Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

What other ways could Rachel Reeves have raised more money?

396 replies

Katypp · 01/11/2024 19:55

As a former small business owner (thankfully former!), the additional costs would have crippled our company.
But according to some posters on MN, we should just have sucked them up from our profits and if we could not afford to do so, should not have been running a business in the first place. If only life were as simple as some (who clearly have never run a business) seem to think it is.

Anyway, I wondered if any other posters would like to contribute to a thread of suggestions of alternative ways money could have been raised. Specifics if possible, not general Tax The Rich type posts.

I'll go first ...

  1. Restore employees' NI to the level it was before Jeremy Hunt tinkered with it last Budget. We've only had the uplift a few months so the pain would be minimal
  2. Get rid of the pension triple lock and put pensioners on a level footing with other benefits increases.
OP posts:
Hmmmmamilucky · 02/11/2024 19:29

frostywhite · 01/11/2024 23:40

I think even people with a really solid faith in government would shy away from allowing the treasury to seize all money of theirs for three months that wasn’t considered “necessary” - seems a bit of a slippery slope to embark on, putting it rather mildly…!

It might be a good opening chapter to a dystopian novel though 🤣

I would definitely bring forward some big purchases just for those three months - buy Xmas presents early etc the money would get spent 😂. How would they police that?

Yikitty · 02/11/2024 19:15

Spacecrispsnack · 02/11/2024 18:56

I've seen doctors trying to manage operational processes and it's an utter disaster, fuelled by some of the antiquated 'god complex' cultures that still stubbornly persist. Apparently both the cleverest people in the world whilst also completely unable to locate the 'accept' button an on outlook teams invitation.

Yes!!

god I bet we work together 👀

BIossomtoes · 02/11/2024 19:13

Spacecrispsnack · 02/11/2024 18:56

I've seen doctors trying to manage operational processes and it's an utter disaster, fuelled by some of the antiquated 'god complex' cultures that still stubbornly persist. Apparently both the cleverest people in the world whilst also completely unable to locate the 'accept' button an on outlook teams invitation.

Our local hospital was a DoH franchise trial with an obs/gynae consultant appointed as chief executive. He decided to do it part time and spend two days a week doing clinical work. Needless to say it was an unmitigated disaster and he lost the franchisee millions.

FudgeSundae · 02/11/2024 19:12

taxguru · 02/11/2024 11:14

Well, there is the scope to properly charge NIC on bonuses by changing the NIC rules to allign with income tax in that NIC worked on total wages for the year (like tax) rather than "per payslip" which means that full NIC isn't charged on big bonuses etc.

But this works in HMRC’s favour as often as the taxpayer’s, in fact one of my clients once paid monthly bonuses to weekly workers to take advantage of NIC rates.

Worldgonecrazy · 02/11/2024 19:09

Increase tax on alcoholic retail drinks to reflect the true cost to the country, so add at least £1 to a bottle of wine, £2 or £3 to spirits, etc. Allow restaurants to avoid this to ensure that the hospitality trade is not as impacted. This would raise billions, and save NHS and police resources, and reduce violence/injuries. Win win.

Spacecrispsnack · 02/11/2024 18:56

I've seen doctors trying to manage operational processes and it's an utter disaster, fuelled by some of the antiquated 'god complex' cultures that still stubbornly persist. Apparently both the cleverest people in the world whilst also completely unable to locate the 'accept' button an on outlook teams invitation.

FudgeSundae · 02/11/2024 18:56

I work in tax and this thread is scaring me.@GreengrassofW per your comment on p3 Labour HAS abolished the non dom regime as expected and thousands of wealthy people have already left the country.
@fruitbrewhaha I’m not sure if you’re being sarcastic but tax evasion is literally a form of money laundering. That’s not my opinion, that’s the legal definition and the reason why my tax firm is regulated the way it is.

BIossomtoes · 02/11/2024 18:48

Yikitty · 02/11/2024 18:46

Oh god please please do not put doctors in charge . You’d be horrified if you knew the level of waste and fraud being committed by doctors in the NHS!

