let’s say your Sudanese asylum seeker has family already in the UK. Let’s say that the family have failed to assimilate into our society (I will let you use your imagination as to what that might mean). Let’s say that they are therefore consequently dependent on benefits.

Would you still be supportive of those open channels to the UK?

OP posts:
dodgyplant · 20/03/2025 12:02

I think many people would agree things are in an almighty mess. But racism is not the way forward.
Look at the infantile language we use..." gangs" " small boats" and so on. And the racist language " illegals"
Ironic someboyd mentions Churchill. His Grandson is a major player in SERCO, an organisation that has made billions on the back of this chaos.

WiggyPig · 20/03/2025 11:47

RaininSummer · 20/03/2025 10:46

Our streets are full of Turkish barber shops which cant possibly be properly employing and training all the chaps who hang out there. Legal routes would be no good to many of the immigrants I see as they are often enonomic migrants.

Turkish barbers are extremely unlikely to have entered as refugees - they have a bespoke route under the Ankara Agreement.

Bromptotoo · 20/03/2025 11:33

RaininSummer · 20/03/2025 10:46

Our streets are full of Turkish barber shops which cant possibly be properly employing and training all the chaps who hang out there. Legal routes would be no good to many of the immigrants I see as they are often enonomic migrants.

In my world you won't get access to a safe route unless you can show (a) a prima facie claim for Asylum and (b) a connection to the UK.

We'd also need to restore the means to return people to the EU.

EasternStandard · 20/03/2025 11:16

@Bromptotoohow many people are you talking about from Sudan or any country in similar situations?

BarneyRonson · 20/03/2025 11:13

it is absurd to use compassion as a sole response to this issue. What about compassion for our own country and how it’s being undermined. We are all jumping into the sea, saving no one at all.

WiggyPig · 20/03/2025 11:10

@Rosybud88 no, they're not. The smugglers are very keen for them not to have contact with the authorities for obvious reasons - and even those who do encounter the authorities in Italy or Greece for example can't be given travel documents by those countries, unless they are granted status there.

DuncinToffee · 20/03/2025 11:06

As with the previous 100 threads,

There is no such thing as an "illegal" or "bogus" person seeking asylum. Under international law, anyone has the right to apply for asylum in any country that has signed the 1951 Convention and to remain there until the authorities have assessed their claim.

https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/stay-informed/explainers/the-truth-about-asylum/

Swipe left for the next trending thread