Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Dominic Cummings is Musk's informer

482 replies

trapforsanta · 12/01/2025 09:02

It's been revealed in multiple media sources after much speculation that Dominic Cummings has been whatsapping Musk with strategies to undermine the UK government and our democracy. For a while commentators have been speculating that Musk must have a hard right UK informant, since he's not across any detail himself and really has no understanding of the UK or our political system himself (see his comments about asking the King to dissolve the government). He's clearly been radicalised by watching Tommy Robinson's videos, and now we discover it's Cummings up to his dark tricks again.

I don't think I've ever wished harm to another person but honestly I wish Cummings would just bugger off for good.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
FrankieStein403 · 12/01/2025 13:40

BBC media show on 8th Jan had excellent piece explaining roles of times journalism, Azfal and Starmer. Musk couldn't be more wrong.

BBC world at one on 7th https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0026nck 8mins in, had interview with Simon Bailey explaining that police now have statistics - data is not the issue.

He said that probably more than 50 towns would be involved in gang related abuse, that overall abuse is increasing, that actually 52% is child on child - which no-one is talking about, that 'gang related abuse' is ca 3% of the total and the majority of that 3% (gang abuse) is actually familial - cf uncles etc abusing a girl in the family.

World at One - Grooming gangs: Tories claim 50 towns could be affected - BBC Sounds

We assess the Conservatives' claims about the scale of child abuse grooming gangs.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0026nck

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:31

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:29

The Telegraph.

I give up. There are too many people replying to me who clearly only see this from a tribal perspective and are arguing in defence of Keir Starmer rather than for the victims. I really hope no one who has been directly affected reads this thread.

Edited

Why are you ignoring that the gang in question was prosecuted under Keir Starmer's leadership?

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:30

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:28

You saying that Telegraph is a reliable source is incredibly funny. That is a standalone comment.

Did you notice that the gang that wasn't prosecuted then went on to be prosecuted due to the changes made?

"In 2011, Nazir Afzal, who at the time was director of prosecutions in London, was made chief prosecutor for the north west. He subsequently overturned the 2009 decision and a total of nine men were later convicted.
In a recent interview Mr Afzal recalled: “The only way we could bring that case was to admit that we had failed these victims when they had first made a complaint in 2008. Keir was 100% behind the decision to publicly admit that we had got it wrong in the past.”
Following these convictions, Mr Starmer appointed Mr Afzal as the head of a newly formed national network of specialist prosecutors for child abuse and sexual exploitation. Mr Afzal went on to oversee numerous convictions against other grooming gangs. "

And you're criticising Starmer for admitting that they had got things wrong when that was the thing that enabled the prosecution to go ahead?

At the time it meant that the police stopped the wider investigation into the Asian gangs.

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:29

Bromptotoo · 12/01/2025 13:27

Revealed by whom and to whom.

Whose assessment of "overwhelming evidence" is that?

I'm sorry but we need more than newspaper clippings of unknown provenance before starting a Public Inquiry or hanging the PM out to dry.

The Telegraph.

I give up. There are too many people replying to me who clearly only see this from a tribal perspective and are arguing in defence of Keir Starmer rather than for the victims. I really hope no one who has been directly affected reads this thread.

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:28

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:21

But it still happened. Despite "overwhelming evidence of their guilt"

The legal justice system hasn't changed that much since then.

I don't find any of this "incredibly funny"

Edited

You saying that Telegraph is a reliable source is incredibly funny. That is a standalone comment.

Did you notice that the gang that wasn't prosecuted then went on to be prosecuted due to the changes made?

"In 2011, Nazir Afzal, who at the time was director of prosecutions in London, was made chief prosecutor for the north west. He subsequently overturned the 2009 decision and a total of nine men were later convicted.
In a recent interview Mr Afzal recalled: “The only way we could bring that case was to admit that we had failed these victims when they had first made a complaint in 2008. Keir was 100% behind the decision to publicly admit that we had got it wrong in the past.”
Following these convictions, Mr Starmer appointed Mr Afzal as the head of a newly formed national network of specialist prosecutors for child abuse and sexual exploitation. Mr Afzal went on to oversee numerous convictions against other grooming gangs. "

And you're criticising Starmer for admitting that they had got things wrong when that was the thing that enabled the prosecution to go ahead?

Nazir Afzal: how the CPS plans to bring more child abusers to justice

Interview: The north-west head of the Crown Prosecution Service speaks about his role in bringing the child sex ring in Rochdale before the courts

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/nov/21/nazir-afzal-cps-child-abuse

Bromptotoo · 12/01/2025 13:27

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:20

"Overwhelming evidence of their guilt"

Revealed by whom and to whom.

Whose assessment of "overwhelming evidence" is that?

I'm sorry but we need more than newspaper clippings of unknown provenance before starting a Public Inquiry or hanging the PM out to dry.

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:21

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:20

It's incredibly funny that you think that the Telegraph is reliable on the topic of Keir Starmer, but if you read the full fact article it explains that Keir Starmer was saying why changes were being made under his watch to stop this happening.