Exactly. They can’t even run a small GP practice efficiently. God help us if they were in charge of the whole shebang.

Yikitty · 02/11/2024 18:46

ladykale · 01/11/2024 20:15

Cut civil servant jobs - so many unproductive workers!

Reform black hole that is NHS - lots of the funding went there and will just be swallowed up with inefficient and bureaucratic processes. It should be run like a private business with public money with doctors more in charge of actual management instead of random low quality managers.

Windfall tax on profits of oil companies.

Oh god please please do not put doctors in charge . You’d be horrified if you knew the level of waste and fraud being committed by doctors in the NHS!

Heatherbell1978 · 02/11/2024 18:46

Raise income tax in England to the same level as we pay in Scotland.

itsnotabouthepasta · 02/11/2024 18:31

The thing that really pisses me off over the last few years was Rishi Sunak KNEW who the fraudsters were who stole taxpayer cash during Covid. He signed the cheques for gods sake.

the fact that there had been no attempt from the last government to recoup that money, nor pressure from the media or even social media was staggering.

the likes of Michelle Mone should absolutely be pressured into paying back what she essentially stole.

compare it to companies like Octopus Energy who gave BACK the money they were given to rescue the situation when Bulb went under shows that there are some good people still around.

if only we the country was run by Greg from Octopus with Martin Lewis as chancellor…

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 02/11/2024 18:03

Close al the tax loopholes that the rich and big business use to avoid paying tax.

Reform the NHS (genuinely reform) so that hospitals are run effectively and efficiently by people who understand what matters in medicine. The wastage in the NHS is mind boggling.

Stop with the ridiculous shit of pointless surveys and stupid projects and shit.

Go after those who ripped the country off during covid. The false £ claims, the useless ppe.

Put a stop to all the consultancy bullshit contracts people in governments give to their mates.

Take a good long look at the MOD and the scary amount of wastage there. Billions.

Go after the REAL money lost through loopholes, incompetence and dodgy shit rather than going after pennies from those that have the least.

But they won't do that and we all know why.

So nothing will change. Evenr. Governments will always fight to take pennies from the poorest while chucking pounds at the richest.

Aduvetday · 02/11/2024 17:52

titchy · 01/11/2024 22:23

I think the advice given to MNers is usually work more than the 10 hours a week you're currently doing to maximise your income.

Therefore - maximise income - I'd suggest an extra 2p on higher rate income tax couple with a 1p decrease in the basic rate.

How would that maximise income? Economists have already said, again and again - our highest earners are some of the highest taxed in the world. It’s our lower and middle earners that aren’t. It’s our obsession with taxing a small minority of higher earners, over and over which means we don’t take enough tax. An increase on a tiny minority will not increase tax take. One when this cohort are changing behaviour already and two when the overwhelming majority will pay less tax. It’s basic maths.

Unfortunately, we have relied on over taxing such a small percentage of workers, there now isn’t enough money. They are leaving and dropping hours. Meanwhile, those with wealth do ok. Lower earners pay some of the lowest taxes in the Western world.

The uncomfortable truth is that the personal allowance needs to go down, tax needs to go up at every level. Welfare state need to be cut so more are earning full time. It’s how comparable economies with better outcomes do it.

Meadowfinch · 02/11/2024 17:05

Jollyjoy · 02/11/2024 10:02

Cut the defence budget significantly. Be the adults and stop the grandiose willy wagging that the nuclear deterrent and defence spending is.

That's exactly what Ukraine did, unilaterally gave up their nuclear weapons.

Look where that got them !

So perhaps not.

Morph22010 · 02/11/2024 15:47

taxguru · 02/11/2024 15:30

I suggest you research - the Excluded UK website is a good place to start which explains all the different reasons why over 3 million were excluded. Many of those excluded were excluded from the SEISS scheme, mostly due to the crazy 50-50 rule which didn't even apply to the covid year, or the £50k limit which didn't apply to furlough nor other support schemes, and of course those who started a business in the year prior to covid were automatically disqualified from the SEISS scheme, so three huge "exclusions" that were completely unnecessary and grossly unfair.

