Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Anyone feeling slightly uncomfortable with the scale of the sentencing after the riots?

362 replies

TiredWife · 14/08/2024 17:51

Firstly, in no way do I support the disgusting, racist behaviour we've seen over the last couple of weeks, and I fully believe the major perpetrators need to be found and punished.

Given his background Starmer has obviously been able to pull lots of strings to process a huge volume of offenders through the courts, and there is clearly a directive to name and shame in the media to send the clear message that this sort of behaviour will not be tolerated. All good, and in the past I would have been firmly in support of this.

However there's something about the scale and speed of the court response which is making me uncomfortable. It feels as if they are highlighting specific cases to 'send a message' and it doesn't seem consistent with how the police and courts have handled previous similar cases.

So for instance an 18 year old has just been sentenced to 26 weeks in a young offender institution for 'possession of a bladed article in a public place'. I live near a London suburb and I reckon about a third of men out on the streets on a Saturday night would fall foul of this! But the police seem reluctant to stop them, let alone charge them?

Similarly the 53 year old woman, first offender, jailed for 15 months over Facebook hate post. Again, I don't condone what she did, but when you look at all the hate that women get online, or the death threats sent to JKR or MPs, there are few instances of people being jailed in the same way?

Justice needs to be applied fairly and consistently, across all groups, but this feels like a response at a level which cannot be maintained/applied across the board? Is that fair?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Newhere5 · 14/08/2024 22:57

Nope. I for once think Labour are doing a great job here.
And I’m not a Labour voter

westisbest1982 · 14/08/2024 22:56

But some woman mouthing off on Facebook just the once is sentenced for over a year!

It wasn't mouthing off. She posted this:

"It’s absolutely ridiculous. Don’t protect the mosques. Blow the mosque up with the adults in it.”

Minimising what she typed - inciting murder - is abhorrent.

perfectstorm · 14/08/2024 22:55

Ted27 · 14/08/2024 22:44

@perfectstorm

I agree with you
Many people wouldn't though.
He was found on the railway line just behind my mum's house, it's always been a difficult one for me, so close to home

I've always struggled with it. There's a large part of me that wants to throw away the key. But we studied this - how seriously offending kids across Europe are treated, and it's pretty undeniable that they aren't cognitively developed enough to understand properly what they have done, and that outcomes societally are better if that is accepted and they are treated and worked with. I was haunted when the boys were freed, as I had a child the age James Bulger had been and it was so awful, realising what he had suffered and looking at a three year old. And his mother's suffering, too. But I'd want the death penalty if it were one of mine, too, and I know that's not logically right or effective. You have to separate out the two.

I'm so sorry for your mum. She must have had so much wish she'd realised and been able to intervene. I remember feeling that way, living miles away and only being a teenager myself, so God knows how someone close by felt.

Ted27 · 14/08/2024 22:44

@perfectstorm

I agree with you
Many people wouldn't though.
He was found on the railway line just behind my mum's house, it's always been a difficult one for me, so close to home

AngelusBell · 14/08/2024 22:37

Paul2023 · 14/08/2024 21:45

Yes I meant why do they have to wait for so long for their cases ? Was it because they pleaded not guilty ? I don’t understand why others were sentenced so quickly?

Is it likely the Labour councillor will go to prison ?

Hopefully he will go to prison. If people plead not guilty there has to be a trial and that takes longer - however, if found guilty after pleading not guilty they are likely to receive longer sentences.

Lampzade · 14/08/2024 22:33

These thugs are lucky that police offers didn’t lose their lives during these riots. They would have been facing much more serious charges.
I have often been very critical of the police. However, i was alarmed at the blatant disrespect and recklessness exhibited by these vile thugs attacking police officers who were simply doing their job
It is also not an exaggeration to say that many

POC feared for their lives after witnessing the break down of law and order.
My niece works at an international Summer school . The students were afraid to leave their accommodation during the riots. Parents were frantically phoning the school as they were concerned about the welfare of their children.

Name, shame and jail all these racist thugs.

perfectstorm · 14/08/2024 22:32

Ted27 · 14/08/2024 21:57

@perfectstorm

Should that not also apply to the 10 year olds who murdered James Bulger?

Yes, it should have done. It doesn't mean you don't intensively treat and support them, and that that is likely to mean restricting their freedom for at least some time, it means you try to do just that, instead of punish, because they are kids and by definition can't understand, think or reason as an adult can be expected to do.

In point of fact we studied that case as part of my degree - it was a youth offending paper - and our response in holding them criminally responsible was hugely out of kilter with the other nations. All countries have kids who kill, on occasion. They are almost always treated, not punished, in countries without the death penalty, and intense efforts made towards rehabilitation. Because a child is not an adult, and they don't magically become one just because they do something truly horrific.