But it still happened. Despite "overwhelming evidence of their guilt"

The legal justice system hasn't changed that much since then.

I don't find any of this "incredibly funny"

GrammarTeacher · 12/01/2025 13:21

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:19

No I don't think it's just him as presumably it's been going on for years.

For years? Try since the dawn of time in any situation where there are men with authority over others (cf. RC and CofE churches, boarding schools scandals etc etc). Depressing but true. Safeguarding basic ‘It COULD happen here’.

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:20

Bromptotoo · 12/01/2025 13:17

Can you give a bit more detail of when he ordered a prosecution to be stopped?

Or do you actually mean that, on his watch, prosecutions did not proceed because the rules at the time place too much emphasis on the credibility of witnesses?

Rules that he subsequently reformed so that cases went ahead.

"Overwhelming evidence of their guilt"

Dominic Cummings is Musk's informer
noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:20

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:18

Here you go. The Telegraph which I find more reliable. Screenshot as there may be a paywall.

It's incredibly funny that you think that the Telegraph is reliable on the topic of Keir Starmer, but if you read the full fact article it explains that Keir Starmer was saying why changes were being made under his watch to stop this happening.

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:19

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:16

You seem to think that it is Keir Starmer.

Why do you think that?

No I don't think it's just him as presumably it's been going on for years.

GrammarTeacher · 12/01/2025 13:19

The barrister involved in prosecutions in this area wrote a book about it years ago (took ages to scroll back through my Kindle library to find it).
It’s worth a read and demonstrates clearly that this is and was all known about.

Dominic Cummings is Musk's informer
Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:18

Here you go. The Telegraph which I find more reliable. Screenshot as there may be a paywall.

Dominic Cummings is Musk's informer
Bromptotoo · 12/01/2025 13:17

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:10

Keir Starmer failed in his job and ordered that the prosecution of a rape gang be stopped which led to the Greater Manchester Police stopping wider investigation into Asian rape gangs. He has admitted his own failures.
He also has ultimate responsibility for the whole of the CPS. He's proud of holding that position but also needs to take responsibility for it's failings to all those girls. He has admitted those failures and, egregiously, that the failure to prosecute was due to the racial element.

And yet he has not been held accountable, was not sacked and appears to now be Prime Minister.

Can you give a bit more detail of when he ordered a prosecution to be stopped?

Or do you actually mean that, on his watch, prosecutions did not proceed because the rules at the time place too much emphasis on the credibility of witnesses?

Rules that he subsequently reformed so that cases went ahead.

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:16

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:15

You're lumping everything into one mass without picking out the important part which is how to find out who is accountable for the failure to stop the mass rapes. Yes it's going to be horrendous for everyone but the way to diffuse the tension is to establish what went wrong, who made the decisions and hold them accountable. Not dodging an enquiry that would look at all the cases in the poor northern towns, specifically and comprehensively consider grooming gangs and join the dots nationwide.

You seem to think that it is Keir Starmer.

Why do you think that?

bellinisurge · 12/01/2025 13:16

He's not an "informer". We're not a secret club.
Half a minute on UK X would show you that people are pissed off about the widespread institutional failures to tackle p@edophile gangs and the incontinent spending on drag queen awareness etc

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:15

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:09

What has happened? Jess Phillips unable to leave the house on her own and being in fear for her life (I suspect the same for Starmer too). The Tories, in an incredibly cynical move trying to use the inquiry call to block a schools bill that they object to, knowing that Labour would be whipped to vote for the schools bill and their names would then be put online as 'enablers of child abuse'. Labour, retaliating with similar claims about those who voted against the schools bill. Piers Morgan having to school foreigners like Jordan Peterson on why Tommy Robinson isn't a brave political prisoner jailed for truth-telling but in fact in prison for something he pleaded guilty to, that he nearly collapsed two grooming trials and has a long history of crimes and thuggery. Britain's international reputation being actively damaged.

And an inquiry into what? Some want an inquiry to find out whether Starmer was complicit in mass rape. Others want an inquiry into Muslims. Some want an inquiry into the 'cover-up'. Not many seem particularly interested in the outcomes of all the other inquiries because they didn't lead to the exact recommendation that they are really after (Starmer resigning/mass deportation of Muslims).

You're lumping everything into one mass without picking out the important part which is how to find out who is accountable for the failure to stop the mass rapes. Yes it's going to be horrendous for everyone but the way to diffuse the tension is to establish what went wrong, who made the decisions and hold them accountable. Not dodging an enquiry that would look at all the cases in the poor northern towns, specifically and comprehensively consider grooming gangs and join the dots nationwide.

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 13:12

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:10

Keir Starmer failed in his job and ordered that the prosecution of a rape gang be stopped which led to the Greater Manchester Police stopping wider investigation into Asian rape gangs. He has admitted his own failures.
He also has ultimate responsibility for the whole of the CPS. He's proud of holding that position but also needs to take responsibility for it's failings to all those girls. He has admitted those failures and, egregiously, that the failure to prosecute was due to the racial element.