I suggest you research it also using hmrc website all the info is on hmrc website still. There was a limit on furlough that could be claimed from hmrc under cjrs, it was limited to £2500 which is far less than £50k limit for self employment. I’m not saying either scheme was perfect, far from but it was very much a balancing act between providing support and the scheme not being taken advantage of more than it already was by putting some safeguards in place. Within the people that were excluded were also people who were on paye that had changed jobs and weren’t processed on a payroll prior to the cut off date. The main people who lost out were director/shareholders thst were paid through paye/ dividends as their furlough was limited to their small salary and dividends not taken into account, whether they should have been or not is a different discussion, There were lots of losers but the post I initially replied to of yours said that self employed people were excluded from support and they weren’t

taxguru · 02/11/2024 15:40

JRSKSSBH · 02/11/2024 15:31

Money acquired by breaking the law often by selling drugs, selling sex, selling guns, trafficking, etc. So any tax paid pales into insignificance compared to the vast sums spent dealing with the societal consequences of such crimes. I am going to assume you have never had anything to do with meeting money laundering regs in the City? I sort of feel for people who are so simplistic in their thinking.

Have to agree. The societal problems and human misery caused by the organised criminal gangs is abhorrent and needs tackling. The tax side of things is pretty insignificant compared with the human misery and crime involved.

taxguru · 02/11/2024 15:37

fruitbrewhaha · 02/11/2024 13:34

Why crack down on money laundering? Money laundering is the opposite of tax evasion. It’s a way of actually paying tax on the money.

I mean, crack down on crime. But this is a conversation on how to raise taxes, so allowing money laundering brings in tax revenue. The City of London is a hub for finances for this very reason. We are lax and allow vast sums of money into our systems to be cleaned and pay tax.

I sort of feel on this thread people are ill informed about economics.

Money laundering is usually accompanied by illegal employment - often illegal immigrants with no right to work in the UK, often "living" in squalid conditions above the shop/takeaway.

And not all of the money is taxable either. There are various "scams" where bogus suppliers are set up to charge for fake services, so whilst the money does go through the books, there are false expenses set against it, which reduce/eliminate the profit and therefore reduce/eliminate the tax paid. A common one is false invoices for shopfitting - the money laundering places regularly get a "refit" for which grossly inflated bills are raised and paid, thus moving the "cleaned" money elsewhere. Same happens with shops that are regularly re-sold, money flowing between buyer and seller.

I agree, I think people need to become informed and educated about how money laundering, drugs gangs, and illegal employment actually works in practice - completely different to economics courses!!!

JRSKSSBH · 02/11/2024 15:31

fruitbrewhaha · 02/11/2024 13:34

Why crack down on money laundering? Money laundering is the opposite of tax evasion. It’s a way of actually paying tax on the money.

I mean, crack down on crime. But this is a conversation on how to raise taxes, so allowing money laundering brings in tax revenue. The City of London is a hub for finances for this very reason. We are lax and allow vast sums of money into our systems to be cleaned and pay tax.

I sort of feel on this thread people are ill informed about economics.

Money acquired by breaking the law often by selling drugs, selling sex, selling guns, trafficking, etc. So any tax paid pales into insignificance compared to the vast sums spent dealing with the societal consequences of such crimes. I am going to assume you have never had anything to do with meeting money laundering regs in the City? I sort of feel for people who are so simplistic in their thinking.

taxguru · 02/11/2024 15:30

Morph22010 · 02/11/2024 12:55

Self employed weren’t excluded from the Covid support schemes they had their own support scheme called the Seiss (self employed income support scheme)

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-grant-through-the-coronavirus-covid-19-self-employment-income-support-scheme

I suggest you research - the Excluded UK website is a good place to start which explains all the different reasons why over 3 million were excluded. Many of those excluded were excluded from the SEISS scheme, mostly due to the crazy 50-50 rule which didn't even apply to the covid year, or the £50k limit which didn't apply to furlough nor other support schemes, and of course those who started a business in the year prior to covid were automatically disqualified from the SEISS scheme, so three huge "exclusions" that were completely unnecessary and grossly unfair.

taxguru · 02/11/2024 15:27

AnareticDegree · 02/11/2024 12:32

The only difference you could make would be moving from Amazon to a genuinely local/independently owned small business.