I don't pretend I would want that if it were my child - I would be out for blood - and that is an especially horrendous case, because of the scale of what they did to that little boy. But sometimes following the evidence of what actually works flies in the face of what our gut instincts want to do. And the whole point of being a civilised country is to try to do what works and is effective, instead of venting the very human and comprehensible urge for revenge. It's why we no longer execute even the worst murderers.

AngelusBell · 14/08/2024 22:29

Viviennemary · 14/08/2024 21:25

I thought it was harsh for folk who hadn't been in trouble before.

A large proportion of them had lists of previous convictions.

Paul2023 · 14/08/2024 22:26

FFS- Chris Grayling is a Lord ? He’s going to the House of Lords ? What on earth ? It’s bloody cronyism again !

NewspaperTaxis · 14/08/2024 22:24

Stickytoffeepudding6 · 14/08/2024 22:08

Tell you what - you wait and see how you feel if your husband/son/brother had their jaw broken or bricks pelted at them when they were just trying to do their jobs......

Thought so.

No, I'll tell you what. Wait and see how you feel when your parent is stuck in a care home being deliberately dehydrated by the State because that's the sly method of euthanasia, and you have to go in daily to give them drink to stop them dying, and Surrey's Adult Safeguarding go after you to exact revenge because you take a failing care home to the press, and they do this with complete impunity, using your elderly parent as bait.

I don't have to wait for that, but don't expect anyone to get into trouble - the perpetrators are all still in their job and our local MP Chris Grayling whom we consulted and eventually treated me with sarcasm and contempt has since stepped down and now has a peerage!

But some woman mouthing off on Facebook just the once is sentenced for over a year!

betterangels · 14/08/2024 22:24

Perhaps they should have thought twice. I read about an older man getting his prison sentence and being all, 'I can't cope!'

Fucking don't riot, then. I have zero sympathy.

AngelusBell · 14/08/2024 22:23

Mojodojocasahous · 14/08/2024 19:41

You do know that the director of public prosecutions at that time was Kier Starmer don’t you? That’s what he got his “sir” for

He wasn’t the Prime Minister then. He may well have advised the coalition government to take a hard stance on the 2011 riots.

ElleintheWoods · 14/08/2024 22:17

Ted27 · 14/08/2024 21:44

@ElleintheWoods

Great post.

I don't live in an affected area but the library that was torched was the library of my childhood and my family are all close by.
I was however in 6th form at the time of the 1981 Toxteth riots. I had to go though that area on the way to school and remember very well the devastation and smell of smouldering buildings. Not something I ever wanted to see again

Thanks for sharing your experience. Things like that affect many of us personally and if you have experiences like yours, you don’t want this happening to you again.

The public areas are an extension of our homes. Your home may not have been smashed up or burnt, but what happened made you feel unsafe in your home area, and places that formed a part of your daily life were destroyed, right? Especially as a child, feeling safe on your streets is important and a right the gov has to protect.

I was caught up in one of the early online-driven riots involving 1000s of people. Public transport was cut off so I couldn’t get home, so was stuck in an area of ethnic tension and violence as a young girl and scared for my physical safety. It created ethnic division overnight so my best friend stopped talking to me or anyone who was white overnight, it was us vs them at school, with white and minority ethnic kids sitting separately after being good friends 10+ years. A member of gov lived on my street so we had 24/7 armed special forces outside and a sniper on the roof.

I don’t think this is how anyone wants to live.

Online posts don’t just spontaneously appear in events like these in 2024. Yes, useful idiots jump on the bandwagon, but bot accounts and coordinated amplification is very real. So people that post online to set specific buildings on fire and naming individuals without any evidence… Sorry, they aren’t innocent, their actions quite possibly caused more damage than any individual in-person rioter.

AngelusBell · 14/08/2024 22:16

Fiorentina9 · 14/08/2024 19:22

It's not the fact that the rioters are being deservedly punished. The problem is the double standards. It would be fine if the PM also referred to "Left-wing thugs" during the anti-semitic marches in London that terrorised Jews on their own streets. Or "Islamist thugs" for those committing Islamic State attacks. Have you ever heard a Labour MP use phrases like this?

Considering that Starmer’s wife and children are Jewish and that the anti-genocide protests didn’t involve setting synagogues on fire, I don’t think it’s double standards.

Tigger1895 · 14/08/2024 22:16

Noname99 · 14/08/2024 18:05

It’s fucking outrageous. A 13 year old girl and two 12 year old boys have been charged but all the fawning labour supporters on here are defending it because their lord and master can do no wrong. It’s absolutely horrifying

Those children will get a slap on the wrist and as they are minors it most likely won’t impact their future careers but hopefully it will get them thinking twice about being little shits.