And yet he has not been held accountable, was not sacked and appears to now be Prime Minister.

Wrong.

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:11

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:10

Keir Starmer failed in his job and ordered that the prosecution of a rape gang be stopped which led to the Greater Manchester Police stopping wider investigation into Asian rape gangs. He has admitted his own failures.
He also has ultimate responsibility for the whole of the CPS. He's proud of holding that position but also needs to take responsibility for it's failings to all those girls. He has admitted those failures and, egregiously, that the failure to prosecute was due to the racial element.

And yet he has not been held accountable, was not sacked and appears to now be Prime Minister.

https://fullfact.org/online/starmer-muslim-grooming-prosecution-crime/

Here you go.

No evidence Keir Starmer tried to block the prosecution of Muslim grooming gangs - Full Fact

Widely-shared posts on Facebook make an unsubstantiated claim about Mr Starmer’s work for the Crown Prosecution Service.

https://fullfact.org/online/starmer-muslim-grooming-prosecution-crime

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:10

Ah, @Hoppingabout I see you want the inquiry that ends in Starmer resigning.

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 13:10

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 13:02

So in all your forensic perusal of this issue you failed to notice that the DPP at the time made changes to the CPS to increase prosecutions?

Keir Starmer failed in his job and ordered that the prosecution of a rape gang be stopped which led to the Greater Manchester Police stopping wider investigation into Asian rape gangs. He has admitted his own failures.
He also has ultimate responsibility for the whole of the CPS. He's proud of holding that position but also needs to take responsibility for it's failings to all those girls. He has admitted those failures and, egregiously, that the failure to prosecute was due to the racial element.

And yet he has not been held accountable, was not sacked and appears to now be Prime Minister.

noblegiraffe · 12/01/2025 13:09

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 12:47

Yes. And what's your point? I don't have to agree with 100% of what anyone says. I do have a brain that (occasionally) works. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating. What has been the outcome of Elon Musk highlighting this issue? Wall to wall coverage. Labour I would suspect are.highly likely to end up backing down on the national enquiry point. And that's in large part due to Elon Musk like it or not. He's made some good points about this country. Some aren't obviously but some are.

What has happened? Jess Phillips unable to leave the house on her own and being in fear for her life (I suspect the same for Starmer too). The Tories, in an incredibly cynical move trying to use the inquiry call to block a schools bill that they object to, knowing that Labour would be whipped to vote for the schools bill and their names would then be put online as 'enablers of child abuse'. Labour, retaliating with similar claims about those who voted against the schools bill. Piers Morgan having to school foreigners like Jordan Peterson on why Tommy Robinson isn't a brave political prisoner jailed for truth-telling but in fact in prison for something he pleaded guilty to, that he nearly collapsed two grooming trials and has a long history of crimes and thuggery. Britain's international reputation being actively damaged.

And an inquiry into what? Some want an inquiry to find out whether Starmer was complicit in mass rape. Others want an inquiry into Muslims. Some want an inquiry into the 'cover-up'. Not many seem particularly interested in the outcomes of all the other inquiries because they didn't lead to the exact recommendation that they are really after (Starmer resigning/mass deportation of Muslims).

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 13:02

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 12:55

I think it's important that people who made the decisions are held and seen to be held accountable. The person ultimately responsible for prosecutions (or not prosecuting) let's face it is in Number 10 now.

So in all your forensic perusal of this issue you failed to notice that the DPP at the time made changes to the CPS to increase prosecutions?

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 12:55

Pleaselettheholidayend · 12/01/2025 12:51

Fine, and the Cummings stuff is meh because I'm sure he's like a gnat to Musk. But it is explicitly bad he's intervening - all the noise and he's ignoring and undoing lots of careful, slow work that HAS been done on this issue in the last few years.

I've a family member that works with vulnerable kids and they get loads of training on spotting grooming, how to respond to girls at risk and professionals are very switched on to it in way they evidently werent 20 years ago. And he just swoops in a stirs it up as makes people feel more hostile to authorities and institutions who are trying to improve but can only do so slowly.

Edited

I think it's important that people who made the decisions are held and seen to be held accountable. The person ultimately responsible for prosecutions (or not prosecuting) let's face it is in Number 10 now.

Hoppingabout · 12/01/2025 12:52

GrammarTeacher · 12/01/2025 12:38

Yup. The class aspect of this is hugely important and being overlooked at the minute by many.

But when you see threads on here with people thinking that it was fine in the 90s for 14 year olds to be dating 20 odd year olds (spoiler most of us thought it was creepy then too) you can see how these things get swept under the carpet.

It is also very telling that the coverage of the all white grooming gang in the SW on social media was significantly less. It’s awful wherever it happens. We need to support ALL girls regardless of background. We need to ensure ALL boys regardless of background respect women. EM repeatedly demonstrates he does NOT. He is no help in this whatsoever, and would do better to look at what is happening in his own adopted country.

This issue is very specific though and has extra elements that need to be specifically dealt with, mainly the cover up and refusal by the police and authorities to prosecute due to fear of being branded far right racists.