Why can Labour not start to make that difference? Tax breaks for small business owners, eco businesses and start ups, Tax hikes for unsustainably greedy multinationals.

Both Labour and Tory politicians absolutely hate small businesses.

BIossomtoes · 02/11/2024 14:40

Katypp · 01/11/2024 19:55

As a former small business owner (thankfully former!), the additional costs would have crippled our company.
But according to some posters on MN, we should just have sucked them up from our profits and if we could not afford to do so, should not have been running a business in the first place. If only life were as simple as some (who clearly have never run a business) seem to think it is.

Anyway, I wondered if any other posters would like to contribute to a thread of suggestions of alternative ways money could have been raised. Specifics if possible, not general Tax The Rich type posts.

I'll go first ...

  1. Restore employees' NI to the level it was before Jeremy Hunt tinkered with it last Budget. We've only had the uplift a few months so the pain would be minimal
  2. Get rid of the pension triple lock and put pensioners on a level footing with other benefits increases.

I’m a Labour voter who’s also a pensioner and I’d have been happy with both of those.

fruitbrewhaha · 02/11/2024 13:34

itsnotabouthepasta · 02/11/2024 07:36

In our town, we have 12 phone repair shops. It’s ridiculous. They look at you like your crazy if you going to have your phone repaired, it’s clearly a money laundering front, yet no one does anything about it,

if they put time into cracking down that shit, it would be a start.

I would add in fuel tax - the amount of people switching to EVs mean that they are getting less from fuel tax every year,

id revoke the NI cut from Jeremy hunt,

add a 1% increase to VAT

add 1p to tax

make it mandatory for all new public buildings to have solar panels added, which would aid our reliance on fuel prices and provide a long term infrastructure, ideally, add them to all schools and hospitals

add in a £5 charge to see a GP for an initial appointment (not follow ups), which could limit time wasters. Or at least add a £75 charge for anyone who misses an appointment,

that way, everyone is targeted the same.

Why crack down on money laundering? Money laundering is the opposite of tax evasion. It’s a way of actually paying tax on the money.

I mean, crack down on crime. But this is a conversation on how to raise taxes, so allowing money laundering brings in tax revenue. The City of London is a hub for finances for this very reason. We are lax and allow vast sums of money into our systems to be cleaned and pay tax.

I sort of feel on this thread people are ill informed about economics.

Morph22010 · 02/11/2024 12:55

taxguru · 02/11/2024 12:07

Not just that, Starmer and Reeves actively hate small businesses. It's not just the employers NIC tax grab. They were useless during covid at challenging Sunak excluding 3 million self employed, freelancers and casuals from the covid support schemes. They showed themselves to either be incapable of understanding the problem or that they just couldn't care less.

Self employed weren’t excluded from the Covid support schemes they had their own support scheme called the Seiss (self employed income support scheme)

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-grant-through-the-coronavirus-covid-19-self-employment-income-support-scheme

[Withdrawn] Check if you can claim a grant through the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme

If you're self-employed or a member of a partnership and have been impacted by coronavirus (COVID-19) find out if you can use this scheme to claim a grant.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/claim-a-grant-through-the-coronavirus-covid-19-self-employment-income-support-scheme

AnareticDegree · 02/11/2024 12:32

The only difference you could make would be moving from Amazon to a genuinely local/independently owned small business.

Why can Labour not start to make that difference? Tax breaks for small business owners, eco businesses and start ups, Tax hikes for unsustainably greedy multinationals.

taxguru · 02/11/2024 12:07

JRSKSSBH · 02/11/2024 11:49

Well since no one in the cabinet has run a business, what do people expect.

Not just that, Starmer and Reeves actively hate small businesses. It's not just the employers NIC tax grab. They were useless during covid at challenging Sunak excluding 3 million self employed, freelancers and casuals from the covid support schemes. They showed themselves to either be incapable of understanding the problem or that they just couldn't care less.

Swipe left for the next trending thread