Moonshiners · 14/08/2024 22:13

Noname99 · 14/08/2024 18:05

It’s fucking outrageous. A 13 year old girl and two 12 year old boys have been charged but all the fawning labour supporters on here are defending it because their lord and master can do no wrong. It’s absolutely horrifying

Many of my friends and most of my work colleagues are predominantly Asian. They have been so very sad and upset at the riots and the language and hate they see as being directed at them. They are the most lovely group of people and I'm heartbroken for them.
A few of them have young teenagers who have been too scared to go to the park or shops because of the riots and a couple have shown signs of anxiety that are new.
We need to come down hard on racism and rioters.
However with the young ones I think education and safe and well checks are in order. We live near one of riots and my kids are loved, never racist and well cared for. They weren't allowed out. The parents of these youngsters need the punishment for failing them.

Lampzade · 14/08/2024 22:13

Lonelycrab · 14/08/2024 22:11

Haven’t read the thread but I think these sentences were the right thing to do.

The possibility of the riots escalating and overwhelming the police and authorities was very real; a breakdown of law and order on a large scale across the country. The violence could have escalated very fast in a very nasty way. This is what the agitators wanted, and the consequences should that breakdown have happened would have been devastating- it felt very close to that happening before the counter protests happening that Wednesday night.

So a clear signal that anyone involved in such actions will be harshly dealt with was exactly the right thing to do for the wider security and peace of the country.

This

Edingril · 14/08/2024 22:12

AngelusBell · 14/08/2024 22:01

I have worked with autistic people for over two decades and I have always explained to them how the law works and what is considered a crime, precisely because of the number of autistic people in the criminal justice system. The Southport attacker is also autistic. Harold Shipman was autistic.

The vast majority of autistic people are more likely to be victims than perpetrators of crimes, but I have made it part of my mission in life to keep autistic young people out of the criminal justice system as much as possible.

Schools do no favours by excusing criminal behaviour on the grounds that the student is neurodivergent, because that is not going to be a defence in court. Yes, I do feel very sorry for this young man and I think we need to recognise that autistic young people are more vulnerable to radicalisation than their neurotypical peers. It needs to be considered as part of education moving forward after the riots.

Being autistic should not be an excuse for committing crime, nor having the same punishment no excuse should be

Lonelycrab · 14/08/2024 22:11

Haven’t read the thread but I think these sentences were the right thing to do.

The possibility of the riots escalating and overwhelming the police and authorities was very real; a breakdown of law and order on a large scale across the country. The violence could have escalated very fast in a very nasty way. This is what the agitators wanted, and the consequences should that breakdown have happened would have been devastating- it felt very close to that happening before the counter protests happening that Wednesday night.

So a clear signal that anyone involved in such actions will be harshly dealt with was exactly the right thing to do for the wider security and peace of the country.

AngelusBell · 14/08/2024 22:10

Upallnight2 · 14/08/2024 18:36

This!

A prison sentence for a Facebook post is ludicrous

As long as you haven’t called for asylum seekers to be murdered on Facebook or for hotels to be burned down, you have nothing to be concerned about.

Stickytoffeepudding6 · 14/08/2024 22:08

Tell you what - you wait and see how you feel if your husband/son/brother had their jaw broken or bricks pelted at them when they were just trying to do their jobs......

Thought so.

NewspaperTaxis · 14/08/2024 22:03

Yes, I agree with the OP. I am sort of impressed with the speed of sentencing - not that that stops some Tory supporters claiming it's all Sir Keir's fault on being elected! - but it reminds me of Mick Jagger's sentencing for drug possession in 68 or thereabouts where it was successfully argued - by Jacob Rees-Mogg's Dad in fact - that he got a far stiffer sentence for being famous, and to be made an example of, because of his influence, and that's not how justice should work.

But you'll be advised not to hold your breath waiting for the likes of the Post Office's Paula Vennells to come before the court, those complicit with the contaminated blood scandal, Grenfell prosecutions and so on - in fact, any State operative will get let off, I'd be far more impressed if Sir Keir applied the law in those areas but as he is not going ahead with Leveson 2 then I can't see it yet.

The State applies the law to uphold the power and authority of the State - but use the law to hold the State to account? Don't be soft!

AngelusBell · 14/08/2024 22:03

tissueboxandcandles · 14/08/2024 18:21

I understood that is impossible to arrest the vast majority of paedophiles because there are no prison cells to put them in.

That is not the case and there are many paedophiles with long prison sentences or on remand awaiting trial.

Portakalkedi · 14/08/2024 22:03

I think it's good, and amazing to see the justice system is able to move so fast. A pity it's crap for everything else, murderers out after a few years, rapists getting a slap on the wrist. It should be a lot tougher and faster acting. Oh and they should stop using the words 'life sentence' because it isn't anymore, it's a nonsense when they say XX was sentenced to life, with a minimum of 10 years.

Lampzade · 14/08/2024 22:01

No, it serves then right

Swipe left for the next trending thread